Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | primadeluxe  | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 03:39 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| To come back on the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) the variations in
print are due to the material (CA, ABS) and the mold pip (edge, side):
1. CA with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1958-1963). Old logo is wide straight.
2. ABS with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1963-1968). Old logo is wide round.
3. ABS with modern logo and side mold pip (around 1968-......)
See pictures.
This also explains the variantion in the print, which are in all the 3 cases
embossed. The 3005pt{number} is also embossed and the 3005pt{number}b has a surface
print.
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| | Within the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) I found also some difference
in the print. See picture. For example number 6: right in the picture has an
old logo on the stud and the two on the left have modern and old logo on the
stud, but I think this are just variations.
So maybe a reshuffle of the images, variantions and sets appearing is in order.
Also looking at set 237, because the bold numbered bricks could not be a alternate
for this set. The bold numbers all have a modern logo (1968) and yet in 1966
the set 237 (1960) was replaced by set 437. So the bold numbered bricks could
be a alternate for set 437, but not for set 237.
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:10 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6382-1 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| Yes, I just submitted it yesterday. So it would have been nice to finish it myself,
but thanks for your time!
In Inventories Requests, AFOLliquidation writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA196pb01 Red Stickered Assembly 12 x 6 x 2 1/3 with Fire Pattern (Sticker) - Set 6382 - 3 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 4, 1 Plate 6 x 10 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
This item number is already in the system it just needs to be linked to set 6382
|
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:07 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 180-1 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA198pb01L Black Stickered Assembly 8 x 1 x 2 with Red '180' with Oval Border on Black Background Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 180 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA198pb01R Black Stickered Assembly 8 x 1 x 2 with Red '180' with Oval Border on Black Background Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 180 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA197pb01 Black Stickered Assembly 4 x 4 x 2 with Red '180' with Oval Border on Black Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 180 - 1 Brick 1 x 4, 2 Slopes 45 2 X 4 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 15:11 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Within the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) I found also some difference
in the print. See picture. For example number 6: right in the picture has an
old logo on the stud and the two on the left have modern and old logo on the
stud, but I think this are just variations.
So maybe a reshuffle of the images, variantions and sets appearing is in order.
Also looking at set 237, because the bold numbered bricks could not be a alternate
for this set. The bold numbers all have a modern logo (1968) and yet in 1966
the set 237 (1960) was replaced by set 437. So the bold numbered bricks could
be a alternate for set 437, but not for set 237.
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 14:28 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
)
)
)
)
