Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Oct 11, 2019 01:24 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| Also, it doesn't make much sense to call this part a cylinder:
When its own counterpart that fits into it is a Slope:
|
This actually makes a bit more sense, since Part (45411)'s original
counterpart is Part (45410), which is also classified as a Curved Slope. Both
Parts (45411) and (45410) could also be reclassified as Cylinders, though. 😐
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 16:52 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, DeLuca writes:
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| So it's a door/window/panel/technic/vehicle/slope/arch/brick modified/cylinder..
I think this part just broke the catalog
|
What about a new category: “Technic, Brick, Modified”?
This would include Parts (49699) and (30528), along with (2991), (2991b), (2989),
(85943), (18975), (92715), and (61185c01).
|
Actually, Part (61185c01) should be moved to “Projectile Launcher”: https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?searchMethod=searchBoth&q=&itemBrand=1000&catType=&itemYear=&catID=992&catLike=W
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 16:45 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| So it's a door/window/panel/technic/vehicle/slope/arch/brick modified/cylinder..
I think this part just broke the catalog
|
What about a new category: “Technic, Brick, Modified”?
This would include Parts (49699) and (30528), along with (2991), (2991b), (2989),
(85943), (18975), (92715), and (61185c01).
|
|
Author: | qwertyboy | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 15:51 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| So it's a door/window/panel/technic/vehicle/slope/arch/brick modified/cylinder..
I think this part just broke the catalog
|
We used to have the one category it would fit in perfectly - Other.
Niek.
|
Author: | BricksThatStick | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 15:24 | Subject: | Re: Adding a Power Adapter | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| Which category? Any other specifics for a listing like this?
Anyone know what set it comes from?
|
I don't know specifically about these but it looks the same as the attached
pic from set 9833
The US/Canada listing on BL shows a different design (although it is the same
spec)
But yours does look like the UK version of 9833 but I assume yours has the US/Canada
pins
Could just be an updated design?
|
|
|
Author: | tons_of_bricks | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 14:15 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
|
I can't discover anything panel-ish about this part. I'd say it's
window, door, technic, other, vehicle, or pretty much anything except a panel...
What do you think it should be?
|
Since
is an arch, 49699 should perhaps just be a slope
|
I don’t quite follow the logic here
Half an arch might be a slope but, surely, an arch + an inverted arch is not
a slope, it’s a cylinder!
| At least it has something in common with
|
|
|
| |
Okay but then it should be a Slope AND a Slope Inverted. And both Double. So
does that make it Quadruple or Double-Double?
We really need a catmin who is used to deep and rigorous classifications.
I don’t know, maybe an entomologist or something like that?
|
So it's a door/window/panel/technic/vehicle/slope/arch/brick modified/cylinder..
I think this part just broke the catalog
|
Brickowl has it as: Parts/Uncategorized
So they don't know where to put it either.
|
|
Author: | Grego | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 14:09 | Subject: | Re: Adding a Power Adapter | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| Which category? Any other specifics for a listing like this?
Anyone know what set it comes from?
|
It appears very similar to
|
Author: | TorontoLego | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 13:31 | Subject: | Adding a Power Adapter | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Which category? Any other specifics for a listing like this?
Anyone know what set it comes from?
|
|
|
Author: | Teup | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 11:29 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
|
I can't discover anything panel-ish about this part. I'd say it's
window, door, technic, other, vehicle, or pretty much anything except a panel...
What do you think it should be?
|
Since
is an arch, 49699 should perhaps just be a slope
|
I don’t quite follow the logic here
Half an arch might be a slope but, surely, an arch + an inverted arch is not
a slope, it’s a cylinder!
| At least it has something in common with
|
Okay but then it should be a Slope AND a Slope Inverted. And both Double. So
does that make it Quadruple or Double-Double?
We really need a catmin who is used to deep and rigorous classifications.
I don’t know, maybe an entomologist or something like that?
|
So it's a door/window/panel/technic/vehicle/slope/arch/brick modified/cylinder..
I think this part just broke the catalog
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 11:24 | Subject: | Re: 49699 a Panel?! | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
|
I can't discover anything panel-ish about this part. I'd say it's
window, door, technic, other, vehicle, or pretty much anything except a panel...
What do you think it should be?
|
Since
is an arch, 49699 should perhaps just be a slope
|
I don’t quite follow the logic here
Half an arch might be a slope but, surely, an arch + an inverted arch is not
a slope, it’s a cylinder!
| At least it has something in common with
|
Okay but then it should be a Slope AND a Slope Inverted. And both Double. So
does that make it Quadruple or Double-Double?
We really need a catmin who is used to deep and rigorous classifications.
I don’t know, maybe an entomologist or something like that?
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|