Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies |
Author: | Personnexyz | Posted: | May 1, 2024 23:01 | Subject: | Reference ITEMID changed | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Inventories | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
recently you change some ITEMID references
3626bp01 (Minifigure, Head Standard Grin Pattern - Blocked Open Stud)
becomes
3626ap01 (Minifigure, Head Standard Grin Pattern - Solid Stud)
3626cp01 (Minifigure, Head Standard Grin Pattern - Hollow Stud)
becomes
3626p01 (Minifigure, Head Standard Grin Pattern)
Where is this tracked ? I look at a couple of different places but so far no
luck !
Thank you
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 28, 2024 17:48 | Subject: | Re: Error in inventory | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, lorivanderbilt writes:
| I am working on set 7313 Red Planet Protector. There is a part (30526) where
the picture in manual differs from inventory. Manual shows blue but inventory
is dark gray. Which one do I follow?
|
It's explained in the note at the bottom of the inventory:
-----
Redesigned during production.
There are at least 2 different versions of instructions for this set. The differences
for the second version are indicated in this inventory in the Alternate Items
section with Match ID 99.
Quick overview of redesign: Three dark gray 30526 Brick, Modified 1 x 2 with
Pins are replaced by three blue pieces of the same type.
-----
So, the set can have either all dark gray 30526 or all blue 30526.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | lorivanderbilt | Posted: | Apr 28, 2024 17:41 | Subject: | Error in inventory | Viewed: | 113 times | Topic: | Inventories | Status: | Open | |
| I am working on set 7313 Red Planet Protector. There is a part (30526) where
the picture in manual differs from inventory. Manual shows blue but inventory
is dark gray. Which one do I follow?
|
Author: | Vosblokjes | Posted: | Apr 27, 2024 16:56 | Subject: | Re: MOC Pop-up Bricklink store | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, cazh writes:
| Hi! I bought the "working mini golf course" instructions from the MOC
pop-up back in Nov, but didn't purchase parts as I have a large inventory;
didn't figure how time-consuming it would be to put together a "Wanted"
list for this set from the pdf. Has anyone done that and would be willing to
share with me (e.g. excel/word doc)? TIA!
|
Take a look over at rebrickable the MOC is listed there (with part lost)
|
|
Author: | cazh | Posted: | Apr 27, 2024 15:35 | Subject: | MOC Pop-up Bricklink store | Viewed: | 91 times | Topic: | Inventories | Status: | Open | |
| Hi! I bought the "working mini golf course" instructions from the MOC
pop-up back in Nov, but didn't purchase parts as I have a large inventory;
didn't figure how time-consuming it would be to put together a "Wanted"
list for this set from the pdf. Has anyone done that and would be willing to
share with me (e.g. excel/word doc)? TIA!
|
|
Author: | Dhobeck | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 13:39 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| In Inventories, 1001bricks writes:
| | Was there something wrong? Did the submitters gave up?
|
Hi!
Seeing your feedback rate, you seem to be new here.
Please be patient!
Please open an Help Desk ticket.
|
|
I could not resist
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 13:17 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, 1001bricks writes:
| | Was there something wrong? Did the submitters gave up?
|
Hi!
Seeing your feedback rate, you seem to be new here.
Please be patient!
Please open an Help Desk ticket.
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 12:53 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| | Was there something wrong? Did the submitters gave up?
|
Hi!
Seeing your feedback rate, you seem to be new here.
Please be patient!
Please open an Help Desk ticket.
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 12:27 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, randyf writes:
| […]
| Doesn’t the set’s page show “pending approval” either way?
|
Nope.
A set that is reserved shows "Inventory In Progress".
|
Right, now you’re saying it, I remember I have seen that sometimes
(Still can’t swear it was for these two sets I need to buy me a “dash cam”
and record everything I do )
| A set that is being worked on or is complete and pending approval shows "Inventory
Pending Approval".
Both conditions are poorly labeled.
|
+1
Seems there should be three conditions too: reserved, WIP, pending approval.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 12:18 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| In Inventories, randyf writes:
| […]
I don't recall ever seeing these inventories pending approval. They may have
been reserved, but they weren't pending.
|
Doesn’t the set’s page show “pending approval” either way?
|
Nope.
A set that is reserved shows "Inventory In Progress".
A set that is being worked on or is complete and pending approval shows "Inventory
Pending Approval".
Both conditions are poorly labeled.
| I was just waiting for these inventories to check I had the colours right in
Studio, without having to check the element IDs from the instructions one by
one
But I’m not sure I looked at the pending inventories for these ones. I think
I did but I may be confusing with other sets 🤔
|
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 12:00 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, randyf writes:
| […]
I don't recall ever seeing these inventories pending approval. They may have
been reserved, but they weren't pending.
|
Doesn’t the set’s page show “pending approval” either way?
I was just waiting for these inventories to check I had the colours right in
Studio, without having to check the element IDs from the instructions one by
one
But I’m not sure I looked at the pending inventories for these ones. I think
I did but I may be confusing with other sets 🤔
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 11:44 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| Hi all,
I was just wondering¹ what happened with
and
These sets had inventories pending approval for some time… and now they don’t
have anything.
Was there something wrong? Did the submitters gave up?
(¹ Not an “I need to part them out! do your job! chop chop!” rant, I’m just puzzled.)
|
I don't recall ever seeing these inventories pending approval. They may have
been reserved, but they weren't pending.
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 09:03 | Subject: | Re: Not approved? | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| Hi all,
I was just wondering¹ what happened with
and
These sets had inventories pending approval for some time… and now they don’t
have anything.
Was there something wrong? Did the submitters gave up?
(¹ Not an “I need to part them out! do your job! chop chop!” rant, I’m just puzzled.)
|
It's most likely that the submitter intended to work on them and then didn't.
Or, that someone attempted to submit it without having the set in hand.
~Jen
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 08:23 | Subject: | Not approved? | Viewed: | 143 times | Topic: | Inventories | Status: | Open | |
| Hi all,
I was just wondering¹ what happened with
and
These sets had inventories pending approval for some time… and now they don’t
have anything.
Was there something wrong? Did the submitters gave up?
(¹ Not an “I need to part them out! do your job! chop chop!” rant, I’m just puzzled.)
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 09:20 | Subject: | Re: Set 6074 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, Turez writes:
Ah yes, I see them now the sun is out… and that I was told to look there
Hmm, to put these arches on the ‘manor’ part, you need other small parts that
are not in the inventory: a 1x2 brick, 2x 1x1 plates and 2x (1 or 2)x3 plates….
You could do without the (1 or 2)x3 plates with the Extra 1x2 and 2x2….
And you can get one 2x3 if you can use the (1 and 2)x10 plates instead of the
(1x2)x8 ones on the walkway… but it doesn’t seem like they did that on the pic.
A head-scatcher….
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 08:25 | Subject: | Re: Set 6074 | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| […]
Ah ha! On the alternate build shown on the instructions, we can see a 3rd arch
used (and we can infer a 4th one on the other side).
So, according to the rules, at least these two should be Regular 🤔
|
And there’s already three LG plates (a 1x10, a 2x2, and a 2x10) in Regular that
are not needed for the main build and that are not visible on the alternate.
The plot thickens 🤔
|
Yes, we know that inventory needs some work.
The "extra" arches are actually shown in the instructions:
http://www.peeron.com/scans/6074-1/16
The same alternate build is also shown on the box, bottom right corner: https://brickshelf.com/gallery/Jojo/Alternatives/alt-6074-1.jpg
|
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 04:05 | Subject: | Re: Set 6074 | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| […]
Ah ha! On the alternate build shown on the instructions, we can see a 3rd arch
used (and we can infer a 4th one on the other side).
So, according to the rules, at least these two should be Regular 🤔
|
And there’s already three LG plates (a 1x10, a 2x2, and a 2x10) in Regular that
are not needed for the main build and that are not visible on the alternate.
The plot thickens 🤔
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 18:21 | Subject: | Re: Set 6074 | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| […]
Weird that there were no images of their use on the box….
|
Ah ha! On the alternate build shown on the instructions, we can see a 3rd arch
used (and we can infer a 4th one on the other side).
So, according to the rules, at least these two should be Regular 🤔
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|