BrickLink Discussion Forum

In General, tEoS writes:

It's for split payment status from order status. See picture (It's actually
a gold color text):

In General, crazylegoman writes:

I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.

David

Interesting...
I've never used that before, but it's good to know.

Thanks,
David

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Oct 21, 2017 23:38

Subject:

Re: Clearing should be the same as Paid

Viewed:

23 times

Topic:

It's for split payment status from order status. See picture (It's actually
a gold color text):

In General, crazylegoman writes:

I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.

David

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Oct 21, 2017 23:30

Subject:

Re: Clearing should be the same as Paid

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.

David

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jul 16, 2017 12:06

Subject:

Re: Easy Buy / Autofinder

Viewed:

57 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, daf1009 writes:

I get error messages every time I try to use this functionality. It seemed to
start within the last week or so...help!

I am using suggestions, as it is the only place I could find to leave a message!

Duane

See also this post from yesterday: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1046953

Author:

Captain_Q

Posted:

Apr 27, 2017 17:37

Subject:

Re: ORDER STATUS: change multiple at once

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Shipping, qwertyboy writes:

In Shipping, QCHUCKA writes:

You misunderstood me, I want to change the status of all "paid" orders
with 2 clicks total into "shipped", whether it is 5 orders or 20+ not change
the status per order, one by one . Clicking submit after just one is a little
silly.

You don't have to click submit after just one. You can pick a new status
for several orders, and then do the one submit click. So not "change status"
- "submit" - "change status" - "submit" etc, but rather "change status" - "change
status" ... - "submit".

Niek.

"change the 'order status' of multiple orders at once?"

Author:

qwertyboy

Posted:

Apr 27, 2017 17:18

Subject:

Re: ORDER STATUS: change multiple at once

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

In Shipping, QCHUCKA writes:

Author:

Captain_Q

Posted:

Apr 27, 2017 17:15

Subject:

Re: ORDER STATUS: change multiple at once

Viewed:

19 times

Topic:

Just select shipped from the dropdown next to each order you want to change then
press submit, no need to press submit after each order.

In Shipping, QCHUCKA writes:

Greetings good citizen of Bricklink forums,

I have been wondering for some time, is there a way to change the "order status"
of multiple orders at once? It would be nice to change all orders that are
packed/paid to "shipped" when the time is right. Is there a way to do this
that I don't see? It gets tedious changing the status one by one.

Thank you!

Cheers,
Captain Q

Author:

Vegitt

Posted:

Apr 27, 2017 07:25

Subject:

Re: ORDER STATUS: change multiple at once

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

Just select shipped from the dropdown next to each order you want to change then
press submit, no need to press submit after each order.

In Shipping, QCHUCKA writes:

Cheers,
Captain Q

Author:

TheBrickGuys

Posted:

Apr 10, 2017 11:58

Subject:

Re: Please give the forum a make over.

Viewed:

72 times

Topic:

In General, Steineflut writes:

In General, TheBrickGuys writes:

In other words, take at least a few minutes to learn the basics. You can not
make it any easier if you don't bother to try to learn it. In the same amount
of time it took you to complain how difficult the forum is to navigate and to
say you will probably never use it again, if instead you took that time and used
it to hit a few buttons, tap a few links, etc, you would have learned that it
already IS EASY to use.

Jim.

Jim

Okay, I get how we all love that nothing ever changes and that we love to keep
stuff the way it is but seriously, the guy is absolutely right!!!
And I am sure that this is the reason why there are about 100 people in this
forum when the site is used by thousands!
Even though you can click on a million buttons to make it look like you want
it to, it should look like that from the start and not with clicking links on
the bottom of a page every single time you want to read something.

The studio beta forum is what a normal forum should look like. It's been
invented... probably about 25 years ago!

- Nadine

All you have to do is set up a page with the setting you like and then save it
as a favorite up on your favorites bar and you wont have to keep clicking on
the options. Just do it once and all is well.

As far as changing the way it looks, I am all for that. I love the changes BL
has done so far. The only reason I kind of got on the guys case was because he
was complaining (with more of an attitude) about things that need to be changed
but was not even willing to see if the options he wanted already existed. He
complained even before he took just a couple of minutes to learn what options
existed.

Jim

Author:

Steineflut

Posted:

Apr 10, 2017 05:29

Subject:

Re: Please give the forum a make over.

Viewed:

64 times

Topic:

In General, TheBrickGuys writes:

Author:

legoman77

Posted:

Apr 10, 2017 01:00

Subject:

Re: Please give the forum a make over.

Viewed:

73 times

Topic:

In General, tweegster writes:

I like that.

John P

Author:

tweegster

Posted:

Apr 10, 2017 00:56

Subject:

Re: Please give the forum a make over.

Viewed:

65 times

Topic:

Author:

TheBrickGuys

Posted:

Apr 10, 2017 00:38

Subject:

Re: Please give the forum a make over.

Viewed:

73 times

Topic:

In General, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, thiswizard writes:

Bricklink's forum is very ugly and hard to read/navigate. Why do I have to
click on the replies (Msgs) one by one? All responses should be displayed on
one screen.

Already possible. Click the balloon or link below the page 'Show entire thread
on 1 page'.

Also what's the point of "RE: what's this?" showing up 17
times in a row on the main page. Each post should only be displayed once.

Already there. Click the 'Without repliedls' on top of the page.

If it gets a reply, the post should go bold so that readers know there is a new
response. This way the front page isn't spammed to high heaven. Maybe it's
because I'm using my phone?

Yes it is. Posts change colour when read.

I've never tried on a desktop or laptop.

Try it.

Anyway, these forums are gross to look at. I can't imagine ever using this
again.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Apr 10, 2017 00:03

Subject:

Re: Please give the forum a make over.

Viewed:

73 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, thiswizard writes:

Bricklink's forum is very ugly and hard to read/navigate. Why do I have to
click on the replies (Msgs) one by one? All responses should be displayed on
one screen.

Already possible. Click the balloon or link below the page 'Show entire thread
on 1 page'.

Also what's the point of "RE: what's this?" showing up 17
times in a row on the main page. Each post should only be displayed once.

Already there. Click the 'Without repliedls' on top of the page.

If it gets a reply, the post should go bold so that readers know there is a new
response. This way the front page isn't spammed to high heaven. Maybe it's
because I'm using my phone?

Yes it is. Posts change colour when read.

I've never tried on a desktop or laptop.

Try it.

Anyway, these forums are gross to look at. I can't imagine ever using this
again.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Apr 9, 2017 16:42

Subject:

Re: What to do when buyer doesnt pay

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, stuartflight writes:

Ive had an order from a buyer for 7 days now sent email still no payment just
want to know how do i go about this now?

File a NPB alert: https://www.bricklink.com/retractOrder.asp

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Apr 2, 2017 11:19

Subject:

Re: how i can add one set with all parts??

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

Buying

In Suggestions, catalinduma writes:

hi,
I want to add parts from one set to wanted list and I don't know the way
I can do it.
anyone can give me an advise??

Click the Part out into wantlist link.
Enable the links below this page https://www.bricklink.com/catalogOptions.asp?viewFrom=P

Author:

shawnxyz

Posted:

Sep 24, 2016 04:51

Subject:

Re: Need to be able to set default search setting

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

Feedback

Yes please ... Because for us the first results are usually US based ... with
ridiculous postage.

Har har

Really, is there a way to set the defaults for the search? Min part
#s would help too.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Sep 16, 2016 17:18

Subject:

Re: Need to be able to set default search setting

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

Feedback

In Feedback, shawnxyz writes:

On pages like this http://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3005&name=Brick%201%20x%201&category=%5BBrick%5D#T=S&C=12&O={"color":12,"ss":"US","cond":"N","rpp":"500"}

I should be able to set my default search settings - actually it'd be best
if it just remembered my current settings, then I could tweak them for my next
search.

Most specifically, it should remember that I'd like results for the US (or
maybe North America). Instead I have to hit that button every time 'cause
the first results are usually Europe with ridiculous shipping.

Yes please ... Because for us the first results are usually US based ... with
ridiculous postage.

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Sep 5, 2016 17:39

Subject:

Re: Pay Your Fees Now! (please?)

Viewed:

75 times

Topic:

I totally agree. I've always thought that it was worded rudely.

David

Author:

HeinousJones

Posted:

Jun 30, 2016 14:32

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In General, par016 writes:

In General, HeinousJones writes:

In General, par016 writes:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

You mean the "See items in order on wanted list" which would bring up all the
wanted list items in your order and then you could delete them if you wanted?

-Pete

Because that can be switched on and off in your settings and can be accessed
on your orders page. See this post: http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=993808

-Pete

Thank you for your help, and thank you for having the vintage pieces I needed
to recreate my police boat from 1978. I thought I had dealt with you in the past.
I did have to turn that function on in my settings. It still doesn't do
what I expect it to. I got a chance last night to try it out. I think I'm
throwing an extreme situation at this new BUY function, and my expectations are
way too high. I'm trying to build 5 of the 7 Speed Racer vehicles. I have
them on 4 separate wanted lists. 300+ pieces in 86 lots, with identical lots
on several of them. This is what I had to go through to adjust everything....
Followed the link provided after purchase to the "Search Wanted List" page...
Manually adjusted several quantities (took notes on the partial quantities before
i placed the order). Broke the list into four pages. 100 items per page option
would have come in handy. Had to make sure I saved each individual page.
Then.. apply each of the four wanted lists (will only apply ONE list or ALL,
no option for multiple... check boxes would be handy here). Or at least I thought
so. It doesn't work correctly. I had one list selected, and it showed entries
for ALL of my wanted lists. Not just the ones present in this order. That caught
me by surprise. That wasn't very common (3 lots), but it could have been
very irritating on those future projects. After catching that, and thinking I
had a grasp on this, I realize that I had hit the delete button and had failed
to "un-check" the partial qty lots that I had just adjusted. Went back and fixed
that..
It just seems to me like all the information is there, and it's not being
used efficiently. The quantity’s that I ordered are there. I don't understand
why I can't be done with fewer steps. Not gonna mess with a "have" function.
Have and % of completion are useless to me and will surely irritate me even more.
I don't need Bricklink to keep track of what i have. If I need 20 of something,
and I buy 15 from a vendor, all I need is for the WANT qty to change to 5. I
think that’s pretty simple. I spent a couple of hours last night trying to figure
this out. I feel like I'm spending an extensive amount of time doing something
that BrickLink should be able to do in seconds. That means less time to shop
and spend money.
I do admit, this is the most complicated order I've ever made. I think my
high hopes and expectations for the BUY function coaxed me into it. It wouldn't
be this difficult if I had chosen to purchase ONLY full quantities, AND not had
so many identical lots scattered throughout several wanted lists. Then it would
work pretty similar to old version and I wouldn't be whining.

Author:

WoutR

Posted:

Jun 28, 2016 15:34

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

In General, Classicsmiley writes:

In General, HeinousJones writes:

In General, par016 writes:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

Now, you have the option of applying an order to a wanted list. On the new Wanted
List page, select the wanted list in question, and then click the Apply Order
button at the top of the list.

The "Apply Order" button seems to assume that I only order for one wanted list
at a time. Also, for some reason is does not seem to work always but I have not
tested that more.

At the same time the "Items in order on wanted list" has gained a bug and gives
incomplete results.

Author:

Classicsmiley

Posted:

Jun 28, 2016 14:57

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

In General, HeinousJones writes:

In General, par016 writes:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

Now, you have the option of applying an order to a wanted list. On the new Wanted
List page, select the wanted list in question, and then click the Apply Order
button at the top of the list.

Author:

par016

Posted:

Jun 28, 2016 14:48

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

21 times

Topic:

In General, par016 writes:

In General, HeinousJones writes:

In General, par016 writes:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

You mean the "See items in order on wanted list" which would bring up all the
wanted list items in your order and then you could delete them if you wanted?

-Pete

Because that can be switched on and off in your settings and can be accessed
on your orders page. See this post: http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=993808

-Pete

Author:

par016

Posted:

Jun 28, 2016 14:46

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In General, HeinousJones writes:

In General, par016 writes:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

You mean the "See items in order on wanted list" which would bring up all the
wanted list items in your order and then you could delete them if you wanted?

-Pete

Author:

HeinousJones

Posted:

Jun 28, 2016 14:14

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

44 times

Topic:

In General, par016 writes:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

Author:

par016

Posted:

Jun 24, 2016 17:58

Subject:

Re: BUY function woes

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:

Author:

CPgolfaddict

Posted:

Jan 22, 2016 18:15

Subject:

Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

My understanding is that eCheck can happen when the buyer chooses to pay with
funds in their bank account, or the PayPal account doesn't have enough cash
in it.

So far after a couple of onsite payments both were normal, no eChecks. Had
eCheck's in the past from non-onsite payments. So unless there is some
other bug...it seems fine to me.

In Problem, qwertyboy writes:

In Problem, therobo writes:

In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:

Complete/Packed shows in "orders not yet shipped" just like Complete/Ready....
the issue is the one in between. Complete/Paid (Payments status/order status)
does not show in "orders not yet shipped"

Converting this reply to the "Problem" topic.

IMO it does not make sense at all to use the "Paid" status if payment and order
status is separated. Whoever programmed this PayPal (Onsite) feature either was
not familiar with the separation (and its triggering the action items) or desperately
looked for a solution to block order additions after payment is done. An elegant
solution would be to block order additions if the payment status was set by the
system to "Complete" after payment, regardless of order status. But this
may have required more programming work.

I don't want to stir the pot too much, but some people have seen that onsite
payments result in people apparently paying with eCheck. If that bug (if it _is_
a bug) is still there, having the system flip the payment status to "complete"
would not be appropriate for those eCheck payments. In those cases it should
go to "clearing" or somesuch.

Maybe the developer knew this and explicitly avoided "complete" to force the
seller to decide it is complete. Just shooting in the dark here (as most of us
do when it comes to figuring out how new features are meant to work).

Niek.

Author:

qwertyboy

Posted:

Jan 22, 2016 16:45

Subject:

Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Problem, therobo writes:

In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:

Author:

therobo

Posted:

Jan 22, 2016 16:03

Subject:

Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:

In Suggestions, therobo writes:

It seems like a bug.
I would not set the order status from "Paid" to "Ready" as this opens the order
for additions. What happens if you set it to "Packed" instead?

Author:

CPgolfaddict

Posted:

Jan 22, 2016 15:33

Subject:

Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped

Viewed:

19 times

Topic:

It seems like a bug.
I would not set the order status from "Paid" to "Ready" as this opens the order
for additions. What happens if you set it to "Packed" instead?

Author:

Jan_K

Posted:

Jan 2, 2016 06:47

Subject:

Re: Technical issue: Wanted list data missing

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/catalogitem.page?S=4000012-1

In General, viejos writes:

In General, Jan_K writes:

The wanted list information seems to display incorrectly for many sets - and
for a while already. See this example:

4000012-1 Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
2012
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Inside Tour

Right-click on the blue BUY button on the top right and you will see the old
catalog page. For the set you mentioned, it looks like the image below. You can
see it is on 105 wanted lists. There are many glitches with the new page, but
fortunately this does not mean the back end is broken.

Hi Russell,

thanks for that hint - I wasn't aware of this workaround!

Jan

Author:

viejos

Posted:

Jan 2, 2016 06:24

Subject:

Re: Technical issue: Wanted list data missing

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In General, Jan_K writes:

Dear Admins,

as mentioned as a sidenote in this post already:
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=958268

The wanted list information seems to display incorrectly for many sets - and
for a while already. See this example:

4000012-1 Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
2012
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Inside Tour

http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/catalogitem.page?S=4000012-1

This item is included in my wanted list (and very likely in a few others as well),
but this is not being displayed correctly - both the missing number in "My Wanted
List (1)" and the completely missing "On xx Wanted Lists" information seem to
be a technical issue here.

When browsing my own wanted lists, I see a correlation between this effect and
database entries without any price guide information and current listing for
sale - so maybe it's just a similar glitch like the "action item missing
on start page" issue where a certain condition was needed to display these correctly.

for a few parts, I see the ""On xx Wanted Lists" entry, but not the "(1)" in
"My Wanted List (1)" - see attached example images.
(Yes, all four of these items ARE included in a wanted list of mine!)

Please have a look into this.

Thanks!
Jan

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Dec 8, 2015 22:54

Subject:

Re: Please remove cancelled spam posts

Viewed:

75 times

Topic:

I totally agree.

David

Author:

kidsncritters

Posted:

Aug 22, 2015 18:46

Subject:

Re: Changes to catalog part view are terrible.

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

I was wondering what all the fuss was about - then I looked on the part detail
page...

NO TABS at the bottom!

I thought it was a great idea to have the tabs there!

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Aug 8, 2015 09:58

Subject:

Re: BL needs to set time frame for shipping order

Viewed:

54 times

Topic:

Selling

You may want to change this to a suggestion.

In Selling, TheBrickStore writes:

Hi BL community:

After careful and deliberate consideration, I honestly believe BrickLink needs
to establish a timeframe for shipping of an order from the date/time the order
was placed with a seller. The site seems to be moving in a "carte blanche" way
for sellers. Sellers who take weeks/months to ship orders should be banned quite
honestly. Those few sellers are NOT a GOOD commodity for this site. New buyers
just don't understand and experienced buyers like myself are becoming more
and more alarmed over these long long shipping practices by a few sellers. Sure
you can avoid them once you know who they are but why give any seller more than
seven business days to get an order in the mail???? I just don't get it.
What other company takes a month plus to ship an order????

So if BrickLink is not willing to establish shipping rules for sellers (seem
to have all kinds of rules in place for buyers concerning payments) then at least
allow a buyer to be able to cancel a contract if seller has NOT shipped within
seven business days. Personally I think seven business days is too long but
it is a start.

Yes I understand that some sellers here are hobbyists and do not run a store
as a business but it is strange that most if not all hobbyists send out their
orders within seven business days.

I am not suggesting at this time that we punish any seller for failing to ship
within seven business days, I am just giving the buyer the right to cancel an
order/contract if the order is not shipped within seven business days of payment.

Sellers under this new rule would not be able to state in their terms that shipping
time is longer than seven business days.

Thanks

TheBrickStore

Author:

viejos

Posted:

Sep 19, 2014 22:50

Subject:

Re: BrickLink China店铺微博推广活动诚邀您的加入

Viewed:

68 times

Topic:

Announce

In 中文, cs_china writes:

尊敬的卖家您好，

BrickLink（以下简称BL）的中文页BrickLink China（以下简称BLC）已经推出1个月了。感谢大家一直以来对BLC的期待和鼓励。

访问BrickLink China：http://www.bricklink.com/china/

我们开设了BLC的新浪官方微博平台：BricklinkChina，欢迎您关注我们。
我们的微博地址：http://weibo.com/u/2833298890

BrickLink China店铺微博推广活动：
如果您在店铺的Splash和Store Terms页中加入中文的店铺指南和介绍，并允许发货到中国大陆、香港、台湾、澳门和新加坡，我们会定期在微博平台免费推送您的BL店铺，让更多的中文用户看到您的商店。

我们还将在近期开设支付宝等其他中国大陆第三方支付平台交易方式，方便中国大陆地区买家的购买。

希望您能经常在讨论区的中文分区发布新的主题帖。让更多的中文用户加入到BLC的讨论中来。中文区暂不设有分区和主题，大家可以直接发布自己的讨论帖。

如果您对BL有任何宝贵意见和建议，请随时回复本帖告知我们。

BrickLink China工作团队期待您的回复！

——BrickLink China团队
客户服务与支持

显然，我们有一个新的讨论主持人，cs_china。欢迎登机！
http://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp

Author:

bagelboybugle

Posted:

Sep 17, 2014 14:59

Subject:

Re: BrickLink China店鋪微博推廣活動誠邀您的加入

Viewed:

83 times

Topic:

In Problem, ToddMyers writes:

Reported cs_china as a fraud account. If this were a legit account, it should
be listed as "BrickLink Administrator" (as is done with other legitimate cs accounts).

I agree and there are no announcements on the issue so this thread can be unlocked
by cs team later if it is genuine

Gareth

Author:

Brettj666

Posted:

Sep 16, 2014 22:54

Subject:

Re: 测试

Viewed:

91 times

Topic:

In General, ToddMyers writes:

In 中文, cs_china writes:

测试用帖，请勿回复。

回复测试。

Anyone know if this is a genuine BrickLink CS account? Wondering if I should
report it under the problem tab.

I think a real one would be labelled admin

Author:

TakeAbricK

Posted:

Aug 25, 2014 08:37

Subject:

Re: 中文版论坛区终于建成了~

Viewed:

237 times

Topic:

Buying

In Buying, brasletty writes:

In 中文, kaitoukiddo writes:

In 中文, daiyuan writes:

大家快来吐槽~

这个必须顶！！

Welcom to the forum .

dont chance de topik

Author:

Speciale

Posted:

Aug 25, 2014 08:33

Subject:

Re: 中文版论坛区终于建成了~

Viewed:

492 times

Topic:

Buying

In 中文, kaitoukiddo writes:

In 中文, daiyuan writes:

大家快来吐槽~

这个必须顶！！

Welcom to the forum .

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

May 29, 2014 10:29

Subject:

Re: Sort by best price at Min Qty.

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

That's a good idea. I always wondered why that function wasn't built
into the search before.

David

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Mar 28, 2014 15:56

Subject:

Re: More Forum Bans Please

Viewed:

94 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, goshe7 writes:

There is practically nothing productive being added to BrickLink.

Since when has the BL forum ever been the place to add something productive?
That's that the Catalog is for.

David

Author:

mnementh

Posted:

Jan 16, 2014 17:18

Subject:

Re: Not having Google search is killing our sales

Viewed:

64 times

Topic:

In General, Pokernut writes:

In General, BRICKS_R_KIDS writes:

In other words, if someones trying to buy a 10179, then the search result should
direct them to that exact page. They can see all the listing for sale and decide
where to go next.

Bill

While I can agree with the main contents of this thread I thinkl this has the
potential to cause harm, particularly for the new buyers we are trying to get
here.
All it takes is a couple of succesful " sales " to scammers, as they will show
at the top of the page as cheapest item, and we get a lot of heat.

Just wanted to point out that you have replied to an 8 month old thread. In
the time since this thread was posted, Google has been allowed to crawl the site,
and BrickLink now shows up on the first page of results for a search of "Lego
10179". It takes you right to the catalog page, which is where I believe it
should take you.

Now they just have to do some optimizing to move BrickLink up the list a bit.

Troy

Troy

Author:

Pokernut

Posted:

Jan 16, 2014 16:42

Subject:

Re: Not having Google search is killing our sales

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

In General, BRICKS_R_KIDS writes:

In other words, if someones trying to buy a 10179, then the search result should
direct them to that exact page. They can see all the listing for sale and decide
where to go next.

Bill

Author:

RobErNat

Posted:

Dec 1, 2013 13:28

Subject:

Re: NPB increasing problem !

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

In Problem Order, rogerrabbitt writes:

Yeah, you got it !
I can see 6 buyers logging in after invoicing them a week or more before and
no one of them read my Messages - and not only newbies !

A lot of people have BL e-mails send automaticly to their inbox, and read the
message from there. Why would they read them again

Being harsh would result in NPB procedure and risk of negatve Feedback ( including
senseless work )

But that's how the system works, and if the buyer pays, why would he leave
negative over it

and if he doesn't pay, completing the NPB will give you
the right to have any negative removed.
And you can invoice before picking the order

The automatic reminder for a Minute or 2 ( for example after logging in ) will
stop
excuses like "I didn't read email" !

Well, like I said above, some people read offline and execute their payment from
there, why add additional banners that will only confuse buyers more. If they
lack reading their messages, well they will also simply ignore other things to
read and it won't change a thing wether they pay or not, regardless wether
you send 1 or 10 reminders, if they decided not to pay, well then you move to
NPB, that's what it serves for and does give a red banner, simple as that.

Author:

BLUSER_236118

Posted:

Dec 1, 2013 13:15

Subject:

Re: NPB increasing problem !

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

In Problem Order, Brick_Top writes:

In Problem Order, rogerrabbitt writes:

In Problem Order, RobErNat writes:

In Problem Order, steekstra writes:

Yeh i have send out some NPB's.. i don't mind if they have more feedback
point's !!

Always send them reminders.

The problem with some HUGH feedback buyers is they think they are so speciaal
, that would not give the new Sellers a nice feeling...

Steekstra

It has nothing to do with NPB, the OP wants it BEFORE one opens an NPB, like
** all the time **.

And it has also nothing to do with buyers who might think they are special and
also nothing to do with new sellers. This has to do with a notification a buyer
has an unpaid order...

We don't need that, as the 'my bricklink' page overview already tells
you that

and if the buyer doesn't pay, then he'll get a red banner when he is
in NPB status, so no need for an extra banner BEFORE that.

Hello

Sorry for confusing you all !
My Intention has been completely misunderstood - what i wanted is !

After 1 week and lets say at least 2 reminders i want a less harsh method than
NPB !
It would be the last step before NPB procedure and not an immediate affect after
buying !

Hope this got clear now !

So like, automatic reminders instead of the seller manually sending the reminder?

Yeah, you got it !
I can see 6 buyers logging in after invoicing them a week or more before and
no one of them read my Messages - and not only newbies !

Being harsh would result in NPB procedure and risk of negatve Feedback ( including
senseless work )

The automatic reminder for a Minute or 2 ( for example after logging in ) will
stop
excuses like "I didn't read email" !

Author:

RobErNat

Posted:

Dec 1, 2013 13:14

Subject:

Re: NPB increasing problem !

Viewed:

47 times

Topic:

In Problem Order, rogerrabbitt writes:

Sorry for confusing you all !
My Intention has been completely misunderstood - what i wanted is !

After 1 week and lets say at least 2 reminders i want a less harsh method than
NPB !
It would be the last step before NPB procedure and not an immediate affect after
buying !

Hope this got clear now !

Well, maybe, but totally pointless and an NPB is not harsh, it already serves
'alerting' the buyer he has an unpaid order

http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=72&q=npb

So no need for extra banners...

Besides, a lot of people have asked in the past to speed up the NPB process,
you actually wanna delay it some more

Still NO, the system works fine the way it is now.

And in the long run there will be no need either, as the site will need to move
towards an auto-payment on checkout, so whenever PP is involved as payment method,
there will be no more NPB's on those (might still be there for other payment
methods).

Eric

Author:

bb314137

Posted:

Dec 1, 2013 13:05

Subject:

Re: NPB increasing problem !

Viewed:

41 times

Topic: