| Discussion Forum: Thread 243968 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | odurt  | | Posted: | Nov 4, 2018 13:01 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60072-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 44567 Blue Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on Side (undetermined type) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Blue 44567a Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on Side with Bottom Groove {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
Comments from Submitter:
I don't think an alternate is required for an underdermined part. I confirm this part has a groove. I have this set in my collection.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Nov 4, 2018 16:07 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 60072-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, odurt writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 44567 Blue Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on Side (undetermined type) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Blue 44567a Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on Side with Bottom Groove {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
Comments from Submitter:
I don't think an alternate is required for an underdermined part. I confirm this part has a groove. I have this set in my collection.
|
I think it is needed. It shows that this set has most probably alternate variant
also. But must be now confirmed from sealed set content. This set was originally
inventoried with non groove variant (for this part) and then was added groove
variant to the inventory as alternate. But we can't just simply change all
undetermine to "b" variant which this undetermine entry formerly represented.
Please read the discussions about similar issues in inventories:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=240948&nID=1103746
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=231759&nID=1075720
BTW I checked some reviews of this set here you have set with non groove (b variant)
https://youtu.be/PyjWlxDtFI4?t=38s
Review is from sealed set content, set opened in front of the camera.
But thank you for confirming grooved variant in this set. Considering above request
will be rejected.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | odurt | | Posted: | Nov 4, 2018 20:28 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 60072-1 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, odurt writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 44567 Blue Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on Side (undetermined type) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Blue 44567a Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on Side with Bottom Groove {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
Comments from Submitter:
I don't think an alternate is required for an underdermined part. I confirm this part has a groove. I have this set in my collection.
|
I think it is needed. It shows that this set has most probably alternate variant
also. But must be now confirmed from sealed set content. This set was originally
inventoried with non groove variant (for this part) and then was added groove
variant to the inventory as alternate. But we can't just simply change all
undetermine to "b" variant which this undetermine entry formerly represented.
Please read the discussions about similar issues in inventories:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=240948&nID=1103746
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=231759&nID=1075720
BTW I checked some reviews of this set here you have set with non groove (b variant)
https://youtu.be/PyjWlxDtFI4?t=38s
Review is from sealed set content, set opened in front of the camera.
But thank you for confirming grooved variant in this set. Considering above request
will be rejected.
|
I get it. I now fully understand the reason for the "undetermine". However, in
this particular case, since we know that "a" and "b" types both exist for this
set ("a"= me opening this seal set 2-3 years ago and "b" = Youtube link you provided
above), why don't we just keep "a" as regular and "b" as alternate (or the
opposite) and get rid of "undetermine"?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Nov 5, 2018 01:19 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 60072-1 | | Viewed: | 14 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, odurt writes:
| | I get it. I now fully understand the reason for the "undetermine". However, in
this particular case, since we know that "a" and "b" types both exist for this
set ("a"= me opening this seal set 2-3 years ago and "b" = Youtube link you provided
above), why don't we just keep "a" as regular and "b" as alternate (or the
opposite) and get rid of "undetermine"?
|
It was already done just after I had rejected your request.
Inventory was corrected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada, Quebec
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie