Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | iprice  | | Posted: | May 15, 2019 00:37 | | Subject: | Re: Technic battery boxes | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SezaR writes:
| | In Catalog, iprice writes:
This
is a set (not an item) consisting of the item
Indeed, 8881-1 is like a service pack. See the second photo.
|
I have compared the photos. To me they appear physically identical; I just wanted
to know if they were in effect the same - whether a "set" (of one item?) or a
component (one item) in a set!
I don't get the whole service pack thing. :/
|
 |
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | May 14, 2019 23:54 | | Subject: | Re: Technic battery boxes | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, iprice writes:
This
is a set (not an item) consisting of the item
Indeed, 8881-1 is like a service pack. See the second photo.
|
|
| Author: | 1974 | | Posted: | May 14, 2019 13:37 | | Subject: | Re: Does part 6057 (Short Rigging) need a variant | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Same thing with the large brown riggings
In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| | The four black ones and one brown one are about a plates width shorter. I can't
be the first one to notice this!
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 14:12 | | Subject: | Re: Does part 6057 (Short Rigging) need a variant | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| | I don't know.
Do you have black ones and brown ones? Can you check to see if this holds true
for at least all the black ones?
|
Nope. I have none. Dark Ages.
If the sets that use them are using them differently, — that is, if they aren’t
substitutable —, the variant would really be necessary. It wouldn’t be the first
time TLG thought better about making a part “in System,” like
or
I wanted to look at the building instructions to look for a mathematical necessity
for the change, but there are some 14 sets that use them, so knowing from which
sets they came from would have narrowed the search.
On the other hand, another possibility simply is that some are not LEGO 
|
|
| Author: | TorontoLego | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 13:38 | | Subject: | Re: Does part 6057 (Short Rigging) need a variant | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I don't know.
Do you have black ones and brown ones? Can you check to see if this holds true
for at least all the black ones?
In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| |
In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| | The four black ones and one brown one are about a plates width shorter. I can't
be the first one to notice this!
|
Do you know which sets they come from?
It would be interesting to check if something changed in their uses, mathematically
speaking.
|
|
|
| Author: | Agcomptech | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 12:44 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO DC 30623: Shazam! Polybag | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Hello,
Can you please approve LEGO DC Super Heroes: 30623 Shazam Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
I didn't order this not do I want it.
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 11:55 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO DC 30623: Shazam! Polybag | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Hello,
Can you please approve LEGO DC Super Heroes: 30623 Shazam Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 10:52 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO DC 30623: Shazam! Polybag | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, rapar writes:
| | Hello,
Can you please approve LEGO DC Super Heroes: 30623 Shazam Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
You type very well with polybags in your hands.
I didn't realize this was coming. It means I'm gonna need a Flynn Rider
now too.
|
| Author: | rapar | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 10:45 | | Subject: | Please approve LEGO DC 30623: Shazam! Polybag | | Viewed: | 244 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Can you please approve LEGO DC Super Heroes: 30623 Shazam Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 07:26 | | Subject: | Re: Does part 6057 (Short Rigging) need a variant | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| | The four black ones and one brown one are about a plates width shorter. I can't
be the first one to notice this!
|
Do you know which sets they come from?
It would be interesting to check if something changed in their uses, mathematically
speaking.
|
| Author: | TorontoLego | | Posted: | May 13, 2019 04:37 | | Subject: | Does part 6057 (Short Rigging) need a variant | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| The four black ones and one brown one are about a plates width shorter. I can't
be the first one to notice this!
|
|
| Author: | joesecc | | Posted: | May 12, 2019 19:19 | | Subject: | Re: Power functions - Hub | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, joesecc writes:
| | Hi,
What are the differences between the Power function Hubs: 88009 and bb892c01?
Externally they look the same.
|
None. It is just the classification system used on BrickLink.
is a set sold by LEGO containing one part
[p=bb892c01]
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thanks. That clears things up as to why there there are two entries for the same
item.
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | May 12, 2019 11:40 | | Subject: | Re: Power functions - Hub | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, joesecc writes:
| | Hi,
What are the differences between the Power function Hubs: 88009 and bb892c01?
Externally they look the same.
|
None. It is just the classification system used on BrickLink.
is a set sold by LEGO containing one part
[p=bb892c01]
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | joesecc | | Posted: | May 12, 2019 08:12 | | Subject: | Power functions - Hub | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
What are the differences between the Power function Hubs: 88009 and bb892c01?
Externally they look the same.
|
| Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | May 11, 2019 19:21 | | Subject: | Re: Iron Man Mark 43 Issue | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | came out last year, retroactively an Age of Ultron set. It is very similar to sh167. There is a slight deco change to the legs that reflects nothing on Mark 33. There is a larger change to the upper torso with a large gray panels with silver cables.
|
Looking at the suits side-by-side, (sh498) is definitely the Mark 43. Since the
"cables" are in the same places that plates are, on (sh167), they likely represent
the skeletal inner layer of the suit, visible before the outer pieces are added.
It is an odd design choice, however, as the Mark 43 is never shown in
such a state.
|
|
|
| Author: | avyz66 | | Posted: | May 11, 2019 08:54 | | Subject: | Re: Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| | I can issue you with an excel file which details all star wars minifigs & sets,
including variants and also average guide prices.
Please send me a message with your email & I’ll forward it over to you.
Thanks Graeme.
In Catalog, avyz66 writes:
| | Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
|
Just want to thank everyone for the replies and the help. Hope one day I can
return the favor to this community.
|
|
| Author: | grimsbricksuk | | Posted: | May 11, 2019 03:22 | | Subject: | Re: Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I can issue you with an excel file which details all star wars minifigs & sets,
including variants and also average guide prices.
Please send me a message with your email & I’ll forward it over to you.
Thanks Graeme.
In Catalog, avyz66 writes:
| | Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
|
|
| Author: | sandpitcam | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 23:15 | | Subject: | Re: Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, avyz66 writes:
| | Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
My 10 cents is dont. But if you insist, I am about 900 figs into the approx 1090
figs and variants, it has been about 6 or 7 years worth of work and I estimate
5 to 6000 US Dollars so far. I suggest that you break it down into small batches,
and start a want list and go from there.
You will find that being SW attracts a premium, even common figs get expensive,
there are more than a few figs that will cost you $100 plus each up to $400 or
500 for a cloud city Boba fett. Add in some of the Rare older ones and you have
to search the BL catalogue regularly to find the bargains. I guesstimate that
the average per fig is $10 to 15 each - as new.
Good luck and many grey hairs to you on your quest mate.
Regards
Cameron
|
|
| Author: | M_R | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 16:39 | | Subject: | Re: Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Inventories, avyz66 writes:
| | Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
Here´s a list:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=M&catString=65&itemBrand=1000
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 15:45 | | Subject: | Iron Man Mark 43 Issue | | Viewed: | 114 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| and are both named Mark 43 in the catalog and though they
are very similar, they are distinguishable and I fear there may be an error.
But maybe not?
came in 3 Age of Ultron sets and was originally named "Iron Man MK43".
Tony did use Mark 43 in that movie. And you can recognize design elements from
it in the minifig. All 3 of the scenes depicted in the Lego sets were when Tony
was wearing 43 in the movie. In short, this seems like a closed case.
came out last year, retroactively an Age of Ultron set. It is very
similar to sh167. There is a slight deco change to the legs that reflects nothing
on Mark 33. There is a larger change to the upper torso with a large gray panels
with silver cables. This also doesn't depict anything in the Mark 33 Armor
or the Mark 34 used late in the movie. I don't readily find an MCU Armor
with that design element. What's worse (and embarrassing) is that this minifig
was originally named "Iron Man (76105)". It was me that changed it to "Iron
Man Mk 43 (Trans-Clear Head)" and then to "Iron Man Mark 43 Armor (Trans-Clear
Head)" and I have no recollection of what information I was going on. Maybe
the instructions or box say so? I haven't seen the movie since it came out.
Does this perhaps depict damage that Hulk did to the Armor?
|
|
| Author: | SasquatchBricks | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 15:31 | | Subject: | Re: Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Inventories, avyz66 writes:
| | Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
Put a want list together and it should bring up the stores that have the most
in one place, you will be ordering from multiple stores as Star Wars is your
biggest single category for figs
|
| Author: | avyz66 | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 15:29 | | Subject: | Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
| Author: | avyz66 | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 14:52 | | Subject: | Star Wars MiniFigs | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Not sure if this is in the correct area to post. I am wanting to start and complete
a Star Wars MiniFig collection. I am looking for a list with variants included
to help me with this. Any push in the right direction is appreciated.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 03:11 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
As others, I don't know from where this part is.
But I did some researches too.
It can come from Gear sets for example:
The "red point" of
Others unlucky ideas:
[g=64776]
This part look small to be an axle, maybe it's used to close a '+'
hole.
for example
|
Thanks for the effort. I also thought that it could be a button from some LEGO
clock or watch. But as I see those buttons don't have LEGO name molded there.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 03:08 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | As others, never see that before, still the shape and the notch in an axle shape
suggest to me it could be part of some NXT/Mindstorm sensor end, toggle switch,
a toggle for a light brick or toggle/release switch of a windup motor.
I have checked all this kind of parts known in BL without any luck, my closest
match is the button on the left side of the Code Pilot (but the red button does
not have Lego logo on it)
Last guess: kind of pin to keep Technic parts with axle hole together/in place,
especially flat liftarms like 11478, in place or a wheel decoration.
Good opportunity to make a forum challenge, this could become the quest for the
mythical "pièce de résistance"  .
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
|
Thanks for the effort, I appreciate that. Quite a challabge with this part there
is
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | May 9, 2019 09:29 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
As others, I don't know from where this part is.
But I did some researches too.
It can come from Gear sets for example:
The "red point" of
Others unlucky ideas:
[g=64776]
This part look small to be an axle, maybe it's used to close a '+'
hole.
for example
|
|
| Author: | JusTiCe8 | | Posted: | May 9, 2019 08:45 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| As others, never see that before, still the shape and the notch in an axle shape
suggest to me it could be part of some NXT/Mindstorm sensor end, toggle switch,
a toggle for a light brick or toggle/release switch of a windup motor.
I have checked all this kind of parts known in BL without any luck, my closest
match is the button on the left side of the Code Pilot (but the red button does
not have Lego logo on it)
Last guess: kind of pin to keep Technic parts with axle hole together/in place,
especially flat liftarms like 11478, in place or a wheel decoration.
Good opportunity to make a forum challenge, this could become the quest for the
mythical "pièce de résistance" .
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
|
|
| Author: | palenjo | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 17:40 | | Subject: | 3009p01 | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi!
I would just like to know if the entry 3009p01 encompasses entry 3009p01e (embossed
print), since there is no separate entry 3009p01s with surface print (or whatever
part id the part with surface print would receive)?
Johan
|
| Author: | paolocolombo | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 15:32 | | Subject: | Re: Set 71040 Disney castle | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| A very big thanks to both for the fast and comprehensive answer!
with regard
Paul
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 15:27 | | Subject: | Re: Set 71040 Disney castle | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, paolocolombo writes:
| | Goodmorning everyone!
Set 71040: are there 2 versions? I noticed that the front box "type 1" under
the word "16+" has:
- the number of pieces
- the word "building toy"
- has 7 minifig.
The front box type 2 does NOT have the number of pieces and does not have the
word "building toy"; has 5 minifig.
Are there any fakes?
Also on the small side where there are minifigs in the type 2 box there are no
small writings.
Thanks as always for the info.
|
Maybe just a US / EU difference on the boxes: number of parts is an obligation
in the USA, it’s rarely on EU boxes.
For the minifigures, 5 are Disney characters, 2 are statues. They just decided
the statues weren’t real minifigures after all.
There might be other differences in the production runs: newer variants, different
extra parts….
At least, for now, no one has come and said the inventory was wrong 
|
|
| Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 15:25 | | Subject: | Re: Set 71040 Disney castle | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| European version.
In Catalog, paolocolombo writes:
| | In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| | Pictures?
In Catalog, paolocolombo writes:
| | Goodmorning everyone!
Set 71040: are there 2 versions? I noticed that the front box "type 1" under
the word "16+" has:
- the number of pieces
- the word "building toy"
- has 7 minifig.
The front box type 2 does NOT have the number of pieces and does not have the
word "building toy"; has 5 minifig.
Are there any fakes?
Also on the small side where there are minifigs in the type 2 box there are no
small writings.
Thanks as always for the info.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | paolocolombo | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 14:56 | | Subject: | Re: Set 71040 Disney castle | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| | Pictures?
In Catalog, paolocolombo writes:
| | Goodmorning everyone!
Set 71040: are there 2 versions? I noticed that the front box "type 1" under
the word "16+" has:
- the number of pieces
- the word "building toy"
- has 7 minifig.
The front box type 2 does NOT have the number of pieces and does not have the
word "building toy"; has 5 minifig.
Are there any fakes?
Also on the small side where there are minifigs in the type 2 box there are no
small writings.
Thanks as always for the info.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 14:05 | | Subject: | Re: Set 71040 Disney castle | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Pictures?
In Catalog, paolocolombo writes:
| | Goodmorning everyone!
Set 71040: are there 2 versions? I noticed that the front box "type 1" under
the word "16+" has:
- the number of pieces
- the word "building toy"
- has 7 minifig.
The front box type 2 does NOT have the number of pieces and does not have the
word "building toy"; has 5 minifig.
Are there any fakes?
Also on the small side where there are minifigs in the type 2 box there are no
small writings.
Thanks as always for the info.
Paul
|
|
|
| Author: | paolocolombo | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 13:39 | | Subject: | Set 71040 Disney castle | | Viewed: | 113 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Goodmorning everyone!
Set 71040: are there 2 versions? I noticed that the front box "type 1" under
the word "16+" has:
- the number of pieces
- the word "building toy"
- has 7 minifig.
The front box type 2 does NOT have the number of pieces and does not have the
word "building toy"; has 5 minifig.
Are there any fakes?
Also on the small side where there are minifigs in the type 2 box there are no
small writings.
Thanks as always for the info.
Paul
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 10:41 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 77 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I have no idea what it's from, but I do find it very interesting. The non-stud
end looks like it's the same as a notched 2L axle, which means that there
are all kinds of places that it could securely fit as either a decorative or
functional piece.
David
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 06:38 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
Some kind of button?
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 8, 2019 05:38 | | Subject: | Mystery part | | Viewed: | 293 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
|
|
| Author: | JusTiCe8 | | Posted: | May 6, 2019 06:51 | | Subject: | Re: Looking for an item | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I would like to see them as set in the catalog too. I don't see why inventory
could be an issue, as a note could state something like "inventory is not garanteed
100% accurate but confirmed by x members."
+ a little form with confirm this inventory/add remarks
it would need a given minimum confirmations to be accepted as ok.
The need is mostly to buy the right parts in right colour to be able to build
the set when we can't get it in store for any reason.
By the way, I have add this cute micro Systar in the Studio gallery a while back
using pictures from a german website but cannot be sure of the exact colour used,
even it's not such a big deal to use a dark pink plate instead of a magenta
one for instance (unless price of one part in one rare coulour is very high,
which is not the case here).
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | It is on the roadmap under number 20 here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
| | "Add Sets Members Want - A project to discuss and possibly add pickable models, in-store builds, and other similar sets to the catalog. This is a relatively minor project which is essentially just a policy change. It has been added to the roadmap so that members ?know we may be open to the possibility of adding these sets in the future and so that we don't forget about doing this.
Date first added: 12/06/2018
Suggested by: Many members"
|
So we consider possibility to allow them in the catalog as sets. But not for
now. When this project will come alive in future we will start considering all
possiblities.
(My private opinion is that I would like to see them as sets)
But there could be some problem with iventories for them for example as they
never came sealed just loose parts to build in store.
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 5, 2019 13:47 | | Subject: | Re: Looking for an item | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jenso writes:
| | Hi Hygrotus,
Interesting considering that the Monthly Mini Model Build Sets do get accepted
(e.g. ). These can also only be built in stores and at least here in Germany
they are not given out in sealed bags and instructions can also only be viewed
in the store as well. So I agree with you that I would like to see these get
listed. For the Tantive IV, I uploaded a picture of the instructions which I
photographed with my cell phone in the store.
Jens
|
Interesting, so Germany is an exception as in other countries those Monthly Mini
Model Build Sets are distibuted in polybag from 2012. Check this article https://brickset.com/article/2243/brand-store-monthly-mini-model-build-now-in-polybags
See the attached photos of this certain example set.
That is why those from 2012 and later are in the catalog as sets. And those older
ones are still as instruction in gear category only
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catID=745&catXrefLevel=0&catType=G&q=Monthly+Mini+Model+Build&catLike=W&itemBrand=1000
Of course previous catmins accepted some in store build as sets but they are
still exception. So we have some precedences (Like those three Brickheadz). But
still policy that they goes as instruction to gear category till we run this
certain project from road map.
|
|
|
| Author: | jenso | | Posted: | May 5, 2019 13:21 | | Subject: | Re: Looking for an item | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Hi Hygrotus,
Interesting considering that the Monthly Mini Model Build Sets do get accepted
(e.g. 40241-1). These can also only be built in stores and at least here in Germany
they are not given out in sealed bags and instructions can also only be viewed
in the store as well. So I agree with you that I would like to see these get
listed. For the Tantive IV, I uploaded a picture of the instructions which I
photographed with my cell phone in the store.
Jens
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 5, 2019 13:12 | | Subject: | Re: Looking for an item | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jenso writes:
Currently we do not accept entries for "in store builds" in the catalog. They
are added as instructions only to gear category here
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catType=G&catString=745
It is on the roadmap under number 20 here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
| | "Add Sets Members Want - A project to discuss and possibly add pickable models, in-store builds, and other similar sets to the catalog. This is a relatively minor project which is essentially just a policy change. It has been added to the roadmap so that members ?know we may be open to the possibility of adding these sets in the future and so that we don't forget about doing this.
Date first added: 12/06/2018
Suggested by: Many members"
|
So we consider possibility to allow them in the catalog as sets. But not for
now. When this project will come alive in future we will start considering all
possiblities.
(My private opinion is that I would like to see them as sets)
But there could be some problem with iventories for them for example as they
never came sealed just loose parts to build in store.
So for now please add your pending in store build Tantive IV in such way. Current
pending one as set will soon be rejected.
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | May 5, 2019 10:15 | | Subject: | Re: Vintage version of 4175? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | | I do agree that vintage ones look different and seem to be of a different plastic.
|
Does that warrant a note on the part? They look quite odd compared to each other,
and some might think that they are unoriginal despite the LEGO logo.
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | May 4, 2019 15:45 | | Subject: | Re: Vintage version of 4175? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When sorting my parts
I've noticed some blue and black versions that look different. The shade
of blue is a bit greenish (image may not show this clearly) and the shade of
blue is a bit greyish. They are easily identifiable by their color variation
but they can also be identified by some whitening/fraying along the edges. I
believe they're made from a softer plastic than usual. Are these vintage
or from certain special sets?
/Jan
|
I do agree that vintage ones look different and seem to be of a different plastic.
I have never found a modern one broken either.
|
|
| Author: | WhiteVanMan | | Posted: | May 4, 2019 15:34 | | Subject: | Re: Vintage version of 4175? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When sorting my parts
I've noticed some blue and black versions that look different. The shade
of blue is a bit greenish (image may not show this clearly) and the shade of
blue is a bit greyish. They are easily identifiable by their color variation
but they can also be identified by some whitening/fraying along the edges. I
believe they're made from a softer plastic than usual. Are these vintage
or from certain special sets?
/Jan
|
Honestly?
I wouldn't be surprised if this is indeed the case, as I have seen differences
in 2x2 inverted slopes, especially with Blue, and LEGO has experimented with
various 'compositions' of the plastic over the years, and I have often
seen texture differences with 1x plates, as well as various Trans colours, as
there are documented differences over the years of some of them being quite distinctly
different, but LEGO doesn't distinguish between them, for example, Trans
Orange comes to mind, and I 've seen Trans Light Blue come into play as well.
You can always list them separately, and I've done this myself.
Paul
|
|
| Author: | dadebrick | | Posted: | May 4, 2019 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: Part identification 3229a ; 3230a | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank youuuuuuuuuu very much
In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, dadebrick writes:
| | How do i identify curved inside or curved outside. Thank you all
|
Inside is a sharper curve and has a smooth top.
Outside is shallower curve and has a serrated top.
|
|
| Author: | WhiteHorseMatt | | Posted: | May 4, 2019 11:20 | | Subject: | Re: Part identification 3229a ; 3230a | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dadebrick writes:
| | How do i identify curved inside or curved outside. Thank you all
|
Inside is a sharper curve and has a smooth top.
Outside is shallower curve and has a serrated top.
|
| Author: | dadebrick | | Posted: | May 4, 2019 11:14 | | Subject: | Part identification 3229a ; 3230a | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| | How do i identify curved inside or curved outside. Thank you all |
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | May 4, 2019 09:32 | | Subject: | Vintage version of 4175? | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| When sorting my parts
I've noticed some blue and black versions that look different. The shade
of blue is a bit greenish (image may not show this clearly) and the shade of
blue is a bit greyish. They are easily identifiable by their color variation
but they can also be identified by some whitening/fraying along the edges. I
believe they're made from a softer plastic than usual. Are these vintage
or from certain special sets?
/Jan
|
|
|
| Author: | elias3 | | Posted: | May 3, 2019 07:44 | | Subject: | Re: 3039p23 variations | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 92ebii writes:
| | Hello,
I have in my possession two types of 3039p23 Light Gray Computer Screen with
buttons on the right side.
The regular version (left) has buttons in Yellow, Green and Red - reading downwards.
The other version (right) has the Yellow and Red buttons swapped.
Would this difference be enough for a new code number or at least a mention on
the 3039p23 page.
Regards,
Karl.
|
Hi
From time to time this part comes up.
It's a print error.
Stefaan
|
|
| Author: | 92ebii | | Posted: | May 3, 2019 07:38 | | Subject: | 3039p23 variations | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I have in my possession two types of 3039p23 Light Gray Computer Screen with
buttons on the right side.
The regular version (left) has buttons in Yellow, Green and Red - reading downwards.
The other version (right) has the Yellow and Red buttons swapped.
Would this difference be enough for a new code number or at least a mention on
the 3039p23 page.
Regards,
Karl.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | 69transamman | | Posted: | May 2, 2019 00:05 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Thanks! I first saw this in Houston two weeks ago at the FIRST FLL Robotics World
Festival Championship - I am in no way pushing the sale of these items. I have
coached FLL robotics for @18 years and have seen many iterations of LEGO robots
and technic parts. From what I understand, the combo 2 x 4 brick with the middle
technic X axle holes in these colors are new too and won't be for sale until
later this summer - I picked up a few as part of promotional building kits -
the product designer was kind enough to sign the sealed bags for us too. Kinda
something to hold on to for a while. Currently offered as part #39789. Our team
purchases LEGO parts and items from all over the world using team funds they
raise on their own. If you like, Google their team name below and you will find
out more about their amazing efforts towards giving back to the world - especially
girls like themselves in third-world countries.
Thanks again,
Mark in Oregon
FIRST FLL Team #27006
The Fin-tastic Fish LEGO Team
I googled the team name as you suggested. First on the list was a article on the North Albany Middle School page. Sounds like a fantastic group of young ladies! I hope their success continues in all facets of life!
|
Howard
| |
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | From Kennewickman1, I called LEGO and they informed me that this part is a part
from the new LEGO SPIKE Prime robot system and the part will not be available
until the 1st of June  Thank you for your help.
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
|
Bummer that they aren't available for another month but, not as bad as not
coming out until Christmas! Curiosity got the better of me so, I googled "LEGO
SPIKE Prime robot". Interesting looking set. From the images I saw it looks like
that part will be magenta/hot pink in color. Not sure what bricklink color it
falls under. Looks like it's going to have some unique wheels and a new power
pack as well. Are the 2x4 bricks with the 3 axle holes new also?
Howard
|
A few more photos. The "Dancing" Robot appears to have a new part for the shoulder
area.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | bb827804 | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 23:45 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks! I first saw this in Houston two weeks ago at the FIRST FLL Robotics World
Festival Championship - I am in no way pushing the sale of these items. I have
coached FLL robotics for @18 years and have seen many iterations of LEGO robots
and technic parts. From what I understand, the combo 2 x 4 brick with the middle
technic X axle holes in these colors are new too and won't be for sale until
later this summer - I picked up a few as part of promotional building kits -
the product designer was kind enough to sign the sealed bags for us too. Kinda
something to hold on to for a while. Currently offered as part #39789. Our team
purchases LEGO parts and items from all over the world using team funds they
raise on their own. If you like, Google their team name below and you will find
out more about their amazing efforts towards giving back to the world - especially
girls like themselves in third-world countries.
Thanks again,
Mark in Oregon
FIRST FLL Team #27006
The Fin-tastic Fish LEGO Team
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | From Kennewickman1, I called LEGO and they informed me that this part is a part
from the new LEGO SPIKE Prime robot system and the part will not be available
until the 1st of June Thank you for your help.
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
|
Bummer that they aren't available for another month but, not as bad as not
coming out until Christmas! Curiosity got the better of me so, I googled "LEGO
SPIKE Prime robot". Interesting looking set. From the images I saw it looks like
that part will be magenta/hot pink in color. Not sure what bricklink color it
falls under. Looks like it's going to have some unique wheels and a new power
pack as well. Are the 2x4 bricks with the 3 axle holes new also?
Howard
|
A few more photos. The "Dancing" Robot appears to have a new part for the shoulder
area.
|
|
|
| Author: | 69transamman | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 23:30 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | From Kennewickman1, I called LEGO and they informed me that this part is a part
from the new LEGO SPIKE Prime robot system and the part will not be available
until the 1st of June Thank you for your help.
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
|
Bummer that they aren't available for another month but, not as bad as not
coming out until Christmas! Curiosity got the better of me so, I googled "LEGO
SPIKE Prime robot". Interesting looking set. From the images I saw it looks like
that part will be magenta/hot pink in color. Not sure what bricklink color it
falls under. Looks like it's going to have some unique wheels and a new power
pack as well. Are the 2x4 bricks with the 3 axle holes new also?
Howard
|
A few more photos. The "Dancing" Robot appears to have a new part for the shoulder
area.
|
One more photo.
|
|
|
| Author: | 69transamman | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 23:24 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | From Kennewickman1, I called LEGO and they informed me that this part is a part
from the new LEGO SPIKE Prime robot system and the part will not be available
until the 1st of June Thank you for your help.
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
|
Bummer that they aren't available for another month but, not as bad as not
coming out until Christmas! Curiosity got the better of me so, I googled "LEGO
SPIKE Prime robot". Interesting looking set. From the images I saw it looks like
that part will be magenta/hot pink in color. Not sure what bricklink color it
falls under. Looks like it's going to have some unique wheels and a new power
pack as well. Are the 2x4 bricks with the 3 axle holes new also?
Howard
|
A few more photos. The "Dancing" Robot appears to have a new part for the shoulder
area.
|
|
|
| Author: | 69transamman | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 23:19 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | From Kennewickman1, I called LEGO and they informed me that this part is a part
from the new LEGO SPIKE Prime robot system and the part will not be available
until the 1st of June Thank you for your help.
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
|
Bummer that they aren't available for another month but, not as bad as not
coming out until Christmas! Curiosity got the better of me so, I googled "LEGO
SPIKE Prime robot". Interesting looking set. From the images I saw it looks like
that part will be magenta/hot pink in color. Not sure what bricklink color it
falls under. Looks like it's going to have some unique wheels and a new power
pack as well. Are the 2x4 bricks with the 3 axle holes new also?
Howard
|
|
|
| Author: | bb827804 | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 23:02 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| From Kennewickman1, I called LEGO and they informed me that this part is a part
from the new LEGO SPIKE Prime robot system and the part will not be available
until the 1st of June Thank you for your help.
In Catalog, 69transamman writes:
| | It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | 69transamman | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 22:46 | | Subject: | Re: Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| It is very similar to part #64179 but it appears to be larger. Judging
by the photo it looks to be 7 X 11 (best guess). If it's in the catalog it
isn't under Technic Liftarm. Where did the photo come from? Is it truly LEGO
red or is it a hot pink?
Howard
In Catalog, 1Kennewickman writes:
| | Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
| Author: | bb827804 | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 20:45 | | Subject: | Part Identification? | | Viewed: | 113 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Can anyone out there help identify the below red colored technic part ID number?
Thank you from Oregon.
|
|
| Author: | Miro78 | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 09:16 | | Subject: | Re: classic space minifig | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, narval writes:
| | hi
did i create it when i was a child ? or is it unlisted ?
|
Pretty sure you created it. Have not seen torso mismatched with arms and legs
in this Classic Space theme. They started doing that with Futuron later down
the line. Also yellow hands is another giveaway.
Miro
|
| Author: | narval | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 07:57 | | Subject: | classic space minifig | | Viewed: | 128 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| hi
did i create it when i was a child ? or is it unlisted ?
|
|
| Author: | yoavheskia | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2019 16:48 | | Subject: | Re: Part 3023 1x2 plate sky blue color | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Thank you so much for your answer! |
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 22:00 | | Subject: | Re: New minifigures | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Jack_Mcdonald writes:
| | Has anyone entered into the catalog the new Disney minifigures 2 71024.
Thanks
|
Not yet.
|
How about now?
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 19:32 | | Subject: | Re: New minifigures | | Viewed: | 554 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Jack_Mcdonald writes:
| | Has anyone entered into the catalog the new Disney minifigures 2 71024.
Thanks
|
Not yet.
|
Someone has entered the sets and then had to go out and get dinner.
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 19:13 | | Subject: | Re: New minifigures | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Jack_Mcdonald writes:
| | Has anyone entered into the catalog the new Disney minifigures 2 71024.
Thanks
|
Not yet.
|
| Author: | bb564489 | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 17:38 | | Subject: | New minifigures | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Has anyone entered into the catalog the new Disney minifigures 2 71024.
Thanks
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 13:30 | | Subject: | Add CM and studs on wire name | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Because it's easer to check the length,
I wanted to add [cm] and [Studs] on wires of category [Electric, Wire & Connector]
For example:
Electric, Power Functions Extension Wire with one Light Bluish Gray End, 25
Studs (20cm) Long
What do you think?
|
|
| Author: | Quaysretire | | Posted: | Apr 26, 2019 13:21 | | Subject: | Re: Help identify 2 pieces | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| | In Catalog, Quaysretire writes:
| | I have 2 pieces : 44570 dark grey and light grey and on the back they say 2002
however the catalog only starts from 2003 . Help please . Very new to all of
this thanks .
|
The piece was probably first produced in 2002. It takes some time from the first
design of a new piece until it actually shows up in a set. So it's not unusual
for a piece to have a copyright year on it that is a year before it first appears
in a set.
|
Ok thanks for info
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2019 00:09 | | Subject: | Re: Help identify 2 pieces | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Quaysretire writes:
| | I have 2 pieces : 44570 dark grey and light grey and on the back they say 2002
however the catalog only starts from 2003 . Help please . Very new to all of
this thanks .
|
The piece was probably first produced in 2002. It takes some time from the first
design of a new piece until it actually shows up in a set. So it's not unusual
for a piece to have a copyright year on it that is a year before it first appears
in a set.
|
| Author: | Quaysretire | | Posted: | Apr 24, 2019 17:53 | | Subject: | Help identify 2 pieces | | Viewed: | 107 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have 2 pieces : 44570 dark grey and light grey and on the back they say 2002
however the catalog only starts from 2003 . Help please . Very new to all of
this thanks .
|
| Author: | randyipp | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2019 10:28 | | Subject: | Re: Brand filter not working | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | The brand filter is not working correctly. I have LEGO only turned on, yet I
am shown adverts for non-LEGO items during my searches. Is it possible to turn
off non-LEGO products?
|
Oh, that’s a good one 
|
Yeah, I had a laugh at this too.
At least I don't have to filter bricklink colors out of brickstock, yet.
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2019 07:51 | | Subject: | Re: Brand filter not working | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | The brand filter is not working correctly. I have LEGO only turned on, yet I
am shown adverts for non-LEGO items during my searches. Is it possible to turn
off non-LEGO products?
|
Oh, that’s a good one
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2019 07:40 | | Subject: | Brand filter not working | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| The brand filter is not working correctly. I have LEGO only turned on, yet I
am shown adverts for non-LEGO items during my searches. Is it possible to turn
off non-LEGO products?
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 17:44 | | Subject: | Re: size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, SRC writes:
| | size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower
weight is 290g
dimensions are 26 x 6 x 14 cm
SRC
|
Hi your dimensions are in wrong order. In Bricklink catalog boxes are mesured
like in attached picture.
1st dimension : 2nd dimension : 3rd dimension
So should be 14 x 26 x 6 cm
Somebody already added dimension for this set and it looks correct
14.1 x 26.2 x 6.2 cm
|
I wonder if we could change the dimensions to x, y, and z. The current names
are none of them obvious. The same would be true for many of x, y, z, but probably
no one would go with an assumption with those. I certainly have with length,
width, and depth.
|
|
| Author: | DamoB | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 15:30 | | Subject: | Re: Help identifying a brick | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| | In Catalog, WrefordBrown writes:
| | Hi there, hope someone can help.
I've found what looks like a 7049b but with a white rather than red interior
and 'Pat Pend' on the bottom. It's from a box of my own childhood
Lego so it's definitely from the early 80's - should I list this as a
7049b or is there a better description?
Grateful for some advice...
|
There are a few variations of the interior colors.
BrickLink does not separate those variations, so 7049b is correct.
|
Thank you - 7049b it is!
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 14:22 | | Subject: | Re: size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SRC writes:
| | size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower
weight is 290g
dimensions are 26 x 6 x 14 cm
SRC
|
Hi your dimensions are in wrong order. In Bricklink catalog boxes are mesured
like in attached picture.
1st dimension : 2nd dimension : 3rd dimension
So should be 14 x 26 x 6 cm
Somebody already added dimension for this set and it looks correct
14.1 x 26.2 x 6.2 cm
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 14:09 | | Subject: | Re: size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SRC writes:
| | size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower
weight is 290g
dimensions are 26 x 6 x 14 cm
SRC
|
Please submit this information using the appropriate form:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S
Thanks,
Randy
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 13:55 | | Subject: | Re: Help identifying a brick | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WrefordBrown writes:
| | Hi there, hope someone can help.
I've found what looks like a 7049b but with a white rather than red interior
and 'Pat Pend' on the bottom. It's from a box of my own childhood
Lego so it's definitely from the early 80's - should I list this as a
7049b or is there a better description?
Grateful for some advice...
|
There are a few variations of the interior colors.
BrickLink does not separate those variations, so 7049b is correct.
|
|
| Author: | DamoB | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 13:50 | | Subject: | Help identifying a brick | | Viewed: | 111 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi there, hope someone can help.
I've found what looks like a 7049b but with a white rather than red interior
and 'Pat Pend' on the bottom. It's from a box of my own childhood
Lego so it's definitely from the early 80's - should I list this as a
7049b or is there a better description?
Grateful for some advice...
|
|
| Author: | SRC | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 13:40 | | Subject: | size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| size and weight 40334 Avengers Tower
weight is 290g
dimensions are 26 x 6 x 14 cm
SRC
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 04:19 | | Subject: | Re: Help recognise piece | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
In Catalog, Alang41 writes:
| | I bought a job lot of older Lego and there was a lot of plants and trees. And
there is 3 parts I can’t recognise from anywhere
|
|
| Author: | nectara | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 04:08 | | Subject: | Re: Help recognise piece | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Alang41 writes:
| | I bought a job lot of older Lego and there was a lot of plants and trees. And
there is 3 parts I can’t recognise from anywhere
|
2488
|
| Author: | Alang41 | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 04:01 | | Subject: | Help recognise piece | | Viewed: | 104 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I bought a job lot of older Lego and there was a lot of plants and trees. And
there is 3 parts I can’t recognise from anywhere
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2019 05:35 | | Subject: | Re: Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| |
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
The price guide doesn't help much: the average prices seem too low for a
set of 12 and too high for a single fig. Judging by the individual prices it
appears that some sellers are treating this entry as a single random fig and
others are treating it as a a set of 12.
Am I better off creating a super lot if I want to sell a complete set of 12?
|
Project complete, all entries for complete sets of Collectible Minifigures have
been created.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 15:54 | | Subject: | Re: 111901-1 ninjago legacy foilpack | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, smink45 writes:
| | Hi,
I have 111901-1 as a foilpack but this set number is given to another set. Is
it possible to make this set correct with the right set numbers?
Jeroen
|
This is exactly the same set just in different packing. Inside parts and minifig
are exactly the same. In some countries this minfig was added to the magazine
as blister pack like in Germany or Poland in other in foilpack like in the
UK for example.
So just add it as set variant: 111901-2 as Randy wrote in previous post.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 14:05 | | Subject: | Re: 111901-1 ninjago legacy foilpack | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, smink45 writes:
| | Hi,
I have 111901-1 as a foilpack but this set number is given to another set. Is
it possible to make this set correct with the right set numbers?
Jeroen
|
It will need a new catalog entry as 111901-2.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 13:47 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | My point was that if you categorize it as a bushing, you don't need to worry
about the length of it at all. You don't see the axle bushing above listed
as a "Technic Bush 1L". It is just "Technic Bush". So change that one to "Technic
Axle Bush" and
to "Technic Pin Bush" and problem solved. No need to worry about the length at
all. Like I said, it doesn't and can't connect pins or axles at all,
so it is definitely *not* a "Technic, Pin Connector". And that's a fact.
|
I submitted changes along this train of thought long ago but they were not approved.
It is a 1x1 Liftarm in actuality but functions only as a bushing. I support moving
it to a more appropriate category.
Jen
|
I had never thought of it as a 1x1 liftarm, but that makes perfect sense at least
in an algorithmic type way. A liftarm that cannot actually lift or connect anything!
Maybe go further and rename all liftarms as double bush, treble bush, etc!
|
The official name for the part from LEGO is "Beam 1X1". That should tell you
exactly how they think it is classified. But I am against naming something
a liftarm that can't lift anything, just like I am against naming something
a pin connector that can't connect any pins.
Randy
|
|
| Author: | smink45 | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 13:41 | | Subject: | 111901-1 ninjago legacy foilpack | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I have 111901-1 as a foilpack but this set number is given to another set. Is
it possible to make this set correct with the right set numbers?
Jeroen
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 13:40 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | My point was that if you categorize it as a bushing, you don't need to worry
about the length of it at all. You don't see the axle bushing above listed
as a "Technic Bush 1L". It is just "Technic Bush". So change that one to "Technic
Axle Bush" and
to "Technic Pin Bush" and problem solved. No need to worry about the length at
all. Like I said, it doesn't and can't connect pins or axles at all,
so it is definitely *not* a "Technic, Pin Connector". And that's a fact.
|
I submitted changes along this train of thought long ago but they were not approved.
It is a 1x1 Liftarm in actuality but functions only as a bushing. I support moving
it to a more appropriate category.
Jen
|
I submitted changes long ago, also, and they were also rejected. Great minds
and all that!
Randy
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 09:45 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | My point was that if you categorize it as a bushing, you don't need to worry
about the length of it at all. You don't see the axle bushing above listed
as a "Technic Bush 1L". It is just "Technic Bush". So change that one to "Technic
Axle Bush" and
to "Technic Pin Bush" and problem solved. No need to worry about the length at
all. Like I said, it doesn't and can't connect pins or axles at all,
so it is definitely *not* a "Technic, Pin Connector". And that's a fact.
|
I submitted changes along this train of thought long ago but they were not approved.
It is a 1x1 Liftarm in actuality but functions only as a bushing. I support moving
it to a more appropriate category.
Jen
|
I had never thought of it as a 1x1 liftarm, but that makes perfect sense at least
in an algorithmic type way. A liftarm that cannot actually lift or connect anything!
Maybe go further and rename all liftarms as double bush, treble bush, etc!
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 09:29 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | My point was that if you categorize it as a bushing, you don't need to worry
about the length of it at all. You don't see the axle bushing above listed
as a "Technic Bush 1L". It is just "Technic Bush". So change that one to "Technic
Axle Bush" and
to "Technic Pin Bush" and problem solved. No need to worry about the length at
all. Like I said, it doesn't and can't connect pins or axles at all,
so it is definitely *not* a "Technic, Pin Connector". And that's a fact.
|
I submitted changes along this train of thought long ago but they were not approved.
It is a 1x1 Liftarm in actuality but functions only as a bushing. I support moving
it to a more appropriate category.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 09:07 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | […]
Yeah, so why call this a pin 1/2 ... […]
|
Because there’s no constistence to the catalogue?
| | Personally, I'd go with a naming convention of the form:
Pin 2L (with friction ridges) and Stop Bush 1L.
So a normal pin would be a pin 2L, a half pin would be a pin 1L, and so on. Anything
with four half pins would be "with 4 pins 1L" and so on.
|
Okay… provided we agree on what a “L” is and out-of-system dimensions like “2/3
L” are verified before being accepted in the catalogue 
|
Yes, consistency is key. Maybe as a definition, call 1L equal to what LEGO call
1M.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 08:59 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | […]
Yeah, so why call this a pin 1/2 ... […]
|
Because there’s no constistence to the catalogue?
| | Personally, I'd go with a naming convention of the form:
Pin 2L (with friction ridges) and Stop Bush 1L.
So a normal pin would be a pin 2L, a half pin would be a pin 1L, and so on. Anything
with four half pins would be "with 4 pins 1L" and so on.
|
Okay… provided we agree on what a “L” is and out-of-system dimensions like “2/3
L” are verified before being accepted in the catalogue
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 08:45 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | No. A "pin" is the standard Technic pin. Basically, half of
|
Why half of it? And if it was half of it, shouldn't that one be named a "double
pin". […]
|
But
has only one pin, or is the other half considered hidden inside the brick?
And
and the like are “pin”s, not “half-pin”s and there’s no room for a hidden second
half.
|
Yeah, so why call this a pin 1/2 ...
And this ...
And everyone's favourite, the flick missile ...
Personally, I'd go with a naming convention of the form:
Pin 2L (with friction ridges) and Stop Bush 1L.
So a normal pin would be a pin 2L, a half pin would be a pin 1L, and so on. Anything
with four half pins would be "with 4 pins 1L" and so on.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2019 08:32 | | Subject: | Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | […]
My point was that if you categorize it as a bushing, you don't need to worry
about the length of it at all. You don't see the axle bushing above listed
as a "Technic Bush 1L". It is just "Technic Bush". So change that one to "Technic
Axle Bush" and
to "Technic Pin Bush" and problem solved. No need to worry about the length at
all. Like I said, it doesn't and can't connect pins or axles at all,
so it is definitely *not* a "Technic, Pin Connector". And that's a fact.
|
Simple solution indeed.
No wonder you’re, er, should be, paid the big bucks
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
