Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | mfav | Posted: | Feb 8, 2020 21:08 | Subject: | Description standardization note | Viewed: | 168 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| It would be good for consistency in the catalog description if all instances
of numbers were either integers or words, not arbitrarily some of each.
So:
Three eyeballs, Three earlobes
or
3 eyeballs, 3 earlobes
not
Three eyeballs, 3 earlobes
...that kind of thing.
There are pros and cons for each option. Please investigate how the search mechanism
works to see which option yields better results.
|
Author: | OmnipresentECA | Posted: | Feb 8, 2020 15:30 | Subject: | Sticker # When adding Items | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have come across a few tiles with stickers that are not in the catalog.
, nor in their set inventory.
How do I go about determining the Sticker # when Adding to the catalog.
For example one is a 87079pb###, how do I determine the last few digits?
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 14:45 | Subject: | February Roadmap Project: Old and New | Viewed: | 243 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| We are finally making serious headway with the catalog backlog. The catalog
change requests queue is cleared out.
In the spirit of trying to ensure that the Catalog Roadmap is not just something
to look at, I am continuing with the goal of moving through one project each
month. We have essentially had a January project (flesh to nougat) and there
is a new project starting today for February:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
What is this project?
This project involves accurately describing the differences between early (old)
versions of an item and later (new) versions. We need this for two reasons:
1. Using the words "old" and "new" were easy ways to avoid having to describe
actual differences between items. Set numbers in minifigure titles performed
the same function, which is why they were removed.
2. When a third version of an item appears, the old/new descriptors are useless.
Similar items should be described by their differences (usually the way in which
the later version is different from the earlier version).
There are around 500-1000 items expected to be affected by this project.
How can members contribute?
For the immediate moment, members may contribute by submitting title change requests.
I'm not sure how we're going to do item numbers yet, so hold off on
those. If you're not confident that you know exactly what this project entails
or need clarification on a specific issue, then please ask before submitting
a request.
For the immediate moment, ignore the additional topic bundled with this project
(looking at the use of with/without in titles). We may be able to include that,
or it may need to be made its own project. This project should also look at
the use of early/later descriptors since they serve the same function as the
terms old/new.
The goal is to wrap this up by the end of February. Of course, we also have
catalog work still to do and that takes precedence over projects - so this may
run over schedule.
|
|
Author: | Brick.Door | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 10:39 | Subject: | 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Found some frosted trans-light-blue 1x4 bars in a set recently and I'm not
comfortable mixing them with my current inventory. They are quite different and
I don't think a customer who orders several would be happy getting a mixture.
The additional notes state:
"Alternate item number 28697 is used for transparent colors. This mold variant
has no bubbles and number 28697 molded on it. It has been found in two variations
clear and frosted as showed on additional images."
So it seems the catalog admins are aware of the difference and have decided not
to reflect it in the catalog here? Personally I think this is a mold variation
worth recognizing.
|
|
Author: | rick_holl | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 16:52 | Subject: | The 6x6 tiles in 10227 B-Wing | Viewed: | 104 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Anyone knows if those tiles are flat or they have a shiny finish?
Thank you
|
Author: | Adjour | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:36 | Subject: | Correction sheet for set 8847 | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
Author: | Grinjer1 | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:06 | Subject: | Identifying minifigures | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have a batch of incomplete minifigures. I need help identifying them to find
out what parts I need to complete them. I seem to remember there were a couple
of sites which had this information but I can't remember the names.
Can anyone help please?
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 12:31 | Subject: | Shadow Trooper | Viewed: | 150 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
(OK I understand we can see them only from the front as they never retreat when
they attack so you can't see their back )
Interesting in our catalog torso is showed without long line.
According to the information which I found here
http://minifigs.nl/swminifigs/mfnl-shadow-ms.html
one with long line could be from magnet set from 2009.
* | | 852715 (Inv) Magnet Set, Minifigures SW (3) - Darth Vader, Snowtrooper, Shadow Trooper - with 2 x 4 Brick Bases blister pack Gear: Magnet: Star Wars |
so from sets which were issued earlier 2007 and 2008 could be one with short
line
My with short line is from set
I have also two in my collection with long line but bought them years ago loose
without sets.
I submitted both as new as in this case sw0166 should be marked for deletion
as we don't know which one is currently sell under this entry.
|
|
|
Author: | Honig | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 05:58 | Subject: | NAM (Shell) Holiday Set 2014 Christmas Tree | Viewed: | 67 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I get a NAM (Shell) 2014 Christmas Holiday Giveaway from the brand Blokbrick
with seemed to cooperate with the Lego Company.
I've never seen these item and it's not listet in the bricklink.
Probably these set is an interseting item for the bricklink catalouge. If these
set will listed, I can send you better pictures, a tile list and the instruction
as pdf.
The parts are completly orignial Lego, the 1x1 Tile with the NAM Logo is printed.
Greetings from germany
Holger Honig
|
|
|
Author: | SurplusParts | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 18:14 | Subject: | Adding photos to the Catalogue | Viewed: | 67 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| When adding photos to the catalogue, can you only add 1 at a time for the same
part?
I just added 2 photos of a new part that i added to the catalogue, one a rendered
photo and the other showing the part from 2 angles. Now it only shows the second
photo i added and the other has disappeared.
Cheers
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 15:07 | Subject: | We have a new Catalog Associate! | Viewed: | 426 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everyone,
Today I am very pleased to announce we have a new Catalog Associate! As you may
see from the Hall of Fame, StormChaser has previously held two catalog-type admin
positions - Inventories Admin and the legacy Catalog Admin - and has recently
returned to the site.
We're delighted he has decided to come back, and I know many of you missed
him as well. He has many ambitious plans for the catalog, and now that we have
more staff on board, it's looking as though we can start making some serious
headway.
So please join me in welcoming him. You can see his familiar profile in line
with the others here:
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
StormChaser is also the first member to officially join our new Community Expert
Program. We hope to see the other catalog admins joining in the next day or two,
and the rest of our admins within the week.
|
|
Author: | tpr | Posted: | Feb 2, 2020 07:48 | Subject: | PUT COLOURS BACK & DISCUSS WITH LEGO | Viewed: | 202 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi
For now as we have more changes in discussion, can't we put the colours back
to how they were. I'm sure a few more days/weeks of flesh isn't going
to hurt us.
Then discuss with the Lego Company regarding changing all colours to their colours
- we are part of their group. What they say will be correct !!
tpr
|
Author: | AZbrickGUY | Posted: | Jan 29, 2020 20:17 | Subject: | Disney Princess Cogsworth and Lumiere sets. | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello. Trying to find info on these two sets.
Disney Princess Cogsworth. 47pcs
Disney Princess Lumiere. 23pcs.
Cant find them anywhere. TRU build so there isn't a set number. Link? Thanks
for the help.
|
|
Author: | mattkaupke | Posted: | Jan 29, 2020 14:05 | Subject: | Brickarms inventory | Viewed: | 166 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I had a crazy week last week and didn't get a chance to manually pull my
Brickarms inventory before Lego kicked it off the site. I was hoping it would
be somewhere that I can still see what I had in my inventory. Does anyone know
if this is possible? Otherwise, I have absolutely no way to find them in my shelves
without access to the old listing details. Am I just going to have to stumble
across them over time as I pull other orders and see them? I was hoping they
would go into stockroom with no option to relist or something like that, not
just completely disappear. I should have screenshotted it so I had a record of
my previous inventory and its location, but didn't get a chance to between
when I saw the notice and when they pulled the listings.
|
|
Author: | Marmi58 | Posted: | Jan 29, 2020 13:12 | Subject: | 1880 set | Viewed: | 101 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| in your list of item for the 1880 set, you mention 3 of the green plant flower
stem (3741), but to complete the set you need 4.
Also, you listed 4 green window 1X2X3 shutter, which is the case, but on the
original list of pieces, there is 8 listed, I don't know why.
have a nice day
|
Author: | bb1592198 | Posted: | Jan 27, 2020 18:28 | Subject: | Piece 33492 | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I can't seem to find piece 33492. |
Author: | tomaso | Posted: | Jan 25, 2020 14:34 | Subject: | miss 64391+sticker | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| hello i would like to insert some part lego, but they doesn't for example
64683+sticker( set 42058) set 60122 : 52031 lime +sticker.
how should I do?
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 24, 2020 13:06 | Subject: | Have A Heart | Viewed: | 276 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I can't help myself from returning to this topic.
It is not right to erase people who have contributed to the catalog and turn
them into a meaningless number (and a username that rhymes with "loser.").
The first attached image shows people who have contributed a set inventory to
the catalog. For each person it was only one inventory, but it was time they
took out of their day or week to make a contribution.
The second image shows people who have added items to the catalog. One person
added 113 items. Another added 97 items. Yet another added 87 items. And so
on down the list.
Some of these unregistered users are no doubt dead. Some have moved on to new
pursuits. Some may be in a coma or in prison. Who knows why any one person
hasn't logged on or may never log on again?
BrickLink wants contributions. BrickLink wants an involved community. But when
BrickLink treats former contributors so dismissively, by erasing them into meaninglessness,
it makes me think they have no respect for contributors.
BrickLink contributors deserve better treatment than this. Anonymizing people
who have contributed to the catalog was a poor decision. It was a careless and
heartless decision.
I urge the site to reconsider the decision to anonymize any former catalog and
inventory contributors.
|
|
|
Author: | spattersonlego | Posted: | Jan 22, 2020 12:37 | Subject: | goatleg | Viewed: | 222 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Who is willing to start a search site to replace goatleg?
I'm sure people would be willing to pay a small fee to use it. I would.
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 20, 2020 14:37 | Subject: | Keyword Exclusions | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I feel like Bill in that I find myself making observations and then posting them
in the forum whilst saying, "Hmmmm." This is my Bill moment.
I just searched for the Where Are My Pants person from The LEGO Movie. The system
excluded 75% of my keywords. So . . . what's the point of titling this character
this way if 75% of the title is useless?
Wouldn't it be better to simply title him "Pants Guy" and leave it at that?
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 19, 2020 12:00 | Subject: | bb0007 Differences | Viewed: | 107 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| What are the differences in these parts? The images seem to me to show exactly
the same parts in different colours.
[P=bb0007pb01]
Am I missing something or are the images for the second part wrong?
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 19, 2020 10:02 | Subject: | 31023 Dimensions | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
The title says 1 x 4 x 4, but the stud dimensions are 1 x 4 x 5. Can someone
who has this part verify the correct dimensions?
|
Author: | PatrickGroover | Posted: | Jan 19, 2020 08:47 | Subject: | Sorting by Price | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Can I sort parts in the catalog by price? |
Author: | Mrco | Posted: | Jan 19, 2020 02:03 | Subject: | Duplicate | Viewed: | 95 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please delete duplicate
* | | 65072pb02 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap Type 6 with Molded White Mask and Printed Medium Azure Ninjago Logogram Letter L on Black Background Pattern Parts: Minifigure, Headgear |
This is the same
* | | 65072pb01 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap Type 6 with Molded White Mask and Printed Medium Azure Ninjago Logogram Letter J on Black Background Pattern Parts: Minifigure, Headgear |
|
|
Author: | M.Boss | Posted: | Jan 18, 2020 19:56 | Subject: | 7662 MTT Reddish-Brown 4460a Slope | Viewed: | 81 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I recently purchased a used 7662 MTT set. Instead of the 4460a reddish-brown
slopes listed in the BrickLink inventory, it came 4460b slope. I also noticed
the set listed 4460b slopes in DBG as a counterpart. I know it is a longshot,
but could someone who purchased this set brand new check if their set's 4460
slope has hollow studs or open studs. Thank You!
|
|
Author: | chetzler | Posted: | Jan 14, 2020 21:31 | Subject: | Multipacks as one inventory item? | Viewed: | 119 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I know this is going to open a can of worms and probably get some people agitated.
But can someone refresh me on the point of adding multipacks (such a as
) as a single inventory item? I know it was discussed as some point but I can't
find much in the forum. Was it because LEGO gives the entire thing a single
design ID? It makes extra work during part out since I have to part out the
parts after the set.
|
|
Author: | tons_of_bricks | Posted: | Jan 14, 2020 06:32 | Subject: | Naginata 41159pb01 two different colors. | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have 11 new Naginatas all from the Titan Mech set 70676. However, there is
an obvious color difference among them when held up to the light. 5 of them look
trans-black, and the others look trans-dark blue (even the staff of the piece
has a bluish look when held just right in the light).
But the current Bricklink catalog only has Naginatas with a trans-orange blade
and trans-light blue, both of which mine don't fit. Does anyone else with
these pieces notice this color discrepancy? I'm not sure how to list these
pieces as I feel I'd be listing them incorrectly.
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 13, 2020 11:34 | Subject: | Pattern 1. Pattern 2. | Viewed: | 164 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| There seems to be an increasing trend of identifying patterned parts by simply
calling them Pattern 1 and Pattern 2. Here are three random examples of recent
parts, but I could go on for a while.
I would caution against this practice of non-descriptively titling items. In
fact, I was hoping the site would move away from things like this, not more toward.
Although I suppose we could greatly simplify all titles by simply going the Mini
Upper Part "No. 1470" route that TLG uses.
|
|
Author: | dcarmine | Posted: | Jan 12, 2020 15:25 | Subject: | Another inconsistency | Viewed: | 163 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Inconsistency is a pet peeve of my, so you know it's my last nerve on this
issue.
I haven't parted out much lately, but I got an opportunity to part out 3
of the 2019 Star Wars Advent Calendars
For the last 9 years TLC has included a Winter-ized SW figure in the 24th position
on the calendar. I saw that this last year was a Porg Santa. I didn't look
at the BL inventory to see how the subsets were being handled before I started.
I wanted to preserve the Porg Santa as a complete fig and part out all the other
"parts only" droids.
After finishing the sorting, I went to upload the part-out to BL. And that's
when I found it....Porg Santa was a part out...grrr. But the Gonk and Mouse
droids were left to sell whole...grrrr.
Who decides this stuff? How hard is it to be more consistent? I know there
is a lot of discussion about "What SW Droids are figures" and what are not.
But geesse, SMH.
Just my two cents.
Thanks for reading, no changes are expected.
Donna
|
|
Author: | Yogi_007 | Posted: | Jan 11, 2020 05:30 | Subject: | catalogue problem - zero lots showing up | Viewed: | 87 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi All,
Ive been looking for through the catalogue for various parts and have found that
some lots are coming up as zero available but still showing up for sale.
I was looking at 3700 technic 1x2 brick in dark green last week and the stores
showed up with zero in stock in the catalogue. I checked again today and all
resolved.
I then looked at orange part 6005 and same thing.
Whats going on ??
Seems off to me or is it related to these rarer parts ?
Help please
Yogi
|
|
|
Author: | QNIKET8 | Posted: | Jan 8, 2020 00:23 | Subject: | Stores Need Attention | Viewed: | 191 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I am new to Bricklink. I recently decided to get out my lego to rebuild some
of my old Lego Star Wars sets. There were 2 sets I wanted to build but noticed
I was missing some pieces. I ordered two pieces last night (awaiting arrival)
for the first time, but then realised I needed more pieces for the other set.But
it says that 2 stores need my attention, why is that?
Thanks
|
Author: | AZbrickGUY | Posted: | Jan 7, 2020 22:11 | Subject: | Batman Movie figures S1/2 | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Is there anyway we can split up the two sets of minifigs from Batman movie lines??
Series 1 and 2 are all under one. Disney is 1 and 2 and not all together. I cant
help to fell that they should be, Batman Movie S1 and S2? Just sayin.
|
Author: | Duq | Posted: | Jan 7, 2020 19:47 | Subject: | Element 6286835 wrong colour | Viewed: | 114 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Element 6286835 is 28870 in black, not medium azure. |
Author: | waltzking | Posted: | Jan 7, 2020 18:49 | Subject: | Alternate Images | Viewed: | 79 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please add these alternate images for comparison of mini doll head patterns 37591
vs 66706 and also 37592 vs 66600 with new but similar print.
Jonathan
|
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Jan 7, 2020 11:25 | Subject: | Broken part x191c01? | Viewed: | 97 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Should I be able to push all the way to the bottom with almost no
force when I cover up the hole, or does this mean that the part is broken? This
is the first small version I've had.
/Jan
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Jan 6, 2020 18:48 | Subject: | Remove image | Viewed: | 115 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| For part
* | | 476 Bar 12L with Open Stud, Tow Ball, and Slit (Boat Mast) Parts: Bar | the image for Rust color should be removed. This part doesn't
exist in this color (but may appear rust colored as written in the note).
/Jan
|
Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick | Posted: | Jan 6, 2020 14:18 | Subject: | Instructions Dimensions -- way off? | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| On My Inventory the dimensions for set are 582mm x 378mm. Which is
the size of the Box itself (!)
How were these dimensions populated and what can I do to remove them altogether
(not just one by one)?
(Or better yet to mass-set the dimensions correctly.)
Thanhk you again.
|
|
Author: | calsbricks | Posted: | Jan 6, 2020 10:04 | Subject: | It's a funny old world we live in | Viewed: | 296 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| For quite some time now there have been discussions on the forum about catalogue
changes as well as other areas of improvement to the site (Performance etc.).
There have been lots of different people involved and Russell has commented on
a couple of occasions but of course nothing is out in the open for plans at present
whilst the Lego takeover completes.
One thing I find strange and that is with all the talent (Programming wise) that
exists on the site, coupled with the technical Lego knowledge that also exists,
no one other than a couple of people have chimed in about getting some senior
analysts involved with a plan to redevelop. This is a very complex site but it
can be broken into segments |(elements) many of which can be handled by existing
software. For example the core processing behind the site is an order processing
system. We are aware of at least two products which could deal with that side
of it easily and have been built with 'linking in' other elements in
mind.
Inventory control, which in our opinion, is an essential element which has been
needed for some time is also out there and fits nicely into either of the two
above products. Again this needs an analyst to look at it and report to the decision
makers what needs to be done. It doesn't, with all due respect, require a
programmer to sit down and write the code first.
The catalogue is a different animal and needs a huge amount of thought. The data
currently held is priceless - not sure even Lego have it all, so that needs some
TLC and a significant amount of time spent to come up with the best way forward.
But, and it is a little word with a great big meaning here, the costs of doing
this are nowhere near outrageous and if libraries of code can be used e,g, order
processing, inventory control etc, then huge amounts of money and time can be
saved in achieving what is required.
The redevelopment of this site will not cost a fortune and it was well within
the means of the former owners to accomplish. They chose, for whatever reason,
not to do that - Lets hope that Lego will look at it differently.
Lets get behind hiring some senior analysts and get the project off the ground.
There was never a better time to start than now. With the strength of Lego and
its marketing machine behind the site who knows where we can go.
|
|
Author: | graafie | Posted: | Jan 6, 2020 08:09 | Subject: | Sticker, LEGO.com/life Promotional (French) | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| New stickersheet to add.
Possible reference number:
"GSTK229"
Reference name:
"Sticker, LEGO.com/life Promotional (French)"
|
|
Author: | swfoxtrot | Posted: | Jan 3, 2020 19:33 | Subject: | Items scheduled to be removed from catalog | Viewed: | 113 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Doing some shopping and browsing and I have come across a few items that say
they are scheduled to be deleted from catalog. I’m curious if that mean removed
so I can no longer find/buy that piece and if that’s true then how would you
go about obtaining it? Also why would any piece be removed from the catalog?
Perhaps I’m not understanding the why behind it. Can someone explain to me please
|
|
Author: | sircueball | Posted: | Jan 2, 2020 23:33 | Subject: | Description change for 94886c01? | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I think the "and Medium Blue Base" should be dropped from the description.
What do you all think?
I honestly missed this when parting out and just sold a black one, which is completely
black as is the one in the picture, don't think one was ever made with a
different color base than the cannon.
Should I post this somewhere else to request this?
* | | 94886c01 Duplo Cannon Shooting with Axle Hole, Red Firing Button and Matching Color Base Parts: DUPLO |
|
|
|
Author: | infinibrix | Posted: | Jan 2, 2020 19:06 | Subject: | Official Lego Part Codes vs Bricklink Codes? | Viewed: | 187 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Now that Lego has acquired Bricklink do you think the official Lego part numbers
will be more widely used/accepted on BL or will Lego in fact actively want to
encourage the use of their codes on the site as a primary means of identifying
parts in the BL catalog?
Either way when you search for an official Lego part number BL already recognises
it so is there any reason the official Lego part code is not displayed alongside
the part in question? Perhaps there’s already an option in the settings to display
them that I don’t know about?
Also is there any reason BL have continued using their own reference codes instead
of switching to Legos? If it’s just a case of not wanting to upset members that
have inventoried their physical stock and become accustomed to these BL codes
wouldn’t it be better to have both codes to hand so that buyers and sellers alike
have the option of choosing whichever codes they prefer to work with?
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 2, 2020 17:34 | Subject: | New 2020 Colors | Viewed: | 433 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| This is not a comprehensive list. As always, it would be most helpful if BrickLink
included an easy way to see these.
New appearances in dark turquoise:
* | | 18923c01 Vehicle, Base 8 x 16 x 2 1/2 with Mudguards Raised, 4 x 14 Recessed Center with 3 Holes, and Dark Bluish Gray Wheels Holders Parts: Vehicle, Base |
New appearances in black:
New appearances in white:
New appearances in pearl dark gray:
New appearances in dark bluish gray:
New appearances in light bluish gray:
New appearances in tan:
* | | 32828 Bar 1L with 1 x 1 Round Plate with Hollow Stud Parts: Bar |
New appearances in reddish brown:
* | | 476 Bar 12L with Open Stud, Tow Ball, and Slit (Boat Mast) Parts: Bar |
New appearances in red:
New appearances in blue:
New appearances in yellow:
New appearances in orange:
* | | 21459 Minifigure, Weapon Sword, Shamshir/Katana (Square Guard) with Capped Pommel and Holes in Crossguard and Blade Parts: Minifigure, Weapon |
New appearances in green:
* | | 44665 Cockpit 4 x 10 x 4 with 3 Holes on Bottom and 2 Pin Holes on Sides Parts: Cockpit |
* | | 15254 Arch 1 x 6 x 2 - Medium Thick Top without Reinforced Underside Parts: Arch |
New appearances in lime:
New appearances in pearl gold:
New appearances in bright light yellow:
New appearances in bright light orange:
* | | 14137 Hinge Plate 1 x 8 with Angled Side Extensions, Squared Plate Underside Parts: Hinge |
New appearances in bright light blue:
New appearances in bright green:
New appearances in bright pink:
New appearances in dark pink:
New appearances in dark orange:
New appearances in dark blue:
New appearances in dark red:
New appearances in dark azure:
* | | 11208 Wheel 14mm D. x 9.9mm with Center Groove, Fake Bolts and 6 Double Spokes Parts: Wheel |
* | | 55982 Wheel 18mm D. x 14mm with Axle Hole, Fake Bolts and Shallow Spokes Parts: Wheel |
New appearances in dark green:
New appearances in dark tan:
New appearances in dark purple:
New appearances in dark brown:
New appearances in magenta:
* | | 13269 Wedge 6 x 4 Cutout (Train Roof) with 5 Large Bottom Tubes Parts: Wedge |
New appearances in light aqua:
* | | 95347 Support 2 x 2 x 10 Girder Triangular Vertical - Type 4 - 3 Posts, 3 Sections Parts: Support |
New appearances in lavender:
New appearances in medium lavender:
New appearances in medium dark flesh:
New appearances in medium azure:
New appearances in coral:
New appearances in trans-neon orange:
[P=35252]
I got tired of sorting colors, so here are the rest:
This is now in trans-neon green:
* | | 41125 Technic Circular Saw Blade with Pin Hole and Six Teeth (Large Shuriken Throwing Star) Parts: Technic |
This is now in trans-light blue:
This is now in glitter trans-light blue:
This is now in trans-dark pink:
This is now in trans-orange:
This is now in metallic gold:
This is now in sand green:
This is now in violet:
This is now in yellowish green:
This is now in flat silver:
Finally, if you missed these, here are some entirely new parts:
[P=bb1115]
|
|
Author: | gvbricks | Posted: | Jan 2, 2020 11:38 | Subject: | Set 11010 White Baseplate with 48x48 studs | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why does BrickLink show me a picture of a white 48 x 48 baseplate when I click
on the catalog entry for set 11010?
Ok, maybe the picture is there because it is an official product image from TLG.
So they are also using the wrong image in their own online shop.
According to TLG's description of the set, it contains only a 32 x 32 baseplate...
|
|
Author: | joesecc | Posted: | Jan 1, 2020 08:35 | Subject: | minifig cty0006 inconsistency error. | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
Whilst checking this minifig prior to packing it for an order. I noticed a discrepancy
with the description.
The minifig description is listed as having black sunglasses.
but the head description in its inventory states it as having Dark Blue sunglasses.
* | | 3626bpx299 Minifigure, Head Glasses with Dark Blue Sunglasses, Closed Mouth, Light Brown Sideburns and Goatee Pattern - Blocked Open Stud Parts: Minifigure, Head |
How does this get sorted?
Joe
|
|
Author: | pieceXpiece | Posted: | Jan 1, 2020 06:38 | Subject: | Items Being Deleted | Viewed: | 129 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
As I am going through my LEGO parts I am finding a couple of items that have
the banner that says it will be deleted. It is the only listing of that part
that I can find. Am I not able to list these parts that I have?
Thanks for your help!
Nik
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|