Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | anathema  | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 03:05 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!! 
|
The inventory does show that the set was redesigned during production. Please
upload a scan of the correction sheet to the instruction entry for the set and
we'll add it as an alternate image.
|
Could you also add a note to say that there are two versions of the instruction
booklet too, please? The booklet was updated to incorporate the changes from
the supplemental sheet.
|
 |
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:51 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
The inventory does show that the set was redesigned during production. Please
upload a scan of the correction sheet to the instruction entry for the set and
we'll add it as an alternate image.
|
Sweet! Its late here, so I'll see what I can do tomorrow.
Thanks!!
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:40 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
The inventory does show that the set was redesigned during production. Please
upload a scan of the correction sheet to the instruction entry for the set and
we'll add it as an alternate image.
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:36 | | Subject: | Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
| Author: | JustBricks | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 18:28 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Part spa0010 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {4 to 5} Part Dark Green 3023 Plate 1 x 2
Comments from Submitter:
According to the picture and instructions there should be two per leg and one on the torso.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 18:23 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mhortar writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating 
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty  You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
If you know that the current catalog admins are open to investigating and adding
these minifigs and you have knowledge of other minifigs that need to be corrected,
would you be willing to re-share that information with the current admins so
that the catalog can be more accurate?
|
Sure, Josh, I could and would for the current admin. In my book they are the
best we've seen here. Truly gifted and dedicated people, with strong guidance
from Russell.
But let me ask you, why is it needed? Given that TLG are in possession of the
site and it's catalog's information. They can spin whatever yarn they'd
like. In other words, get it straight from the horse's mouth. It's a
gift for you purest, if played right.
|
|
| Author: | mhortar | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 17:58 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
If you know that the current catalog admins are open to investigating and adding
these minifigs and you have knowledge of other minifigs that need to be corrected,
would you be willing to re-share that information with the current admins so
that the catalog can be more accurate?
Josh
|
|
| Author: | jblock | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 17:25 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1846-1 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4744px6 Yellow Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Lion Face Pattern
* Change {1 to 2} Part Yellow 4744px11 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Tiger Face Pattern
Comments from Submitter:
Based on picture of the polybag, both decorated 4744 parts should be the "tiger face" brick with whiskers on the decoration (the "lion face" brick decoration has no whiskers).
|
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 17:23 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, yapke writes:
| | Hello,
It's remarkable quit now, about the Nougat colours!
With all do of respect and comprehension about the decision to change the name
from Flesh to Nougat...
I didn't follow all those threads and discussions/remark, some were so funny
I couldn't stop laugh about it...
But I assume it has to be one of the most controversial and humorous decision
made by BrickLink or Lego, isn't it?
Anyway, we can presume that most BL members have accepted (or learned to deal
with it) the name change of the colour!
Now is the question: which colour next ???
Greetings, Yannick
|
The group of color names 'flesh' were purely constructs that BL came
up with. THe 'nougat' family of names has been available in the LEGO
community, since at least 2011, when TLG gave to Peeron a reasonably accurate
list (as of that point in time). Now, having said that, before anyone knew the
names should have been 'nougat', BL began to coin color names, and this
likely began about 2003, when certain NBA minifigures came out with what appeared
to be flesh like shade of ABS. Having not seen much of this before, BL created
their own name(s). Soon thereafter, some of the HP minifigs transitioned from
basic yellow to flesh like shades.
What is happening here, is to steer the BL color inventory to align with other
sites, and (in the case of Earth Orange) to untangle errors that were being perpetuated
by a lack of clear information at BL.
IMHO, it's for the greater good, and people need to recognize that.
Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | yapke | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 16:19 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, manganschlamm writes:
| | In Colors, yapke writes:
| | In Colors, qwertyboy writes:
| |
I wouldn't mind if these types of replies resulted in a formal warning.
Niek.
|
Do you mean I said something wrong in my reply to the thread ???
Please, tell me. Cause I personally don't know what I said wrong.
I said I respect and understand the made decision (the why or the reason) and
why they chose Nougat as reference.
But at looking to or reading all those threads and discussions, I've concluded
that the decision is controversial, and in some people's mind humorous (if
you've got a little sens for humour).
Greetings, Yannick
|
I think he referred to the reply to your message, not to your message.
|
Oh yes, now I see.
... Rude reply of Dino1!
|
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 15:45 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, yapke writes:
| | In Colors, qwertyboy writes:
| |
I wouldn't mind if these types of replies resulted in a formal warning.
Niek.
|
Do you mean I said something wrong in my reply to the thread ???
Please, tell me. Cause I personally don't know what I said wrong.
I said I respect and understand the made decision (the why or the reason) and
why they chose Nougat as reference.
But at looking to or reading all those threads and discussions, I've concluded
that the decision is controversial, and in some people's mind humorous (if
you've got a little sens for humour).
Greetings, Yannick
|
I think he referred to the reply to your message, not to your message.
|
|
| Author: | yapke | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 15:42 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, qwertyboy writes:
| |
I wouldn't mind if these types of replies resulted in a formal warning.
Niek.
|
Do you mean I said something wrong in my reply to the thread ???
Please, tell me. Cause I personally don't know what I said wrong.
I said I respect and understand the made decision (the why or the reason) and
why they chose Nougat as reference.
But at looking to or reading all those threads and discussions, I've concluded
that the decision is controversial, and in some people's mind humorous (if
you've got a little sens for humour).
Greetings, Yannick
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 15:14 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
Thank you
Some of them ar know just not yet distinguished and they are here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2488
under paragraph
Known Print Variants Not Distinguished
some examples
there are notes about them in the catalog
but in this case there wasn't even a note about it.
|
Interesting choices to start with, Marek!
Nonetheless, as to your first example: the full triangle is the anomaly. It was
initially intended as full triangle but as production produced a flawed triangle,
it was quickly corrected (wrongly in some minds) to the commonly seen trapezoid
shape. So, what’s the norm? I couldn’t say, it’s a matter of perspective. However,
the quantity of fully 'faulty' triangle produced, is far less than that
of the corrected trapezoid version.
|
|
| Author: | qwertyboy | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 14:27 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, Dino1 writes:
| | In Colors, yapke writes:
| | Hello,
It's remarkable quit now, about the Nougat colours!
With all do of respect and comprehension about the decision to change the name
from Flesh to Nougat...
I didn't follow all those threads and discussions/remark, some were so funny
I couldn't stop laugh about it...
But I assume it has to be one of the most controversial and humorous decision
made by BrickLink or Lego, isn't it?
Anyway, we can presume that most BL members have accepted (or learned to deal
with it) the name change of the colour!
Now is the question: which colour next ???
Greetings, Yannick
|
Do you know North Korea?
The same is here. Do not say anything against a decision by the Admins!
|
I wouldn't mind if these types of replies resulted in a formal warning.
Niek.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 14:14 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
Thank you
Some of them ar know just not yet distinguished and they are here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2488
under paragraph
Known Print Variants Not Distinguished
some examples
there are notes about them in the catalog
but in this case there wasn't even a note about it.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 14:04 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:52 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, yapke writes:
| | Hello,
It's remarkable quit now, about the Nougat colours!
With all do of respect and comprehension about the decision to change the name
from Flesh to Nougat...
I didn't follow all those threads and discussions/remark, some were so funny
I couldn't stop laugh about it...
But I assume it has to be one of the most controversial and humorous decision
made by BrickLink or Lego, isn't it?
Anyway, we can presume that most BL members have accepted (or learned to deal
with it) the name change of the colour!
Now is the question: which colour next ???
Greetings, Yannick
|
Do you know North Korea?
The same is here. Do not say anything against a decision by the Admins!
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:44 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, manganschlamm writes:
| | When I searched for the term "flesh", the search returned only custom parts.
So it appears that at least the descriptions of the legit parts have been updated.
|
Yes, as the Catalog Roadmap shows, this project is now complete:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:38 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, mfav writes:
| | In Help, Stonemonkey1974 writes:
Note "nougat/flesh" hasn't been updated since the apocalypse, and Anders
is away for a week.
|
When I searched for the term "flesh", the search returned only custom parts.
So it appears that at least the descriptions of the legit parts have been updated.
|
| Author: | Stonemonkey1974 | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:16 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, mfav writes:
| | In Help, Stonemonkey1974 writes:
Note "nougat/flesh" hasn't been updated since the apocalypse, and Anders
is away for a week.
|
Good point, thx.
The NOUGPOCALYPSE!!!
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:12 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 7667-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Minifig {sw0166 Shadow Trooper to sw0166a Shadow Trooper - Short Line on Back}
Comments from Submitter:
Only this one set I can confirm from my own set never mixed.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1178937
|
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:12 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, Stonemonkey1974 writes:
Note "nougat/flesh" hasn't been updated since the apocalypse, and Anders
is away for a week.
|
| Author: | Stonemonkey1974 | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:09 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Try
http://avbricks.no/#/avSearch
In Help, Grinjer1 writes:
| | I have a batch of incomplete minifigures. I need help identifying them to find
out what parts I need to complete them. I seem to remember there were a couple
of sites which had this information but I can't remember the names.
Can anyone help please?
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:09 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Quba writes:
| | Dobry jesteś!
|
Thanks
|
| Author: | Grinjer1 | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:06 | | Subject: | Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I have a batch of incomplete minifigures. I need help identifying them to find
out what parts I need to complete them. I seem to remember there were a couple
of sites which had this information but I can't remember the names.
Can anyone help please?
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
United Kingdom, England
USA, Tennessee
Belgium, Flemish Brabant
Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen
Canada, Alberta
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie
Luxembourg
