Discussion Forum: Thread 243250 |
|
|
| | Author: | grimsbricksuk | Posted: | Oct 18, 2018 12:38 | Subject: | Rejected SW minifig name changes | Viewed: | 94 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Yesterday I submitted two name changes to minifigs sw500 & sw673 which have been
rejected, however I have no idea why?
sw500 Jedi Knight (Kao Cen Darach)
sw673 Kanjiklub Gang Member (Croking Shand)
These name have been taken from the recent Lego trading cards, series 1, see
images.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Oct 18, 2018 13:26 | Subject: | Re: Rejected SW minifig name changes | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| Yesterday I submitted two name changes to minifigs sw500 & sw673 which have been
rejected, however I have no idea why?
sw500 Jedi Knight (Kao Cen Darach)
sw673 Kanjiklub Gang Member (Croking Shand)
These name have been taken from the recent Lego trading cards, series 1, see
images.
|
The names at BL are taken from what is written on the box or in the LEGO description
of the set, if they are available. Although I see no problem with adding them
in brackets like that, as the original names are still there. Other characters
get non-official descriptions added.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | STARWARSMINI | Posted: | Oct 19, 2018 03:15 | Subject: | Re: Rejected SW minifig name changes | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| I agree, these should be added as brackets. Try to submit it again, best of luck! |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Oct 18, 2018 23:13 | Subject: | Re: Rejected SW minifig name changes | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| Yesterday I submitted two name changes to minifigs sw500 & sw673 which have been
rejected, however I have no idea why?
sw500 Jedi Knight (Kao Cen Darach)
sw673 Kanjiklub Gang Member (Croking Shand)
These name have been taken from the recent Lego trading cards, series 1, see
images.
|
If they had names different from a set box, then I could see why the changes
were rejected, but since both MF's had no names, I agree that the changes
should have gone through. Maybe try again and put a link to the images in your
post?
David
|
|
|
|
|
|