| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - legoman77 (3628)  | [...] That is precisely why I do not think that this is an easy discussion. There is good and bad in testing a store. I find that self policing can work at times. Often [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - ToriHada (8887) | [...] This brings up the slippery slope problem. If BrickLink allows vigilante orders against new sellers who are BELIEVED to be scammers, how much further will the vigilantes [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
| Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - ToriHada (8887) | [...] [...] I completely agree. But I don't agree that vigilante orders are any part of the solution. Vigilantism only adds to the problem. [...] No, it is not the same [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
| Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - Captain_Q (7893) | [...] I am the person in question. And if the items were legitimate I would have definitely bought some of them since the prices were absurdly good. I would have requested [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - Proprietor (1699) | [...] The price guide gets messed up regardless. Does anyone really believe 2 new UCS Falcons were sold in March for US$700? Or even the 1 for $1,000? (URL) Not a chance, [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - prairie (16) | [...] It'd only be fair to hold the buyer to their commitment, or if they made a knowingly fraudulent offer to buy everything, show them the door just as they wanted done [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
| Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - legoman77 (3628) | This is a hard one to decide on. OP lists some good points and you list some good points. While BL often takes quick action at other times they do not. The are sellers still [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
| Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - calebfishn (2145) | I understand your reasoning. But the solution is unnecessary and unworkable. I do not necessarily condone what you refer to as "vigilante orders", but Bricklink should be focussed [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
| Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - Captain_Q (7893) | [...] Yes, you make some valid points I agree that my action was not necessarily the best choice to take. But I saw what I perceived as a live grenade with it's pinned [...]
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
| Re: Prohibit Vigilante Orders - Reki_Lobsheek (2465) | I get the sentiment of your statement, but all in all, how is Bricklink to decide which order fits the definition of a "vigilante" order? Reki
(107 months ago, Aug 27, 2015, to Suggestions) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
