|
 |
| | | Author: | DeLuca  | | Posted: | Sep 7, 2022 11:51 | | Subject: | Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Sep 7, 2022 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
And Part (973pb1067) from Relationship #10075.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 06:06 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 07:40 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
These similarities are very helpful to highlight, since the key decoration here
- the number of stripes (insignia) are the same, just to make a user double check
the similar torsos to be sure. The collars on these are the easy to spot difference
but this is not mentioned in the description, so it is good to have a warning
to check the similar patterns.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 07:43 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
These similarities are very helpful to highlight, since the key decoration here
- the number of stripes (insignia) are the same, just to make a user double check
the similar torsos to be sure. The collars on these are the easy to spot difference
but this is not mentioned in the description, so it is good to have a warning
to check the similar patterns.
|
+1
I don't see why the source material matters for this kind of relationship
at all.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 08:33 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | +1
I don't see why the source material matters for this kind of relationship
at all.
|
Indeed, if it stops mistakes being made, then it is useful.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 10:06 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, peregrinator writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
These similarities are very helpful to highlight, since the key decoration here
- the number of stripes (insignia) are the same, just to make a user double check
the similar torsos to be sure. The collars on these are the easy to spot difference
but this is not mentioned in the description, so it is good to have a warning
to check the similar patterns.
|
+1
I don't see why the source material matters for this kind of relationship
at all.
|
Perhaps I should have been a bit more clear about my intentions regarding Star
Wars Minifig part Relationships: Part names need to be descriptive, but also
not overly-long; my goal is to work on improving the names, but also to provide
comparisons to other parts with the same source material (via Relationships),
so that the part titles do not become too long and cluttered.
As for the concern that this torso might be confused with others; I am moving
on to reworking the names of Imperial Officers’ torsos, since the current structure
provides no useful information whatsoever (“Torso SW Imperial Officer # Pattern”).
I am going to be adding things like a description of the rank plaque, printing
details, and other searchable keywords that can be used to find and compare the
parts.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 10:54 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Perhaps I should have been a bit more clear about my intentions regarding Star
Wars Minifig part Relationships: Part names need to be descriptive, but also
not overly-long; my goal is to work on improving the names, but also to provide
comparisons to other parts with the same source material (via Relationships),
so that the part titles do not become too long and cluttered.
|
Has BL historically used part relationships for this purpose? Wouldn't categories
be sufficient to identify and distinguish source material?
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 11:31 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, peregrinator writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
These similarities are very helpful to highlight, since the key decoration here
- the number of stripes (insignia) are the same, just to make a user double check
the similar torsos to be sure. The collars on these are the easy to spot difference
but this is not mentioned in the description, so it is good to have a warning
to check the similar patterns.
|
+1
I don't see why the source material matters for this kind of relationship
at all.
|
Perhaps I should have been a bit more clear about my intentions regarding Star
Wars Minifig part Relationships: Part names need to be descriptive, but also
not overly-long; my goal is to work on improving the names, but also to provide
comparisons to other parts with the same source material (via Relationships),
so that the part titles do not become too long and cluttered.
As for the concern that this torso might be confused with others; I am moving
on to reworking the names of Imperial Officers’ torsos, since the current structure
provides no useful information whatsoever (“Torso SW Imperial Officer # Pattern”).
I am going to be adding things like a description of the rank plaque, printing
details, and other searchable keywords that can be used to find and compare the
parts.
|
My understanding of the function of the pattern relationship is that it alerts
people who think they have found the part they are looking for that there is
another, nearly identical part they should be aware of. It's a very important
tool for sellers listing used parts who are looking them up without knowledge
of what set they are from.
Jen
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 11:44 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, peregrinator writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
These similarities are very helpful to highlight, since the key decoration here
- the number of stripes (insignia) are the same, just to make a user double check
the similar torsos to be sure. The collars on these are the easy to spot difference
but this is not mentioned in the description, so it is good to have a warning
to check the similar patterns.
|
+1
I don't see why the source material matters for this kind of relationship
at all.
|
Perhaps I should have been a bit more clear about my intentions regarding Star
Wars Minifig part Relationships: Part names need to be descriptive, but also
not overly-long; my goal is to work on improving the names, but also to provide
comparisons to other parts with the same source material (via Relationships),
so that the part titles do not become too long and cluttered.
As for the concern that this torso might be confused with others; I am moving
on to reworking the names of Imperial Officers’ torsos, since the current structure
provides no useful information whatsoever (“Torso SW Imperial Officer # Pattern”).
I am going to be adding things like a description of the rank plaque, printing
details, and other searchable keywords that can be used to find and compare the
parts.
|
My understanding of the function of the pattern relationship is that it alerts
people who think they have found the part they are looking for that there is
another, nearly identical part they should be aware of. It's a very important
tool for sellers listing used parts who are looking them up without knowledge
of what set they are from.
Jen
|
+1 it has saved me many times from listing the wrong part
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 09:53 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I think this relationships is for similar patterns in the same type of parts,
not related to the figure itself.
|
These similarities are very helpful to highlight, since the key decoration here - the number of stripes (insignia) are the same
|
The ranks are completely different - This is six red squares over six blue (Admiral),
while the other is six blue over three red and three yellow (Grand Moff).
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 10:56 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | The ranks are completely different - This is six red squares over six blue (Admiral),
while the other is six blue over three red and three yellow (Grand Moff).
|
Someone who is taking a quick look might not distinguish if not alerted to the
possibility. Also there are people on BL with varying degrees of colorblindness!
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 11:14 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, peregrinator writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | The ranks are completely different - This is six red squares over six blue (Admiral),
while the other is six blue over three red and three yellow (Grand Moff).
|
Someone who is taking a quick look might not distinguish if not alerted to the
possibility. Also there are people on BL with varying degrees of colorblindness!
|
+1
It’s called similar patters similar dosnt mean almost identical but similar (it’s
in the name  )
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 11:17 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 15:11 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Sep 8, 2022 15:18 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
He is suggesting the creation of a new relationship type that could be used for
character or source material relationships. The current relationship isn't
for that. 
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Sep 9, 2022 00:03 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
He is suggesting the creation of a new relationship type that could be used for
character or source material relationships. The current relationship isn't
for that.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ah, OK - That would be VERY useful to have!
My only concerns are that it would overlap with the upcoming tag system, or
that it would take years to implement (like said tag system). 😕
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Sep 9, 2022 07:48 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
He is suggesting the creation of a new relationship type that could be used for
character or source material relationships. The current relationship isn't
for that.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ah, OK - That would be VERY useful to have!
My only concerns are that it would overlap with the upcoming tag system, or
that it would take years to implement (like said tag system). 😕
|
Tag system would supersede it. But is the tag system upcoming?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Sep 9, 2022 17:58 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
He is suggesting the creation of a new relationship type that could be used for
character or source material relationships. The current relationship isn't
for that.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ah, OK - That would be VERY useful to have!
My only concerns are that it would overlap with the upcoming tag system, or
that it would take years to implement (like said tag system). 😕
|
Tag system would supersede it. But is the tag system upcoming?
|
My question exactly - The tag system has been “coming soon” for a few years!
😕
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Sep 9, 2022 18:52 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
He is suggesting the creation of a new relationship type that could be used for
character or source material relationships. The current relationship isn't
for that.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ah, OK - That would be VERY useful to have!
My only concerns are that it would overlap with the upcoming tag system, or
that it would take years to implement (like said tag system). 😕
|
Tag system would supersede it. But is the tag system upcoming?
|
My question exactly - The tag system has been “coming soon” for a few years!
😕
|
I can't recall that I have ever heard Bricklink say they are going to do
it. I have seen lots of people saying they ought to.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Sep 9, 2022 18:57 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| | Please remove Part (973pb1067c01) from Relationship #10074, as it is not based
on the same source-material as the other parts in the Relationship.
|
I would support the creation of a relationship for what you are trying to do,
but this one is for something else.
|
Unfortunately, parts cannot be in more than one same-part-similar-pattern Relationship.
|
He is suggesting the creation of a new relationship type that could be used for
character or source material relationships. The current relationship isn't
for that.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ah, OK - That would be VERY useful to have!
My only concerns are that it would overlap with the upcoming tag system, or
that it would take years to implement (like said tag system). 😕
|
Tag system would supersede it. But is the tag system upcoming?
|
My question exactly - The tag system has been “coming soon” for a few years!
😕
|
I can't recall that I have ever heard Bricklink say they are going to do
it. I have seen lots of people saying they ought to.
|
Call me crazy but I’m almost certain I’ve seen admins say that it’s for sure
coming soon for a while now
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Sep 10, 2022 07:03 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Item From Relationship | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
Now I can recall it.
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Virginia
Spain, Comunidad Valenciana
United Kingdom, England
Canada, Ontario
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine