Discussion Forum
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: bb75359 View Messages Posted By bb75359
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 09:41
 Subject: New Payment Method
 Viewed: 134 times
 Topic: Suggestions
 Status:Open
 Vote:[Yes|No]
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
Would it be possible to add another payment method.
Afterpay
Zip Pay
or at least have a blank one so that we can input our own custom method.
 Author: mfav View Messages Posted By mfav
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 08:24
 Subject: Catalog Policy Issues
 Viewed: 123 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
http://v4ei.com/mini-fig-ure-outer/comics/index.php
 Author: 62Bricks View Messages Posted By 62Bricks
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 07:53
 Subject: Re: Remove image
 Viewed: 53 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  In Catalog Requests, 62Bricks writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  In Catalog Requests, mfav writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  Why shouldn't rust be considered a verified color for this part?

I know it's daft of me to think this, but can't you just call up the
mothership and get an answer? Then definitively tell us what it is? I mean instead
of questioning us. Like we know.

You know. As in sincerely, can't you do that?

Regarding this color Rust, BrickLink's definition (and usage) don't line
up with the internal official palette, as you can see here:

http://ryanhowerter.net/colors.html

BrickLink sellers tend to list colors exactly as they see them, not what the
catalog says they are supposed to be. That is why there are 86 lots listed under
Rust, yet no inventory lists Rust as a "known" color. And the image "verifies"
the existence of this part in Rust - that's why I am hesitant to remove it.

As far as access to the "mothership" goes, it's still very early in the transition.
Yes, I could contact someone who could put me in touch with someone else who
has access to internal color info. But right now there are other much more important
issues to deal with, so I will be reserving my lifelines for those.

"Rust" is just red in certain non-ABS parts. If it is considered a legitimate
color, then we should also have the "medium old gray" of certain old 1x1 clips
and airtanks and maybe "translucent light yellow" for old minifig hands and airtanks.

According to Ryan's sheet, 216 Rust is an official LEGO color. And 13 Red
Orange falls into that category too:
 
Part No: 4010pb01  Name: Duplo Cow Adult with Black and White Eyes Pattern
* 
4010pb01 Duplo Cow Adult with Black and White Eyes Pattern
Parts: DUPLO, Animal {Rust}

Ryan's sheet also points out that there is a "rust" that is "Really 21 Bright
Red in softer plastics."

That is the case with the boat mast in question here. I don't think it is
a deliberate color by Lego in this part. It is considered red by Lego, but appears
dull because of the material. If we are going to use our own color definitions,
which I have no problem with, then we should allow them in similar situations
like I mention where the appearance does not match the official Lego color because
of the part material. .
 Author: Brickwilbo View Messages Posted By Brickwilbo
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 06:30
 Subject: Re: Ability to search through order history
 Viewed: 37 times
 Topic: Suggestions
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Suggestions, badlego writes:
  In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
  In Suggestions, badlego writes:
  to enable me to see what I've already purchased, it would be good to search
my completed orders.

It already exists.
On your orders placed page, click on "Find Orders"

thank you. I was hoping to search through my entire order history but this is
a good start. I have tried searching for a recent item by minifigure reference
number.

Maybe it's possible to download old data, the same as with old purged received
orders.
 Author: Stellar View Messages Posted By Stellar
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 04:17
 Subject: Re: Remove image
 Viewed: 62 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  In Catalog Requests, normann1974 writes:
  For part
 
Part No: 476  Name: Bar  12L with Open Stud, Tow Ball, and Slit (Boat Mast)
* 
476 Bar 12L with Open Stud, Tow Ball, and Slit (Boat Mast)
Parts: Bar
the image for Rust color should be removed. This part doesn't
exist in this color (but may appear rust colored as written in the note).

/Jan

I'm not sure I follow this. This part does appear in a rust variant - we
have one here in the office. It's not exactly like other rust colors, but
it's not red either.

Why shouldn't rust be considered a verified color for this part?

If you have one there, could you make a better picture and upload to the catalogue?
The current one is small and blur...
 Author: badlego View Messages Posted By badlego
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 03:25
 Subject: Re: Ability to search through order history
 Viewed: 36 times
 Topic: Suggestions
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
  In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
  In Suggestions, badlego writes:
  to enable me to see what I've already purchased, it would be good to search
my completed orders.

It already exists.
On your orders placed page, click on "Find Orders"

Although that only works for orders that have not been purged - so six months.
An alternative is to search through emails for past orders, although part numbers
are missing in favour of names.


thank you, I had hoped to see historic orders too as I've been buying for
years and want to avoid buying duplicate figures without searching through my
collection. maybe I need an inventory of items I own.
 Author: badlego View Messages Posted By badlego
 Posted: Jan 7, 2020 03:23
 Subject: Re: Ability to search through order history
 Viewed: 38 times
 Topic: Suggestions
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
  In Suggestions, badlego writes:
  to enable me to see what I've already purchased, it would be good to search
my completed orders.

It already exists.
On your orders placed page, click on "Find Orders"

thank you. I was hoping to search through my entire order history but this is
a good start. I have tried searching for a recent item by minifigure reference
number.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Jan 6, 2020 22:02
 Subject: Re: Remove image
 Viewed: 62 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Requests, 62Bricks writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  In Catalog Requests, mfav writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  Why shouldn't rust be considered a verified color for this part?

I know it's daft of me to think this, but can't you just call up the
mothership and get an answer? Then definitively tell us what it is? I mean instead
of questioning us. Like we know.

You know. As in sincerely, can't you do that?

Regarding this color Rust, BrickLink's definition (and usage) don't line
up with the internal official palette, as you can see here:

http://ryanhowerter.net/colors.html

BrickLink sellers tend to list colors exactly as they see them, not what the
catalog says they are supposed to be. That is why there are 86 lots listed under
Rust, yet no inventory lists Rust as a "known" color. And the image "verifies"
the existence of this part in Rust - that's why I am hesitant to remove it.

As far as access to the "mothership" goes, it's still very early in the transition.
Yes, I could contact someone who could put me in touch with someone else who
has access to internal color info. But right now there are other much more important
issues to deal with, so I will be reserving my lifelines for those.

"Rust" is just red in certain non-ABS parts. If it is considered a legitimate
color, then we should also have the "medium old gray" of certain old 1x1 clips
and airtanks and maybe "translucent light yellow" for old minifig hands and airtanks.

According to Ryan's sheet, 216 Rust is an official LEGO color. And 13 Red
Orange falls into that category too:
 
Part No: 4010pb01  Name: Duplo Cow Adult with Black and White Eyes Pattern
* 
4010pb01 Duplo Cow Adult with Black and White Eyes Pattern
Parts: DUPLO, Animal {Rust}
 Author: 62Bricks View Messages Posted By 62Bricks
 Posted: Jan 6, 2020 21:10
 Subject: Re: Remove image
 Viewed: 46 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  In Catalog Requests, mfav writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  Why shouldn't rust be considered a verified color for this part?

I know it's daft of me to think this, but can't you just call up the
mothership and get an answer? Then definitively tell us what it is? I mean instead
of questioning us. Like we know.

You know. As in sincerely, can't you do that?

Regarding this color Rust, BrickLink's definition (and usage) don't line
up with the internal official palette, as you can see here:

http://ryanhowerter.net/colors.html

BrickLink sellers tend to list colors exactly as they see them, not what the
catalog says they are supposed to be. That is why there are 86 lots listed under
Rust, yet no inventory lists Rust as a "known" color. And the image "verifies"
the existence of this part in Rust - that's why I am hesitant to remove it.

As far as access to the "mothership" goes, it's still very early in the transition.
Yes, I could contact someone who could put me in touch with someone else who
has access to internal color info. But right now there are other much more important
issues to deal with, so I will be reserving my lifelines for those.

"Rust" is just red in certain non-ABS parts. If it is considered a legitimate
color, then we should also have the "medium old gray" of certain old 1x1 clips
and airtanks and maybe "translucent light yellow" for old minifig hands and airtanks.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Jan 6, 2020 20:52
 Subject: Re: Remove image
 Viewed: 65 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Requests, mfav writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
  Why shouldn't rust be considered a verified color for this part?

I know it's daft of me to think this, but can't you just call up the
mothership and get an answer? Then definitively tell us what it is? I mean instead
of questioning us. Like we know.

You know. As in sincerely, can't you do that?

Regarding this color Rust, BrickLink's definition (and usage) don't line
up with the internal official palette, as you can see here:

http://ryanhowerter.net/colors.html

BrickLink sellers tend to list colors exactly as they see them, not what the
catalog says they are supposed to be. That is why there are 86 lots listed under
Rust, yet no inventory lists Rust as a "known" color. And the image "verifies"
the existence of this part in Rust - that's why I am hesitant to remove it.

As far as access to the "mothership" goes, it's still very early in the transition.
Yes, I could contact someone who could put me in touch with someone else who
has access to internal color info. But right now there are other much more important
issues to deal with, so I will be reserving my lifelines for those.

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More