Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Autism_And_I  | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 12:33 | | Subject: | Can't add catalog information to Instructions | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Which preset am I supposed to select when submitting a change request for instructions?
I assumed it was just the Catalog one.
However when submitting it tells me; "Item No to Change does not exist in
Catalog."
I am copy/pasting them Item No from the existing entry.
I've tried changing to Book rather than Catalog as well as attempting to
change the Item No by removing both the -1 and "Instructions Entry" Text.
I did not expect these to work and indeed they did not.
Looking at the Catalog Add or Change menu, there is an option for instructions
under Add Image but not under Change Item.
I just wanted to submit weight and dimensions for an instruction manual.
Perhaps I am missing something. But the guide just leads to the same Change Item
form, which is where I started.
|
|
 |
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:54 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Yes but you didn't read sir.
Now we currently have for the same range
3068bp
and
3608pb
This is an error.
|
The error there is yours. You shouldn't be searching "3068bp*".
If you go look, nothing is named that. They just put the old numbers in as
alternates so people who were unaware of the change will be able to find things
labelled with the old numbers. You are aware of the change and should only be
searching "3068p*".
| | If 3068b doesn't exist anymore ALL the 3068bp should change to 3068p
|
They did. You are finding the same pieces in both searches, except the "bp"
search will omit new ones going forward and also the peeron, LDraw, and I guess
Star Wars ones.
| | But old tiles are under 3068bp.
|
Only in their alternate numbers.
Yes
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:27 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | This works only for OLD tiles.
|
Yes, it works for all the decorated tiles that had been created before the change
from 3068b to 3068.
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:21 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, peregrinator writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | 3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The search is fine, it is searching alternate numbers. So those 3068p- that have
a 3068bp- alternate number will be returned on a search for 3068bp*
|
This works only for OLD tiles.
So if you look for the 3068bp* in your inventory, only some will spawn.
This is wrong.
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:12 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | 3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The search is fine, it is searching alternate numbers. So those 3068p- that have
a 3068bp- alternate number will be returned on a search for 3068bp*
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:11 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
You are right.
The problem is not the result, but the research.
3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The old item numbers 3068bpXXXX were put as Alternate IDs in the corresponding
parts to help locate them for users who don't know about the changes.
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:07 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
You are right.
The problem is not the result, but the research.
3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:57 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
What about ps?
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=168
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:55 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
Neither do I:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?pg=1&q=3068%2A&catLike=W&catString=39&sortBy=I&sortAsc=A&catType=P
|
|
| Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:26 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| | So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:22 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
Yes but you didn't read sir.
Now we currently have for the same range
3068bp
and
3608pb
This is an error.
If 3068b doesn't exist anymore ALL the 3068bp should change to 3068p
So, actually the inventory is inconsistent because new tiles are under the 3068p
following the new rule that 3068b doesn't exist anymore.
But old tiles are under 3068bp.
Do you understand now?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 05:31 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 05:16 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
| Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 04:22 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 04:08 | | Subject: | Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 148 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 24, 2024 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: Inaccuracies with the BIONICLE mask packs | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| All fixed up.
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| | Hello, this has been bothering me for a while now, but several of the mask packs
listed either do not exist at all, or are listed with the wrong region.
For starters, the US/non-US distinction -- having spoken with several Canadian
BIONICLE fans about these, Canada had the boxed versions as well. Additionally,
LEGO's naming scheme uses the distinguishment of "IN" and "AM",
rather than "NA" or "US", which leads me to believe that they
were available in both South and North America.
Considering that Connecticut became HQ for LEGO's activities in all of America
around 1998, this also tracks: https://www.lego.com/en-gb/history/articles/g-production-in-brazil/
Further-more, I have found no evidence of 8530, 8559, 8597, or 8600 existing
in boxed form. Just Google them, there are no photos of them - because they do
not exist.
To go through each set one-by-one:
Kanohi:
- US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/Lego-Shop-At-Home-summer-2001-Bionicle-Cover/page/n1/mode/2up
- US Shop@Home: https://web.archive.org/web/20031203111200/http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=8525
- UK Ad: https://biosector01.com/w/images/bs01/6/63/UK_2001_LEGO_shop_ad.jpg
This one is correct.
This one is correct.
[S=8530-2]
This one does not exist; the image used in a prototype moccup of the box art.
Krana:
UK Catalogue 1: https://images.brickset.com/library/view/?f=catalogues/c02uk&p=64
UK Catalogue 2: https://images.brickset.com/library/view/?f=catalogues/c02uk2&p=80
(this onse seems to confused 8559 and 8597).
US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/lego-shop-at-home-summer-2002/page/n31/mode/2up
This one does exist. The image is a digital moccup.
[S=8559-2]
This one is correct.
This one was released in America.
Kanohi Nuva:
US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/lego-shop-at-home-holiday-2002/page/n43/mode/2up
US Catalogue 2: https://archive.org/details/shop-at-home-fall-2003/page/n35/mode/2up
LEGO Shop at Home: http://web.archive.org/web/20031204080846/http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=8574
(has a dead link to 8598)
This one should be labelled non-American polybag version.
This one should be labelled American boxed version.
Krana-Kal:
This one should be labelled American boxed version.
This one is correct.
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 24, 2024 15:52 | | Subject: | Re: How to resolve a Doctor Octopus inconsistency | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Peteparker writes:
| | Hello!
I noticed that some sets like the Daily Bugle (76178-1) list the Doc Ock figure
with the arms included, but the one from the Monster Truck set (76174-1) didn't.
Could it be at least included as an alternate to the minifigure alone? It makes
more sense to me for the figure to be offered both with and without the mechanical
arms, but the listings including these are inconsistent.
Thanks for the consideration and any feedback about the situation.
Nathan (Peteparker)
|
Our current catalog guidelines for minifigures make the condition of handheld
items being added to the minifigure in the instructions the finishing point of
the minifigure build. So, for Doc Ock from
the figure is considered complete on page 5 before the arms are built and added
on the subsequent pages.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 22:53 | | Subject: | Re: Flounder version | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, myixjetjet24 writes:
| | I got 2 version of flounder (little mermaid)(15679pb01) and got different set
of eyes. Is the set 43207 contains the latest version?
|
This has been completed.
The two new entries are
* | | 15679pb03 Fish, The Little Mermaid with Blue Stripes, Medium Azure Dorsal and Caudal Fins, Lime Eyes without Bottom Eyelids Pattern (Flounder / Fabius)
Parts: Animal, Water |
and
* | | 15679pb04 Fish, The Little Mermaid with Blue Stripes, Medium Azure Dorsal and Caudal Fins, Lime Eyes with Bottom Eyelids Pattern (Flounder / Fabius)
Parts: Animal, Water |
All inventories have also been updated.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 17:24 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
Any logged in member can submit a change request, unless the site has a glitch
and is giving you an error. Since you're the one who has the physical item,
it should be you who submits the dimension information.
David
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 15:29 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, KNI writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
I have submitted a change request
|
The change request has been approved
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 12:58 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
I have submitted a change request
|
|
| Author: | KNI | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 11:20 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
|
| Author: | andreaseldh | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 21:10 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
Yeah, but that’s 800x600 (or 600x800). I believe the catalogue team sometimes
accepts better images.
|
Yes. The question is how do I upload the 1600x1050 version? The text is hard
to read on the current 800x525.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
