| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | BulbaNerd4000  | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2020 15:54 | | Subject: | Broken gallery | | Viewed: | 109 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I think we should get a better system for the gallery. I tried searching up something
simple and got many results that don’t match. Should we get an upgrade for it
or not?
|
|
 |
| Author: | 3001Bricks | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2020 14:49 | | Subject: | Re: Feature Request | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Emporiosa writes:
| | In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| | Now and then (today for me) it would be handy to be able to merge two orders
from the same customer. I'm going to be sending two separate invoices to
be paid because it seems to be the most proper way to do it in this case. It
would be nice to just merge them.
|
+1 And to add to that (and I think you may have been referring to this scenario
too), it would be nice that there is an order combine option (as seen on another
site) for IC orders, or any order that has been already paid. Ever since expanding
IC, it's just been order after order of buyers reaching out asking if they
can somehow add to their original order without paying shipping twice via IC.
|
This!
With some additional option settings like 'order addon fee', and to allow
this option based on status. When status is 'packed' or 'shipped',
it shouldn't be possible anymore.
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2020 13:17 | | Subject: | Re: Feature Request | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| | Now and then (today for me) it would be handy to be able to merge two orders
from the same customer. I'm going to be sending two separate invoices to
be paid because it seems to be the most proper way to do it in this case. It
would be nice to just merge them.
|
+1
For now you can credit the second order and adds its value to the first order
as additional charges. Then you only send 1 invoice and buyer pays 1 time.
|
|
| Author: | dearlydeparted | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2020 08:46 | | Subject: | Re: Feature Request | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| | Now and then (today for me) it would be handy to be able to merge two orders
from the same customer. I'm going to be sending two separate invoices to
be paid because it seems to be the most proper way to do it in this case. It
would be nice to just merge them.
|
+1 Yes!
Long ago, you could request from Admin that the orders be merged and it would
be done, no problem. After the first sale of the site, I requested this be done
and was surprised that they would no longer do this. Didn't make sense.
|
|
| Author: | Emporiosa | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2020 07:03 | | Subject: | Re: Feature Request | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| | Now and then (today for me) it would be handy to be able to merge two orders
from the same customer. I'm going to be sending two separate invoices to
be paid because it seems to be the most proper way to do it in this case. It
would be nice to just merge them.
|
+1 And to add to that (and I think you may have been referring to this scenario
too), it would be nice that there is an order combine option (as seen on another
site) for IC orders, or any order that has been already paid. Ever since expanding
IC, it's just been order after order of buyers reaching out asking if they
can somehow add to their original order without paying shipping twice via IC.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2020 06:51 | | Subject: | Feature Request | | Viewed: | 126 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Now and then (today for me) it would be handy to be able to merge two orders
from the same customer. I'm going to be sending two separate invoices to
be paid because it seems to be the most proper way to do it in this case. It
would be nice to just merge them.
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2020 06:21 | | Subject: | Re: Please add the following features as appropri | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | I wish Bricklink would take a closer look at Brickstock and incorporate at least
some of the features that exist there.
For example the use of multiple filter capabilities would be superb for the order
detail page as well as lots of other areas e.g. part identification etc.
If you look at the image I have attached you will see what I mean. It is a natural
element of SQL and when we had goatleg and miniconfigurator that is how both
of them worked (with some modifications)
It really is not a difficult feature to add and would save hundreds if not thousands
of hours work on behalf of the stores for a small amount of time for developers.
Anyone else feel the same?
The 'and/or' filter is a great tool - is easy to learn and use and with
the catalogue getting more and more complex and populated with data this is really
a must.
BTW - we would have expected something like this in the long delayed (and probably
forgotten about) sellers tools
|
Editing posts would be a nice feature and long overdue. I put the wrong image
I n - try this one.
|
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2020 06:17 | | Subject: | Please add the following features as appropri | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I wish Bricklink would take a closer look at Brickstock and incorporate at least
some of the features that exist there.
For example the use of multiple filter capabilities would be superb for the order
detail page as well as lots of other areas e.g. part identification etc.
If you look at the image I have attached you will see what I mean. It is a natural
element of SQL and when we had goatleg and miniconfigurator that is how both
of them worked (with some modifications)
It really is not a difficult feature to add and would save hundreds if not thousands
of hours work on behalf of the stores for a small amount of time for developers.
Anyone else feel the same?
The 'and/or' filter is a great tool - is easy to learn and use and with
the catalogue getting more and more complex and populated with data this is really
a must.
BTW - we would have expected something like this in the long delayed (and probably
forgotten about) sellers tools
|
|
|
| Author: | Kenopolis | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2020 18:08 | | Subject: | Re: Part out listed by remarks | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, CanadaFirst writes:
| | We've been parting out and listing a lot of sets lately and we use the remark
field to put in the location in our inventory system.
One thing that slows us down a lot when storing parts is that there is no way
to sort the list by remark. That means that we have to run around the warehouse
to put parts in their correct spot and it's a big waste of time. If we could
sort the part out by remarks then we wouldn't have this issue and it's
very likely an easy fix on the side of the site.
|
I sort my parts using remarks too.
What I do, when parting out a set, is select the following options.
On the Part out screen, check the box that says...
"Consolidate lots with my existing inventory and adjust quantity of items that
are already in my inventory by using:"
Then select "Old Remarks." This will combine the lots, and keep your old location.
Once you upload the parts, you can then look at the parts in order of REMARKS.
Go to your inventory.
On the right enter the set number
Then once it loads, sort by remarks.
NOTE: If you have the option to keep your parts in your inventory when they are
sold out turned on, remember that they will stay in stock room unless you manually
change them, or choose "NEW STOCKROOM Option"
Hope that helps.
|
|
| Author: | mogli252 | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2020 10:33 | | Subject: | Re: Part out listed by remarks | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| | |
If there was a way to sort by remarks then we'd have the black part later
in our part out.
|
so i understood correctly.
Yes, this can be done with brickstock with the method i described.
If you need any help with brickstock you can write me a message.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
