* Add 2 Part 2436c White Bracket 1 x 2 - 1 x 4 with Two Rounded Corners at the Bottom (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 2 Part White 2436b Bracket 1 x 2 - 1 x 4 with Rounded Corners {match ID 0 to 1}
I think the "and Medium Blue Base" should be dropped from the description.
What do you all think?
I honestly missed this when parting out and just sold a black one, which is completely
black as is the one in the picture, don't think one was ever made with a
different color base than the cannon.
Should I post this somewhere else to request this?
*
94886c01 Duplo Cannon Shooting with Axle Hole, Red Firing Button and Matching Color Base Parts: DUPLO
However, I had trouble doing so and could not provide images of the individual
medium legs myself. I wanted these separate legs inventoried so they can be added
to Studio 2.0 in the future. Thank you!
Now that Lego has acquired Bricklink do you think the official Lego part numbers
will be more widely used/accepted on BL or will Lego in fact actively want to
encourage the use of their codes on the site as a primary means of identifying
parts in the BL catalog?
Either way when you search for an official Lego part number BL already recognises
it so is there any reason the official Lego part code is not displayed alongside
the part in question? Perhaps there’s already an option in the settings to display
them that I don’t know about?
Also is there any reason BL have continued using their own reference codes instead
of switching to Legos? If it’s just a case of not wanting to upset members that
have inventoried their physical stock and become accustomed to these BL codes
wouldn’t it be better to have both codes to hand so that buyers and sellers alike
have the option of choosing whichever codes they prefer to work with?
Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen
USA, Louisiana
United Kingdom, England