| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | SylvainLS  | | Posted: | Nov 26, 2019 13:40 | | Subject: | Re: Find sets based on pieces | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, bwbwings writes:
| | There is a feature I would love to see in Bricklink, it goes like this:
I have x number of pieces that belong to a set but I do not know what the set
is. I would love to specify which pieces I have and then view all the sets that
all the pieces belong to.
I do know that I can look up a single piece but it gets difficult cross referencing
5 or 6 pieces to find the common set.
Please let me know if you think this would be a beneficial feature or if you
would like more info.
Thanks 
|
rebrickable.com
|
And https://www.bricklink.com/catalogIn.asp?viewMulti=Y
|
 |
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 23, 2019 17:33 | | Subject: | Re: 4150 not dead? | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, maxx3001 writes:
| | […]
| | I wonder though: what happens when the variants aren’t functionnally equivalent?
|
LEGO doesn’t really care, a brick is a brick is a brick.
|
Well, apparently, from the Eurobricks’ topic Hygrotus linked to, it depends whether
you get a friendly person from LEGO customer services, especially if you’re one
of the first to encounter the issue.
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 23, 2019 17:27 | | Subject: | Re: 4150 not dead? | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
Oh, very interesting indeed. Thank you.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 23, 2019 13:07 | | Subject: | Re: 4150 not dead? | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, maxx3001 writes:
| | In Catalog, Teup writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Teup writes:
| | That's funny. I just encountered 4 of these:
|
|
|
LEGO just uses everything they have, maybe they dug up an old container with
the X bottom and mixed them in with the newer parts.
LEGO never throws anything away, this is how we got old Maersk blue 3001old in
modern sets
|
I wonder though: what happens when the variants aren’t functionnally equivalent?
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 15, 2019 12:23 | | Subject: | Re: Suggestion for extra function in Studio | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, JLvL writes:
| | In Suggestions, JLvL writes:
| | Hello,
Over the las couple of months i have designed some cars in Studio.
Some bricks in the middle may have a different color than the color I am currently
building. So if the color doesn't matter you select 'not applicable'
for that specific brick.
It always takes quite some time to figure out in the wanted list which bricks
should be on not applicable. I think it is much easier to include the 'color'
not applicable in the list of colors in Studio.
As an extra function it is then useful to be able to choose the color of the
'not applicable' bricks. For example, if you are building a model in
red, you can set the 'not applicable' bricks to yellow. Because of the
contrast between these two colors you keep the overview on the model.
|
|
Agreed… but the dedicated forum for Studio is http://forum.bricklink.com/
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
