| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Nov 30, 2023 20:59 | Subject: | entering dimensions for a playmat | Viewed: | 79 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| This is about this item ...
* | | 4182737 Plastic Playmat Duplo, with Water/Ice Pattern from Set 3621 Polar Animals (Explore) Parts: Plastic |
It does not have dimensions in the catalog. I have several in stock. They were
factory packed folded in half (so half the long dimension). Do I enter the folded
or the unfolded length for the X dimension. Note that using the folded X dimension,
will cause the Y dimension to become the large of the two.
thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
Author: | David892 | Posted: | Nov 29, 2023 01:26 | Subject: | Questioning Trans-Red Color of item 3899 | Viewed: | 102 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Good evening,
While sorting parts, I came across a Utensil Cup (Mug) 3899 that was trans-red
color.
I looked at the item with a magnifying glass and I came to the conclusion that
this was probably Megablocks of another brand that copies Lego. It looks very
similar to a true 3899 item, but the lip seems different and (of course) no Lego
marking anywhere.
However, I see that this color is referenced in the Bricklink Catalog (not as
known but in the "All" category) and that even 10 sellers offer such
items worldwide.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3899&name=Minifigure,%20Utensil%20Cup&category=%5BMinifigure,%20Utensil%5D#T=C&C=17
My opinion is that this color is not produced by Lego and therefore should be
deleted from the catalog.
Can anybody provide an expertise on my affirmation? Is there something we can
do to prove if I'm right or wrong?
Thanks a lot!
David
|
|
Author: | Bricksgram | Posted: | Nov 27, 2023 16:06 | Subject: | Does the Ninja theme belong to the Castle? | Viewed: | 147 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I wonder does the Ninja theme belongs to the castle theme? On some sites they
treat them in the same basket, but not on bricklink, so I'm interested? In
general, the these two themes are in some point similar. I like some Ninja sets
from 2000' almost as much as Castle sets.
|
Author: | karolainen | Posted: | Nov 26, 2023 13:28 | Subject: | Oprava | Viewed: | 93 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| MISCLASSIFIED PARTS RED AND WHITE TECHNIC PANEL 87080PB060 AND 87080PB061 |
Author: | LordSkylark | Posted: | Nov 25, 2023 11:19 | Subject: | Shadow Leonardo comcon025-1 | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Does anyone have this set or photos that it could be determined if the skateboard
is stickered or printed, and then have the skateboard added to the inventory?
Or should the minifigure be deleted from the set so that the set can be flagged
as "not inventoried" so that people are aware that this set is not (otherwise
it will never show up as part of the "not inventoried" sets. (It always
irked me that this set got approved with an incomplete inventory... And it's
never been fixed to this day, probably because it never shows up in the "not
inventoried" sets.)
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Nov 25, 2023 02:58 | Subject: | HELP! | Viewed: | 170 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
Any help with this part number?
Regards!
|
|
Author: | reedertwins | Posted: | Nov 24, 2023 14:37 | Subject: | Set 8097 Regular part mistake? | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Under the regular parts section of this set 8097, item #3298 is listed as quantity
of 4. This part is not needed to build this set, however you do need item #4210637
quantity 6, which currently listed under alternative parts. I think this needs
to be corrected, unless I’m mistaken.
|
|
Author: | RockiesGuyLego | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 13:47 | Subject: | Wrong inventory for a figure in set 850889 | Viewed: | 86 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| When you look at this set on BrickLink, there is a picture of the actual blister
pack. There is only one figure with the legs 970c00pb0271. All of the other
figures in the pack have Black Hips and Black Legs. However, the inventory for
the figure cas529 show this figure with the legs 970c00pb0271. This figure should
have black hips and black legs. The inventory is incorrect for this figure and
needs to be changed. I have tried to submit the change but don't know how
to fill out the form to get it to accept it. Can anyone help with getting this
change made? I would love to learn how to do this since I have found several
errors in the past as well. Thanks for any help on this. RockesGuy Brick Store.
|
|
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Nov 21, 2023 04:39 | Subject: | HELP! | Viewed: | 110 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
I think this helmet has a printing error...
I think is the x164pb09
Can i sell the minifig with this helmet?
Regards!
|
|
|
Author: | WOLKsite | Posted: | Nov 20, 2023 14:41 | Subject: | Length variation of part 23221? | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| All of my 23221 are noticeably different in length (and longer than what the
name describes). Is this a common issue?
Four of these (all except the shortest one, the ones with the brighter green
rubber bands - I don't believe those are LEGO bands) are from a used copy
of 7690. The other one is from my 2007 copy of set 7691.
Of course, it is very hard to make these not bend so much... The baseplate in
the image is 48x48. The brick separators mark the lengths when straightened outs.
This increased length has pretty significant impact on 7690, putting quite a
lot of stress on the bricks. The shortest one is just short of 33 studs long,
the longest is 40.
LEGO describes these as 252 mm (31.5 studs).
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|