Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Hygrotus  | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:00 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, therobo writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red 
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706] 
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
|
Here it is:
|
Thanks
|
 |
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 10:57 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
|
Here it is:
| |
I will correct then everything, thank you once again for finding this
Cheers
Marek
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 08:04 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10194-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Teutsch writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 44375b Black Dish 6 x 6 Inverted (Radar) - Solid Studs (match ID 2)
Comments from Submitter:
I built my Emerald Night a month ago, MISB Set which I bought myself from Lego-Online-Store several years ago in Germany. The Set contains definately another version - my black dish has not any hollow studs, it has solid studs, so there is an alternate version of this set! If needed, I can send pictures of the LOT, Train itself, seals on packaging to locate the lego-factory my set got produced.
|
Please attach then pictures of your finding.
The only one which I fould with solid stud on this part is in this review:
https://youtu.be/b02yVGIH2xM?t=352
made by Australian Lego Fan, his speed build were always very good and usful
for checking variants he do them mostly from sealed set content (I trust his
reviews), but unluckily this one is older one from him so there isn't showed
box unpacking and bags unpacking 
|
P.S.
I want to be here very carful for this variant here because when I was looking
for some more proofs I found many builds of lepin counterfeit showed on youtube
and in them this dish is with soild studs
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 08:03 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10194-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Teutsch writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 44375b Black Dish 6 x 6 Inverted (Radar) - Solid Studs (match ID 2)
Comments from Submitter:
I built my Emerald Night a month ago, MISB Set which I bought myself from Lego-Online-Store several years ago in Germany. The Set contains definately another version - my black dish has not any hollow studs, it has solid studs, so there is an alternate version of this set! If needed, I can send pictures of the LOT, Train itself, seals on packaging to locate the lego-factory my set got produced.
|
Please attach then pictures of your finding.
The only one which I fould with solid stud on this part is in this review:
https://youtu.be/b02yVGIH2xM?t=352
made by Australian Lego Fan, his speed build were always very good and usful
for checking variants he do them mostly from sealed set content (I trust his
reviews), but unluckily this one is older one from him so there isn't showed
box unpacking and bags unpacking
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 07:48 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
I will correct then everything, thank you once again for finding this
Cheers
Marek
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 07:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
It will be difficult to implement.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 06:23 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 05:46 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Hello,
Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
Nice. The NK shield in sand green.
|
| Author: | rapar | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:50 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank you, I appreciate it!
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
|
For you I will, but only just this once.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:41 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
|
For you I will, but only just this once.
|
| Author: | rapar | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:21 | | Subject: | Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 249 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 03:33 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Hello,
Maybe this link can Help:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Rober-to/Technic/8714/8714a.jpg
You can see the helmets into sealed bag on the background.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 02:22 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8272-1 | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| | As previously discussed for another set, it's my belief that the 2L hoses are PLG, not
flat silver. They seem to have the same color as the bionicle teeth which are PLG in
this set. But a change of this is likely to be rejected, I'll not do it here but only
leave my thoughts on it.
|
Why would you say it would be rejected? I would be more than happy to look into
this before making any determination.
Could you post a picture of the hoses from this set next to the Bionicle teeth
from this set? I may not be considered one of the resident color experts, but
I do know my LEGO colors quite well. In the meantime, I will search the intertubes
for other data points.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 01:11 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 21:34 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8225-1 | | Viewed: | 11 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
Comments from Submitter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa2dkkFfo0s
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 21:32 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8244-1 | | Viewed: | 13 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
Comments from Submitter:
http://lego.brickinstructions.com/lego_instructions/set/8244/Transformer_Set I don't actually see a page where they say to get him out and put him together. He's just pictured in the driver's seat with his helmet on.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 21:27 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 21:25 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6622-1 | | Viewed: | 14 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4073 Trans-Yellow Plate, Round 1 x 1 Straight Side
* Add 1 Part 4073c01 Trans-Yellow Plate, Round 1 x 1, 2 on Sprue
Comments from Submitter:
MISB from personal collection. Photos will be added soon.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 21:23 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8229-1 | | Viewed: | 12 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
|
| Author: | Brixalotl | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 20:36 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 76021-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 2 Part 44302 Light Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End (Undetermined Type)
* Add 2 Part 44302a Light Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End with Bottom Groove (match ID 1)
* Add 2 Part 44302b Light Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End without Bottom Groove (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Add 2 Part 21459 Flat Silver Minifigure, Weapon Sword, Shamshir/Katana (Square Guard) with Capped Pommel and Holes in Crossguard and Blade (Alternate) (match ID 2)
* Add 1 Part 14769 Lime Tile, Round 2 x 2 with Bottom Stud Holder (Alternate) (match ID 3)
* Change 2 Part Flat Silver 30173b Minifigure, Weapon Sword, Shamshir/Katana (Square Guard) with Uncapped Pommel and Hole in Hilt {match ID 0 to 2}
* Change 1 Part Lime 4150 Tile, Round 2 x 2 {match ID 0 to 3}
Comments from Submitter:
confirmed during part-out, thanks
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 18:32 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8272-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 78c07 Red Hose, Ribbed 7mm D. 7L (Counterpart)
* Change 2 Part Dark Bluish Gray {2739 Technic, Link 1 x 6 - (MARKED FOR DELETION - Undetermined Inner Ring Ends Version) to 2739b Technic, Link 1 x 6 with Stoppers}
Comments from Submitter:
Source: MISB-based set that was never mixed with other bricks. My set has link with stoppers. I'm also adding two counterparts, because the instructions instructs the user to cut the hose in two halves (page 63). I'm not sure if this is the correct way to do it on BrickLink, but any used set would most likely never include a 14L hose, but two 7L hoses. As previously discussed for another set, it's my belief that the 2L hoses are PLG, not flat silver. They seem to have the same color as the bionicle teeth which are PLG in this set. But a change of this is likely to be rejected, I'll not do it here but only leave my thoughts on it.
|
|
|
| Author: | Flyingmic | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 18:12 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8641-1 | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6091 Orange Brick, Modified 1 x 2 x 1 1/3 with Curved Top (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
The second sticker with the number 2 as seen on the sticker sheet goes on one of the orange parts (nr. 6091) in the set.
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 16:41 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 6622-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4073 Trans-Yellow Plate, Round 1 x 1 Straight Side
* Add 1 Part 4073c01 Trans-Yellow Plate, Round 1 x 1, 2 on Sprue
Comments from Submitter:
MISB from personal collection. Photos will be added soon.
|
| Author: | samsam2 | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2018 16:41 | | Subject: | Same Microfigure Ramses and Orient Bazaar | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| These two microfigures look very similar,
it took me forever to see the difference, one with belt and one without belt.
Does it make sense to mention belt/no belt in their names?
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
)
)
)
)
)
