| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Jul 6, 2021 11:42 | Subject: | Missing image | Viewed: | 130 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Completed | |
| Hey!
Anyone know where the image went for this part?
[p=3069bpb0208]
It was there last week when I sold one and now... poof!
There's an entry to the Change Log on July 1st.
Jen
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Jul 6, 2021 11:33 | Subject: | Re: Lack of Features and UI Design / Difficult | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I love when brand new people come through... look at stuff for 5 minutes, and
then decide they know everything they need to know.
Really, the site is built on ASP, a really old language? No way! I bet none of
the owners, developers, contributors, volunteers, and members had any idea. Now
we can fix it!
{Insert sarcasm emoji here}
Sorry, just had to rant. Of course, we all want to see better design, bug fixes,
and updates where appropriate. But, if you take away my ancient-looking really
awesome Forum, we are going to have some words.
Jen
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Jul 5, 2021 13:35 | Subject: | Re: Bricklink layout like Stud.io forum software? | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, BorgMan writes:
| Hey guys,
This has been bugging me for a while. Every time I look at the Bricklink Community,
I keep thinking "woah, all those posts in such a cluttered UX... not sure where
I'd start" and then decide not to post. I mean, it took me a little while
to actually get to the forum index, organised in a way I've seen with other
boards. But then I hit a topic (like this one, [Suggestions]) and get thrown
back to the unorganized, plain text hierarchy. Is there no way for us to implement
the same software that runs the Stud.io forums? Why even two separate forums
running separate software? I mean, I think it has to do with Bricklink and Stud.io
being two separate legal entities, but still, it feels weird and counter intuitive.
It's the second decade of the 21st century, why the outdated look and feel?
|
Because there is more to this Forum than just looks. There are built-in tools
and features here which are essential to catalog work. Aside from being able
to ping someone (which is a feature that needs a great deal of moderation), I
don't think it is lacking for those that know how to use it.
Jen
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Jul 3, 2021 11:43 | Subject: | Re: Help with inventory - ing a set | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, CormacMoran writes:
| Hi there
I started updating the inventory for a set, and have reserved it. Now a day later,
I have no idea in how to get back to the screen where I can update the inventory
of the set I've reserved
Any help appreciated
Cormac
|
Add or Change tab, Add Inventory: -Set
It’s the same page you reserved it from, second column.
FYI: Put in your set number and a lot quantity of 1. The next page will tell
you if the data is available for your set.
Good luck!
Jen
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Jul 1, 2021 12:37 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifigure sw1126 | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, taxan writes:
|
The way to tell them apart is:
That the old version is cut with the fiber in + position and the c version in
the x position. I cant confirm this do i don't own both version.
|
I am sorry, but I do not believe this correct. There are both 40mm and 39mm versions
that are cut on the bias (fiber in the x position), so it is not possible to
tell the difference from a minifig image or video.
Jen
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|