|
 |
| | | Author: | BricksOfFaith  | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 10:23 | | Subject: | More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 119 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Poncke | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 10:31 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
LEGO is a brand name, and the company sells interlocking plastic bricks. I think
Legos is incorrect.
I guess its the same as Nike and say you bought Nikes, which should be Nike shoes.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 10:49 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Another reason to burn chatGPT on the pyre!
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | BricksOfFaith | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:08 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Another reason to burn chatGPT on the pyre!
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:11 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Lego once said ‘Legos’ isn’t correct. Lego is always a plural.
Lego is the name of the factory, only 1 brand, LEGO means ‘play well’ or in Danish
Leg Godt, in Latin ‘to gather, to collect’, sometimes I see it means ‘to assemble’
but in fact I only know medical Latin or some Latin I learned from Asterix…
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | BricksOfFaith | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:14 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, tonnic writes:
| | In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Lego once said ‘Legos’ isn’t correct. Lego is always a plural.
Lego is the name of the factory, only 1 brand, LEGO means ‘play well’ or in Danish
Leg Godt, in Latin ‘to gather, to collect’, sometimes I see it means ‘to assemble’
but in fact I only know medical Latin or some Latin I learned from Asterix…
|
So who’s right then? TLG? Or a super computer? 😂
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:17 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | In Off Topic, tonnic writes:
| | In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Lego once said ‘Legos’ isn’t correct. Lego is always a plural.
Lego is the name of the factory, only 1 brand, LEGO means ‘play well’ or in Danish
Leg Godt, in Latin ‘to gather, to collect’, sometimes I see it means ‘to assemble’
but in fact I only know medical Latin or some Latin I learned from Asterix…
|
So who’s right then? TLG? Or a super computer? 😂
|
TLG since chatgpt is still in its early stages
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:18 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | In Off Topic, tonnic writes:
| | In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Lego once said ‘Legos’ isn’t correct. Lego is always a plural.
Lego is the name of the factory, only 1 brand, LEGO means ‘play well’ or in Danish
Leg Godt, in Latin ‘to gather, to collect’, sometimes I see it means ‘to assemble’
but in fact I only know medical Latin or some Latin I learned from Asterix…
|
So who’s right then? TLG? Or a super computer?
|
I think the inventor.
Not the one of the computer but the one that invented Lego.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:15 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
Only grammatically correct to those who don’t like to use proper language. It’s
considered grammatically correct by chatgpt likely since it’s searching grammar
of the word rather then the usage of that grammar in this specific terminology
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:25 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
Only grammatically correct to those who don’t like to use proper language. It’s
considered grammatically correct by chatgpt likely since it’s searching grammar
of the word rather then the usage of that grammar in this specific terminology
|
It’s not searching anything. It only repeats (reformulate) what people have
already answered to similar questions.
Allways remember that it’s a language model: it generates text from a starting
point, the same way your phone auto-completes your sentences, no more, no less.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:27 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
Only grammatically correct to those who don’t like to use proper language. It’s
considered grammatically correct by chatgpt likely since it’s searching grammar
of the word rather then the usage of that grammar in this specific terminology
|
It’s not searching anything. It only repeats (reformulate) what people have
already answered to similar questions.
Allways remember that it’s a language model: it generates text from a starting
point, the same way your phone auto-completes your sentences, no more, no less.
|
But is still crazy powerful and will only get more powerful.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:36 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
But is still crazy powerful and will only get more powerful.
|
It’ll get more powerful like a plane can get faster, cheaper, lighter, whatever…
but a plane will never get you to the moon, and chatGPT will never know anything.
And you’ll always get wrong information, it’ll just be better phrased and harder
to spot.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | BricksOfFaith | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:37 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
But is still crazy powerful and will only get more powerful.
|
It’ll get more powerful like a plane can get faster, cheaper, lighter, whatever…
but a plane will never get you to the moon, and chatGPT will never know anything.
And you’ll always get wrong information, it’ll just be better phrased and harder
to spot.
|
Man, you really hate this thing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:48 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | […]
Man, you really hate this thing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
|
Mostly, I hate the buzz around it and I don’t want people to imagine things.
There’s already too many people thinking James Bond’s gadgets (or invisible 5G
nanochips) are real.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:56 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | […]
Man, you really hate this thing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
|
Mostly, I hate the buzz around it and I don’t want people to imagine things.
|
I mean for me at least I’ve been legitimately using it for probably over 5000
messages for helping with some code and with it it’s been able to help do so
much it’s is crazy good
| | There’s already too many people thinking James Bond’s gadgets (or invisible 5G
nanochips) are real.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:40 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
But is still crazy powerful and will only get more powerful.
|
It’ll get more powerful like a plane can get faster, cheaper, lighter, whatever…
but a plane will never get you to the moon, and chatGPT will never know anything.
And you’ll always get wrong information, it’ll just be better phrased and harder
to spot.
|
Not always wrong but sometimes wrong but what did planes probably pave the
way to (just guessing tbh) rockets which went to the moon so chatgpt might lead
the way for something better
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:18 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
| | And you’ll always get wrong information, it’ll just be better phrased and harder
to spot.
|
Not always wrong but sometimes wrong
|
Yes. I meant: You’ll always get some wrong information among all the
information you get.
| | but what did planes probably pave the way to (just guessing tbh) rockets
|
Not really. Or in the same way boats did: engineering, industry….
| | which went to the moon so chatgpt might lead the way for something better
|
For info, those models are decades old, we just arrived at a time when computers
are fast enough and we have data enough to feed them.
So, yes, scientists are learning more about them as they can now experiment with
them, and they build better ones. But inherently, they won’t lead to something
else.
For instance, chatGPT will never play chess. It will be able (or already is
able) to fake a game, write a series of moves that look like a game. It may
also only use legal moves (no obvious error). But it’s not “playing.”
One game, it will look like Bobby Fischer, the next, it’ll be SylvainLS. And
it’ll mostly be something in the middle, because the middle is more probable.
But that doesn’t mean those “AI”s aren’t useful (or funny). Just don’t expect
or believe too much.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:21 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
| | And you’ll always get wrong information, it’ll just be better phrased and harder
to spot.
|
Not always wrong but sometimes wrong
|
Yes. I meant: You’ll always get some wrong information among all the
information you get.
| | but what did planes probably pave the way to (just guessing tbh) rockets
|
Not really. Or in the same way boats did: engineering, industry….
| | which went to the moon so chatgpt might lead the way for something better
|
For info, those models are decades old, we just arrived at a time when computers
are fast enough and we have data enough to feed them.
So, yes, scientists are learning more about them as they can now experiment with
them, and they build better ones. But inherently, they won’t lead to something
else.
For instance, chatGPT will never play chess. It will be able (or already is
able) to fake a game, write a series of moves that look like a game. It may
also only use legal moves (no obvious error). But it’s not “playing.”
One game, it will look like Bobby Fischer, the next, it’ll be SylvainLS. And
it’ll mostly be something in the middle, because the middle is more probable.
But that doesn’t mean those “AI”s aren’t useful (or funny). Just don’t expect
or believe too much.
|
But they only improve. They haven’t been able in the past to get so much learning
data from real time inquires with actual people who use the site and all of that
data is then used to improve it. And as other companies integrate chatgpt more
and more into everyday stuff it will become more powerful
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:39 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
But they only improve. They haven’t been able in the past to get so much learning
data from real time inquires with actual people who use the site and all of that
data is then used to improve it. And as other companies integrate chatgpt more
and more into everyday stuff it will become more powerful
|
We’re back to the beginning of this conversation. So, better analogy: it’ll
make a bigger pizza, it will never reinvent the calzone.
(And it’s also grabbing personal data.)
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:42 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
But they only improve. They haven’t been able in the past to get so much learning
data from real time inquires with actual people who use the site and all of that
data is then used to improve it. And as other companies integrate chatgpt more
and more into everyday stuff it will become more powerful
|
We’re back to the beginning of this conversation. So, better analogy: it’ll
make a bigger pizza, it will never reinvent the calzone.
(And it’s also grabbing personal data.)
|
Which is what makes it better 
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:45 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
| | (And it’s also grabbing personal data.)
|
Which is what makes it better
|
Sure thing, getting your phone number helps it writing a story about the Pizza
gang….
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | […]
| | (And it’s also grabbing personal data.)
|
Which is what makes it better
|
Sure thing, getting your phone number helps it writing a story about the Pizza
gang….
|
It might!
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:19 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| How about something a bit more fun?
write a story about the pizza gang and the mustard gang fighting over Lego
bricks
Once upon a time, in a small town, there were two groups of friends, the Pizza
Gang and the Mustard Gang. The Pizza Gang loved pizza and everything about it,
while the Mustard Gang was obsessed with mustard and all its yellow glory. One
day, the two groups stumbled upon a large box of Lego bricks and decided to build
something together.
However, as they started building, they realized that they had different ideas
of what to build. The Pizza Gang wanted to build a giant pizza with all the toppings,
while the Mustard Gang wanted to create a mustard bottle that was bigger than
a house. This disagreement led to a heated argument, and soon the two groups
were fighting over the Lego bricks.
The fight escalated quickly, with both sides using their bricks as weapons. The
town was in chaos as the Pizza Gang and the Mustard Gang continued to fight,
destroying each other's creations in the process.
Just then, a wise old man appeared and saw what was happening. He approached
the two groups and asked them to stop fighting. He reminded them that Lego bricks
were meant to bring joy and creativity, not to cause conflict.
The two groups listened to the old man and realized the error of their ways.
They decided to work together and build something even more incredible than their
separate creations. So, they combined their ideas and built a giant pizza with
a mustard bottle as the centerpiece.
The town was amazed at the sight of the pizza-mustard creation and everyone came
to admire it. The Pizza Gang and the Mustard Gang became friends again and learned
a valuable lesson about teamwork and cooperation. From that day on, they built
many more incredible creations together, always working as a team and never fighting
again.
The End.
In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | BricksOfFaith | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:22 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| | Did chatGPT give you that?! 😂 I guess y’all are right! ChatGPT sucks! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 11:24 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, peregrinator writes:
| | How about something a bit more fun?
write a story about the pizza gang and the mustard gang fighting over Lego
bricks
Once upon a time, in a small town, there were two groups of friends, the Pizza
Gang and the Mustard Gang. The Pizza Gang loved pizza and everything about it,
while the Mustard Gang was obsessed with mustard and all its yellow glory. One
day, the two groups stumbled upon a large box of Lego bricks and decided to build
something together.
However, as they started building, they realized that they had different ideas
of what to build. The Pizza Gang wanted to build a giant pizza with all the toppings,
while the Mustard Gang wanted to create a mustard bottle that was bigger than
a house. This disagreement led to a heated argument, and soon the two groups
were fighting over the Lego bricks.
The fight escalated quickly, with both sides using their bricks as weapons. The
town was in chaos as the Pizza Gang and the Mustard Gang continued to fight,
destroying each other's creations in the process.
Just then, a wise old man appeared and saw what was happening. He approached
the two groups and asked them to stop fighting. He reminded them that Lego bricks
were meant to bring joy and creativity, not to cause conflict.
The two groups listened to the old man and realized the error of their ways.
They decided to work together and build something even more incredible than their
separate creations. So, they combined their ideas and built a giant pizza with
a mustard bottle as the centerpiece.
The town was amazed at the sight of the pizza-mustard creation and everyone came
to admire it. The Pizza Gang and the Mustard Gang became friends again and learned
a valuable lesson about teamwork and cooperation. From that day on, they built
many more incredible creations together, always working as a team and never fighting
again.
The End.
|
Peace was never an option
| |
In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | BigFish | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:15 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
How about the often overlooked "LEGO's"?
I like to build LEGO's sets.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2023 12:18 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, BigFish writes:
| | In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
How about the often overlooked "LEGO's"?
I like to build LEGO's sets.
|
That I can agree with since it’s possessive not plural
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | molten.brick | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2023 09:27 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| AI is dumb.
It's essentially wikichatter.
= every iteration will become correct.
this is correct English - LEGO'
In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | molten.brick | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2023 10:16 | | Subject: | Re: More chatGPT | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| I also sleep with the Fish'
That's complex...
In Off Topic, molten.brick writes:
| | AI is dumb.
It's essentially wikichatter.
= every iteration will become correct.
this is correct English - LEGO'
In Off Topic, BricksOfFaith writes:
| | Me: What is the grammatically correct way to use the word legos
ChatGPT: The correct way to refer to individual Lego bricks is "Lego bricks"
or simply "Legos." "Legos" is a commonly used term and is widely
recognized, although some people might argue that it is not technically correct.
It is a matter of personal preference and usage. In any case, using "Lego
bricks" or "Legos" is grammatically correct
You’re welcome nubs 😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Tennessee
Ireland, Meath
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Netherlands, Noord-Holland
Canada, Ontario
Australia, Tasmania