| Discussion Forum: Thread 313036 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | popsicle  | | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 14:08 | | Subject: | (Cancelled) | | Viewed: | 199 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Discarded | |
|
| | (Cancelled) |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 21:29 | | Subject: | Re: Just curious... | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | I'm contemplating the listing of our older stock. Considering the volume,
I'm delving back into BL SW catalog some, digging around. Doing so, I've
stumbled across what seems to be a few anomalies, or not? Just don't know
anymore 
For example: why was the Star Wars #1 (Sith Minifigure Pack) of all of the Star
Wars Minifigure Packs of that year (#1 thru #4) assigned the non-specific, generic
subcategory that is Star Wars Other?
I’m sure there’s an obvious and valid reason that just eludes me right now, as
per usual 
Thanks in advance
-popsicle
|
It's because that MF pack is the only one where the MF's span different
movies. The other packs have sets of 3 who appear in the same movie.
David
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 21:43 | | Subject: | Re: Just curious... | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | I'm contemplating the listing of our older stock. Considering the volume,
I'm delving back into BL SW catalog some, digging around. Doing so, I've
stumbled across what seems to be a few anomalies, or not? Just don't know
anymore
For example: why was the Star Wars #1 (Sith Minifigure Pack) of all of the Star
Wars Minifigure Packs of that year (#1 thru #4) assigned the non-specific, generic
subcategory that is Star Wars Other?
I’m sure there’s an obvious and valid reason that just eludes me right now, as
per usual
Thanks in advance
-popsicle
|
It's because that MF pack is the only one where the MF's span different
movies. The other packs have sets of 3 who appear in the same movie.
David
|
Thanks, David.
That doesn't quite jive, though. If it's movie assignments for the cataloging,
two of the sets are assigned to the subcategory Star Wars Episode 4/5/6
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=S&catString=65.258
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 22:15 | | Subject: | Re: Just curious... | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | I'm contemplating the listing of our older stock. Considering the volume,
I'm delving back into BL SW catalog some, digging around. Doing so, I've
stumbled across what seems to be a few anomalies, or not? Just don't know
anymore
For example: why was the Star Wars #1 (Sith Minifigure Pack) of all of the Star
Wars Minifigure Packs of that year (#1 thru #4) assigned the non-specific, generic
subcategory that is Star Wars Other?
I’m sure there’s an obvious and valid reason that just eludes me right now, as
per usual
Thanks in advance
-popsicle
|
It's because that MF pack is the only one where the MF's span different
movies. The other packs have sets of 3 who appear in the same movie.
David
|
Thanks, David.
That doesn't quite jive, though. If it's movie assignments for the cataloging,
two of the sets are assigned to the subcategory Star Wars Episode 4/5/6
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=S&catString=65.258
|
Okay, I think I understand the logic now. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Washington
