BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Problem, therobo writes:

In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:

Complete/Packed shows in "orders not yet shipped" just like Complete/Ready....
the issue is the one in between. Complete/Paid (Payments status/order status)
does not show in "orders not yet shipped"

Converting this reply to the "Problem" topic.

IMO it does not make sense at all to use the "Paid" status if payment and order
status is separated. Whoever programmed this PayPal (Onsite) feature either was
not familiar with the separation (and its triggering the action items) or desperately
looked for a solution to block order additions after payment is done. An elegant
solution would be to block order additions if the payment status was set by the
system to "Complete" after payment, regardless of order status. But this
may have required more programming work.

I don't want to stir the pot too much, but some people have seen that onsite
payments result in people apparently paying with eCheck. If that bug (if it _is_
a bug) is still there, having the system flip the payment status to "complete"
would not be appropriate for those eCheck payments. In those cases it should
go to "clearing" or somesuch.

Maybe the developer knew this and explicitly avoided "complete" to force the
seller to decide it is complete. Just shooting in the dark here (as most of us
do when it comes to figuring out how new features are meant to work).

Niek.

Author:

therobo

Posted:

Jan 22, 2016 16:03

Subject:

Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:

In Suggestions, therobo writes:

It seems like a bug.
I would not set the order status from "Paid" to "Ready" as this opens the order
for additions. What happens if you set it to "Packed" instead?

Author:

CPgolfaddict

Posted:

Jan 22, 2016 15:33

Subject:

Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped

Viewed:

19 times

Topic:

It seems like a bug.
I would not set the order status from "Paid" to "Ready" as this opens the order
for additions. What happens if you set it to "Packed" instead?

Author:

Jan_K

Posted:

Jan 2, 2016 06:47

Subject:

Re: Technical issue: Wanted list data missing

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/catalogitem.page?S=4000012-1

In General, viejos writes:

In General, Jan_K writes:

The wanted list information seems to display incorrectly for many sets - and
for a while already. See this example:

4000012-1 Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
2012
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Inside Tour

Right-click on the blue BUY button on the top right and you will see the old
catalog page. For the set you mentioned, it looks like the image below. You can
see it is on 105 wanted lists. There are many glitches with the new page, but
fortunately this does not mean the back end is broken.

Hi Russell,

thanks for that hint - I wasn't aware of this workaround!

Jan

Author:

viejos

Posted:

Jan 2, 2016 06:24

Subject:

Re: Technical issue: Wanted list data missing

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In General, Jan_K writes:

Dear Admins,

as mentioned as a sidenote in this post already:
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=958268

The wanted list information seems to display incorrectly for many sets - and
for a while already. See this example:

4000012-1 Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
2012
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Inside Tour

http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/catalogitem.page?S=4000012-1

This item is included in my wanted list (and very likely in a few others as well),
but this is not being displayed correctly - both the missing number in "My Wanted
List (1)" and the completely missing "On xx Wanted Lists" information seem to
be a technical issue here.

When browsing my own wanted lists, I see a correlation between this effect and
database entries without any price guide information and current listing for
sale - so maybe it's just a similar glitch like the "action item missing
on start page" issue where a certain condition was needed to display these correctly.

for a few parts, I see the ""On xx Wanted Lists" entry, but not the "(1)" in
"My Wanted List (1)" - see attached example images.
(Yes, all four of these items ARE included in a wanted list of mine!)

Please have a look into this.

Thanks!
Jan

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Dec 8, 2015 22:54

Subject:

Re: Please remove cancelled spam posts

Viewed:

75 times

Topic:

General

I totally agree.

David

Author:

kidsncritters

Posted:

Aug 22, 2015 18:46

Subject:

Re: Changes to catalog part view are terrible.

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

I was wondering what all the fuss was about - then I looked on the part detail
page...

NO TABS at the bottom!

I thought it was a great idea to have the tabs there!

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Aug 8, 2015 09:58

Subject:

Re: BL needs to set time frame for shipping order

Viewed:

54 times

Topic:

Selling

You may want to change this to a suggestion.

In Selling, TheBrickStore writes:

Hi BL community:

After careful and deliberate consideration, I honestly believe BrickLink needs
to establish a timeframe for shipping of an order from the date/time the order
was placed with a seller. The site seems to be moving in a "carte blanche" way
for sellers. Sellers who take weeks/months to ship orders should be banned quite
honestly. Those few sellers are NOT a GOOD commodity for this site. New buyers
just don't understand and experienced buyers like myself are becoming more
and more alarmed over these long long shipping practices by a few sellers. Sure
you can avoid them once you know who they are but why give any seller more than
seven business days to get an order in the mail???? I just don't get it.
What other company takes a month plus to ship an order????

So if BrickLink is not willing to establish shipping rules for sellers (seem
to have all kinds of rules in place for buyers concerning payments) then at least
allow a buyer to be able to cancel a contract if seller has NOT shipped within
seven business days. Personally I think seven business days is too long but
it is a start.

Yes I understand that some sellers here are hobbyists and do not run a store
as a business but it is strange that most if not all hobbyists send out their
orders within seven business days.

I am not suggesting at this time that we punish any seller for failing to ship
within seven business days, I am just giving the buyer the right to cancel an
order/contract if the order is not shipped within seven business days of payment.

Sellers under this new rule would not be able to state in their terms that shipping
time is longer than seven business days.

Thanks

TheBrickStore

Author:

viejos

Posted:

Sep 19, 2014 22:50

Subject:

Re: BrickLink China店铺微博推广活动诚邀您的加入

Viewed:

68 times

Topic:

Announce

In 中文, cs_china writes:

尊敬的卖家您好，

BrickLink（以下简称BL）的中文页BrickLink China（以下简称BLC）已经推出1个月了。感谢大家一直以来对BLC的期待和鼓励。

访问BrickLink China：http://www.bricklink.com/china/

我们开设了BLC的新浪官方微博平台：BricklinkChina，欢迎您关注我们。
我们的微博地址：http://weibo.com/u/2833298890

BrickLink China店铺微博推广活动：
如果您在店铺的Splash和Store Terms页中加入中文的店铺指南和介绍，并允许发货到中国大陆、香港、台湾、澳门和新加坡，我们会定期在微博平台免费推送您的BL店铺，让更多的中文用户看到您的商店。

我们还将在近期开设支付宝等其他中国大陆第三方支付平台交易方式，方便中国大陆地区买家的购买。

希望您能经常在讨论区的中文分区发布新的主题帖。让更多的中文用户加入到BLC的讨论中来。中文区暂不设有分区和主题，大家可以直接发布自己的讨论帖。

如果您对BL有任何宝贵意见和建议，请随时回复本帖告知我们。

BrickLink China工作团队期待您的回复！

——BrickLink China团队
客户服务与支持

显然，我们有一个新的讨论主持人，cs_china。欢迎登机！
http://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp

Author:

bagelboybugle

Posted:

Sep 17, 2014 14:59

Subject:

Re: BrickLink China店鋪微博推廣活動誠邀您的加入

Viewed:

83 times

Topic: