Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: 4070a - hpoort (413) | [...] Don't forget about (Part 3678a) versus (Part 3678b) with complete, intended smoothness in the a-version. Hans-Peter
(61 months ago, May 26, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Mystery part - clrv4000 (116) | [...] Sort of reminds me of this thing someone 3D printed: (URL) Of course you wouldn't want to get THAT stuck in a 32474! (I occasionally run into a similar 'homemade [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Mystery part - clrv4000 (116) | [...] Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
Re: Mystery part - bb1237701 (61) | [...] So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it? Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
Re: Mystery part - WoutR (920) | [...] I *had* seen it, probably at the same time as the new 2x4 brick with axle holes and that technic connector block... But I can't find it so I probably noticed the [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Mystery part - clrv4000 (116) | [...] All I can say is that I really would like a part like that! I can already think of some situations I could have solved easily with that. Hopefully some sleuth can [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: 4070a - randyf (442) | [...] This is something we are going to look into. From what I have seen over the years, there is no real "smooth slopes" for some of those parts (or any of them). What [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
Re: 4070a - manganschlamm (1938) | [...] Why do you think that smooth slopes is not an appropriate entry? I actually prefer textured slopes and when I order textured slopes and get smooth slopes it does not [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
Re: 4070a - Brickitty (6460) | [...] Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect. Now if we could just get rid of the [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: 4070a - tEoS (5297) | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these. In Catalog, seymour3113 writes: [...]
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
| 4070a - seymour3113 (598) | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog. Should I just list them as 4070?
(61 months ago, May 25, 2019, to Catalog) |
Old Mosaic pieces. - Stuart9 (1071) | Can I ask what proof is required to submit the rectangular version of the 3062oldtile ? I have both the one shown below and the rectangular version without stud that I suppose [...]
(61 months ago, May 23, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: which is the correct listing? - yorbrick (1185) | [...] There are 87 of the "set", whereas there are 4294 listings for the part. So most people have listed them as the single part. The sealed ones listed as sets are likely [...]
(61 months ago, May 22, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: which is the correct listing? - sheppy02 (1828) | [...] Thanks Nelis, Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most people are listed as (Set 630-3) whereas really they should be (Part 96874) [...]
(61 months ago, May 22, 2019, to Catalog) |
| which is the correct listing? - sheppy02 (1828) | Hello All, I am just listing some items, I had one (Part 630-3) trying to find the others in my inventory no joy, searched by brick separator my others are listed (Part 96874) [...]
(61 months ago, May 22, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion - Admin_Russell | [...] The decision to get rid of the brick hinge and add plate hinge had NOTHING to do with any kind of purist notion. Rather, it was a decision based solely on commercial [...]
(61 months ago, May 20, 2019, to Catalog) |
Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion - mnementh (23247) | [...] And meanwhile, we now have 14 recently created entries for mixed color 3937/ 3738 Hinges. (URL) That decision goes directly AGAINST the catalog policy, so I deem those [...]
(61 months ago, May 20, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion - tons_of_bricks (12776) | [...] I believe they have all those colored listings simple because of the difficulty of taking those two pieces apart. I have broken several trying to do so. With the 1x4 [...]
(61 months ago, May 20, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion - yorbrick (1185) | [...] While this piece is being discussed, I have always found the name odd. It only looks like a 1x4 hinge brick when it is paired together. Therefore if it is not paired, [...]
(61 months ago, May 20, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion - WhiteHorseMatt (1432) | [...] Not saying it should be deleted, but that reason is valid. There are plenty of sets where the two parts have different colours. Why would those combinations not be [...]
(61 months ago, May 20, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion - JusTiCe8 (121) | Especially when considering the reason why it has been marked: "This item was marked for deletion because it sets a precedent for adding dozens of unnecessary combinations of [...]
(61 months ago, May 20, 2019, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
