Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | StarBrick  | | Posted: | Oct 1, 2014 06:39 | | Subject: | Set quoting OFF in forum posts | | Viewed: | 177 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| In replying to forum posts, the standard system setting is to quote the post
you are replying to. This generates LARGE texts that one has to scroll through
to get the additional post made by the poster.
Please set this standard to OFF:
- makes the forumposts cleaner
- readingspeed increases
- mouses/PGDWN-keys will last longer due to less scrolling
- less data storage needed on servers
(has been requested two times before, no follow-up unfortunately)
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Sep 23, 2014 09:02 | | Subject: | Re: Cap on number of message i can send | | Viewed: | 77 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| there's a 4 -letter word in his username that is quite odd too  |
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Sep 18, 2014 15:58 | | Subject: | Re: Negative Feedback Note | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Thanks!
Voted YES!!!
|
 |
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Sep 15, 2014 02:25 | | Subject: | NSS / NRS Overhaul | | Viewed: | 226 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| (probably multiple times suggested before....)
Overhaul of the NSS/NRS system required.
Regarding recent posts of blocked shops due to a cummulation of three (!) NSS's
over the last few years (!!), this system needs an overhaul.
1) NSS / NSR are in effect NO longer than a fixed time; for instance 6 months
2) users can ALWAYS review their scores on ALL the codes (NSS/NRS/NPB/OCR/etc....)
availabe for classifying orders (the data must be in the database.
Short post, needs more work, I know. Please add when wanted....... or when you
miss stuff.
If there IS a way to check your scores, please post it here AND (@ADMIN/@TECHSTAFF),
add it to the MyBrickLink page PLEASE.
Cheers
StarBrick
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2014 14:03 | | Subject: | Re: Store View Tabs Missing [SOLUTION] | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Cool,
love the forum, love the members here!
Cheers!
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2014 13:18 | | Subject: | Re: Store View Tabs Missing [SOLUTION] | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | Wow, did you post this to the helpdesk too? |
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Aug 20, 2014 15:33 | | Subject: | Re: BL Development Team: Test before rollout! | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Scott,
You just joined the gang
When's the first meeting at the clubhouse?
Cheers
StarBrick
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 10:55 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, speshy writes:
| | Sorry to be the only voice of dissent so far, but I am going to have to vote
"no" for this one, and it's not just because I haven't yet contributed
anything to the catalog.
|
No need for a sorry, free speak, free thought
| | I would also not be so interested in accepting "points" as payment, because my
fees aren't too high to begin with, being a small store. Points for free
sets, though? That I like.
|
So, basically you do favor a rewarding system, but don't agree on the reward?
Confusing.... You can not be pro another reward and be anti the rewarding system.
That doesn't add up.
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 09:50 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | I think it would be automated. No different than fee accumulation, and any other
data that BL is handling at the moment. This site is already set up for this
sort of information.
|
Yes indeed it is. Just other ways of using the data, easy for the coding wizzards.
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 09:49 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program -> BAP!!! | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | And what about those who already contributed massive amounts of work on the catalog??
Kinda unfair since at this point there is more in the catalog from prior people,
than being added.
|
Where that came frome is stored in the database, so that can be used to give
points to admissions placed already. Also that's a small coding job I guess
Data is there, infrastructure too, it all needs some thinking and programming
and then LAUNCHING the BrickLink Appreciation Program = BAP!!!
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 09:47 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | |
Who will do all the bookwork for these points? Will BrickLink end up paying
someone to do it, or will it become another chore for the volunteer admins?
|
With all those programming experts on board this must be a piece of cake to automate
that process!
Even some MOC-Shop coding could be re-used. That was the purpose of the platform
right? For Bricklink 2.0 or 2.1 or 3.0.... ah, you know what I mean, nudge, nudge,
wink, wink...
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 08:34 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mabccc writes:
| | I voted no. For the simple reason that if you give discounts for inventories
and so on, then more people will grab them as soon as they can, possibly not
have the set anyway but copy the inventory based on lego's database or the
one imported into brickset or similar, or make errors because they have reserved
too many inventories for themself and need to rush through them to get their
discounts.
|
Than you must not vote no to this idea. Your NO is pointed at the incorrect additions
to the inventory. Only correct (checked, double checked, triple checked, whatever-ple
checked!) additions qualify for points. So that needs to be ruled out.
Errors in additions might also result in deduction of points.
Your vote changed?
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 07:47 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Interesting distinction between sellers and buyers, but ANY member can contribute.
So as a buyer doesn't have to pay BL fee's indeed, they might be up for
a generic store coupon on redeeming points. This coupon should be redeemable
at ANY store.
Nice addition !
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 07:28 | | Subject: | Re: Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
|
Thanks
| |
I think a points system would work well, different weightings for different things
you do to the catalogue, points = money off your fee's.
|
Agreed, didn't work that out as there are many ways to do this. Indeed there
has to be a weight factor and time factor to earn points that you can redeem
as fee discounts or coupons at specific stores. Hey, that just sounds like
a membership programm!!
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2014 06:26 | | Subject: | Fee deduction program | | Viewed: | 317 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Discarded | |
|
| As this is still a community build and moderated site, all efforts by members
to improve the site, listings, behaviour of members etc, should result in a discount
on fees to be paid.
Bricklink should have a program that rewards members who:
- catalog contributions
- image improvements
- price guide corrections
- listings corrections
- adding help files/video's/translations
- .....
At this day, only BAD behaviour is santioned (NSS, NPB's, site and forum
bans etc....). Let us not emphasize the negative behaviour but reward the positive
behaviour.
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | May 9, 2014 16:23 | | Subject: | Re: Link to All Admin Posts | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | Smooth YES! |
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 14, 2014 11:38 | | Subject: | Re: New Feedback Format | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| This solution does not prevent tricks like BRicksters (see other posts for details)
has pulled of succesfully over a long period of time.
Apparently the rule is:
if you can't read the feedback right, we can't be bothered when are being
scammed, it's your own fault.
We as sellers and buyers do our best to help new members getting familiar here
at BL and at the same time, they are easy prey for scavengers.
The feedback system is fine, reading is required, decisions are made by individuals
to buy stuff. But the system that provides these bad sellers needs to be addressed
and changed. NOT the feedback system (at least: not for this reason...).
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 13, 2014 12:09 | | Subject: | Re: I Have Removed Stoplist & Ignore Suggestion | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| It takes a wise man to make this post. Not many people have the strength and
wisdom to do this. Nice to see one who has.
Thanks Ken.
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 13, 2014 03:35 | | Subject: | Re: Make it easier to report suspicious members | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| No: the member is not suspicious, its store or items or practices are.
Please do not label people when you want to label behaviour
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 10, 2014 13:22 | | Subject: | Re: Remove MSRP Price | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Woeha!!!
Always better than Borg....
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 10, 2014 13:20 | | Subject: | Re: Remove MSRP Price | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | In fairness, it WAS suggested. Why they chose this suggestion, out of all of
them, to implement is beyond me though.
|
Missed that 
| | Better text:
"When this set was released on 2010 the Manufacturers' Suggested Retail Price
was $99.99. Be advised that in the secondary market prices are determined by
supply and demand and may be significantly more than MSRP."
|
Yep, please add this to the implemented feature CS! Please?
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 10, 2014 13:05 | | Subject: | Re: Remove MSRP Price | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Nicely put.
An explanation on the WHY this was added would be nice
I haven't got a clue from the point of sales that is.... As research facility,
it is a nice addition though.
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2014 03:55 | | Subject: | Re: Clarify nature of the forum | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Well made point.
I recently hinted the CS to opening an update tab or something like that so
there is an OFFICIAL 'release/update/news' thread that doesn't fill
up the forum.
I'm PRO!
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Apr 2, 2014 03:30 | | Subject: | Re: Update policy on foriegn customs laws | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Ignorent readers will also not read the TOS, useless addition in my opinion.
You can't educate a potential buyer with a sharper TOS....
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Mar 21, 2014 04:50 | | Subject: | Re: Request for Forum Roundtable with Mr. Kim | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | |
This is the hardest thing for so many people to do without feeling like they
are incompetent. But it is the best way to gain the confidence of your customer.
It's one of those things that most people think is backwards, ie "don't
admit you don't know something or they will think you are incompetent". This
is simply not true.
|
I feel saying 'I don't know' proof of pure selfknowledge. It is not
always regarded as such, but being aware of ones limitations is a very powerful
force.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Netherlands, Gelderland
