| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | axaday  | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 07:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this 
|
It will be difficult to implement.
|
 |
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 06:23 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 05:46 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Hello,
Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
Nice. The NK shield in sand green.
|
| Author: | rapar | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:50 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank you, I appreciate it!
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
|
For you I will, but only just this once.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:41 | | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| | Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
|
For you I will, but only just this once.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
