Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | manganschlamm  | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 09:14 | | Subject: | Re: Clips Ahoy, part three. | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
Great work, very helpful and instructive, keep on doing your excellent work,
wherever it may appear.
Keep making these wonderful cartoons as well.
|
| Author: | BricksThatStick | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 09:01 | | Subject: | Re: 9498 - Complete Inventory | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, StarBrick writes:
I think they mean the set they bought is incomplete as the inventory on here
has been verified as well.
In which case to the OP you need to create a wanted list with the missing parts
on it and then use that wanted list to buy the parts:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1
If you need any more help just post on here 
|
 |
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 09:00 | | Subject: | Re: 9498 - Complete Inventory | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, RochLeader1 writes:
| | Hi,
I've just got a set 9498.
But when checking parts and instructions on you site, I see it is far from complete.
How can I help to complete at least the inventory part?
Regards,
Roch Leader
|
What sort of problems are there?
|
|
| Author: | Teup | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 08:54 | | Subject: | Re: Clips Ahoy, part three. | | Viewed: | 87 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Captain_Q writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, mfav writes:
A very nice site you’re constructing. The detail of information and quality is
amazing!
I’m curious though, why do all of the active links on your fup page, link
to Law’s site, Brick Owl?
|
That is a very good and important question.
|
I am curious now. Is this allowed? Because the links were not directly shared
of BO but overall this seems like a conflict on interest with the TOS? Yeah,
no?
|
Well I think this is just something "they don't like". I also mentioned Br*ckOwl
somewhere just to explain a point and it got removed or something like that
(don't recall clearly, but it was an issue).
It always makes me feel weird when Bricklink is being all "shhhh don't mention
to people that Br*ckOwl exists". I can only see that as Bricklink calling itself
a bad marketplace. It would make Bricklink look a lot better and professional
if they acknowledged AFOLs use different sites and tools at the same time and
didn't go all "shhh!".
Btw Mark I read your response on your page and I agree. It is not about "picking
a side" at all.
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 08:30 | | Subject: | Re: 9498 - Complete Inventory | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, RochLeader1 writes:
| | Hi,
I've just got a set 9498.
But when checking parts and instructions on you site, I see it is far from complete.
How can I help to complete at least the inventory part?
Regards,
Roch Leader
|
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChange.asp?itemType=S&itemNo=9498-1 ?
|
| Author: | RochLeader1 | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 08:17 | | Subject: | 9498 - Complete Inventory | | Viewed: | 72 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I've just got a set 9498.
But when checking parts and instructions on you site, I see it is far from complete.
How can I help to complete at least the inventory part?
Regards,
Roch Leader
|
|
| Author: | Elvys | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 07:58 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 21042-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Turez writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Turez writes:
| | I can check the other parts if needed, the set is still built up in its box.
|
Please do. It may be a regional thing, since the inventory was submitted by someone
here in the States, and it was confirmed by someone here in the States (both
of them are recognized contributors to BrickLink). When I was checking some speed
builds on YouTube from people not in the States, I seemed to see some evidence
of the extra baby bows with cut corners.
|
Okay, I have checked the set and can confirm the extra slope and wedges, but
not the extra 1x2 plate.
Additional evidence: https://youtu.be/R6xVJdlFl6g?t=87
Regards,
Jonas
|
Beautiful, Jonas! Thanks! 😄
|
I can confirm the extra 1x2 plate was my mistake. Sorry!! 😓
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 07:22 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 5512-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| Randy,
you are right, as there was previously no alternate part for the whites, it does
not make sense to add white 3794b as alternate.
Thanks
Mauro
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Randy, it was not a mistake but I did not want to complicate the inventory change
- as the regular part was already established as an alternate one.
|
But you said *all* of your sets came with *all* white 3794a. If they *all* came
with *all* white 3794a and you didn't get any white 3794b, why would you
ask to add any white 3794b as alternates? It doesn't make sense. There is
no established white 3794a or 3794b in the set, just one undetermined entry that
should just be replaced with what you found. Right?
| | But when we get now rid off of the undertermined entries, I would just simly
add my findings as regular ones and fully skip the alternate ones.
Mauro
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | Thanks, Mauro!
So it was a mistake on your part to ask to add 3794b in white as an alternate?
And are we sure we need to keep 3794a in red in the Regular Items section?
Cheers,
Randy
In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Hi Randy,
in ALL 3 boxes there were the SAME mix up of these parts:
ALL red ones came as 3794b.
ALL white ones came as 3794a.
It seems that this was the standard for these boxes as I have bought all 3 from
different sources.
Regards
Mauro
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 3794b White Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud with Groove (Jumper) (Alternate) (match ID 5)
* Change 2 Part Red {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud, Jumper (Undetermined Bottom Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 2 Part White {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud, Jumper (Undetermined Bottom Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)} {match ID 0 to 5}
Comments from Submitter:
From 3 sealed sets, the red part was 3794b, during the white part was 3794b. The undertermined version is not required here anymore.
|
I am sorry if I am still confused by your statements, but can I ask you to just
answer these questions with a 'yes' or 'no'?
Did you find any 3794a in red in any of the three sets you parted
out?
Did you find any 3794b in red in any of the three sets you parted
out?
Did you find any 3794a in white in any of the three sets you parted
out?
Did you find any 3794b in white in any of the three sets you parted
out?
Thanks,
Randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | Legoboy_II | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 06:53 | | Subject: | Re: Clips Ahoy, part three. | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| | In Catalog, StarBrick writes:
| | In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| |
Banning a member for placing links on an external website would be childish.
If that is the only reason for a ban, then it is unacceptable.
|
I think that was not the real reason, but hey, I can't read minds (yet...)
|
I hope it is not.
|
I have read the email the admin sent the now banned member, there were no violations
cited... 
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2020 06:33 | | Subject: | Re: Sets 1045-2 and 1050-2 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories, SezaR writes:
| | What parts are self-contradictory?
|
I was confused on this. I can see when I reread your post that you were presenting
a series of different possibilities, instead of one idea backed up by three facts
as I originally read your post. So ignore what I said here.
No, the contents of your set are not true and original. Your statements are
self-contradictory.
|
It took me significant efforts to buy these two sets from overseas, convince
the seller to ship them and buy for him a shipping label. It also took me few
hours to check the contents of the two sets and find the differences with the
inventory on BL. I did them for these two sets because it is very hard to find
them in new condition.
Overall I considered all possibilities and so I believe that the contents are
new and original.
I am not sure why you undermine my efforts by giving a one-line proposition that
the contents of my sets are not true and original. Have you seen any photos of
them? The majority of parts in one set are in sealed bags. Based on what facts
did you decide that the content is not true and original?
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
