| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | bb1237701  | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:11 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:03 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
I *had* seen it, probably at the same time as the new 2x4 brick with axle holes
and that technic connector block...
But I can't find it so I probably noticed the part when I was looking at
new items pending approval in our catalog... 
|
| Author: | clrv4000 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 20:22 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
All I can say is that I really would like a part like that! I can already
think of some situations I could have solved easily with that. Hopefully some
sleuth can sort this out for us. Please keep us updated.
|
 |
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 18:15 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
This is something we are going to look into. From what I have seen over the years,
there is no real "smooth slopes" for some of those parts (or any of them). What
they are are parts that come from molds where the sand-blasted texture has been
worn down over time making the slopes look more smooth than others that were
produced when the molds were new. One thing is for certain - none of them are
smooth like real smooth-molded slopes such as
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 16:02 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
Why do you think that smooth slopes is not an appropriate entry? I actually prefer
textured slopes and when I order textured slopes and get smooth slopes it does
not make me happy.
|
|
| Author: | Brickitty | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 15:18 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:34 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
| Author: | seymour3113 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:10 | | Subject: | 4070a | | Viewed: | 125 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | May 23, 2019 10:13 | | Subject: | Old Mosaic pieces. | | Viewed: | 113 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Can I ask what proof is required to submit the rectangular version of the 3062oldtile
?
I have both the one shown below and the rectangular version without stud that
I suppose would be something like 3005oldtile.
Not ready to list just yet but might want to do so sometime this year.
[p=3062oldtile]
|
|
| Author: | sheppy02 | | Posted: | May 22, 2019 06:40 | | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
|
There are 87 of the "set", whereas there are 4294 listings for the part. So most
people have listed them as the single part. The sealed ones listed as sets are
likely to be correct, as are the used ones listed as sets as they do not need
to contain the packaging (although the listing should say that).
If you have plenty of a single part set (or single minifigure set), it is often
a good idea to list some as the part (or minifigure) and some as the set, as
different buys will search for different things.
|
Thanks, that is very helpful
Alex
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
