Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Dino | Posted: | Mar 5, 2022 15:25 | Subject: | Re: Separate buyer and seller addresses | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Poncke writes:
| Please please separate buyer and seller addresses on a hybrid account.
Keep one main address set fixed on the account, but let sellers have the option
to use separate shipping addresses that do not have an impact on your store status.
I find it ridiculous that my store gets closed if I want to have something shipped
to another country.
Amazon, eBay, etc all have the option to change a shipping address.
Please implement this!
|
But you are aware that the seller loses his seller protection if the payment
is made via Paypal and the shipping address does not match the Paypal address?
With Stripe it should be the same.
|
|
Author: | Dino | Posted: | Mar 5, 2022 15:19 | Subject: | Re: Separate buyer and seller addresses | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, wildchicken13 writes:
| In Suggestions, Poncke writes:
| Please please separate buyer and seller addresses on a hybrid account.
Keep one main address set fixed on the account, but let sellers have the option
to use separate shipping addresses that do not have an impact on your store status.
I find it ridiculous that my store gets closed if I want to have something shipped
to another country.
Amazon, eBay, etc all have the option to change a shipping address.
Please implement this!
|
Step 2 of the checkout process lets you ship to any address without having your
store closed.
|
You can't change the country.
|
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | Mar 5, 2022 15:09 | Subject: | Re: Separate buyer and seller addresses | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Poncke writes:
| Please please separate buyer and seller addresses on a hybrid account.
Keep one main address set fixed on the account, but let sellers have the option
to use separate shipping addresses that do not have an impact on your store status.
I find it ridiculous that my store gets closed if I want to have something shipped
to another country.
Amazon, eBay, etc all have the option to change a shipping address.
Please implement this!
|
Step 2 of the checkout process lets you ship to any address without having your
store closed.
|
|
|
Author: | Poncke | Posted: | Mar 5, 2022 14:52 | Subject: | Separate buyer and seller addresses | Viewed: | 165 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Please please separate buyer and seller addresses on a hybrid account.
Keep one main address set fixed on the account, but let sellers have the option
to use separate shipping addresses that do not have an impact on your store status.
I find it ridiculous that my store gets closed if I want to have something shipped
to another country.
Amazon, eBay, etc all have the option to change a shipping address.
Please implement this!
|
|
Author: | iprice | Posted: | Mar 2, 2022 16:40 | Subject: | Re: My inventory (non-seller) | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, antant7 writes:
| In Suggestions, stasher writes:
| Hello. This is my first post. Be patient with me.
I would like to be able to mark a set as in my inventory. I would like to mark
individual bricks as in my inventory. I would like to go to a random set and
then this site lets me know if I have enough pieces in my inventory to build
that set.
(this is implemented on Peeron but not here, from what I can see)
Thank you.
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think what you are describing is closer
to the functionality of rebrickable.
|
Brickset is closer to what the OP wants if I'm not mistaken, although Rebrickable
does offer some of the reuired features I don't think it enables you to store
your sets like Brickset (I most definitely could be wrong though).
|
|
Author: | antant7 | Posted: | Mar 2, 2022 16:30 | Subject: | Re: My inventory (non-seller) | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, stasher writes:
| Hello. This is my first post. Be patient with me.
I would like to be able to mark a set as in my inventory. I would like to mark
individual bricks as in my inventory. I would like to go to a random set and
then this site lets me know if I have enough pieces in my inventory to build
that set.
(this is implemented on Peeron but not here, from what I can see)
Thank you.
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think what you are describing is closer
to the functionality of rebrickable.
|
|
Author: | stasher | Posted: | Mar 2, 2022 16:02 | Subject: | My inventory (non-seller) | Viewed: | 113 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hello. This is my first post. Be patient with me.
I would like to be able to mark a set as in my inventory. I would like to mark
individual bricks as in my inventory. I would like to go to a random set and
then this site lets me know if I have enough pieces in my inventory to build
that set.
(this is implemented on Peeron but not here, from what I can see)
Thank you.
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | Feb 28, 2022 15:07 | Subject: | Re: wanted list orders | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tbohlsen writes:
| Would be nice once a order is set to completed it would up date the wanted list
|
Use the "apply order" button. Be careful not to apply the same order twice!
|
|
Author: | tbohlsen | Posted: | Feb 28, 2022 15:04 | Subject: | wanted list orders | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Would be nice once a order is set to completed it would up date the wanted list |
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Feb 25, 2022 08:18 | Subject: | Re: Sort by seller on Items for sale tab on part | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, biker72 writes:
| Hi all,
Is it possible to add a sort option on seller in the Items For Sale tab on the
parts page?
At this point of time each color is seperately shown as intended.
As I am often looking for more colors of the same part it is convenient if I
can sort on seller. So I can easily see if a certain seller has more than one
color available.
Regards,
Dennis
|
If this became an option, then user names and/or store names would become things
like "AAAAAAAA Bricks" or "A1 Bricks" as sellers manipulate names to appear higher
in the list.
|
|
Author: | Andrsv | Posted: | Feb 25, 2022 08:11 | Subject: | Re: Sort by seller on Items for sale tab on part | Viewed: | 9 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, biker72 writes:
| Hi all,
Is it possible to add a sort option on seller in the Items For Sale tab on the
parts page?
At this point of time each color is seperately shown as intended.
As I am often looking for more colors of the same part it is convenient if I
can sort on seller. So I can easily see if a certain seller has more than one
color available.
Regards,
Dennis
|
Sounds like you should create a wanted list and add all needed parts there
then you can search for sellers who has all parts you need, much more convinient
|
|
Author: | biker72 | Posted: | Feb 25, 2022 08:04 | Subject: | Sort by seller on Items for sale tab on part | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hi all,
Is it possible to add a sort option on seller in the Items For Sale tab on the
parts page?
At this point of time each color is seperately shown as intended.
As I am often looking for more colors of the same part it is convenient if I
can sort on seller. So I can easily see if a certain seller has more than one
color available.
Regards,
Dennis
|
|
Author: | patrickgill | Posted: | Feb 23, 2022 16:32 | Subject: | Display part notes when shopping wanted list | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I was rather disappointed when on a recent order I received a number of broken,
heavily damaged, and heavily discoloured parts, and was even more surprised when
the order showed that those parts were listed as such. Somehow I had purchased
a number of parts that I am quite literally going to throw straight in the bin.
I suspect I am not the first person this has happened to, and that I won't
be the last.
As far as I can tell, this happened because there is no visibility of the part
notes when shopping a wanted list. In my case, I shopped my wanted list with
~300 parts, and used the auto-select option. The store selection - both in the
confirm and edit views - doesn't show the part notes. To make matters worse,
the auto-select option will favour damaged parts because they are cheaper.
I then created the carts. When viewing the carts, notes are visible, but this
stage is too late to find out about bad parts, because rejecting them here means
having to re-select these from elsewhere. In other words, going back to store
selection, and potentially having to exclude stores or set a desired "new" condition
on those parts. It becomes a very manual process, and I probably don't want
new parts as they will stand out in a second hand set. Note also that the notes
are not highlighted in the cart view - the dimmer grey colour means its easy
to gloss over those.
It would be great if part notes where shown in the "confirm selection" and "edit
selection" modals when shopping a wanted list.
While we're at it, it would be great if there was a "damaged" part state,
to go with "new" and "used", as I definitely do not want damaged parts. Or perhaps
a grading?
|
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Feb 23, 2022 05:18 | Subject: | Re: Visable last sold price, even after long time | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| In Suggestions, jarrovlissingen writes:
| I woud like to see the last known sellingprice for an item, no matter how long
ago it sold.
Now we can only see the sales from last 6 months and the items for sale.
But sometimes an item is no longer for sale and it has been more than 6 months
since a sale, I would still like to know what it was sold for.
Why? For my insurrance policy...
Is it an good idea to change it to what I suggest? How do I make it happen??
|
Obviously the price guide is just a guide anyway, but there is the downside that
something that sold for example seven years ago will have changed in value. The
idea of the price guide is that it is current. Under your plan if a part sold
765 days ago for $60 and a broken one sold for $10 760 days ago, then only the
last price would show. Whereas if they both sold within six months then both
would show in the price guide indicating one was likely defective.
Keeping single out of date data points is not necessarily better than no current
data. Perhaps keeping the last 10 sales if older than six months and the number
of current points us less than 10 is better.
|
Always retaining the last 10 sales has been discussed in the past. I thought
that had already voted YES PLEASE on that one, but I don't see it so I guess
that it was discussed only...
So yes, I would like to see the last 10 sales if there were few sales in the
last 6 months.
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Feb 23, 2022 03:07 | Subject: | Re: Visable last sold price, even after long time | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, jarrovlissingen writes:
| I woud like to see the last known sellingprice for an item, no matter how long
ago it sold.
Now we can only see the sales from last 6 months and the items for sale.
But sometimes an item is no longer for sale and it has been more than 6 months
since a sale, I would still like to know what it was sold for.
Why? For my insurrance policy...
Is it an good idea to change it to what I suggest? How do I make it happen??
|
Obviously the price guide is just a guide anyway, but there is the downside that
something that sold for example seven years ago will have changed in value. The
idea of the price guide is that it is current. Under your plan if a part sold
765 days ago for $60 and a broken one sold for $10 760 days ago, then only the
last price would show. Whereas if they both sold within six months then both
would show in the price guide indicating one was likely defective.
Keeping single out of date data points is not necessarily better than no current
data. Perhaps keeping the last 10 sales if older than six months and the number
of current points us less than 10 is better.
|
|
Author: | maxx3001 | Posted: | Feb 23, 2022 01:17 | Subject: | Re: Visable last sold price, even after long time | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, jarrovlissingen writes:
| I woud like to see the last known sellingprice for an item, no matter how long
ago it sold.
Now we can only see the sales from last 6 months and the items for sale.
But sometimes an item is no longer for sale and it has been more than 6 months
since a sale, I would still like to know what it was sold for.
Why? For my insurrance policy...
Is it an good idea to change it to what I suggest? How do I make it happen??
|
Voted yes 👍
|
|
Author: | jarrovlissingen | Posted: | Feb 22, 2022 19:07 | Subject: | Visable last sold price, even after long time | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I woud like to see the last known sellingprice for an item, no matter how long
ago it sold.
Now we can only see the sales from last 6 months and the items for sale.
But sometimes an item is no longer for sale and it has been more than 6 months
since a sale, I would still like to know what it was sold for.
Why? For my insurrance policy...
Is it an good idea to change it to what I suggest? How do I make it happen??
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Feb 22, 2022 08:38 | Subject: | Re: New Relationship - Items Reference Each Other | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| I would like to propose a new relationship for the catalog. Items that reference
each other. Some examples are below.
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
|
Another relation that might be worth mentioning
and
with the same "model number" on parts
and the name Lloyd
in
and
* | | 18910pb003L Panel 3 x 4 x 3 Curved with Double Clip Hinge with 'NO STEP', White Stripes, and Gold Ninjago Logogram 'LLOYD' on Black Chevron Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 70612 Parts: Panel, Decorated |
* | | 18910pb003R Panel 3 x 4 x 3 Curved with Double Clip Hinge with 'NO STEP', White Stripes, and Gold Ninjago Logogram 'LLOYD' on Black Chevron Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 70612 Parts: Panel, Decorated |
|
|
Author: | maxx3001 | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 12:35 | Subject: | Re: Last item sold visable, no matter how log ago | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Price Guide, jarrovlissingen writes:
| I woud like to see the last known sellingprice for an item, no matter how long
ago it sold.
Now we can only see the sales from last 6 months and the items for sale.
But sometimes an item is no longer for sale and it has been more than 6 months
since a sale, I would still like to know what it was sold for.
Why? For my insurrance policy...
Is it an good idea to change it to what I suggest? How do I make it happen??
|
Set your question to SUGGESTIONS.
I’ll support it, it is a good suggestion 👍
Maxx
|
|
Author: | Teup | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 11:44 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | That's just your personal method and opinion. I have soooo many benefits
to category based sorting that remark based sorting seems really stupid to me
|
Sorting is way faster when you're searching something different.
Imagine you're searching for a Black small part in a stack of Black parts
on your table.
It'll be long, tedious and subject to errors.
Now if you're searching for the same part in between many different colors,
it'll be different and way faster.
And if it's the only Black part, then there couldn't be any possible
error.
Of course - but in both cases - assuming your inventory is correct.
In short, searching 1 Torso in between a drawer of 50 different bags of torsos
is like the above solution.
At the contrary, if it's the only bag of Torsos in a drawer with bags of
different parts, you don't have to think at search; your visual search is
optimal, and you read the sticker just to be sure, you don't have to search
using the stickers (reading is long and subject to errors).
Conclusion: I don't sort by Color neither by Category; it's way better.
And it may be an error to think this is stupid
Sylvain
|
Not sure if I see the analogy with colour, but on the topic of colour: I've
noticed that most of my many-lot orders have the same part in multiple colours,
so I get them all out of the same bag. (And there's no need to waste time
searching, either, because the bags are transparent and none are so big that
you can't see the part you need) - just one out of many advantages of category
based sorting.
Well, I'm exaggerating saying it's 'stupid', I know it's
not As clearly many sellers are doing it, so clearly it works for many people.
It's just something I don't understand well, because I haven't learned
how to do it, because I don't have any problems that it could solve. I don't
understand how the remarks get there in the first place (in a way that doesn't
require lots of extra manual labour), or how it works when a lot grows bigger
so you need a different location for it, or what the chronology of the workflow
is when you add parts while some already have locations and some don't. Probably
interesting to watch a video on how it works sometime, but as I said I don't
have any problems - I can stock parts immediately and pick the immediately -
so there isn't really much I could gain from that method even if it was perfect
and remarks were all automatic.
One exception though is minifig parts, your torso example is a good one. I've
got those sorted on minifigure series number, or year, as it would be too
much in one category otherwise. So I am kind of using remarks there. But it's
extra work that's only really worth it for problematic categories like those.
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 11:17 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| | That's just your personal method and opinion. I have soooo many benefits
to category based sorting that remark based sorting seems really stupid to me
|
Sorting is way faster when you're searching something different.
Imagine you're searching for a Black small part in a stack of Black parts
on your table.
It'll be long, tedious and subject to errors.
Now if you're searching for the same part in between many different colors,
it'll be different and way faster.
And if it's the only Black part, then there couldn't be any possible
error.
Of course - but in both cases - assuming your inventory is correct.
In short, searching 1 Torso in between a drawer of 50 different bags of torsos
is like the above solution.
At the contrary, if it's the only bag of Torsos in a drawer with bags of
different parts, you don't have to think at search; your visual search is
optimal, and you read the sticker just to be sure, you don't have to search
using the stickers (reading is long and subject to errors).
Conclusion: I don't sort by Color neither by Category; it's way better.
And it may be an error to think this is stupid
Sylvain
|
|
Author: | qwertyboy | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 10:47 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Teup writes:
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
|
Oh Gosh
While that still could be a problem, the idea is DO NOT use Categories to organize
your Shop Inventory.
At least use the Remarks field - and BrickStore
(some may start to think I've Stock Options there...)
You can put drawer 12 : "#DR12" in Remark for example.
It won't change (unless you change it).
|
That's just your personal method and opinion. I have soooo many benefits
to category based sorting that remark based sorting seems really stupid to me
|
+1
Niek.
|
|
|
Author: | lcgs13 | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 07:03 | Subject: | Search Wanted Lists | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hi, I love BrickLink!!!
As a user I would like to be able to sort the results of a search in my wanted
lists by
- List Name
- List completion
List completion should apeear in front of list name.
Thank you all!
|
|
Author: | Teup | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 06:09 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
"Wait, that part was Minifigures, Weapon, Spacegun. Now it's in Minifigures,
weapon, gun. And now I have to refund the customer because I can't find
it. Or what is currently a 1x1 Technic, Liftarm used to be in Technic and Technic,
Connectors."
Please, when you move something, tell us. Make a list.
Thanks,
Joshua
|
Besides the existence of such lists, there are also topics about it in the forum.
As with all important things, the forum is far from an ideal place for communication,
but at least it's something. Oh, there's actually also the catalog newsletter,
which I hope will continue to be a thing.
I agree this is tricky, and that's why the catmins have been doing the more
drastic changes in batches with a notification about it in the forum at least
1 month ahead of the move. Especially if you have to move not just parts but
entire bins/furniture that's very useful.
(However, last time the admin team came in and decided to use that month to think
about whether or not to approve the proposed changes, which of course ruins the
preparation month completely. Hopefully they won't do that again!)
|
|
Author: | Teup | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 06:00 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
|
Oh Gosh
While that still could be a problem, the idea is DO NOT use Categories to organize
your Shop Inventory.
At least use the Remarks field - and BrickStore
(some may start to think I've Stock Options there...)
You can put drawer 12 : "#DR12" in Remark for example.
It won't change (unless you change it).
|
That's just your personal method and opinion. I have soooo many benefits
to category based sorting that remark based sorting seems really stupid to me
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 05:55 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| That's a list made by users after the fact. I would like a list made by
the people who do the moving.
|
No, it’s not “made by users after the fact.”
That list is automatically compiled from the changes that were accepted:
— manual: a user files a change request,
— manual: an admin accepts it,
— automatic: the request is applied and goes into the log.
|
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 05:48 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Got Links? |
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 21, 2022 05:47 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| That's a list made by users after the fact. I would like a list made by
the people who do the moving.
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 13:28 | Subject: | Re: Choose "List" or "Thumbnail" Cookie. | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| A website issue has been that sometimes a Category page opens with 20 items or
50 items and also it doesn't remember to stay with Thumbnail gallery.
Would you write a Cookie or Setting that remembers the preference?
Thanks,
Joshua
|
At some point, the site opened a pop-up asking you what your cookie preferences
were. If you don't accept all, lots of weird things happen.
There's a bunch of info on the cookies on the footer for the site:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/cookies.page
Hope that helps!
Jen
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 13:23 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
"Wait, that part was Minifigures, Weapon, Spacegun. Now it's in Minifigures,
weapon, gun. And now I have to refund the customer because I can't find
it. Or what is currently a 1x1 Technic, Liftarm used to be in Technic and Technic,
Connectors."
Please, when you move something, tell us. Make a list.
Thanks,
Joshua
|
I also sort my store by Category. It's convenient and makes sense to me.
You have to do a bit of homework to keep it up to date:
1) You can check the Change Log on any part you are having trouble with. It's
on the bottom right-hand corner of any catalog item page. If you can't find
a part in an order right away, check there first! It saves a bunch of time.
2) You can keep on eye on Category changes by looking on the main Market page,
What's New, Changes to Items. Search for Item Category Change.
3) Lists were made for major catalog changes. You can see them in the Help pages
under Catalog: 'Movements in Item Type and Category.'
So, they do tell you and they did make a list. It just takes a bit of work/knowledge
to find it.
Good luck,
Jen
|
|
Author: | hpoort | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 12:11 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
"Wait, that part was Minifigures, Weapon, Spacegun. Now it's in Minifigures,
weapon, gun. And now I have to refund the customer because I can't find
it. Or what is currently a 1x1 Technic, Liftarm used to be in Technic and Technic,
Connectors."
Please, when you move something, tell us. Make a list.
Thanks,
Joshua
|
The list already exists, it is called the catalog change log:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?viewYear=2022&viewMonth=2&viewGeDate=&q=&viewStatus=A&itemType=&viewAction=P
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 12:01 | Subject: | Re: List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
|
Oh Gosh
While that still could be a problem, the idea is DO NOT use Categories to organize
your Shop Inventory.
At least use the Remarks field - and BrickStore
(some may start to think I've Stock Options there...)
You can put drawer 12 : "#DR12" in Remark for example.
It won't change (unless you change it).
|
|
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:53 | Subject: | List of renamed/recategorized items. | Viewed: | 85 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| As you clean up the sight, things get renamed or re-categorized on the site,
but I'm not notified and can move the parts in my physical inventory boxes
accordingly.
"Wait, that part was Minifigures, Weapon, Spacegun. Now it's in Minifigures,
weapon, gun. And now I have to refund the customer because I can't find
it. Or what is currently a 1x1 Technic, Liftarm used to be in Technic and Technic,
Connectors."
Please, when you move something, tell us. Make a list.
Thanks,
Joshua
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:49 | Subject: | Re: Choose "List" or "Thumbnail" Cookie. | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| A website issue has been that sometimes a Category page opens with 20 items or
50 items and also it doesn't remember to stay with Thumbnail gallery.
Would you write a Cookie or Setting that remembers the preference?
|
Save the planet Joshua - use BrickStore, free and open-source, work offline (it
caches everything smartly) and you'll save your precious time and zillions
of web pages bytes.
Same note regarding your previous Suggestion: you can manage it offline FAR easier.
IMHO.
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:47 | Subject: | Re: Delete all negative and neutral feedbacks... | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Joshua.Burrier writes:
| So in short:
Delete feedback of people when they are removed.
|
Voted No of course: you may encounter a (few) bad buying experience(s), then
later on having problems and your priviledges being revoked for whatever reason.
This doesn't mean the previous bad experiences should be erased.
|
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:47 | Subject: | Choose "List" or "Thumbnail" Cookie. | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| A website issue has been that sometimes a Category page opens with 20 items or
50 items and also it doesn't remember to stay with Thumbnail gallery.
Would you write a Cookie or Setting that remembers the preference?
Thanks,
Joshua
|
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:42 | Subject: | Add +/❤ to the Parts Guide | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| These quick-links are very helpful in reducing the number of page loads when
adding items to your inventory or wanted list. It would be nice to bypass the
Part page and get strait to the good stuff.
|
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:37 | Subject: | Re: Delete all negative and neutral feedbacks... | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| So in short:
Delete feedback of people when they are removed.
|
Author: | Joshua.Burrier | Posted: | Feb 20, 2022 11:36 | Subject: | Re: Tired of typing "light/dark bluish gray" ... | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, LackBrain writes:
| It would be really nice if you could just type "lbg" or "dbg" instead of "light
bluish gray" or "dark bluish gray". Saves a lot of typing time ...
Aren't there any shortcuts for colors??
|
Light/Dark Bley
|
Author: | ALEIAS_THINGS | Posted: | Feb 18, 2022 17:50 | Subject: | Additional / Alternative Search | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hi,
Can I search LEGO sets by UPC code on BrickLink?
If yes can I be linked to a how to help form?
If no Can this be an Option?
Thanks
Jason
|
Author: | macebobo | Posted: | Feb 18, 2022 16:56 | Subject: | Allow Custom Message Templates Subject Lines | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| At least the drive thru one. I use the drive thru after my order is delivered,
so "...has been shipped" does not jive with "...has been delivered"
I would like all of the message template subject lines to be editable for other
reasons.
The only related suggestion I could find with our fine search tools was:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=282308&nID=1246983
If there are more or even discussions around this, please feel free to link them
here.
|
|
Author: | WUIt | Posted: | Feb 17, 2022 12:46 | Subject: | Re: Improve and simplify shopping experience | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, SnoopyCh writes:
| In my case I know that I want to buy from 3 specific vendors that have together
all what I need, but I would like to buy the cheapest or the new/used or the
bulk of the best one for each item. I would like to compare each options for
each item between those vendors and get an automatic select of the cheapest that
I could also adjust. It is important to see the price per lot and the total number
of lots to do manual adjustments.
|
I have the same need, but have found that nothing short of copying all prices
to Excel and adding costs for handling and shipment will get the job done. If
you have selected a relatively small number of stores and placed your most important
items in a wishlist without specifying the condition, then you can navigate to
each store in a separate window and press the wishlist filter option. By arranging
the lots in each store into the same order, you will be able to compare the prices
of used and new items across all selected stores (windows will need to be arranged
side by side). Any items already in their carts will be shown on that list. However,
you will manually have to update the carts separately on every page in each store.
Make sure you are comparing the prices for the same item in each store. Take
special care to select the desired total amount of each item in each store so
that you do not end up with unwanted duplicates or omissions by mistake.
|
|
Author: | SnoopyCh | Posted: | Feb 16, 2022 16:47 | Subject: | Re: Wanted list - color schemes | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, markt writes:
| Sometimes I find it is the case that I'm constructing a wanted list with
assorted parts and while not too particular about the color, it is nonetheless
important that some different parts be the same color, whatever it is.
So to facilitate that, I would suggest that one have the ability to specify a
color scheme for any wanted list. For example, say that I intend to build a
three color model, but I am not too particular about the colors. The only thing
I might care about, for instance, is that some subset of the parts be specifically
either all black, all white, or all grey, although I may not be particular about
which.
A color scheme for the wanted list would then look something like this:
A: unspecified
B: black, white, grey
C: unspecified
When specifying the desired color of the part in a wanted list, instead of selecting
a standard color (or "unspecified"), I could alternatively select from one of
the color schemes defined for that wanted list (A-C, in this case). In any
case, each color scheme letter would be a unique color, and all parts that utilize
the same scheme letter would be the exact same color. So if white parts were
found for parts using B, for example, then no parts using A or C will be white.
If one is truly indifferent about the color of the part, then one could still
use the existing "unspecified" mechanism. The important thing here is that during
autopick, all parts referring to the same scheme letter would always have the
exact same color.
The existing workaround to this is to create separate wanted lists that are otherwise
identical except for color, each wanted list looking for the same items, but
with a different set of colors. It is quite tedious for wanted lists with many
different parts, however, and I believe something like the above would simplify
that.
|
I would also like to have in studio the ability to have a varriable color A,B,
C that we can after set to blue or red, changing all part accordingly. That would
allow to see if we can get them after importing them to a wanted list.
|
|
Author: | SnoopyCh | Posted: | Feb 16, 2022 16:40 | Subject: | Re: Improve and simplify shopping experience | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, BrickBen writes:
| Current issues: The "Buy All" wizard is not always optimal, so when I am looking
to add parts or minifigures, I want to use the same vendors, especially since
it's ordered by price. I have to have several tabs open to see with what
vendors I have open baskets in my cart and then browse through their oftentimes
massive stores to see if they have other items on my wishlist.
Suggestion: In a view in which vendors are compared (e.g., if I click on a set,
part or minifigure), add 2 icons for whether the vendor is in my basket already
and how many parts/minifigures this vendor is selling that are in my basket.
|
In my case I know that I want to buy from 3 specific vendors that have togather
all what I need, but I would like to buy the cheapest or the new/used or the
bulk of the best one for each item. I would like to compare each options for
each item between those vendors and get an automatic select of the cheapest that
I could also adjust. It is important to see the price per lot and the total number
of lots to do manual adjustments.
This step could also come after an auto select or manual select.
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Feb 16, 2022 04:34 | Subject: | Re: A 0 + 5 Stars Feedback system for BrickLink | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| If they are going to make changes to feedback, then they are going to need to
think about what the point of feedback is. For me, the only real reason is ...
is a seller reliable.
My stance is buyer feedback is pointless. Sellers cannot stop buyers from buying
based on feedback (aside from overall negative), so buyers having feedback is
really just a badge to show how many orders they place. So why not get rid of
it completely, and just have an order count showing for buyers. NPBs exist for
buyers that don't pay. eBay's positive only for buyers is pretty pathetic.
There is no point to feedback if it can only be positive, just get rid of it
and show the order count instead. Otherwise buyer feedback is just a count of
how many sellers can be bothered to leave fairly pointless buyer feedback.
For sellers, a 5-star system is fine but if they are doing that then get rid
of positive and negative ratings. Just have an anonymous 5-star system for quality
of parts and level of service. Feedback could then just be shown as two numbers,
averaged over the last six months worth of sales (if above 10 or more) and blank
if the seller has not made that many sales. Volume could be shown as in "Ratings
averaged over 1063 sales in the past six months". Having anonymous ratings and
pos or neg is also weird. A buyer can put positive but then give 1 star on all
ratings to hide that s/he is marking down ratings.
If it is anonymous it will mean that buyers are free to leave 3 stars even if
they got their order but the seller charged significantly more postage than they
should have or used parts were yellowed.
And make the key score shown based on recent feedback only. No doubt some sellers
would be very unhappy that the feedback they have worked hard for disappears,
but do buyers really care that a seller successfully sold 5000 items 15 years
ago? They want to know what the seller is like now, not a decade or more ago.
There could still be a badge showing that the seller has dealt with X orders
and started selling Y years ago.
Only have one or two 5-star ratings. More than that and the amount of buyers
that can be bothered to leave feedback drops.
I cannot remember the last time I bothered to leave feedback on ebay as a buyer
unless it was negative, and never bother checking as a seller since they changed
to positive-only for buyers. That is also an issue with no buyer feedback too
of course, if a seller doesn't leave it for a buyer then will the buyer bother
to leave it for a seller. As for amazon, I don't think I have ever left it
for a store. I've done it for items but never for a store. I either get what
I ordered and leave it at that, or file a complaint via amazon.
And that is another issue too. If less feedback is left then negative / lower
rating ones will have more impact as people tend to leave feedback if negative
but not bother so much if it is just OK. Sellers will have to expect lower feedback
ratings even if nothing changes.
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Feb 16, 2022 00:40 | Subject: | Re: A 0 + 5 Stars Feedback system for BrickLink | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
|
I propose a 0 + 5 Stars rating system.
In essence:
- 0 would correspond to "Zero service (or the current Negative)"
- 1 would mean "I received the minimal service"
- 2 to 4 stars would be something like "it's ok"
- 5 could be "exceptional".
|
How are we to train buyers and sellers to universally follow something like this?
Most buyers aren't going to read this and decide what feedback to leave according
to our standards. They are going to stick to whatever system they are most used
to.
It seems to me it would cause even more headaches than our Praise - Neutral -
Negative set-up. As someone already stated in this thread, most of the anxiety
about feedback can be solved in two simple ways:
1) Revamp the store's feedback percentage so Neutrals don't count as
negatives.
2) Allow for mutual cancellation of orders without any feedback.
Thanks,
Jen
|
|
Author: | i_r_on | Posted: | Feb 15, 2022 18:39 | Subject: | Re: A 0 + 5 Stars Feedback system for BrickLink | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| A star system is much more beneficial when divided into objective criterias instead
of general feeling of satisfaction which is more subjective.
Customer can rate,
- Purchased Items condition
- Packaging
- Shipping
- Communication
and so on...
Then I think sellers would be less inclined to correct their score with individual
buyers...
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Feb 15, 2022 18:06 | Subject: | Re: A 0 + 5 Stars Feedback system for BrickLink | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I forgot to talk about the textual part of the Feedback.
An annex proposal would be :
* 80+ text would still be allowed, and NOT moderated,
* but the text will be private to the other member.
This way:
* Text part would be OPTIONAL,
* NO moderation,
* NO complain, you can't ask to remove ANY Feedback for any reason,
* Transition to the new feedback would simply copy the existing texts to the
new ones.
In résumé:
* The star feedback will be public "Order 12345678 01/01/1970 whoever *****"
* The optional feedback text is for the other member's eyes only.
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Feb 15, 2022 17:46 | Subject: | Re: A 0 + 5 Stars Feedback system for BrickLink | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, firestar246 writes:
| Yes! It will also be a lot easier for a seller to see if he really is a "perfect"
seller. Currently, most sellers get 98%-99% positive feedback. With that amount,
why think about trying to improve areas that could need improvement? Maybe their
shipping time isn't the best, but not bad enough to deserve a neutral or
negative.
But with a 5 star system, a seller with slightly lower quality will see a lot
more 3-4 star ratings rather than 5, making them realize that while the majority
of their customers are satisfied with their service, if they improved their service
slightly in some way, they might be able to please their customers even more
and earn more repeat buyers.
|
Exactly the point - thanks FiVeStar
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|