| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 12:53 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 5858-1 | Viewed: | 19 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Dark Pink {6192 Slope, Curved 2 x 4 Double (Undetermined Type) to 6192a Slope, Curved 2 x 4 Double without Groove}
Comments from Submitter:
Sealed set, pics following. Purchased at end of November 2023 and just opened.
|
|
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 12:53 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 5858-1 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Dark Pink {6192 Slope, Curved 2 x 4 Double (Undetermined Type) to 6192a Slope, Curved 2 x 4 Double without Groove}
Comments from Submitter:
Sealed set, pics following. Purchased at end of November 2023 and just opened.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 07:36 | Subject: | Re: Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nathan123 writes:
| Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
No
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 05:42 | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
How much data space would it take to have two catalogs? One for detailed data
and one for generalized marketplace?
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 20:35 | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Stellar writes:
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| |
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
|
The catalog panel was informed of this merge project months before it was announced
publicly. But the purpose of the panel is to bring community voice to the development
team, not contribute to catalog policy.
|
Unless there was a meeting I missed somehow, I do not recollect that we were
informed of this project or asked to give any input or suggestions. There was
a brief mention that there was a variant project but no details or timetables
were ever given. Considering that many people on the Panel were among those who
expressed surprise and dismay when this was all introduced, I would think that
those meetings would indeed have been an ideal place to breach the subject with
the members at large.
|
The only thing I recollect is talking about the need to tackle the variants on
the catalog, but nothing specific, I must have missed it too.
|
| We do address catalog policy when it comes up, but it's definitely a sideline
issue, as are all issues that relate to other BrickLink teams, like Marketplace
and Studio. Panel meetings are not the place to debate proposed variant merges.
The Forum is, and there was plenty of debate and even opportunity for more debate.
|
Perhaps it was not the place to discuss the exact specifics of each part being
looked at. But it would have been good to know how the project would be introduced
and carried out. We are supposed to be looking out for the community and sharing
out expertise after all.
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
He only claims that we were informed of the project and that is the truth. We
were told that it existed.
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|