Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | ghyde  | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 18:25 | | Subject: | Re: Doubts on the latest Star Wars promo item | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Please note that the ID can still be changed by the catalog admins, this can
sometimes take a while, but if there's a way for someone to identify it in
the catalog properly, then at least the temporary listing will be visible in
the reference catalog.
I don't recall offhand, but it might be possible for you to receive notifications
of changes to the item ID. Please check back as sometimes item ID will change
as deemed necessary, often months or even years later.
Cheers ...
ghyde
In Catalog, jul9000 writes:
| | Thanks, I figured out the ID myself and added the item.
Here it is, if someone is interested
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?G=107543
If any of the approvers read this, please accept the item, as there's going
to be a lot going on with this item, because of the upcoming "May the 4th
be with you" celebration
In Catalog, Seppiem writes:
| | In Catalog, jul9000 writes:
| | Hello,
Today I acquired the latest "25 Years of Lego Star Wars" promotional
item and I'm having doubts on correct categorisation.
The packaging says: "Fabric Sticker", but the item looks more like a
patch, rather than a sticker. Also, it's made of fabric, not sewed, like
patches usually are, and not paper, as sticker usually are.
That being said, I have doubts how to correctly add the item to the catalog.
What do you guys think? Does it belong to "Sticker, Collectible Sticker"
category, or "Patch & Pin"? Please also suggest an Item ID, as this isn't
obvious neither in both those categories...
Attaching two photos of the actual item
|
Hi, well it is not a Patch, neither a Pin. It is actually a sticker, however
it is a fabric sticker. But still a sticker. So I would suggest it belongs to
"Sticker, Collectible sticker". An item ID suggestions, I leave it for
someone else to comment 
|
|
|
 |
| Author: | jul9000 | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 17:37 | | Subject: | Re: Doubts on the latest Star Wars promo item | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thanks, I figured out the ID myself and added the item.
Here it is, if someone is interested
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?G=107543
If any of the approvers read this, please accept the item, as there's going
to be a lot going on with this item, because of the upcoming "May the 4th
be with you" celebration
In Catalog, Seppiem writes:
| | In Catalog, jul9000 writes:
| | Hello,
Today I acquired the latest "25 Years of Lego Star Wars" promotional
item and I'm having doubts on correct categorisation.
The packaging says: "Fabric Sticker", but the item looks more like a
patch, rather than a sticker. Also, it's made of fabric, not sewed, like
patches usually are, and not paper, as sticker usually are.
That being said, I have doubts how to correctly add the item to the catalog.
What do you guys think? Does it belong to "Sticker, Collectible Sticker"
category, or "Patch & Pin"? Please also suggest an Item ID, as this isn't
obvious neither in both those categories...
Attaching two photos of the actual item
|
Hi, well it is not a Patch, neither a Pin. It is actually a sticker, however
it is a fabric sticker. But still a sticker. So I would suggest it belongs to
"Sticker, Collectible sticker". An item ID suggestions, I leave it for
someone else to comment
|
|
|
| Author: | Seppiem | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 16:56 | | Subject: | Re: Doubts on the latest Star Wars promo item | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jul9000 writes:
| | Hello,
Today I acquired the latest "25 Years of Lego Star Wars" promotional
item and I'm having doubts on correct categorisation.
The packaging says: "Fabric Sticker", but the item looks more like a
patch, rather than a sticker. Also, it's made of fabric, not sewed, like
patches usually are, and not paper, as sticker usually are.
That being said, I have doubts how to correctly add the item to the catalog.
What do you guys think? Does it belong to "Sticker, Collectible Sticker"
category, or "Patch & Pin"? Please also suggest an Item ID, as this isn't
obvious neither in both those categories...
Attaching two photos of the actual item
|
Hi, well it is not a Patch, neither a Pin. It is actually a sticker, however
it is a fabric sticker. But still a sticker. So I would suggest it belongs to
"Sticker, Collectible sticker". An item ID suggestions, I leave it for
someone else to comment
|
|
| Author: | jul9000 | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 16:19 | | Subject: | Doubts on the latest Star Wars promo item | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello,
Today I acquired the latest "25 Years of Lego Star Wars" promotional
item and I'm having doubts on correct categorisation.
The packaging says: "Fabric Sticker", but the item looks more like a
patch, rather than a sticker. Also, it's made of fabric, not sewed, like
patches usually are, and not paper, as sticker usually are.
That being said, I have doubts how to correctly add the item to the catalog.
What do you guys think? Does it belong to "Sticker, Collectible Sticker"
category, or "Patch & Pin"? Please also suggest an Item ID, as this isn't
obvious neither in both those categories...
Attaching two photos of the actual item
|
|
|
| Author: | Autism_And_I | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 12:48 | | Subject: | Re: Can't add catalog information to Instructions | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | Thanks that makes a lot more sense now! |
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 12:37 | | Subject: | Re: Can't add catalog information to Instructions | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Use the set change request forums instruction line not the gear one and just
type in 70356 and make sure -1 is selected in the box beside the set number and
it will work
|
|
| Author: | Autism_And_I | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 12:33 | | Subject: | Can't add catalog information to Instructions | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Which preset am I supposed to select when submitting a change request for instructions?
I assumed it was just the Catalog one.
However when submitting it tells me; "Item No to Change does not exist in
Catalog."
I am copy/pasting them Item No from the existing entry.
I've tried changing to Book rather than Catalog as well as attempting to
change the Item No by removing both the -1 and "Instructions Entry" Text.
I did not expect these to work and indeed they did not.
Looking at the Catalog Add or Change menu, there is an option for instructions
under Add Image but not under Change Item.
I just wanted to submit weight and dimensions for an instruction manual.
Perhaps I am missing something. But the guide just leads to the same Change Item
form, which is where I started.
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:54 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Yes but you didn't read sir.
Now we currently have for the same range
3068bp
and
3608pb
This is an error.
|
The error there is yours. You shouldn't be searching "3068bp*".
If you go look, nothing is named that. They just put the old numbers in as
alternates so people who were unaware of the change will be able to find things
labelled with the old numbers. You are aware of the change and should only be
searching "3068p*".
| | If 3068b doesn't exist anymore ALL the 3068bp should change to 3068p
|
They did. You are finding the same pieces in both searches, except the "bp"
search will omit new ones going forward and also the peeron, LDraw, and I guess
Star Wars ones.
| | But old tiles are under 3068bp.
|
Only in their alternate numbers.
Yes
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:27 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | This works only for OLD tiles.
|
Yes, it works for all the decorated tiles that had been created before the change
from 3068b to 3068.
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:21 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, peregrinator writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | 3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The search is fine, it is searching alternate numbers. So those 3068p- that have
a 3068bp- alternate number will be returned on a search for 3068bp*
|
This works only for OLD tiles.
So if you look for the 3068bp* in your inventory, only some will spawn.
This is wrong.
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:12 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | 3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The search is fine, it is searching alternate numbers. So those 3068p- that have
a 3068bp- alternate number will be returned on a search for 3068bp*
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:11 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
You are right.
The problem is not the result, but the research.
3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The old item numbers 3068bpXXXX were put as Alternate IDs in the corresponding
parts to help locate them for users who don't know about the changes.
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:07 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
You are right.
The problem is not the result, but the research.
3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:57 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
What about ps?
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=168
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:55 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
Neither do I:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?pg=1&q=3068%2A&catLike=W&catString=39&sortBy=I&sortAsc=A&catType=P
|
|
| Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:26 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:22 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
Yes but you didn't read sir.
Now we currently have for the same range
3068bp
and
3608pb
This is an error.
If 3068b doesn't exist anymore ALL the 3068bp should change to 3068p
So, actually the inventory is inconsistent because new tiles are under the 3068p
following the new rule that 3068b doesn't exist anymore.
But old tiles are under 3068bp.
Do you understand now?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 05:31 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 05:16 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Australia, Queensland
Poland, w. Mazowieckie
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
)
)
United Kingdom, England
Canada, Ontario
USA, Oklahoma
Germany, Niedersachsen
Italy, Lombardia
Spain, Comunidad Valenciana
Portugal