Discussion Forum: Thread 291022 |
|
|
| | Author: | Gandalf68 | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 04:21 | Subject: | Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 130 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| Hi !
Again, i'm facing a problem while retro-engineering a model.
I don't understand how the creator of the model manage to put a ball+axle
in the space beween the mudguard and the ball socket underneath !?
It seems impossible because there is apparently 2 Brackets and a Tile there,
and it's leaves not much room to fit anything else !
Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
Any ideas ?
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | fritsp | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 04:40 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
Any ideas ?
|
this one with this?
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | tons_of_bricks | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 06:31 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, fritsp writes:
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
Any ideas ?
|
this one with this?
|
Do those balls work with the socket bricks? I would think they would be too small.
If it is possible though, it would probably be very fragile.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | Gandalf68 | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 10:59 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, firestar246 writes:
| In Help, fritsp writes:
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
Any ideas ?
|
this one with this?
|
Do those balls work with the socket bricks? I would think they would be too small.
If it is possible though, it would probably be very fragile.
|
Yes, they work with socket bricks, and as you say, the whole thing will be fragile
... But i don't think i have any choice here since i can't think of anything
else
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 11:11 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| In Help, firestar246 writes:
| In Help, fritsp writes:
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
Any ideas ?
|
this one with this?
|
Do those balls work with the socket bricks? I would think they would be too small.
If it is possible though, it would probably be very fragile.
|
Yes, they work with socket bricks, and as you say, the whole thing will be fragile
... But i don't think i have any choice here since i can't think of anything
else
|
What about something attached to this:
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | Gandalf68 | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 06:33 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, fritsp writes:
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
Any ideas ?
|
this one with this?
|
Yes ! I've just tried it and it works, although i'm afraid that it's
a little weak to be able to hold the whole thing together, but i don't believe
there are many other solutions anyway
Thanks for your help !
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 11:43 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
|
I don't think it's possible either - usually these ball joints are attached
by axles. Maybe something like this, cut down, would be sturdier than just a
jumper tile?
* | | 98549 Support 2 x 2 x 5 Bar on Tile Base with Hollow Stud and Stop Ring Parts: Support |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | Gandalf68 | Posted: | Jun 7, 2021 13:22 | Subject: | Re: Retro-engineering problem (Part 2) | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, peregrinator writes:
| In Help, Gandalf68 writes:
| Unless the Tile is a 2x2 modified with pin (2460) with a ball somehow attached
to it ?
(But i don't think it's possible)
|
I don't think it's possible either - usually these ball joints are attached
by axles. Maybe something like this, cut down, would be sturdier than just a
jumper tile?
* | | 98549 Support 2 x 2 x 5 Bar on Tile Base with Hollow Stud and Stop Ring Parts: Support |
|
Yeah it's an idea ... I guess i will try the 2 options to see what is the
sturdiest, and in the worst case, if i go all the way to cut a piece, i guess
i could also glue the ball to the jumper tile (even if i'm not fond of the
idea of using glue)
But at the end, the model is just for display so hopefully i won't be forced
to go to this extreme
|
|
|
|
|
|
|