Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (568) | [...] It does. However, this item relationship match is not capable of handling complex relationships consisting of all the parts with which an individual part will fit and [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Does this count as a catalog entry? - StormChaser (568) | [...] I don't see any figs in that package. As for whether it would count as a set, you say they were all prepackaged? Were the contents of all of them identical? If [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (568) | [...] Yes, you're right. For some reason I thought those were: (Part 2420) and I was adding in the red plate below. [...] If you look at the existing sticker over assembly [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (568) | [...] Yes, I like it. Thanks! So, my original version: Shows parts that naturally fit together which are designed to work together and which are nearly always used together [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (568) | We have long needed a relationship match that shows items which fit together and which are frequently used together. I have asked for this type of match in the past and have [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (568) | [...] No. It just means that the assembly must include enough parts to be solid and not be held together merely by the sticker. Look at this example: (Part BA47pb02) The [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (568) | [...] [...] I've added an additional note to this item explaining why it was marked for deletion: (Part BA43pb02) Feel free to submit a new catalog entry for a similar [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? UPDATE - StormChaser (568) | [...] No, there is not. Thank you for researching this and bringing it to my attention and to axaday for contacting sellers and to JulieK and baylit for responding with here [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 22, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? - StormChaser (568) | [...] Sorry, didn't realize it was an attempt at humor. I've been getting some occasionally unfriendly feedback of late and thus I've tended to assume things are [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? - StormChaser (568) | [...] This is not ignoring it: (URL) I will paraphrase what I said in that message: If it's wrong, then let's fix it. But first, let's make sure it's wrong [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? - StormChaser (568) | [...] I don't consider the original source for the inventory of the figure to have been reliable at all. I'm sure we carried these parts over from other websites and [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Extra Parts classification change? - StormChaser (568) | Sorry to keep posting. I should've figured out everything I wanted to say first. I also should have invested in Tesla stock (about 3,200 shares would have done it) [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
