Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | batman11223 | Posted: | May 6, 2023 08:40 | Subject: | can someone review my new parts. Indiana jone | Viewed: | 74 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| can someone review my new parts. Indiana jones set minifig parts |
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 5, 2023 00:00 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| And illegitimate chickens (they are wild) |
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | May 4, 2023 23:56 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
I think the problem is not so much that there are illegitimate parts on BrickLink
but rather that there are illegitimate children on BrickLink
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 4, 2023 00:25 | Subject: | Re: 42152 Firefighter Aircraft- Pending inventory | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 1001bricks writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| No crippling dank meme addiction?
|
|
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 4, 2023 00:21 | Subject: | Re: 42152 Firefighter Aircraft- Pending inventory | Viewed: | 25 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| No crippling dank meme addiction?
|
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 4, 2023 00:10 | Subject: | Re: 42152 Firefighter Aircraft- Pending inventory | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| No crippling dank meme addiction? |
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 4, 2023 00:03 | Subject: | Re: 42152 Firefighter Aircraft- Pending inventory | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| Inventories are added by volunteers like you and me
|
That's bizarre, I don't see anything we could have in common you and
me...
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 3, 2023 23:58 | Subject: | Re: 42152 Firefighter Aircraft- Pending inventory | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Inventories are added by volunteers like you and me it was likely pending
approval as someone was working on it but if they never finished it was changed
back to uninventoried
|
Author: | brox999 | Posted: | May 3, 2023 23:48 | Subject: | 42152 Firefighter Aircraft- Pending inventory | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Any idea why this had not been inventoried yet, did see it as pending a while
back but now its back to no information. I think it might have some useful parts
in it but not sure.
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 3, 2023 15:01 | Subject: | Re: Should 4755pb094 and 4555pb268 be merged? | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, bricksahead writes:
| The following two Duplo figures are identical except that the entry for 4555pb094
also includes a drum reel holder which is a part that is detachable.
|
4555pb268 is part of the 4555pb094 assembly.
|
Author: | bricksahead | Posted: | May 3, 2023 14:51 | Subject: | Should 4755pb094 and 4555pb268 be merged? | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The following two Duplo figures are identical except that the entry for 4555pb094
also includes a drum reel holder which is a part that is detachable.
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 3, 2023 14:07 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, wildchicken13 writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
Through the back door
|
Isn't that pretty much the definition of illegitimate in this scenario.
|
The small parts are probably easy enough to smuggle through the front door also...
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 3, 2023 12:43 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, wildchicken13 writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
Through the back door
|
Isn't that pretty much the definition of illegitimate in this scenario.
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 3, 2023 10:51 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, wildchicken13 writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
Through the back door
|
That would be an alternative route, not the kind I intended.
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 3, 2023 09:11 | Subject: | Re: difference between 3245cpb196 and 3245cpb020 | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, pcthurman writes:
| In Catalog, xdennisma writes:
| Good point, the colour and outline of the Rod of Asclepius is a noticeable difference
as well.
What is the proper method to formally propose to BrickLink to add the Rod colour
and/or the logo measurement as a descriptive not, so that it is clearer for users?
Thank you,
Dennis
|
Name change requests have been sent for both pieces.
|
The sticker on this part is transparent, the white color is just the color of
the brick:
* | | 3245cpb020 Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder with Blue EMT Star of Life on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60023 Parts: Brick, Decorated |
So the sticker description should not include "White".
For the other part I can't even say if the sticker has a white or transparent
background:
* | | 3245cpb196 Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder with Blue EMT Star of Life on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60204 Parts: Brick, Decorated |
|
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | May 3, 2023 02:43 | Subject: | Re: difference between 3245cpb196 and 3245cpb020 | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, xdennisma writes:
| Good point, the colour and outline of the Rod of Asclepius is a noticeable difference
as well.
What is the proper method to formally propose to BrickLink to add the Rod colour
and/or the logo measurement as a descriptive not, so that it is clearer for users?
Thank you,
Dennis
|
Name change requests have been sent for both pieces.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 3, 2023 01:04 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
When will items marked for deletion be removed from the catalog?
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemObsolete=Y&v=3
|
I opened up a line of dialogue with BrickLink about this exact topic just a few
weeks ago. I am still awaiting a response, but we hope to start being able to
permanently remove some of them very soon.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | Sadler_Bricks | Posted: | May 3, 2023 00:06 | Subject: | Re: Mr. Freeze helmet falls off, is that right? | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Yeah I believe I had this issue awhile back has a hard time staying together
Sadler_Bricks
|
Author: | xdennisma | Posted: | May 2, 2023 23:12 | Subject: | Re: difference between 3245cpb196 and 3245cpb020 | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Good point, the colour and outline of the Rod of Asclepius is a noticeable difference
as well.
What is the proper method to formally propose to BrickLink to add the Rod colour
and/or the logo measurement as a descriptive not, so that it is clearer for users?
Thank you,
Dennis
|
Author: | Pancakes. | Posted: | May 2, 2023 21:42 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, wildchicken13 writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
Through the back door
|
Yeah or slide a mexico factory worker a couple bucks
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | May 2, 2023 21:33 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
Through the back door
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | May 2, 2023 21:25 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| Huh? I’m confused here: how do they measure these distances?
|
Maybe it's measuring cultural distance?
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 2, 2023 16:03 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
When will items marked for deletion be removed from the catalog?
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemObsolete=Y&v=3
|
I think the answer is never, but that you cannot use them to list new lots.
|
|
Author: | Cob | Posted: | May 2, 2023 15:54 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
When will items marked for deletion be removed from the catalog?
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemObsolete=Y&v=3
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 2, 2023 14:20 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | (Those legitimate routes do not explain the large quantities that seem to have
become available in recent years.)
|
This is the issue with 'rare' test parts. They get made by the people
making the jellybean Vaders and if 'legitimate' parts are allowed then
they can be sold here whereas the other colour ones cannot. So better just to
ban the lot.
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 2, 2023 13:22 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| […]
Or is it that we cannot prove which of these unreleased parts made it out of
the factory by legitimate routes, and which are illegitimate?
That is what I would expect, but I get a bit confused reading the message by
Admin_Russel
|
What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
I understand that they have, for example, been included in charity donations
and have at least once been given away at a LUG event.
(Those legitimate routes do not explain the large quantities that seem to have
become available in recent years.)
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | May 2, 2023 12:58 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| […]
Or is it that we cannot prove which of these unreleased parts made it out of
the factory by legitimate routes, and which are illegitimate?
That is what I would expect, but I get a bit confused reading the message by
Admin_Russel
|
What would be a legitimate route for test parts to make it out of the factory?
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 2, 2023 12:20 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
|
Or is it that we cannot prove which of these unreleased parts made it out of
the factory by legitimate routes, and which are illegitimate?
That is what I would expect, but I get a bit confused reading the message by
Admin_Russel
|
|
Author: | rab1234 | Posted: | May 2, 2023 11:16 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Excellent post. I couldn't agree more with "Is there a difference between
a genuine test part that was stolen from the factory a decade ago and a new part"...
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| In Catalog, Classicsmiley writes:
| In Catalog, UTLF writes:
| These test prints are for Lego factory use only, they've never been "officially"
released in any sets, so it's essentially the same as the factory leaks we've
seen flood the market in recent years
|
There are a LOT of parts on this site that have never been released in sets!
Q parts, etc. If only parts that have been released in sets are allowed to
be sold, we're in a lot of trouble here.
|
Agreed...
If LEGO has a problem with parts leaking from factories, fine. Address the problem
at the source. But DON'T take it out on the honest, hard working sellers
here by taking blind guesses as to what prototypes to allow or now...
|
Isn't the issue that (honest, hard working) sellers here are buying the illegitimate
parts and trying to sell them here? When setting a rule to stop the sale of illegitimate
parts, sometimes illegitimate parts that would have been allowed in the past
will now get swept up. Is there a difference between a genuine test part that
was stolen from the factory a decade ago and a new part in the same colour (or
a different non-production colour) illegitimately made specifically for the collector
market.
Ban all of these "prototypes" and it will be clear which are allowed
- none.
It woudl be straightforward to ban all minifigure "prototype" parts but
allow non-minifigure parts in non-production colours that were produced for parks,
etc. mainly as it is the minifigure parts that are driving the current craze.
|
|
|
Author: | legoman77 | Posted: | May 2, 2023 10:34 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
What about the test pieces that are red? I remember Star Wars helmet, early
trees, wolf, and more. Are they disappearing also, or is there a double standard?
John P
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 2, 2023 06:10 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
I am not sure I understand this. What was the problem exactly? The quantity of
items for sale, the existence and sales of other colours (at often ridiculous
prices), or both?
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 2, 2023 05:57 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
When I first tried to add these parts to the catalog, they were rejected.
I was surprised that they were accepted later.
By now, I have seen at least 4 different patterns for the head, 3 different patterns
for the legs assembly, 2 different patterns for the torso, and several patterns
on other parts like bricks and plates. I am excited about seeing them and would
love to have some, but to be honest I do not think that they all belong in the
catalog.
In recent years, several of these parts have found legitimate ways out of the
factory, so I hope that sales as custom items remain allowed.
Image for reference, so people know which items we are discussing here
|
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 2, 2023 04:12 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| In Catalog, Classicsmiley writes:
| In Catalog, UTLF writes:
| These test prints are for Lego factory use only, they've never been "officially"
released in any sets, so it's essentially the same as the factory leaks we've
seen flood the market in recent years
|
There are a LOT of parts on this site that have never been released in sets!
Q parts, etc. If only parts that have been released in sets are allowed to
be sold, we're in a lot of trouble here.
|
Agreed...
If LEGO has a problem with parts leaking from factories, fine. Address the problem
at the source. But DON'T take it out on the honest, hard working sellers
here by taking blind guesses as to what prototypes to allow or now...
|
Isn't the issue that (honest, hard working) sellers here are buying the illegitimate
parts and trying to sell them here? When setting a rule to stop the sale of illegitimate
parts, sometimes illegitimate parts that would have been allowed in the past
will now get swept up. Is there a difference between a genuine test part that
was stolen from the factory a decade ago and a new part in the same colour (or
a different non-production colour) illegitimately made specifically for the collector
market.
Ban all of these "prototypes" and it will be clear which are allowed
- none.
It woudl be straightforward to ban all minifigure "prototype" parts but
allow non-minifigure parts in non-production colours that were produced for parks,
etc. mainly as it is the minifigure parts that are driving the current craze.
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | May 2, 2023 01:34 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 106 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, macebobo writes:
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
So, are the good listings going to be restored? From a seller's perspective,
this looks incredibly short sighted and gives me pause to list any more Q elements
or non production parts purchased at Lego Land parks.
|
We can't tell the good listings from the bad, so they all have to go. Please
note we are only taking this kind of severe action on a limited number of minifigure
parts, not on every brick and plate.
These test head entries will likely be merged / deleted in the next 24 hours.
|
|
Author: | macebobo | Posted: | May 2, 2023 01:18 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
So, are the good listings going to be restored? From a seller's perspective,
this looks incredibly short sighted and gives me pause to list any more Q elements
or non production parts purchased at Lego Land parks.
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | May 2, 2023 00:57 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 120 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Unfortunately, there were several Glow in Dark lots for sale and there were hundreds
of the white ones. As with some of the other colors / parts, we do end up removing
some good listings with the bad.
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | May 2, 2023 00:56 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 1001bricks writes:
| […]
Wow - then even chatGPT is the wrong?
|
The question should be “when is chatGPT ever right?”
| Canada is the country closest to the USA. The distance between the two countries
varies depending on the specific locations being compared, but the shortest distance
between any point in the contiguous United States and Canada is approximately
6 miles (9.7 kilometers) at the border crossing between Northwest Angle, Minnesota,
and Manitoba, Canada. […]
|
Huh? I’m confused here: how do they measure these distances?
What are they measuring? The distance between two towns?
Why? Out-of-town people aren’t considered living in the country?
And from where do they measure the distances? The townhall? The geographic
center of the town?
Why? The outskirts of the town (but still inside the official town limits) aren’t
considered in the town?
And if they use the townhall/center of town for the distance between two cities,
why aren’t they using the capital/center of country for the distance between
two countries?
And if they use the towns’ nearest limits, why aren’t they using the countries’
nearest borders? Double standards.
That’s ludicrous. Countries with a common border are 0 miles / 0km / 0 furlongs
apart. There’s no ‘no-man zone’ between them.
(Yes, waking up grumpy. Grumpf!)
|
|
Author: | Yo_Yo_Flamingo | Posted: | May 1, 2023 23:42 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Classicsmiley writes:
| In Catalog, UTLF writes:
| These test prints are for Lego factory use only, they've never been "officially"
released in any sets, so it's essentially the same as the factory leaks we've
seen flood the market in recent years
|
There are a LOT of parts on this site that have never been released in sets!
Q parts, etc. If only parts that have been released in sets are allowed to
be sold, we're in a lot of trouble here.
|
Agreed...
If LEGO has a problem with parts leaking from factories, fine. Address the problem
at the source. But DON'T take it out on the honest, hard working sellers
here by taking blind guesses as to what prototypes to allow or now...
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 1, 2023 23:35 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| france is probably closer
|
Wow - then even chatGPT is the wrong?
Canada is the country closest to the USA. The distance between the two countries
varies depending on the specific locations being compared, but the shortest distance
between any point in the contiguous United States and Canada is approximately
6 miles (9.7 kilometers) at the border crossing between Northwest Angle, Minnesota,
and Manitoba, Canada.
Mexico is located south of the USA and is farther away than Canada. The distance
between the United States and Mexico varies based on the specific locations being
compared, but the shortest distance between the two countries is approximately
55 miles (88.5 kilometers) at the border crossing between San Diego, California,
and Tijuana, Mexico.
France is located across the Atlantic Ocean from the USA and is not close in
terms of distance. The distance between the United States and France varies based
on the specific locations being compared, but the shortest distance between any
point in the USA and France is approximately 3,500 miles (5,630 kilometers) from
the East Coast of the USA to the coast of France.
Thank you!
But I'm off, tired and such - cheers all!
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 1, 2023 23:29 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| france is probably closer |
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 1, 2023 23:28 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | Oh no - I've a dozen of those, shiny brand new from about 2005, with some
some not even in Catalog
|
at least we know who started the Mexico factory runs
|
Ya know, Canada is just the northern Mexico... just to say
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 1, 2023 23:24 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Oh no - I've a dozen of those, shiny brand new from about 2005, with some
some not even in Catalog
|
at least we know who started the Mexico factory runs
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 1, 2023 23:18 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Yo_Yo_Flamingo writes:
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Oh no - I've a dozen of those, shiny brand new from about 2005, with some
some not even in Catalog
|
|
Author: | Classicsmiley | Posted: | May 1, 2023 22:29 | Subject: | Re: "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, UTLF writes:
| These test prints are for Lego factory use only, they've never been "officially"
released in any sets, so it's essentially the same as the factory leaks we've
seen flood the market in recent years
|
There are a LOT of parts on this site that have never been released in sets!
Q parts, etc. If only parts that have been released in sets are allowed to
be sold, we're in a lot of trouble here.
|
Author: | Yo_Yo_Flamingo | Posted: | May 1, 2023 21:50 | Subject: | "Not a legitimate part"? | Viewed: | 323 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I see today that all listings for [P=3626cpb2715,1] (and similar test prints)
have been removed from sale.
Why? These test prints have been around for yeeaaaars, long long before the leaks
started coming out of the mexico factory.
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | May 1, 2023 20:31 | Subject: | Recently deleted items | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why are these being deleted?
[p=3626cpb2715]
[p=3626bpb2715]
the reason "This item was marked for deletion because it was likely not a
legitimate part." makes no sense.
I received them in the same bulk parts bin from Lego as the following items
Bret
|
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | May 1, 2023 01:22 | Subject: | Re: Technic, Plate 2 x 16 witch 15 holes | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jaca8822 writes:
| how i can add this brick to catalog ?
|
Here is a link that should help you.
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
|
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | May 1, 2023 01:16 | Subject: | Re: difference between 3245cpb196 and 3245cpb020 | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, xdennisma writes:
| Hello,
I would like to propose adding a note to distinguish between parts 3245cpb196
and 3245cpb020. I cannot find a way to formally submit this for catalog consideration.
The major difference between the two is that the logo on 3245cpb196 is slightly
larger. The logo on 3245cpb196 measures 11mm from top to bottom, while the logo
on 3245cpb020 is only 9mm from top to bottom.
Thank you,
Dennis
|
The biggest difference between the 2 stickered parts is the Rod of Asclepius
in the middle.
The Rod is white on part 3245cpb196.
The rod is blue and outlined in white on part 3245cpb020.
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | May 1, 2023 00:06 | Subject: | Re: difference between 3245cpb196 and 3245cpb020 | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, xdennisma writes:
| Hello,
I would like to propose adding a note to distinguish between parts 3245cpb196
and 3245cpb020. I cannot find a way to formally submit this for catalog consideration.
The major difference between the two is that the logo on 3245cpb196 is slightly
larger. The logo on 3245cpb196 measures 11mm from top to bottom, while the logo
on 3245cpb020 is only 9mm from top to bottom.
Thank you,
Dennis
|
* | | 3245cpb196 Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder with Blue EMT Star of Life on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60204 Parts: Brick, Decorated |
* | | 3245cpb020 Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder with Blue EMT Star of Life on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60023 Parts: Brick, Decorated |
|
|
Author: | xdennisma | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 20:22 | Subject: | difference between 3245cpb196 and 3245cpb020 | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I would like to propose adding a note to distinguish between parts 3245cpb196
and 3245cpb020. I cannot find a way to formally submit this for catalog consideration.
The major difference between the two is that the logo on 3245cpb196 is slightly
larger. The logo on 3245cpb196 measures 11mm from top to bottom, while the logo
on 3245cpb020 is only 9mm from top to bottom.
Thank you,
Dennis
|
Author: | jaca8822 | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 19:41 | Subject: | Technic, Plate 2 x 16 witch 15 holes | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| how i can add this brick to catalog ? |
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 18:31 | Subject: | Re: Mr. Freeze helmet falls off, is that right? | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In General, abriggs writes:
| Hello, thanks for your reply! I did have the right part but it doesn't stay
secured. I went through all of my domes and found one that was part #26415 and
that one fits securely. Aesthetically they are the same part but there is some
small difference. I still question if Bricklink has the right part in the inventory.
In the items for sale, multiple sellers state that the helmet is loose. Thanks
for your input though, I needed a second opinion.
|
BL differentiates
[p=30151b]
(the part in the inventory)
and
[p=30151a]
an older version (never used in minifigs) with a noticeable difference (the stud).
But 30151b has 26451 and 38708 listed as alternate numbers. That means the part
is found with these numbers inscribed on them but no one found any difference
between them.
But maybe there’s differences. After all, when LEGO changes the mould number,
it’s sometimes for a real reason (the mould is different) and not just to spite
us (which they do a lot too, reusing the same number for different moulds).
Or it’s just a difference in the phase of the Moon when the parts were produced
and it happens you found one that holds better.
|
|
Author: | abriggs | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 18:20 | Subject: | Re: Mr. Freeze helmet falls off, is that right? | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Hello, thanks for your reply! I did have the right part but it doesn't stay
secured. I went through all of my domes and found one that was part #26415 and
that one fits securely. Aesthetically they are the same part but there is some
small difference. I still question if Bricklink has the right part in the inventory.
In the items for sale, multiple sellers state that the helmet is loose. Thanks
for your input though, I needed a second opinion.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 13:33 | Subject: | Re: Minifig from Item No: 912302-1 | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, DukeofRokerUk writes:
| Shouldn’t the minifigure from Item No: 912302-1 have its own SW number given
that it comes with just the helmet and no hair?
As far as I can see the only difference between sw1220 and sw1255 is that sw1255
doesn’t come with just the hood and without the hair piece would follow the same
logic? If not then I can’t see why sw1255 is its own sw number?
|
Minifigures in the catalog are based on how they are shown built in set instructions,
and they do not contain any extra hair pieces or helmets included with the sets.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | DukeofRokerUk | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 13:29 | Subject: | Minifig from Item No: 912302-1 | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Shouldn’t the minifigure from Item No: 912302-1 have its own SW number given
that it comes with just the helmet and no hair?
As far as I can see the only difference between sw1220 and sw1255 is that sw1255
doesn’t come with just the hood and without the hair piece would follow the same
logic? If not then I can’t see why sw1255 is its own sw number?
|
|
Author: | Nicolasamico37 | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 11:20 | Subject: | Re: Mr. Freeze helmet falls off, is that right? | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In General, abriggs writes:
| Hey Everyone, I have a sh319 Mr. Freeze minifig but I'm finding his helmet
just falls off since there is no way to anchor/snap it to the armor. I'm
wondering if the part in the minifig inventory is right. This minifig can't
be played with his helmet just balanced instead of anchored. Am I missing something?
|
Hi,
I don't have this Mr. Freeze Minifigure, but I have Red Hood, from The LEGO
Batman Movie Minifigures Series 1.
They both have the same Armor Breastplate and Brick round 2x2 on top.
On Red Hood, the dome stay in place enough securely, I think.
Do you have the right Dome ? The mold number is inside
Nicolas
|
|
Author: | abriggs | Posted: | Apr 30, 2023 10:38 | Subject: | Mr. Freeze helmet falls off, is that right? | Viewed: | 148 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hey Everyone, I have a sh319 Mr. Freeze minifig but I'm finding his helmet
just falls off since there is no way to anchor/snap it to the armor. I'm
wondering if the part in the minifig inventory is right. This minifig can't
be played with his helmet just balanced instead of anchored. Am I missing something?
|
Author: | Prong | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 08:08 | Subject: | Re: Quick question! | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickwilbo writes:
| In Catalog, Prong writes:
| Is there a way to list a part with sticker applied if it's not in the set
inventory?
I.e.
Set 60283-1
Part 61484
The sticker is applied but not sure if just to put that in listing description.
Have seen other items where the part with sticker has its own counterpart number.
|
You can add it to the Catalog.
|
Thanks!
|
Author: | Brickwilbo | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 07:49 | Subject: | Re: Quick question! | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Prong writes:
| Is there a way to list a part with sticker applied if it's not in the set
inventory?
I.e.
Set 60283-1
Part 61484
The sticker is applied but not sure if just to put that in listing description.
Have seen other items where the part with sticker has its own counterpart number.
|
You can add it to the Catalog.
|
Author: | coevorden01 | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 07:49 | Subject: | Re: Quick question! | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Prong writes:
| Is there a way to list a part with sticker applied if it's not in the set
inventory?
I.e.
Set 60283-1
Part 61484
The sticker is applied but not sure if just to put that in listing description.
Have seen other items where the part with sticker has its own counterpart number.
|
shop in poland part it as custom item
|
Author: | Prong | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 07:43 | Subject: | Quick question! | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Is there a way to list a part with sticker applied if it's not in the set
inventory?
I.e.
Set 60283-1
Part 61484
The sticker is applied but not sure if just to put that in listing description.
Have seen other items where the part with sticker has its own counterpart number.
|
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 06:02 | Subject: | Re: Newest minifigure Star Wars | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, luponera writes:
| Hello
Does anybody know how to get updates on new released minifigures. In my case
specifically Star Wars mini figures. As every now and then new figures are released.
Maybe there is a way to track it, get notifications. Or simply see on bricklink
the latest additions.
Thank you soo much for helping.
|
The newest minifigures will tend to have the highest numbers in the item identification
such as sw0794. So make a note of the highest ones you have seen, then any higher
ones will likely be newer. Sorting by item number will show you a list of the
new ones.
|
|
Author: | coevorden01 | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 04:36 | Subject: | Re: Newest minifigure Star Wars | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, luponera writes:
| Hello
Does anybody know how to get updates on new released minifigures. In my case
specifically Star Wars mini figures. As every now and then new figures are released.
Maybe there is a way to track it, get notifications. Or simply see on bricklink
the latest additions.
Thank you soo much for helping.
|
go to startpage from bricklink, press minifigures, press starwars
then year released, down
here you go
|
Author: | luponera | Posted: | Apr 29, 2023 04:05 | Subject: | Newest minifigure Star Wars | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello
Does anybody know how to get updates on new released minifigures. In my case
specifically Star Wars mini figures. As every now and then new figures are released.
Maybe there is a way to track it, get notifications. Or simply see on bricklink
the latest additions.
Thank you soo much for helping.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 22:56 | Subject: | Re: Forever to catalogue 77013 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SJRB writes:
| I'm wondering why it takes so long for people that apply to catalogue sets
to actually do so, It seems like a job that should only take a few hours at most.
I've been waiting to part out 77013 for weeks now. Can anyone enlighten me
as to why it takes so long?
|
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1400360
Not to mention that the inventory is being completed by a Catalog Admin who has
limited time to do it with his additional responsibilities for the site.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 22:54 | Subject: | Re: Forever to catalogue 77013 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| It's fully done by volunteers like you and me. sets often take many days
from verifying the exact piece count to adding new items to the catalogue. it's
no simple task
|
Author: | SJRB | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 22:50 | Subject: | Forever to catalogue 77013 | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I'm wondering why it takes so long for people that apply to catalogue sets
to actually do so, It seems like a job that should only take a few hours at most.
I've been waiting to part out 77013 for weeks now. Can anyone enlighten me
as to why it takes so long?
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 06:09 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!!
Any help with the reference of this minifig? Can't find this exact torso...
Regards!
|
|
Thanks!!
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 06:09 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, uvt203 writes:
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!!
Any help with the reference of this minifig? Can't find this exact torso...
Regards!
|
|
Thanks!!
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 06:08 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!!
Any help with the reference of this minifig? Can't find this exact torso...
Regards!
|
|
Author: | uvt203 | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 06:08 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!!
Any help with the reference of this minifig? Can't find this exact torso...
Regards!
|
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Apr 28, 2023 06:01 | Subject: | HELP! | Viewed: | 125 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!!
Any help with the reference of this minifig? Can't find this exact torso...
Regards!
|
|
Author: | SimplyBricks | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 16:58 | Subject: | Re: ADD 'TECHNIC, FLEX CABLE 21L' (bb0008c21L) | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dnabrix writes:
| Suggestion:
ADD 'TECHNIC, FLEX CABLE 21L' (bb0008c21L)
Best,
Dylan from DNA Brix
|
Hi,
Are you sure it's 21 long and not 20 (bb0008c20L)
|
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 14:28 | Subject: | Re: ADD 'TECHNIC, FLEX CABLE 21L' (bb0008c21L) | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dnabrix writes:
| Suggestion:
ADD 'TECHNIC, FLEX CABLE 21L' (bb0008c21L)
Best,
Dylan from DNA Brix
|
What LEGO set does this appear in? In order for an item to be added to the catalog,
it first must have been created by The LEGO Group. After that, it has to have
been molded and put into production, or exist as a genuine LEGO spare part with
a means to order it as a spare part.
You can't ask for a non-existent element to be added to the catalog. If you
have a genuine LEGO element of that description and a set that it came in that
was actually and really produced by LEGO, or know the means of it's creation,
you need to show that it is in a LEGO set that exists, or explain how it exists.
Please note that while prototype elements may exist, it is the decision of the
Catalog Admins as to whether or not the part will be added to the BrickLink database.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
Author: | dnabrix | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 13:49 | Subject: | ADD 'TECHNIC, FLEX CABLE 21L' (bb0008c21L) | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Suggestion:
ADD 'TECHNIC, FLEX CABLE 21L' (bb0008c21L)
Best,
Dylan from DNA Brix
|
Author: | Leftoverbricks | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 09:41 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Classicsmiley writes:
| In Catalog, brickfrero writes:
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Any help with this part number...
Thanks!
|
23186
|
|
This is the way!
|
Author: | Classicsmiley | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 09:39 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brickfrero writes:
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Any help with this part number...
Thanks!
|
23186
|
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 06:34 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brickfrero writes:
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Any help with this part number...
Thanks!
|
23186
|
Thanks!!
|
Author: | brickfrero | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 06:32 | Subject: | Re: HELP! | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brunocandeias writes:
| Hello!
Any help with this part number...
Thanks!
|
23186
|
Author: | brunocandeias | Posted: | Apr 27, 2023 06:23 | Subject: | HELP! | Viewed: | 133 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
Any help with this part number...
Thanks!
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | Apr 26, 2023 17:17 | Subject: | Re: window 60601pb017 color description | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, TeeBoxLu writes:
| The description says "gold". I have two different dye lots and prints.
Neither one has a trace of gold. Both lots I have received are tan (brick yellow)
over transparent. Is the bricklink description wrong?
|
The name has been corrected, thanks for spotting this.
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 26, 2023 17:09 | Subject: | Re: window 60601pb017 color description | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, TeeBoxLu writes:
| The description says "gold". I have two different dye lots and prints.
Neither one has a trace of gold. Both lots I have received are tan (brick yellow)
over transparent. Is the bricklink description wrong?
|
Er, I thought they were correctly described as Tan but there’s nothing in the
changelog about that.
IMHO, they clearly are to match the rest of the Tan walls.
|
Author: | TeeBoxLu | Posted: | Apr 26, 2023 16:34 | Subject: | window 60601pb017 color description | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The description says "gold". I have two different dye lots and prints.
Neither one has a trace of gold. Both lots I have received are tan (brick yellow)
over transparent. Is the bricklink description wrong?
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 26, 2023 01:43 | Subject: | Re: Second Opinion | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Perfect! Thanks! |
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | Apr 26, 2023 01:05 | Subject: | Re: Second Opinion | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| just wanted to double-check with someone who has these to confirm that the real
lego ones are a more "flexible" plastic type and don't have any mould
numbers as I recently found 5 in a purchase and just wanted to double-check before
listing
|
Yes, that is correct. They should be semi-flexible and none of ours have any
mold numbers on them. The backsides are smooth.
They are from a sealed set my husband received on his 10th birthday.
Cass T
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 25, 2023 22:42 | Subject: | Second Opinion | Viewed: | 141 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| just wanted to double-check with someone who has these to confirm that the real
lego ones are a more "flexible" plastic type and don't have any mould
numbers as I recently found 5 in a purchase and just wanted to double-check before
listing
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 25, 2023 20:33 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| it makes the boxes very spacious |
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 22, 2023 18:42 | Subject: | Re: Curious | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Perfect! Thanks! |
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 22, 2023 18:09 | Subject: | Re: Curious | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| this part
has the same part number of 44827 as these 2
[P=44827pb03,12][P=44827pb02,12] but looking at the pictures only the 2 newer
ones seem to be the same shape and I was wondering if it has the wrong number
maybe
|
They are Plastic parts, so they should be numbered according to their Design
Numbers, which I have just now updated for the ones that are available to verify:
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 22, 2023 17:34 | Subject: | Curious | Viewed: | 90 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| this part
has the same part number of 44827 as these 2
[P=44827pb03,12][P=44827pb02,12] but looking at the pictures only the 2 newer
ones seem to be the same shape and I was wondering if it has the wrong number
maybe
|
Author: | mateusz_welka | Posted: | Apr 20, 2023 02:07 | Subject: | Re: 6057 different lenght - topic update | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Difference is because of different distance and different cut of image. both
are almoast same 2mm difference
|
Author: | jenwick | Posted: | Apr 19, 2023 09:56 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 100 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank you for the heads up and explaining the logic behind the decision. I strongly
believe that the extended descriptor should stay for a minimum on a year.
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 18, 2023 21:24 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 1001bricks writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| I like to learn as I go the other day I put together with help from ChatGPT
a 60k character page
|
Loser, this is for 1+ million of chars:
https://assets.angio.net/pi1000000.txt
See also the impressive style sheet they use!
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Apr 18, 2023 20:59 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 63 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| I like to learn as I go the other day I put together with help from ChatGPT
a 60k character page
|
Loser, this is for 1+ million of chars:
https://assets.angio.net/pi1000000.txt
See also the impressive style sheet they use!
|
Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | Apr 18, 2023 20:57 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | It's a nerd's joke, I know...
|
I get chat GPT to write all my CSS
|
Just use vanilla bootstrap (which is what BL should do as well)
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 18, 2023 20:54 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I like to learn as I go the other day I put together with help from ChatGPT
a 60k character page
but I agree ChatGPT is probably better at CSS than me
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Apr 18, 2023 20:48 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | It's a nerd's joke, I know...
|
I get chat GPT to write all my CSS
|
That's fine! I'm sure it does a better job than you at this
But read https://www.w3schools.com/ whatever, and progressively understand what
it does?
You learn something, you get some more power
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 18, 2023 20:33 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | It's a nerd's joke, I know...
|
I get chat GPT to write all my CSS
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|