Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: Inventories - peregrinator (776) | [...] They definitely have renders of new parts, but they aren't always good, and they don't have images of minifigures that are useful in the catalogue. The reason [...] (25 months ago, May 6, 2022, to Catalog) |
Inventories - CapnBootle (1094) | Why, bearing in mind The Lego Group now own BrickLink, do we still have to wait for set inventories to be approved? - surely TLG actually have pics of any new parts and have [...] (25 months ago, May 6, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Weight of Titanic Flags - 1001bricks (52375) | [...] (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (Part 3711,11) (approx) (25 months ago, May 5, 2022, to Catalog) |
Weight of Titanic Flags - Treybe (1385) | Item 10294pls01 needs to have the weight added. Not sure if this is the proper place to post this. Thank you, Trey (25 months ago, May 5, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: The Muppets - Nicolasamico37 (1061) | You're right, I found the Minifigures before, but I just saw the menu "The Muppets" in "Collectible Minifigures" in the Catalog Tree. Thank you, Nicolas (25 months ago, May 5, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: small old Lego car ID - Sadler_Bricks (1728) | I come across the different variations of these from used hauls a nifty little find if you ask me. Nice find. Sadler_bricks (25 months ago, May 5, 2022, to Catalog) |
The Muppets - Nicolasamico37 (1061) | Is it me, or The Muppets Collectible Minifigures Series is still not on the Catalog Tree ? Hopefuly you can use the search toolbar :) Nicolas (25 months ago, May 4, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 387-1 - SylvainLS (46) | [...] It’s almost as complicated as 3001 :D There’s: — round pin vs. flat pin — thin walls vs. thick walls — studs with small hole vs. studs with big hole vs. studs with stopper [...] (25 months ago, May 4, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 387-1 - Stellar (3504) | [...] With the new mold of 3660 we might need to update this part title. Also the alternate image in that shows 2 blue pieces, it is for 3660 vs 3660old? That might need to [...] (25 months ago, May 4, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: small old Lego car ID - TheCuteGiraffe (3) | I think maybe a product for Primo or Quarto. I mean like for the older lego for young kids. (25 months ago, May 4, 2022, to Catalog) |
small old Lego car ID - minifig_75 (370) | Hi everyone, hope you're fine. Here's a small car, I had never seen this before. It's made in 1 piece.. The big stud in middle lifts up when bumper's pulled out.. [...] (25 months ago, May 3, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Part weights vary for printed variations - sw_lego_lover (286) | [...] Thanks for clarifying on the data usage. I appreciate all of the responses. A few have been explained or verified already. Especially where newer parts may be lighter [...] (25 months ago, Apr 30, 2022, to Catalog) |
catalog pic show the partID too - tec (61) | Somehow I was able to see an ID inscribed onto a "render" image. select color BLACK to see (Part 4697b) too bad it's not 093 but part 4697b but nice easter egg (25 months ago, Apr 30, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Item Description Inconsistencies - randyf (442) | [...] Category descriptions used in titles are used the way they are for ease of use. In some categories where there is only one item type, it makes sense to have them for [...] (25 months ago, Apr 30, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Item Description Inconsistencies - jennnifer (3533) | [...] I am pretty sure that many of the minifig parts do not have their category at the start of their Item Name because there just isn't enough space with all those pattern [...] (25 months ago, Apr 30, 2022, to Catalog) |
Item Description Inconsistencies - brickearther (3112) | Most parts include its category at the beginning of the description. But not always, such as as part # x577 Engine (category is Aircraft). There's a bunch of minifig [...] (25 months ago, Apr 30, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Part weights vary for printed variations - Admin_Russell | [...] [...] The rule on BrickLink is that the catalog goes with the heaviest color / version of an item under a given entry. This is to prevent undercharging on shipping [...] (25 months ago, Apr 29, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Part weights vary for printed variations - sw_lego_lover (286) | [...] Given that BrickLink is owned by TLG, there is some reasonable expectation that the data regarding the parts would be shared. especially given this is a for-profit company. [...] (25 months ago, Apr 29, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: Part weights vary for printed variations - jennnifer (3533) | [...] Weights and measurements are submitted by members so there is no confirming their scientific accuracy. These weights are all well within a range that is unlikely to affect [...] (25 months ago, Apr 29, 2022, to Catalog) |
Part weights vary for printed variations - sw_lego_lover (286) | So, I'd like to understand how scientific the measurements are for parts, as I have come across some variation in the weights for some parts that share the same "mould" (part [...] (25 months ago, Apr 29, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - runner.caller (2651) | [...] Great stuff Niek! You hit so many great points! Seems like a lot of long time sellers systems' have evolved to the point they have blinders on and can't fathom [...] (25 months ago, Apr 29, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - qwertyboy (7866) | We use those Acro-Mills-style small drawers to store minifigs heads We have them labeled "b0000", "b0050", "b0100" etc, where "b0000" contains heads 3626bpb0000-3626bpb0049 etc. [...] (25 months ago, Apr 28, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - runner.caller (2651) | [...] Makes sense. Even with a setup like that, I'd do 99% of the listing at home, but just not process the XML file. I'd have a baseplate with all the heads lined [...] (25 months ago, Apr 28, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: forestman torso 6077 - color of collar - hpoort (412) | [...] I have several variations, varying from Red, to Dark Red to Reddish Brown; at one time they even have had separate listings and a comparison picture on Bricklink. It [...] (25 months ago, Apr 28, 2022, to Catalog) |
forestman torso 6077 - color of collar - minifig_75 (370) | Hi all! So we've had the 6077 forestman set for a long time. And, both on the instructions AND the Bricklink description, there is a mistake on the color RED of colar for [...] (25 months ago, Apr 28, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - tons_of_bricks (12765) | [...] I can see how that works for maybe a one-room workplace, but we have a storage building, a sorting building, and then the listing usually occurs in the house. When we [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - 1001bricks (52375) | [...] This^ I thought it was obvious; but apparently people prefer to put all the Minifig Heads in the same drawer, so they've 99% chances to make a mistake ;-) (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - runner.caller (2651) | [...] Agreed! I specialize in small minifig parts and most of my picking comes from 784 common sized small drawers. I upload by category and before each upload, I run macros [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - wildchicken13 (876) | [...] Controversial opinion here, but I organize my parts by color or by color family (red, green, blue, etc). It is clear and unambiguous; a tan brick is always a [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - tons_of_bricks (12765) | [...] I organize by category, but also give each container a unique code and put that code in the remarks of the items in that container. If an item changes category, I still [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - Gaston.La.Brick (1841) | [...] I run a very small shop, with a very limited inventory (although I have tons to sort ...). What is your secret to organize stock? By day of the week you purchased [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - 1001bricks (52375) | [...] The problem is you should NEVER organize your stock by Categories, neither by Color or Reference. All this can change, and often changed by BrickLink directly in your [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - Gaston.La.Brick (1841) | Regardless of the fact this new category makes more sense over the old category, please do think of the consequences for sellers when any item switches categories. Where item [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - yorbrick (1184) | [...] Indeed, but that is not what us being suggested in the forthcoming moves. The opposite is. Parts are being (and have already been moved) based on usage rather [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - infinibrix (5000) | [...] I agree and therefore parts should be categorized by their design otherwise you create wider issues where parts like this printed brick also may end up needing to be [...] (25 months ago, Apr 27, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - kreativsnail (2864) | [...] I feel that the Minifigure head part, no matter what is printed or not printed on it, should remain in the minifig head category for ease of locating it. I also feel [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - yorbrick (1184) | [...] That's the issue. If this isn’t a head and so head gets removed from the name (even though the basic part is called a head) then it means we would need to [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - 1001bricks (52375) | [...] That's why we NEED a Tag system, so you could search using tags like: "head", "animal", "star wars", "minifigure" ... and you're not bothered with in which Category [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - Nubs_Select (3775) | [...] Same, I don't think I really check item categories when listing items. I usually only use it to look through different categories when I don't know exactly what [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - tons_of_bricks (12765) | [...] We do all the head modifieds at once, so we start at the top of the list and work down, listing them as we come across them. Sometimes we'll use keywords if we know [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - Nubs_Select (3775) | [...] Fair point, But perhaps they went to the animal, land category and typed in Minecraft and went from there if they could quite remember the name of it. [...] Wouldnt [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - yorbrick (1184) | [...] I think I'd try to find it as a Minecraft head. They both look like faces. Currently I'd be OK, but if the get moved to somewhere else and don't get the keyword [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - runner.caller (2651) | [...] Interesting. I'm not sure I'd ever notice what category they're in. My process would be to go to Steve. Find that his head part number starts with "19729" [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - yorbrick (1184) | [...] And of course there are plenty of other head base parts that are used for other things that might be better placed elsewhere, such as these in animal, water: (Part 3626cpb1109) [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - randyf (442) | [...] Thanks for your thoughts. At this time, these are just proposals. We had some users that wanted them moved, but if more come out against them, they will not be moved. [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - randyf (442) | [...] There will be more in the future. I am currently suffering through some health issues, so am working very little at this time. I had planned to do a lot more, but they [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - yorbrick (1184) | Does that mean things like this should be moved to the food section along side carrots, apples and cherries, since it is not a minifigure head and is only ever used as a food [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - tons_of_bricks (12765) | [...] Perhaps, but on the flipside someone who is looking for these probably already knows what they are called and a simple search of the name is going to bring it right up [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - yorbrick (1184) | [...] Especially when other named animals such as Scooby Doo and Santa's Little Helper go in animal. And cars with names go in minifigs not vehicle. It's the problem [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - novabrick (14555) | [...] Reminds me of searching the Catalog for these two: (Part 95204pb01,34) Which of course is an Animal not head gear (Minifigure elf049) and this makes sense. It's no [...] (25 months ago, Apr 26, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - tons_of_bricks (12765) | [...] I can see the reasoning behind the decorated microfigures being minifigures, and I semi-see your point, but to me sometimes convenience should overrule technicality. [...] (25 months ago, Apr 25, 2022, to Catalog) |
Re: moving heads to animal is stupid - randyf (442) | [...] A good question, and I will lay out the rationale below. This is a part: (Part 85863) These are minifigures: (Minifigure 85863pb001) (Minifigure 85863pb002) (Minifigure [...] (25 months ago, Apr 25, 2022, to Catalog) |
moving heads to animal is stupid - tons_of_bricks (12765) | (Part 19729pb020,59) (Part 19729pb021,108) Why are these suggested to be moved over to animal, land? It doesn't make sense. The category should be based on the shape of [...] (25 months ago, Apr 25, 2022, to Catalog) |
Identify this figure - chriskiepfer953 (402) | Can anyone help me identify this early figure and maybe which sets it was used in? (25 months ago, Apr 25, 2022, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|