I don't want to jinx it...but there have been no cancelled posts by 0 feedback
members in the last hundred-some posts!
Did BL implement something?
I don't know what you are seeing, but the 10th post back is a canceled post
from a 0 feedback user
Huh...that is odd. I could have sworn... Now that I look again, there are several...I
did look originally when I was logged out of my BL account though due to that
one glitch where it won't let you log in for a few minutes, maybe that had
something to do with it.
[…]
Huh...that is odd. I could have sworn... Now that I look again, there are several...I
did look originally when I was logged out of my BL account though due to that
one glitch where it won't let you log in for a few minutes, maybe that had
something to do with it.
Cancelled posts are hidden when you aren’t logged in.
Otherwise, there’s an option to hide cancelled posts. It should default to ON
for new members nowadays.
[…]
Huh...that is odd. I could have sworn... Now that I look again, there are several...I
did look originally when I was logged out of my BL account though due to that
one glitch where it won't let you log in for a few minutes, maybe that had
something to do with it.
Cancelled posts are hidden when you aren’t logged in.
Otherwise, there’s an option to hide cancelled posts. It should default to ON
for new members nowadays.
[…]
Huh...that is odd. I could have sworn... Now that I look again, there are several...I
did look originally when I was logged out of my BL account though due to that
one glitch where it won't let you log in for a few minutes, maybe that had
something to do with it.
Cancelled posts are hidden when you aren’t logged in.
Otherwise, there’s an option to hide cancelled posts. It should default to ON
for new members nowadays.
[…]
I think you're angry because you're now only 3rd in forum stats
Nope, it’s on purpose: I managed to have others to answer for me (“help! I can’t
edit my WL,” “the Studio forum is this way,” etc.).
The message is often shortened (and with “typos” for some posters, *cough* Nubs
*cough*) but still understandable.
Golden Rule 3: “When you’ve something to do, arrange for someone else to do it.”
And posts on the Studio forum should count too!
BTW discovered this the other day with this German seller complaining about my
posts,
oh wow, sure far too many! Wish I'd be paid for this
Well, some would say the time you spend on the forum is time you don’t spend
in the shop… but that’s beancounting… or should I say partcounting?
Nope, it’s on purpose: I managed to have others to answer for me (“help! I can’t
edit my WL,” “the Studio forum is this way,” etc.).
The message is often shortened (and with “typos” for some posters, *cough* Nubs
*cough*) but still understandable.
(Don’t know where that comes from as they don’t sound the same at all.)
(Same with throw and through)
I don’t get your comment.
Throw = θɹoʊ
Through = θɹu
Though = ðoʊ
D’oh = ðoʊ
Dough = doʊ
Threw = θɹuː
So, (even if you don’t read the IPA), it’s clear that throw, though, d’oh, &
dough rhyme, but not through, which rhymes with threw (more or less, depending
on your accent).
(Don’t know where that comes from as they don’t sound the same at all.)
(Same with throw and through)
I don’t get your comment.
Throw = θɹoʊ
Through = θɹu
Though = ðoʊ
D’oh = ðoʊ
Dough = doʊ
Threw = θɹuː
So, (even if you don’t read the IPA), it’s clear that throw, though, d’oh, &
dough rhyme, but not through, which rhymes with threw (more or less, depending
on your accent).
"through" sounds like threw
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/through
and "throw" sounds like "throw"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/throw
tho i think there is miscommunication. my comment " (Same with throw and
through)" was in response to your message " (Don’t know where that comes
from as they don’t sound the same at all.)" as you said "D’oh! (D’ough?)"
as an example so I followed up with the example that you had used in the oringal
message "need to through tomatoes". which when speaking sounds different
then "throw". isn't grammar amazing
tho i think there is miscommunication. my comment " (Same with throw and
through)" was in response to your message " (Don’t know where that comes
from as they don’t sound the same at all.)" as you said "D’oh! (D’ough?)"
as an example so I followed up with the example that you had used in the oringal
message "need to through tomatoes". which when speaking sounds different
then "throw".
*than
(then & than don’t sound the same to me or in Received Pronounciation… but
as almost no one talks like that nowadays…)
What I don’t get is that “d’oh” and “dough” do sound the same, to me and to the
Wiktionary
isn't grammar amazing
Like a train wreck: it’s a chaotic mess everybody watched happening and didn’t
do anything to prevent
tho i think there is miscommunication. my comment " (Same with throw and
through)" was in response to your message " (Don’t know where that comes
from as they don’t sound the same at all.)" as you said "D’oh! (D’ough?)"
as an example so I followed up with the example that you had used in the oringal
message "need to through tomatoes". which when speaking sounds different
then "throw".
*than
(then & than don’t sound the same to me or in Received Pronounciation… but
as almost no one talks like that nowadays…)
What I don’t get is that “d’oh” and “dough” do sound the same, to me and to the
Wiktionary
I agree, they do . but you said
"D’oh! (D’ough?)
(Don’t know where that comes from as they don’t sound the same at all.)"
which made me thing that you thought they didn't sound the same
isn't grammar amazing
Like a train wreck: it’s a chaotic mess everybody watched happening and didn’t
do anything to prevent
(Don’t know where that comes from as they don’t sound the same at all.)"
which made me thing that you thought they didn't sound the same
Ahhh!
No, “that” = my mistake. I don’t know where my mistake comes from, “as throw
and thru don’t sound the same at all.”
I’m more writing-oriented in English anyway: I don’t spell from the pronunciation,
I (awfully) pronounce what’s written
As I’m very influenced by French, I’ll never confuse “you’re” and “your” or “principle”
and “principal.”
(Don’t know where that comes from as they don’t sound the same at all.)"
which made me thing that you thought they didn't sound the same
Ahhh!
No, “that” = my mistake. I don’t know where my mistake comes from, “as throw
and thru don’t sound the same at all.”
I’m more writing-oriented in English anyway: I don’t spell from the pronunciation,
I (awfully) pronounce what’s written
As I’m very influenced by French, I’ll never confuse “you’re” and “your” or “principle”
and “principal.”
ahh, makes sense all good, language is confusing, I could only imagine what
It would be like it i tried writing french
There is a "Hide Cancelled Messages" toggle under My Settings: My Discussion
Forum Settings. I never see cancelled messages when I'm logged in.
In General, rickcraine writes:
In General, Braydensbricks writes:
In General, rickcraine writes:
I don't want to jinx it...but there have been no cancelled posts by 0 feedback
members in the last hundred-some posts!
Did BL implement something?
I don't know what you are seeing, but the 10th post back is a canceled post
from a 0 feedback user
Huh...that is odd. I could have sworn... Now that I look again, there are several...I
did look originally when I was logged out of my BL account though due to that
one glitch where it won't let you log in for a few minutes, maybe that had
something to do with it.
USA, Virginia
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Canada, Ontario
I don’t get your comment.
