Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies |
| Author: | Brixalotl  | | Posted: | Oct 14, 2021 10:54 | | Subject: | alt sticker sheets still International? | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| I have a sticker sheet from 2021 with different numbers than the catalog. Do
we still add them as a "b" sticker sheet entry and call them the International
version? It is this sticker sheet.
[p=76941stk01]
The numbers at the bottom are the same but have a 100 at the front and the number
at the top is different - 149059. The sticker sheet otherwise appears the same.
Let me know and I will submit as directed.
Thanks,
Jim
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Nov 9, 2021 05:09 | | Subject: | Link catalog entries | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Is there a way to link these together?
[I=6861-2]
|
| Author: | Jackson6bricks | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2021 10:05 | | Subject: | Part 47154c01 | | Viewed: | 135 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Hi
For part 47154c01, Electric, Motor 9V 4 x 4 x 3 1/3, would it be possible to
differentiate between the two different colour bases (dark gray and dark bluish
gray)? At present there is only one option?
Reason I ask is that I think (I may be wrong), but set 4094 uses dark gray, set
4895 uses dark bluish gray. I just received the one on the right from a BL seller
to replace the original one on the left which doesn't work. Not really the
seller's fault, but no way of knowing when checking the BL inventory.
Thanks
|
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | May 24, 2021 07:42 | | Subject: | Packaging error with Coyote | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Inventories Administrator | | Status: | Completed | |
| A friend bought 12 still sealed
And upon building them all, he got 3 with the short legs of
I asked him if he was sure all the packs were sealed and he replied that absolutely,
sealed outside and sealed clear bag inside.
So, maybe a note needs to be added to the inventory? And if more evidence is
found add it as alternate in the set entry?
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Oct 24, 2021 18:14 | | Subject: | Alternate 7496? | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| I found a few sellers in East Asia selling a different version of 7496. Has this
version been seen before?
It appears to have a few different parts, including two previously unknown 3437s
in what appear to be Light Purple and Light Violet (maybe?). I can’t find anything
regarding it on BL.
Photos posted here too.
Changes:
The Purple tile seems to be Medium Blue, the Light Violet plate seems to be a
brick in this version of the set, and the Medium Blue brick seems to be Light
Purple.
On a more interesting note, I’m convinced that the 2x2 brick in this set may
be LEGO’s 220 Light Lilac (a color BrickLink doesn’t really need to recognize,
unless maybe this brick is Light Lilac, in which case it might be an idea), which
has only appeared in a few Duplo figures.
I’ll upload photos of the parts to the catalog when I receive the set.
|
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Nov 3, 2021 13:30 | | Subject: | Not Light Violet? Light Lilac? | | Viewed: | 181 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| I bought set 7496 from a seller in Japan, which has different box art than the
version on BL. This set does not appear to be inventoried on Bricklink, Brickset,
or anywhere, really.
This set has a 2x2 Duplo brick in a funky purple that doesn’t match my Light
Violet parts. I do not have any other color that even comes close to this one.
Apart from Light Violet, Lavender is the closest, but it was released in 2011,
which crosses that out, as this set is from 2004. My only guess is that this
is Light Lilac, but I don’t have any parts in that color, nor did it ever come
in any bricks as far as I can tell. Brickset doesn’t have info on this, and neither
does Bricklink. Any help?
|
|
|
| Author: | crimson30 | | Posted: | Nov 20, 2021 08:56 | | Subject: | 44461 & 44534 (Tiny Blue) | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| So... I recently got a 44461 (Duplo Cart Lid) in Tiny Blue, which is listed on
BL as Light Blue. I also see from Ryan Howerter's color list (http://ryanhowerter.net/colors.php)
that 44534 (Duplo Plant Flower Gear) comes in Tiny Blue, and while the picture
for the part entry doesn't look like Tiny Blue, the box art for 7437 (Gardening
with Stripy) looks like Tiny Blue.
If both these parts (44461 & 44534) are the same color, why are they in different
Known Colors on BL? And why, of all colors, is 44461 Light Blue? That's
not even close.
At a minimum: change 44461 to Medium Blue to match 44534.
Maybe consider changing both to Dark Azure or Maersk Blue.
|
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Oct 24, 2021 11:31 | | Subject: | Set 7495 Light Blue 2x4 Duplo plates | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| I came across a listing of this set on another site that I can’t link here, and
those 2x4 plates are definitely not Light Blue. The bag in the listing is still
sealed and maybe an inventory admin can come to their own conclusion on what
this color is? If need be, I can still provide said link through a different
means.
|
| Author: | fairyprinc | | Posted: | Nov 5, 2021 13:00 | | Subject: | 1x13 rack gear with new part number 53504 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| is part 53504 (which I don't see in the catalog) a new part number for the
same 1x13 rack gear that is listed as 64781?
|
|
|
| Author: | 7 | | Posted: | Oct 10, 2021 15:24 | | Subject: | where can I bring up an error in part number? | | Viewed: | 83 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Not exactly an error, but I didn't know what else to write given the strict
char limit in the Subject
Basically there's a new version of a part with a significant but visually
hard to notice difference, which is categorised as the exact same part as the
older version. It was released this year I believe, so maybe it just hasn't
been updated yet, but I think the difference is subtle enough to have been missed.
The new part number is just classed as an Alternate Version, although it is functionally
different to the new part
Where is the best place for me to post about this so it can be changed? Thanks
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Nov 17, 2021 10:44 | | Subject: | add note to part bb0042 | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| | "On Red color version, top is Trans-Purple" |
| Author: | AaronS | | Posted: | Nov 2, 2021 15:31 | | Subject: | Bionicle mask packs | | Viewed: | 82 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Inventories Administrator | | Status: | Completed | |
| Sets, 8525, 8530, 8559, 8569, 8597, 8598, 8599 all have a confirmed possibility
of their inventory, so why aren't they listed on the sets inventory? Kind
of how dots packs are done.
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Oct 20, 2021 06:55 | | Subject: | Additional notes to 7591 and 7592? | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Seems these two sets have a White Box version, I think from Europe.
Images and additional notes for these are the best way to acknowledge this?
|
|
| Author: | carlwain74 | | Posted: | Oct 22, 2021 10:47 | | Subject: | Why is 40158 not a Set | | Viewed: | 155 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Just wondering why this item is not classified as a Set instead of Gear?
I have written a script to retrieve prices and this item threw a spanner in the
works as everything else was considered a Set.
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Nov 14, 2021 17:38 | | Subject: | Brick 1 x 6 "frosted" (and possibly others) | | Viewed: | 131 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| The catalog states that part [P=3009f3] has "frosted vertical lines". It seems
to be just "inside supports", found in other bricks as well. Actually, these
inside supports also exist for vintage 1x6 bricks in other colors (I have found
them in red, black, blue, white, yellow) but for some reason, the catalog considers
those to be regular 3009's. What is the reason for this differentiation?
IMHO, 3009f3 should either be merged with 3009, or 3009f3 should include the
other colors. Or at least mention this confusion in a note on the parts involved.
This issue may also be relevant for other brick types (1x2, 1x3, 1x4, 1x8). I
haven't checked if the opaque colors exist with inside supports for these
yet.
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Nov 17, 2021 18:12 | | Subject: | Please add Alternate number | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Please add alternate number 35163 to part 6267. This number is molded on the
part.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-35163
https://brickset.com/parts/design-6267
There appears to be a slight difference in design between the two. The part I
have in hand has cutouts on the interior edges of the base. I don't have
a 6267 handy, but the existing part image does not show the cutouts. This newer
version has been in place for quite some time according to Brickset, so I don't
if the admins would prefer to split the entries.
Thanks!
Jen
|
|
|
| Author: | tpr | | Posted: | Nov 16, 2021 14:12 | | Subject: | Skeleton Torso differences/variants | | Viewed: | 82 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Hi
Just been checking
6260 shows the joining bar between the leg pins as small, and on 60115 as a large
bar.
Both have large and small - see photo
Both types with the larger bar have printing on the cross bar above the leg pins,
whereas the ones with the thinner central bar only have the Lego stamp in the
neck.
Should there be variants?
If not should it be noted in the catalogue of the differences
Thanks
Tpr
|
|
|
|
| Author: | joshbeagrie | | Posted: | Nov 14, 2021 15:50 | | Subject: | Please add alternative item number | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Please add alternate item number 42947 to 18892
https://brickset.com/parts/design-42947
I have the new mould 42947 and going by pictures of the older one the only difference
is there are + shaped pin -ends.
The new mould appears in set 21330 Home alone so far.
Jonas advised me to add this as an alternative number rather than a seperate
catalogue entry.
Please see pictures attached of new mould.
Thanks,
Josh
|
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Sep 27, 2021 13:22 | | Subject: | Pearl Gold and Flat Dark Gold changes | | Viewed: | 212 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| Set 7600 on Bricklink lists the Bionicle Zamor Sphere as being Flat Dark Gold,
but that color was more than likely retired by 2007, and LEGO has the sphere
as their "Warm Gold" which translates to "Pearl Gold" on Bricklink. This should
be changed to accurately reflect LEGO's database information.
Sets 3615 and 9131 have the same issue. Part 3437 is listed as being "Pearl Gold",
but the color was not around in 2002, and LEGO has it listed as "Sand Yellow
Metallic" which translates to Bricklink's "Flat Dark Gold".
Part 44715 is listed as "Dark Tan", but the available photo shows the part as
having a metallic look to it, and the two sellers have listed it as "Flat Dark
Gold", which seems more accurate given the photo and the photo for the part in
"Flat Dark Gold".
Part 44716 should also be looked at. It is listed as "Pearl Gold", but the color
was not around in 2003 either, as its ID 297 has it being released around 2005.
The part looks more like 139 Copper, whose ID would match a 2003 release date,
but that's not certain. However, it could also be LEGO's 189 Reddish
Gold, which Bricklink does not have a separate color for, as most pearly golds
were just thrown under 84 Copper. This presents the separate issue of adding
new colors to the Bricklink database.
Lastly, part 48647 has multiple iterations in terms of color, but the one listed
for set 4777 has it as Pearl Gold. The photo looks more like "Flat Dark Gold",
which also makes more sense, given that Flat Dark Gold was around in 2004, and
Pearl Gold more than likely wasn't. This is more difficult to work with,
as it could be split into two different colors, with future iterations of the
part being Pearl Gold, and the 2004 version being "Flat Dark Gold". Sellers with
the older part would have to manually change their listing. Lego's database
has the part listed as "Warm Gold", but they do not take different production
runs of sets into account when listing colors, as they probably only account
for the most recent one, which in this set's case, would've been a 2005
run, probably around the time 297 Warm Gold replaced all the previous golds.
|
|
| Author: | wahiggin | | Posted: | Nov 16, 2021 12:43 | | Subject: | incorrect image for CTY0265 | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
The image is incorrect. It shows medium blue legs instead of sand blue legs.
I would replace it but I don't have the complete figure in order to take
a picture of it.
Wesley
|
| Author: | atkk | | Posted: | Nov 14, 2021 09:39 | | Subject: | Switched images | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| The images of the stickers 79603 (41679stk01) and 77542 (43193stk01) are switched.
You can zoom-in on the images to see that they are in fact mismatched.
Thanks in advance for corrected this!
|
| Author: | stecre | | Posted: | Nov 11, 2021 14:47 | | Subject: | Remove images | | Viewed: | 109 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
| The main image for the following head needs to be removed/replaced because it
shows the version without the chin dimple. The other images are correct and
show the chin dimple.
Thanks,
Steve
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
