| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | otaviomoser  | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2020 19:37 | | Subject: | DELETE ALL ITEM IN MY INVENTORY | | Viewed: | 138 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I would like to DELETE all items in my inventory and later upload them with the
correct quantities.
How should I do it?
Thank you
|
| Author: | jbricks | | Posted: | Feb 29, 2020 07:39 | | Subject: | please change 40166 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| set 40166 has a new counterpart in the minifig,
the darktan hair is different in about half of the sets i parted,
new partnumber that has to be added is, 25972 instead of 62810
tried changing it in the inventory (no luck since its a minifig entry) so cannot
use the inventory id of the part.
tried the minifig, but that can't have alternate parts,
why does this have to be so hard?
trying to add to the catalog seems to be a 1 time thing for me now, since it's
already taking me 30 minutes to do this, and nothing has happened,
|
 |
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 28, 2020 03:51 | | Subject: | March Project - Sticker Sheet Restructuring | | Viewed: | 212 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| At long last, it is time. By the end of March, my goal is to eliminate duplicate
catalog entries for sticker sheets:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRelList.asp?relID=15
You can see that this has been moved from Section 11.1 to 11.2 on the roadmap:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
I have some ideas, but I'd like to hear yours - especially those of you who've
given this some thought over the past decade or so that some of us have wanted
it.
Sticker sheets are handled quite consistently at the present moment. How can
we retain that consistency while eliminating duplicate entries with the least
amount of disruption?
As a side note, how do you feel about the NA/International duplicate entries?
These are the same sticker sheets, but have different item numbers, differently-sized
paper backing, and in some cases a slightly different finish (matte vs. glossy).
I don't want to get too distracted with this particular side discussion,
but do we need to maintain separate catalog entries for these sheets? Do you
want us to?
Looking forward to hearing some discussion and seeing some ideas other than my
own to get these duplicate entries handled.
|
|
| Author: | Emperor_Penguin | | Posted: | Feb 27, 2020 14:23 | | Subject: | How to make 'Special Assembly'? | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello, I was looking at the Special Assembly category
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catString=961
And I was wondering how do you make one for the catalog?
I wanted to make a few for some different assemblies, like the Minecraft Iron
Golem figure.
|
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Feb 27, 2020 13:53 | | Subject: | Dimensions 10507 | | Viewed: | 136 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Why is 10507 listed as 1x1 in studs?
10507 is
x: 7.9mm
y: 11.2mm
z: 11.1mm
making it 1 x 1.4 in studs.
Is this just another one of those places of inconsistency madness?
|
| Author: | runner.caller | | Posted: | Feb 26, 2020 11:16 | | Subject: | Tooth vs Toothed | | Viewed: | 107 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| The other day I was searching the catalog.
I typed in "Saber-Tooth" and only the following two minifigs came up.
I was looking for
which I found by going to animal, land and typing "cat, " then scrolling.
Should all be Tooth or all be Toothed ?
Or maybe just left alone, and I use better search practices  like "saber-t*"
or just "tiger"
|
|
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Feb 25, 2020 21:45 | | Subject: | Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? | | Viewed: | 173 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| http://v4ei.com/brickref/4265-variants-proposal.html
I know, there'll be pain with the renaming and whatnot, but it would be nice
if all the axle holes on all the pieces were named consistently and were referred
to in a consistent manner in the item number.
Then there's the issue of sometimes two things that are the similar have
two different catalog numbers and other times two things that are similar have
a single number and a note. So the whole handling of naming and suffixing is
kind of all over the place.
If that page isn't clear, hit me up.
|
|
| Author: | 69transamman | | Posted: | Feb 25, 2020 20:00 | | Subject: | 32553c06 | | Viewed: | 75 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Going thru some unsorted parts and I found the 32553 in dark bluish gray with
the 32554 in trans dark blue that was missing from the catalog. I have uploaded
the picture as a counterpart (32553c06) to set 8610-1.
Howard
|
|
| Author: | samsam2 | | Posted: | Feb 25, 2020 10:13 | | Subject: | name change not in log 3068bpb0139 | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I recently submitted a name change, it was rejected, no problem, but the name
needed to be changed and it was, but I don't see any record in the logs regarding
this very recent name change that added 'and 4 Wear Marks'?
[p=3068bpb0139]
|
| Author: | myixjetjet24 | | Posted: | Feb 24, 2020 11:31 | | Subject: | 92586 White Dog, Alsatian / German Shepherd | | Viewed: | 140 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| | Where did it come from? I cannot find any set containing this. |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
