| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | TheBrickGuys  | | Posted: | Nov 1, 2018 00:39 | | Subject: | Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | As far as I can see this part is not a weapon, and I can't find it even once
used as a hollow hammer. It only appears in brick-built weapons where it features
alongside parts that also are not classified as weapons, such as barbs and chains.
Unlike the lightsaber, which really is a weapon the way it is, this part
is not a weapon.
|
To me it doesn't really matter which classification is used (bar or weapon)
just so long as both are in it. They share the same characteristics so it would
make sense to have them together in the same category.
Jim.
|
 |
| Author: | TheBrickGuys | | Posted: | Oct 31, 2018 20:49 | | Subject: | Re: Second Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| WOW, Lego actually made an ashtray? Who woulda thunk.
Jim
|
| Author: | TheBrickGuys | | Posted: | Sep 28, 2018 22:17 | | Subject: | Help identifying part. | | Viewed: | 125 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I can not for the life of me figure out what this is or where in the catalog
it exists.
Any ideas?
|
|
| Author: | TheBrickGuys | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2018 16:49 | | Subject: | Re: Request official BrickLink app | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, KaanDurak writes:
| | Hi ,
I use my phone alot and I also use Bricklink alot , but the site on phone isn't
that great , so please. Bricklink create a phone app of Bricklink , it would
be easier for phone users.
I hope the staff will see this and an official bricklink app will be created.
Thanks for reading
|
It's in development https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1094209
|
wow, that post was 5 years old so it is still a work in progress??
jim
|
|
| Author: | TheBrickGuys | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2018 19:58 | | Subject: | Re: P.I.X.A.L. Name Capitalisation/Punctuation | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, todeluca writes:
| | In Catalog, TheBrickGuys writes:
| | If I were doing a search for her I would use the spelling on the box - it is
the quickest and the most simple. Plus, the bio you mentioned is not very easy
to find so most people are only going to know the minifigure as just plain Pixal.
As for a compelling reason not to change it to P.I.X.A.L.? If you do a search
on Lego.com for P.I.X.A.L. you don't even get get any relevant search results
related to her or Ninjago but if you do a search for just plain Pixal then you
get search results that apply.
Jim
|
As shown in the images above (the second two), a search for “Pixal” yields “P.I.X.A.L.”,
so there would not be any problem for those who search with the non-punctuated
spelling.
|
If Lego.com refers to her as Pixal on their website and on the set box and in
the set's description then I agree with BL not to change it. The punctuated
form of Pixal is only used by Lego.com in the bio you referred to which is not
even easy to find.
I understand your point and agree with it when looked at from more of a purist
point of view but not even Lego.com deems it important to refer to her using
the punctuated form of her name so again I think BL made the right decision.
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
USA, California
