Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Ddriver  | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2021 02:15 | | Subject: | Re: tls095 Lego Employee, Kidsfest 2013 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I think its good to make a note like:
"The Minifigur is the same as the "Creativity Tour 2014", but with another blister
pack image." 👍
Best regards Daniel & stay healthy.
In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
Maybe it would be better to create a new set entry for that blister pack set?
Like
for example.
|
|
| Author: | Ddriver | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2021 02:07 | | Subject: | Re: tls095 Lego Employee, Kidsfest 2013 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| THX a lot for that. 👍
Best regards Daniel & stay healthy.
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
|
| Author: | roguemjr | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2021 01:46 | | Subject: | New entry??? | | Viewed: | 75 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| To whom it may concern:
Is it possible to create an assembly for the attached 1x6 yellow brick with driver
side sticker from set 5510-1? I see there is another assembly for another sticker
for this part. Or how should I list this part to found by people who may be
looking for it.
Thanks,
roguemjr
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 3, 2021 12:10 | | Subject: | Re: tls095 Lego Employee, Kidsfest 2013 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
Maybe it would be better to create a new set entry for that blister pack set?
Like
for example.
|
 |
| Author: | Ddriver | | Posted: | Apr 3, 2021 02:53 | | Subject: | tls095 Lego Employee, Kidsfest 2013 | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
On the article page of "TLS095 LEGO EMPLOYEE, MALE WITH Apron, Lego Store at
Kidsfest 2013" is a wrong picture where the Minifigur shows in the blister.
The picture with blister is from the "Creativity Tour 2014" and not from the
Kids Festival 2013.
The right picture is attached here.
Where can I report that because the user who does make the changes on the page
can not be notified by mail, as this user has blocked the mail?
Best regards Daniel.
|
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 2, 2021 11:01 | | Subject: | Re: Kids Go Free Vouchers | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, melbourne_josh writes:
I asked this some time ago and got this reply:
It is ephemera. We're still not sure exactly what place ephemera will
occupy in the BrickLink catalog in the future (or if it will have a place at
all). We're not even certain how we're going to define the term. Until
we get it figured out, we're trying not to add any ephemera. This particular
item was mistakenly approved.
I kind of understand it, it will be hard to keep a catalog of everything Lego
ever produces... Wish we could.
|
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 11:12 | | Subject: | Re: Items Moved Today | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| |
I'm preparing a statement about this current round of changes that will help
explain the decisions that were made. But real quick, while I am reading this,
I can let you know that all three of those parts WERE included in the original
list. They were listed under the 2 x 2 corner as related parts that would also
be moved.
Two of them were moved, and two remained behind.
|
Oh... ok; that explains it. Perhaps in the future parts with totally different
shapes shouldn't be under the related parts. I understand the variations
and decorated items, but I wouldn't of thought that the corner and cross
as related.
But anyway, thank you for your response and communication. It is appreciated
by many, I'm sure, even if they don't say so.  I look forward to your
statement as I hope that will clear up some of the confusion of this round.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 10:54 | | Subject: | Re: Items Moved Today | | Viewed: | 99 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | And am I seeing it right that there are some additions (especially the category
changes) which were not part of the original list that was published one month
ago? Despite the fact that it was said there would not be any additions to that
list after March 1st?
|
Yeah, that cross plate was NOT in the list before; I'm certain. Also the
Arch name change; they literally had a statement on that page a couple days ago
saying that no category name changes or additions would be approved.
Hopefully the new method that Stormchaser has mentioned will help with this confusion.
|
I'm preparing a statement about this current round of changes that will help
explain the decisions that were made. But real quick, while I am reading this,
I can let you know that all three of those parts WERE included in the original
list. They were listed under the 2 x 2 corner as related parts that would also
be moved.
Two of them were moved, and two remained behind.
|
|
| Author: | grimsbricksuk | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 10:38 | | Subject: | Re: Jek-14 sw475/sw475a | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| There are dozens of minifig heads that are produced in other non standard colours,
known as test prints.
Produced in batches and given away by Lego which then make their way into the
market.
In Catalog, davidschweer writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
I have one in my collection and have been confused for years. I have been searching
for information about it but have found none. I originally thought it was a
head to another minifigure completely but it pops up on bricklink under jek.
You have to piece him out and look up just his head but the white variant is
present.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPG.asp?P=3626cpb1012&colorID=1
Does anyone know any information on this head or where it came from?
|
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 07:45 | | Subject: | Re: Items Moved Today | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | And am I seeing it right that there are some additions (especially the category
changes) which were not part of the original list that was published one month
ago? Despite the fact that it was said there would not be any additions to that
list after March 1st?
|
Yeah, that cross plate was NOT in the list before; I'm certain. Also the
Arch name change; they literally had a statement on that page a couple days ago
saying that no category name changes or additions would be approved.
Hopefully the new method that Stormchaser has mentioned will help with this confusion.
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 07:42 | | Subject: | Re: Set numbers in Part Titles | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:
| | There are a lot of stickered or printed part stating the set the come from
at the end of the name, for example
At what number does it become unsuitable to put several sets in the name.
I've seen some with 2 but rarely any with 3. Also, does anyone have an opinion
if they should stay or be removed? Because I would much rather a cleaner, simple
title. It is annoying that some don't have this in their title, even if they
only have 1 or 2 sets.
Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex
|
See https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=275787&nID=1224447
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 07:25 | | Subject: | Re: Items Moved Today | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Was it not originally announced that there would be some time for sellers and
anyone else to prepare for these changes? How will that work if the final list
is just published right on the day when the changes are made?
And am I seeing it right that there are some additions (especially the category
changes) which were not part of the original list that was published one month
ago? Despite the fact that it was said there would not be any additions to that
list after March 1st?
Please don't get me wrong, I very much appreciate all the time and effort
you and anyone who is involved are putting into this changes. But with that final
(and rather short) list it feels a bit like a missed opportunity and (regarding
the points mentioned above) yet another instance of bad communication. I am therefore
glad that you will adjust the procedure next time.
As for the changes themselves, I'm fine with them with one exeption: I would
suggest to not move
and
to "Plate, Modified" as long as
has to stay in "Plate". I don't care whether these three parts are in "Plate"
or in "Plate, Modified" but it makes absolutely no sense and creates even more
inconistency to have them in different categories.
|
|
| Author: | Hexy | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 05:08 | | Subject: | Set numbers in Part Titles | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| There are a lot of stickered or printed part stating the set the come from
at the end of the name, for example
At what number does it become unsuitable to put several sets in the name.
I've seen some with 2 but rarely any with 3. Also, does anyone have an opinion
if they should stay or be removed? Because I would much rather a cleaner, simple
title. It is annoying that some don't have this in their title, even if they
only have 1 or 2 sets.
Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Apr 1, 2021 04:59 | | Subject: | Items Moved Today | | Viewed: | 199 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Everything on this list has been moved except for the last two items:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2487
We ran into a brief hiccup with those item type changes, but we plan to get them
moved later today. Let us know if you see anything on the list we missed.
As some of you already noticed, the list of moved items is about 1/9th the proposed
size. For a variety of reasons, we weren't able to accomplish the other
changes. This does not necessarily mean they won't happen, but merely that
they aren't happening right now.
For our October 1st, 2021 list, we're doing things differently to reduce
confusion. We'll post a page for that soon and begin listing items between
now and then. We'll lock it down on September 1st and every single item
placed on the October 1st page will be moved.
For anyone wondering about this process, our goal was to reduce confusion about
where things belong in the catalog. The project consisted of two steps:
1. Define in writing what should be in each category.
2. Move parts as necessary to conform with written definitions.
We've completed step one, for the most part (although it's still being
tweaked here and there). Now we're working (slowly) through step two.
Let us know if you have any questions or comments.
|
|
| Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 21:58 | | Subject: | Re: 970c00pb0364 description color | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I submitted the change request for you.
In Catalog, moreshelfspace writes:
| | The description for Wonder Woman's legs says they are white markings, but
the piece I have's paint is silver, not white. (So neither a search for "white"
or "boots" turn up any results for the piece)
|
|
| Author: | moreshelfspace | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 21:10 | | Subject: | 970c00pb0364 description color | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| The description for Wonder Woman's legs says they are white markings, but
the piece I have's paint is silver, not white. (So neither a search for "white"
or "boots" turn up any results for the piece)
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 19:10 | | Subject: | Re: Dimensions of tires | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| | Pretty much all the examples, in the completed topic, were posted in mm. It's
an easy translation tho.
|
Oops, sorry. I meant millimeters.
|
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 18:19 | | Subject: | Re: Dimensions of tires | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| | I would like to provide a Catalog dimension for
Plus the various part assemblies that include that tire. The change page suggests
that the numbers are in studs. Is this correct, or should I be entering in cm
?
According to my caliper the tire really does measure 30 x 30 x 14 mm.
When entering the dimensions for the assemblies, do I do that with the wheel
inserted in the tire, or with them side by side ? example
Nita Rae
|
It sounds like you are measuring the packaging dimensions for the part. In that
case, you would post them to the Packaging Dimensions forum topic in centimeters.
|
Pretty much all the examples, in the completed topic, were posted in mm. It's
an easy translation tho.
I would love for someone from the catalog packaging team chime in with thoughts
about how to measure tire+wheel assemblies. If the two are to be integrally assembled
prior to shipment, then it would be identical to the tire dimension. If not,
then that really should be spelled out (somehow) on the catalog page so that
sellers know what the game plan is.
Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 16:26 | | Subject: | Re: Dimensions of tires | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| | I would like to provide a Catalog dimension for
Plus the various part assemblies that include that tire. The change page suggests
that the numbers are in studs. Is this correct, or should I be entering in cm
?
According to my caliper the tire really does measure 30 x 30 x 14 mm.
When entering the dimensions for the assemblies, do I do that with the wheel
inserted in the tire, or with them side by side ? example
Nita Rae
|
It sounds like you are measuring the packaging dimensions for the part. In that
case, you would post them to the Packaging Dimensions forum topic in centimeters.
The dimensions entry on the catalog change request form is to be used for adding
stud dimensions for width and length and brick dimensions for height to standard
parts that can be easily measured in those terms (such as bricks and plates).
|
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 14:23 | | Subject: | Dimensions of tires | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I would like to provide a Catalog dimension for
Plus the various part assemblies that include that tire. The change page suggests
that the numbers are in studs. Is this correct, or should I be entering in cm
?
According to my caliper the tire really does measure 30 x 30 x 14 mm.
When entering the dimensions for the assemblies, do I do that with the wheel
inserted in the tire, or with them side by side ? example
Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 09:40 | | Subject: | Re: where does this go in the catologue? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SurplusParts writes:
| | I have this poster that i received with the VIP program from Lego when i purchased
the new Ghostbustern ECTO-1.
I wasn't sure where it goes in the catalogue. I looked in Gear osters for
it. I wasn't sure if that is where it goes?
If yes, i am happy to add to the catalogue if it is not already there.
Thanks
|
I don't see it in the catalog either. I would add it as: Gear, Poster. Check
to see if it has a 7 digit number code on it to use as the item number.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | SurplusParts | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2021 07:12 | | Subject: | where does this go in the catologue? | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have this poster that i received with the VIP program from Lego when i purchased
the new Ghostbustern ECTO-1.
I wasn't sure where it goes in the catalogue. I looked in Gearosters for
it. I wasn't sure if that is where it goes?
If yes, i am happy to add to the catalogue if it is not already there.
Thanks
|
|
|
| Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | Mar 30, 2021 21:17 | | Subject: | Re: Jek-14 sw475/sw475a | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| From an employee or out of the factory. Like this
Obviously not from a set.
In Catalog, davidschweer writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
I have one in my collection and have been confused for years. I have been searching
for information about it but have found none. I originally thought it was a
head to another minifigure completely but it pops up on bricklink under jek.
You have to piece him out and look up just his head but the white variant is
present.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPG.asp?P=3626cpb1012&colorID=1
Does anyone know any information on this head or where it came from?
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
