Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Shiny_Stuff | Posted: | May 15, 2023 14:38 | Subject: | Torso with Muscles or Not? | Viewed: | 94 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I just purchased some minifigs because I like the Muscles look of the torso,
which are visible thru the shirt but not specifically visible as bare skin
or flesh or hair, etc. The muscles are the main reason I like this piece.
However, the description lacks any mention of "muscles" or "muscles
outline" like other torsos have in their descriptions. So, it was not searchable
using "muscles." It took me a long time to find this fig/torso using
other methods.
Bare flesh does not appear to be a solid rule or requirement when using the term
"muscles" to describe several other torsos, for example those for Batman
or Robin. And sometimes the words "muscles outline" is used and sometimes
just "muscles"
So, I am just wondering if "muscles outline" should be added to this
item description:
|
|
Author: | Brickwilbo | Posted: | May 15, 2023 11:32 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congratulations.
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
|
|
Author: | legoman77 | Posted: | May 15, 2023 09:59 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
Thant is great. There is probably no one better anywhere on Bricklink. Her
knowledge goes far beyond that of mortal men. She always has been willing to
help and has built a lot of the catalog herself. Early experience with her when
I was selling, she is impeccably honest.
Such a good choice,
John P
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | May 15, 2023 06:34 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats Diana! |
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 15, 2023 06:21 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
Great Diana! Congratulations
|
|
Author: | elias3 | Posted: | May 15, 2023 06:14 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats Diana!
Gefeliciteerd Diana!
Stefaan
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
|
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | May 15, 2023 05:19 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks!!
In Catalog, SimplyBricks writes:
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Any help with this tile 2x2 part number?
Regards
|
3068bpb0071
|
|
Author: | SimplyBricks | Posted: | May 15, 2023 05:17 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Any help with this tile 2x2 part number?
Regards
|
3068bpb0071
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | May 15, 2023 05:07 | Subject: | HELP! | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
Any help with this tile 2x2 part number?
Regards
|
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 15, 2023 04:16 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
Congrats Diana! Welcome to the most complex area of BrickLink that you have ever
seen.
|
|
Author: | maggiec | Posted: | May 15, 2023 00:49 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Congrats Diana, you're a great choice!
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 15, 2023 00:22 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats! Don’t forget to celebrate with pizza! (Or whatever the thing in the
image is)
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 14, 2023 22:55 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
Woohoo! 🎉👏🎉
|
|
Author: | Nicolasamico37 | Posted: | May 14, 2023 22:35 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congratulations Diana for this new position here !
Sincerely,
Nicolas
|
Author: | macebobo | Posted: | May 14, 2023 21:09 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
|
Congratulations Diana! All of our catalog associates and catalog admins have,
what I imagine, one of the most demanding responsibilities here.
Thank you to you all!
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | May 14, 2023 20:57 | Subject: | We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 259 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everybody,
Based on more than a year of excellent work, we have just promoted BrickLink
member TakeAbricK (Diana) to the Catalog Associate position:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
The Catalog Associate position is equivalent to the old Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on the catalog side only. After a year of activity in
the new area, Diana will be eligible for promotion to the new Catalog Administrator
position with privileges on both sides.
Diana was the first Inventories Administrator who exclusively used the new Inventory
Comparison Tool for inventory approval work:
https://www.bricklink.com/r3/inventorycomparison/main.page?sourceB=1&invB=60001&sourceA=0&invA=60001-1
She has also done considerable work in improving the Help Pages for those contributing
inventories to the BrickLink catalog. For example, this page explaining the Inventory
Comparison Tool was just completed recently:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2594
This page also happens to contain the first-ever BrickLink-hosted color chart
comparing BrickLink color names with official LEGO color names.
We trust Diana will continue with the enthusiasm and dedication she has shown
over the past year. Please join me in welcoming her to this new position!
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 14, 2023 13:18 | Subject: | Re: Length of the ITEMID field | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, xoshimin writes:
| Hi.
I was checking the xml files I received on the page https://www.bricklink.com/catalogDownload.asp
I noticed that in the "Original Boxes" there is an ITEMID field with
a length of 17 characters (Disneylandparis-1). And in the description of the
ITEMID field it is indicated that it is "Limit 15 characters" (https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp
?helpID=168).
It turns out that the real limit on the ITEMID field is 17 characters or more?
Alexei
|
It is indeed 15, the -1 is a sequential ID added to the ITEMID.
You can check it here: https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=S
|
|
|
Author: | Nofones | Posted: | May 14, 2023 10:26 | Subject: | Mario Lego sets in switzerland | Viewed: | 82 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I live in Switzerland and explored through the catalog a bit but couldn’t really
find a store here (or in neighbouring country’s) that has a big catalog of Lego
Mario sets
If anyone either owns a store or can help me find one please let me know
Thank you.
|
Author: | Window60 | Posted: | May 13, 2023 15:25 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, DeLuca writes:
| FWIW, (sw0202b) is the more accurate Minifig, as P1 Fox does not have the grey
torso markings seen on (sw0202a).
|
Interesting discussion. I was not aware of the fox variant until recently, so
looks like my I need to add fox to my collection.
If the criteria is looking for variants produced in significant numbers, shouldn’t
chrome sw0158 have a b variant? Either the North American or European version?
|
|
Author: | xoshimin | Posted: | May 13, 2023 12:41 | Subject: | Length of the ITEMID field | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi.
I was checking the xml files I received on the page https://www.bricklink.com/catalogDownload.asp
I noticed that in the "Original Boxes" there is an ITEMID field with
a length of 17 characters (Disneylandparis-1). And in the description of the
ITEMID field it is indicated that it is "Limit 15 characters" (https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp
?helpID=168).
It turns out that the real limit on the ITEMID field is 17 characters or more?
Alexei
|
|
Author: | archmage | Posted: | May 11, 2023 17:03 | Subject: | La Redoute Version of set 604-2 | Viewed: | 92 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello. I see that there is a La Redoute Version of Set 609-1 that is listed as
609-2.
I want to add to my inventory La Redoute Version of Set 604-2 and I was wondering
what I have to do to request its addition. Of course I can supply all informations
about year and photos of the box, instructions and whatever.
Thank you for your help
|
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | May 11, 2023 03:19 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I've already found it!!
Thanks
In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Anyone know this head part code?
Regards
|
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | May 11, 2023 03:07 | Subject: | HELP! | Viewed: | 97 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
Anyone know this head part code?
Regards
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 10, 2023 17:32 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks for posting this, missed Turez requests.
I’ll see what I can do too.
In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In General, Nubs_Select writes:
| | Would you be able to provide an image of this figure and the other one without
the hair/hood, the 1x1 round plate and the lightsaber bar? That would help us
to finally add proper inventories for these figures.
|
i just got the obi-wan one in a lot and can provide more photos if needed
|
oh and for the dimensions should i remove the lightsaber or keep it on
|
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 10, 2023 17:17 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In General, Nubs_Select writes:
| | Would you be able to provide an image of this figure and the other one without
the hair/hood, the 1x1 round plate and the lightsaber bar? That would help us
to finally add proper inventories for these figures.
|
i just got the obi-wan one in a lot and can provide more photos if needed
|
oh and for the dimensions should i remove the lightsaber or keep it on
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 10, 2023 17:15 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Would you be able to provide an image of this figure and the other one without
the hair/hood, the 1x1 round plate and the lightsaber bar? That would help us
to finally add proper inventories for these figures.
|
i just got the obi-wan one in a lot and can provide more photos if needed
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 10, 2023 16:15 | Subject: | Re: sw1144 is missing (Catalog:Minifig:Star Wars) | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickipedia writes:
| Apparently this number is not assigned and there is no item with this no. in
the entire catalogue.
Does anyone know why it is like that?
|
looks like the number was changed
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=200230
|
Author: | Brickipedia | Posted: | May 10, 2023 16:13 | Subject: | sw1144 is missing (Catalog:Minifig:Star Wars) | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Apparently this number is not assigned and there is no item with this no. in
the entire catalogue.
Does anyone know why it is like that?
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | May 10, 2023 14:45 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| FWIW, (sw0202b) is the more accurate Minifig, as P1 Fox does not have the grey
torso markings seen on (sw0202a).
|
|
|
Author: | par016 | Posted: | May 10, 2023 11:28 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, goldknight writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
The catalog is a fluid entity, and it ebbs and flows in many ways all of the
time. Some things get added (sw0202b), some get deleted, and some just get changed
(like five Star Wars "figures" that were just decommissioned [ https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2571
]).
It was decided by the current catalog administration team as a whole that sw0202b
should get its own entry because it was made and distributed in sets in significant
quantities.
The Star Wars figure mentioned is no different than this Technic figure
that was printed incorrectly and distributed in sets in significant quantities.
That was just added to the catalog in December of last year.
As catalog administrators, we cannot play favorites and we try to apply guidelines
and decisions as consistently as possible.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ok—I’ll say hi here
I am putting together info on sw0102–again as the admins have asked of me since
it was years ago when the full triangle of this minifigure helmet was misprinted
into many sets but never got it’s separate variant entry. It was I and a couple
others that tried to get this accomplished but without success. At present Sw0202
torso misprint was accepted really quick by the admins. Why? Just split the
sw0102 to add the variant correctly as sw0102a and sw0102b.
|
None of the current administrators were around for the old discussions or yet
understand the issue fully for sw0102. That is why we need the information.
We received all of the necessary information promptly when dealing with sw0202b,
and we were able to make a decision based on our collective prior experience
as an admin team dealing with similar scenarios (such as the Technic figure).
Once we feel like we have enough information, a decision will be made and acted
upon.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Any chance you could tell us what this "necessary information" that you
received on sw0202b was? I'd just be interested in knowing the backstory
on this figure.
Also what is the criteria that the decision is made on? What determines whether
you will add it to the catalog or not?
Thanks,
Pete
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | May 10, 2023 09:36 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
A completionist is by definition someone who gives away their power to someone
else. I understand the draw to have an objective standard to compare your collection
to, but you might want to adopt a variant policy. sw0202b DOES indeed have a
legitimate Bricklink listing now, but it is a B. You could ignore him because
you already have a sw0202 and having every number is something without having
to have every sub-letter of every number.
|
|
Author: | tons_of_bricks | Posted: | May 10, 2023 09:09 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
I'm not a star wars minifigure collector, but if I was, I would not base
the completeness of my collection based on whether bricklink decides to give
the item number a "sw" or not. If you're basing it on a catalog,
then what catalog are you basing it on? Brickowl doesn't have separate variation
for this minifig; so by their criteria then your collection is fine.
I feel like you're making something out of nothing.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 10, 2023 08:42 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| I really hope they don’t add any more, the fanbase would implode!
I’m looking at my own ‘variant’ list right now which consists of at least 20
other minifigs that are commonly known or found in mass produced sets in significant
numbers, including the chrome gold c-3po EU/NA version! Can you imagine if that
was added as sw0158a/b, collectors would not be happy.
|
I will say this one time here for everyone's sake. We do not make decisions
based on whether a fanbase is going to be unhappy or not. Our decisions are based
on our experience and the general health of the BrinkLink marketplace.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 10, 2023 08:38 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, goldknight writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
The catalog is a fluid entity, and it ebbs and flows in many ways all of the
time. Some things get added (sw0202b), some get deleted, and some just get changed
(like five Star Wars "figures" that were just decommissioned [ https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2571
]).
It was decided by the current catalog administration team as a whole that sw0202b
should get its own entry because it was made and distributed in sets in significant
quantities.
The Star Wars figure mentioned is no different than this Technic figure
that was printed incorrectly and distributed in sets in significant quantities.
That was just added to the catalog in December of last year.
As catalog administrators, we cannot play favorites and we try to apply guidelines
and decisions as consistently as possible.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ok—I’ll say hi here
I am putting together info on sw0102–again as the admins have asked of me since
it was years ago when the full triangle of this minifigure helmet was misprinted
into many sets but never got it’s separate variant entry. It was I and a couple
others that tried to get this accomplished but without success. At present Sw0202
torso misprint was accepted really quick by the admins. Why? Just split the
sw0102 to add the variant correctly as sw0102a and sw0102b.
|
None of the current administrators were around for the old discussions or yet
understand the issue fully for sw0102. That is why we need the information.
We received all of the necessary information promptly when dealing with sw0202b,
and we were able to make a decision based on our collective prior experience
as an admin team dealing with similar scenarios (such as the Technic figure).
Once we feel like we have enough information, a decision will be made and acted
upon.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | BricksThatStick | Posted: | May 10, 2023 05:56 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stellar writes:
| In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
That could come down to how you perceive these? Do you think they should be 2
entries for sw0202? If so then your completionist nature should collect both.
If you don't agree with our decision then just collect the cheapest and consider
your commander fox collection complete.
As Kevin (goldknight) mentions I have asked for information about sw0102 again.
One question I asked him was what other similar SW print variations or errors
are sitting in the wings also waiting to see what happens with the above?
|
A noticeable one I get asked sometimes to check:
|
Thanks.
If it's a complete error like that then we still wouldn't consider it.
| |
Can you point us to the discussions you mentioned the community are having about
this? I'd be interested to see the opinions and see what other variant minifigs
are being discussed.
Thanks,
Paul.
|
|
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 10, 2023 05:35 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
That could come down to how you perceive these? Do you think they should be 2
entries for sw0202? If so then your completionist nature should collect both.
If you don't agree with our decision then just collect the cheapest and consider
your commander fox collection complete.
As Kevin (goldknight) mentions I have asked for information about sw0102 again.
One question I asked him was what other similar SW print variations or errors
are sitting in the wings also waiting to see what happens with the above?
|
A noticeable one I get asked sometimes to check:
|
Can you point us to the discussions you mentioned the community are having about
this? I'd be interested to see the opinions and see what other variant minifigs
are being discussed.
Thanks,
Paul.
|
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 10, 2023 05:12 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
It is up to collectors to decide whether their collections are complete if they
own a sw0202 or if they need to have both sw0202a and sw0202b. They are a variant,
you can decide if you want to own all variants or not. They existed before they
were catalogued at BL, so being added to the catalogue has not changed whether
they exist or not.
If not owning a rare variant of a figure means someone is put off collecting
SW minifigures completely, then that is up to them. What is more important, enjoying
collecting them and your own collection, or having everything as it is catalogued
at bricklink?
|
|
Author: | BricksThatStick | Posted: | May 10, 2023 04:33 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
That could come down to how you perceive these? Do you think they should be 2
entries for sw0202? If so then your completionist nature should collect both.
If you don't agree with our decision then just collect the cheapest and consider
your commander fox collection complete.
As Kevin (goldknight) mentions I have asked for information about sw0102 again.
One question I asked him was what other similar SW print variations or errors
are sitting in the wings also waiting to see what happens with the above?
Can you point us to the discussions you mentioned the community are having about
this? I'd be interested to see the opinions and see what other variant minifigs
are being discussed.
Thanks,
Paul.
|
|
Author: | grimsbricksuk | Posted: | May 10, 2023 04:25 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I really hope they don’t add any more, the fanbase would implode!
I’m looking at my own ‘variant’ list right now which consists of at least 20
other minifigs that are commonly known or found in mass produced sets in significant
numbers, including the chrome gold c-3po EU/NA version! Can you imagine if that
was added as sw0158a/b, collectors would not be happy.
In Catalog, goldknight writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
The catalog is a fluid entity, and it ebbs and flows in many ways all of the
time. Some things get added (sw0202b), some get deleted, and some just get changed
(like five Star Wars "figures" that were just decommissioned [ https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2571
]).
It was decided by the current catalog administration team as a whole that sw0202b
should get its own entry because it was made and distributed in sets in significant
quantities.
The Star Wars figure mentioned is no different than this Technic figure
that was printed incorrectly and distributed in sets in significant quantities.
That was just added to the catalog in December of last year.
As catalog administrators, we cannot play favorites and we try to apply guidelines
and decisions as consistently as possible.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ok—I’ll say hi here
I am putting together info on sw0102–again as the admins have asked of me since
it was years ago when the full triangle of this minifigure helmet was misprinted
into many sets but never got it’s separate variant entry. It was I and a couple
others that tried to get this accomplished but without success. At present Sw0202
torso misprint was accepted really quick by the admins. Why? Just split the
sw0102 to add the variant correctly as sw0102a and sw0102b.
|
|
|
Author: | goldknight | Posted: | May 10, 2023 03:45 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
The catalog is a fluid entity, and it ebbs and flows in many ways all of the
time. Some things get added (sw0202b), some get deleted, and some just get changed
(like five Star Wars "figures" that were just decommissioned [ https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2571
]).
It was decided by the current catalog administration team as a whole that sw0202b
should get its own entry because it was made and distributed in sets in significant
quantities.
The Star Wars figure mentioned is no different than this Technic figure
that was printed incorrectly and distributed in sets in significant quantities.
That was just added to the catalog in December of last year.
As catalog administrators, we cannot play favorites and we try to apply guidelines
and decisions as consistently as possible.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ok—I’ll say hi here
I am putting together info on sw0102–again as the admins have asked of me since
it was years ago when the full triangle of this minifigure helmet was misprinted
into many sets but never got it’s separate variant entry. It was I and a couple
others that tried to get this accomplished but without success. At present Sw0202
torso misprint was accepted really quick by the admins. Why? Just split the
sw0102 to add the variant correctly as sw0102a and sw0102b.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 10, 2023 03:08 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
The catalog is a fluid entity, and it ebbs and flows in many ways all of the
time. Some things get added (sw0202b), some get deleted, and some just get changed
(like five Star Wars "figures" that were just decommissioned [ https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2571
]).
It was decided by the current catalog administration team as a whole that sw0202b
should get its own entry because it was made and distributed in sets in significant
quantities.
The Star Wars figure mentioned is no different than this Technic figure
that was printed incorrectly and distributed in sets in significant quantities.
That was just added to the catalog in December of last year.
As catalog administrators, we cannot play favorites and we try to apply guidelines
and decisions as consistently as possible.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | grimsbricksuk | Posted: | May 10, 2023 02:53 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| The reason I question if the rules have changed is because I’ve tried on many
occasions over recent years to add variations of minifigs to the catalog (including
Fox) which were not approved. Although I did manage to get the smooth haired
Leia from the X-wing set included, but usually requests such as, Qi’Ra with Yoda
back always got rejected in the past.
|
|
Author: | grimsbricksuk | Posted: | May 10, 2023 02:40 | Subject: | Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 150 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
|
Author: | Yo_Yo_Flamingo | Posted: | May 9, 2023 22:27 | Subject: | Change Item Name on 15210pb164 | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| With LEGO continuing their trend of including Bionicle easter eggs in new sets,
I think it is important to accurately catalog these pieces.
The name of parts and should be modified to
include the phrase "Tahu and Kopaka".
Part
* | | 15210pb095 Road Sign 2 x 2 Square with Open O Clip with Black Robot Silhouette (Bionicle Onua), Bright Light Orange Mountains, Mask, and Health Bars on Computer Screen Pattern (Sticker) - Set 70423 Parts: Road Sign, Decorated {White} | should be modified to include the word "Onua"
I have submitted requests for two of these already.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 9, 2023 15:45 | Subject: | Re: 345870HN - additional variant to be added | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, PMB_store writes:
| The following item has been released by Lego:
345870LL which has been released for sale in UK, identical in dimensions etc
but without without the Target cobranding. Available in Red. Please can this
item be added to the alias list.
|
It will need to be added to the catalog as a separate item since it does not
have the Target cobranding.
You may submit the entry and an image for it using the following forms:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=G
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=G
Feel free to use the current entry as a guideline for filling out the forms.
Once the new entry is approved, we can add a relationship between it and the
other one.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 9, 2023 15:40 | Subject: | Re: Canceled Sets | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Gertschiii writes:
| Hello everyone,
unfortunately i don't know if the topic has already been addressed, but i
would be interested to know if, for the sake of completeness, it is not possible
to include the canceled sets in the catalog as well?
best regards Gerald
|
We discussed this very recently at an admin meeting. It was decided from higher
up the management chain that the site will no longer be adding cancelled sets
to the BrickLink catalog in the future. The ones that are there from the past
have been grandfathered in.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 9, 2023 13:30 | Subject: | Re: Canceled Sets | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, macebobo writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Gertschiii writes:
| Hello everyone,
unfortunately i don't know if the topic has already been addressed, but i
would be interested to know if, for the sake of completeness, it is not possible
to include the canceled sets in the catalog as well?
best regards Gerald
|
As bricklink is owned by lego I don’t think they will sadly. They removed the
osprey after it was cancelled
|
TLG would love to "memory hole" the Osprey, that only makes it more desirable.
The aftermarket prices are insane.
|
indeed
|
|
Author: | macebobo | Posted: | May 9, 2023 13:20 | Subject: | Re: Canceled Sets | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Gertschiii writes:
| Hello everyone,
unfortunately i don't know if the topic has already been addressed, but i
would be interested to know if, for the sake of completeness, it is not possible
to include the canceled sets in the catalog as well?
best regards Gerald
|
As bricklink is owned by lego I don’t think they will sadly. They removed the
osprey after it was cancelled
|
TLG would love to "memory hole" the Osprey, that only makes it more desirable.
The aftermarket prices are insane.
|
Author: | Nicolasamico37 | Posted: | May 9, 2023 12:06 | Subject: | Re: Canceled Sets | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BricksOfFaith writes:
Thank you, I forgot to add the link in my post !
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|