Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Shintaku | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:21 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, peregrinator writes:
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| 3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The search is fine, it is searching alternate numbers. So those 3068p- that have
a 3068bp- alternate number will be returned on a search for 3068bp*
|
This works only for OLD tiles.
So if you look for the 3068bp* in your inventory, only some will spawn.
This is wrong.
|
|
Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:12 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| 3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The search is fine, it is searching alternate numbers. So those 3068p- that have
a 3068bp- alternate number will be returned on a search for 3068bp*
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:11 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
You are right.
The problem is not the result, but the research.
3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
The old item numbers 3068bpXXXX were put as Alternate IDs in the corresponding
parts to help locate them for users who don't know about the changes.
|
|
Author: | Shintaku | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 07:07 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
You are right.
The problem is not the result, but the research.
3068bp* finds SOME result of the 3068p* but not ALL THE results.
Instead, it should return nothing.
The search is broken, not the inventory
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:57 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
What about ps?
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=168
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:55 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
Neither do I:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?pg=1&q=3068%2A&catLike=W&catString=39&sortBy=I&sortAsc=A&catType=P
|
|
Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:26 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
|
I don't see any. Can you give an example?
| So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
|
Author: | Shintaku | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 06:22 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
Yes but you didn't read sir.
Now we currently have for the same range
3068bp
and
3608pb
This is an error.
If 3068b doesn't exist anymore ALL the 3068bp should change to 3068p
So, actually the inventory is inconsistent because new tiles are under the 3068p
following the new rule that 3068b doesn't exist anymore.
But old tiles are under 3068bp.
Do you understand now?
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 05:31 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
3068apb are old, old ones without groove.
3068p are printed ones that were described by LDraw before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068px are printed ones that were described by Peeron before Bricklink was created.
Dan used their designations to harmonize and gave them credit.
3068pb are printed ones that were described on Bricklink after creation.
|
|
Author: | Shintaku | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 05:16 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
But there are many tile printed in 3068bp*
So either all are moved to 3068p* or not.
This is inconsistent.
|
|
Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 04:22 | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
|
Author: | Shintaku | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 04:08 | Subject: | Many errors in the catalog | Viewed: | 146 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 24, 2024 16:41 | Subject: | Re: Inaccuracies with the BIONICLE mask packs | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| All fixed up.
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| Hello, this has been bothering me for a while now, but several of the mask packs
listed either do not exist at all, or are listed with the wrong region.
For starters, the US/non-US distinction -- having spoken with several Canadian
BIONICLE fans about these, Canada had the boxed versions as well. Additionally,
LEGO's naming scheme uses the distinguishment of "IN" and "AM",
rather than "NA" or "US", which leads me to believe that they
were available in both South and North America.
Considering that Connecticut became HQ for LEGO's activities in all of America
around 1998, this also tracks: https://www.lego.com/en-gb/history/articles/g-production-in-brazil/
Further-more, I have found no evidence of 8530, 8559, 8597, or 8600 existing
in boxed form. Just Google them, there are no photos of them - because they do
not exist.
To go through each set one-by-one:
Kanohi:
- US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/Lego-Shop-At-Home-summer-2001-Bionicle-Cover/page/n1/mode/2up
- US Shop@Home: https://web.archive.org/web/20031203111200/http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=8525
- UK Ad: https://biosector01.com/w/images/bs01/6/63/UK_2001_LEGO_shop_ad.jpg
This one is correct.
This one is correct.
[S=8530-2]
This one does not exist; the image used in a prototype moccup of the box art.
Krana:
UK Catalogue 1: https://images.brickset.com/library/view/?f=catalogues/c02uk&p=64
UK Catalogue 2: https://images.brickset.com/library/view/?f=catalogues/c02uk2&p=80
(this onse seems to confused 8559 and 8597).
US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/lego-shop-at-home-summer-2002/page/n31/mode/2up
This one does exist. The image is a digital moccup.
[S=8559-2]
This one is correct.
This one was released in America.
Kanohi Nuva:
US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/lego-shop-at-home-holiday-2002/page/n43/mode/2up
US Catalogue 2: https://archive.org/details/shop-at-home-fall-2003/page/n35/mode/2up
LEGO Shop at Home: http://web.archive.org/web/20031204080846/http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=8574
(has a dead link to 8598)
This one should be labelled non-American polybag version.
This one should be labelled American boxed version.
Krana-Kal:
This one should be labelled American boxed version.
This one is correct.
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 24, 2024 15:52 | Subject: | Re: How to resolve a Doctor Octopus inconsistency | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Peteparker writes:
| Hello!
I noticed that some sets like the Daily Bugle (76178-1) list the Doc Ock figure
with the arms included, but the one from the Monster Truck set (76174-1) didn't.
Could it be at least included as an alternate to the minifigure alone? It makes
more sense to me for the figure to be offered both with and without the mechanical
arms, but the listings including these are inconsistent.
Thanks for the consideration and any feedback about the situation.
Nathan (Peteparker)
|
Our current catalog guidelines for minifigures make the condition of handheld
items being added to the minifigure in the instructions the finishing point of
the minifigure build. So, for Doc Ock from
the figure is considered complete on page 5 before the arms are built and added
on the subsequent pages.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 22:53 | Subject: | Re: Flounder version | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, myixjetjet24 writes:
| I got 2 version of flounder (little mermaid)(15679pb01) and got different set
of eyes. Is the set 43207 contains the latest version?
|
This has been completed.
The two new entries are
* | | 15679pb03 Fish, The Little Mermaid with Blue Stripes, Medium Azure Dorsal and Caudal Fins, Lime Eyes without Bottom Eyelids Pattern (Flounder / Fabius) Parts: Animal, Water |
and
* | | 15679pb04 Fish, The Little Mermaid with Blue Stripes, Medium Azure Dorsal and Caudal Fins, Lime Eyes with Bottom Eyelids Pattern (Flounder / Fabius) Parts: Animal, Water |
All inventories have also been updated.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 17:24 | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
Any logged in member can submit a change request, unless the site has a glitch
and is giving you an error. Since you're the one who has the physical item,
it should be you who submits the dimension information.
David
|
|
Author: | Dhobeck | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 15:29 | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | Viewed: | 18 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
I have submitted a change request
|
The change request has been approved
|
|
Author: | Dhobeck | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 12:58 | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
I have submitted a change request
|
|
Author: | KNI | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 12:50 | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 11:20 | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
|
Author: | andreaseldh | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 21:10 | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 25 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
Yeah, but that’s 800x600 (or 600x800). I believe the catalogue team sometimes
accepts better images.
|
Yes. The question is how do I upload the 1600x1050 version? The text is hard
to read on the current 800x525.
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 18:05 | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
Yeah, but that’s 800x600 (or 600x800). I believe the catalogue team sometimes
accepts better images.
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 17:59 | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 16 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog Requests, andreaseldh writes:
| […]
My large scale image is size 1600 x 1050. It is this version that I do not think
I have succeded with uploading yet.
|
I don’t know the rules and procedures for images in the catalogue but the forum
is not a good solution: it reduces images to a width of 640.
|
it should be as simple as going to this page selecting book
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page
and adding the image so long as it meets the restrictions and then submitting
it
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 17:47 | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, andreaseldh writes:
| […]
My large scale image is size 1600 x 1050. It is this version that I do not think
I have succeded with uploading yet.
|
I don’t know the rules and procedures for images in the catalogue but the forum
is not a good solution: it reduces images to a width of 640.
(And, please, don’t post personal info (e-mail) here )
|
Author: | andreaseldh | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 17:09 | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
| its seems youve already added it
|
Hello again!
My large scale image is size 1600 x 1050. It is this version that I do not think
I have succeded with uploading yet.
Leg godt!
Andreas Eldh
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 16:41 | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| its seems youve already added it
|
Author: | andreaseldh | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 16:39 | Subject: | Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
I did not succeed uploading this large scale image to the catalog, but it seems
to be possible with this message!
Play well!
Andreas Eldh
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 15:54 | Subject: | Re: LEGO House Tile | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, joshbeagrie writes:
| Hi all,
I have discovered that the LEGO House Tile has 2 versions, see below.
Appeared in sets 40502, 40501, 4000010 and 21037, with PCC 6089148.
And it was updated to:
And this newer version appears in sets 40503, 40563, 40504 and 40505, with PCC
6320270.
Once the newer tile has been approved I will update the set inventories above
accordingly, and add a relationship between the 2 tiles.
I have put in a request for the version currently in the catalogue to change
it's name and remove it's second PCC.
Any questions just let me know!
Thanks,
Josh
|
This has been completed.
The two new entries are
and
All inventories have also been updated.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 12:21 | Subject: | Re: Add item | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
You have to submit images before your parts can be approved.
~Jen
|
The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
You can use some tweezers to re-align the sticker. If there is dirt / hair or
such on the part of the sticker that was hanging over the edge, you can use any
flat object to scrape off the debris. If done gently enough, the sticky glue
should still be viable and will re-stick very well.
I do this all the time and it works very well. I use my fingernail to scrape
the debris off as I have semi-long nails.
Cass T
|
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 11:43 | Subject: | Re: Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nathan123 writes:
| Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
If you are looking to sell a misprinted item, you can list it under the normal
item category and add to your description that the part is a misprint. You can
also use your own photo for that item.
You could also list it under custom with the item number, but fewer custom items
get hits when someone searches.
Cass T
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 07:40 | Subject: | Re: Unsuccessful add item attempt? | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Kumquat23 writes:
| Hi,
On the 19th I tried to add a stickered item to the catalog, and I added an image.
Should those appear in the forum, and if not, does it mean that my request did
not go through?
I was trying to add part 45677pb161 (I can't remember the exact number at
the end, but I looked at recent sticker numbers from that part number and chose
the next one) from D.Va & Reinhardt set 75973. It seemed like it allowed me to
submit it and to submit the image. Just double-checking Jennifer's link
explaining how to upload stickered parts was super helpful!
Thanks,
Beth
CA Brick Shop
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 00:16 | Subject: | Re: Catalog Error (Self-Consistency issue) | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, sometom writes:
| Set 76416 Inventory shows part 22385 in Green, but no such item in Dark Green.
This is consistent with the Lego instructions posted on Lego.com, since the
set includes one 6290600 according to the instructions.
The derived item with a sticker, 22385pb304, also in the inventory of that set,
claims it is Dark Green. I believe this needs to be updated to be Green.
|
It sure does. Thanks for catching this.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 00:13 | Subject: | Re: Unsuccessful add item attempt? | Viewed: | 18 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| No it dosnt make a forum post. You can check your entry here
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPend.asp
Market - catalog - pending approval
Stickered parts can take awhile to get approved so keep that in mind
|
Author: | sometom | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 23:34 | Subject: | Catalog Error (Self-Consistency issue) | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Set 76416 Inventory shows part 22385 in Green, but no such item in Dark Green.
This is consistent with the Lego instructions posted on Lego.com, since the
set includes one 6290600 according to the instructions.
The derived item with a sticker, 22385pb304, also in the inventory of that set,
claims it is Dark Green. I believe this needs to be updated to be Green.
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 14:19 | Subject: | Re: Unsuccessful add item attempt? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Kumquat23 writes:
| Hi,
On the 19th I tried to add a stickered item to the catalog, and I added an image.
Should those appear in the forum, and if not, does it mean that my request did
not go through?
|
Submitting an inventory change request does automatically generate a forum post,
but adding an item to the catalog does not generate a post.
David
|
|
Author: | Kumquat23 | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 13:13 | Subject: | Unsuccessful add item attempt? | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
On the 19th I tried to add a stickered item to the catalog, and I added an image.
Should those appear in the forum, and if not, does it mean that my request did
not go through?
I was trying to add part 45677pb161 (I can't remember the exact number at
the end, but I looked at recent sticker numbers from that part number and chose
the next one) from D.Va & Reinhardt set 75973. It seemed like it allowed me to
submit it and to submit the image. Just double-checking Jennifer's link
explaining how to upload stickered parts was super helpful!
Thanks,
Beth
CA Brick Shop
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 07:36 | Subject: | Re: Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nathan123 writes:
| Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
No
|
Author: | Nathan123 | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 06:38 | Subject: | Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | Viewed: | 103 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
|
Author: | ZELDATOTK | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:47 | Subject: | Re: Help identify a Lego part and color | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| In Catalog, ZELDATOTK writes:
| What is this Lego part can someone help
|
|
you beat me to it!
|
Thanks guy I appreciate it.
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:42 | Subject: | Re: Help identify a Lego part and color | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| In Catalog, ZELDATOTK writes:
| What is this Lego part can someone help
|
|
you beat me to it!
|
Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:42 | Subject: | Re: Help identify a Lego part and color | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ZELDATOTK writes:
| What is this Lego part can someone help
|
|
Author: | ZELDATOTK | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:41 | Subject: | Help identify a Lego part and color | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| What is this Lego part can someone help |
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 15:13 | Subject: | Re: Add item | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| […]
You think that’s bad. This sticker was so far off it’s mark that it ended up
on a whole other part.
|
And not wholy on that part
Whom did you get the parts from? Mr Magoo?
|
Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 15:02 | Subject: | Re: Add item | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| […]
| The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
You think that’s bad. This sticker was so far off it’s mark that it ended up
on a whole other part.
|
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 15:02 | Subject: | Re: LEGO® Education Storage (white) Art.Nr. 14473 | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Hi,
I had to cancel your post: link to sites selling LEGO are forbidden here.
Also, the Suggestions topic is for suggestions about the website. Questions
about the catalogue are better placed in the Catalog topics or in the more general
Help section.
As for the part you linked to, sorting trays are in the Gear section. You should
find it here: https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=G&catString=1092
In Suggestions, DreadHeadDad writes:
| Hello.
I'm not sure if I post at the right place.
I'm new here, by the way excellent page.
As I started implement my Collection,
I realized I've got gear at home which isn't implemented in your Database.
What kind of gear you can see in the Topic.
Here the current HP where you can purchase these items.
[redacted]
Best regards
|
|
|
Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 12:14 | Subject: | Re: Add item | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| […]
| The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
I uploaded the images to BL. Now is there an option for someone else who has
the part to add a different main image later? Thanks!
|
Yup! Any image can be updated if a better one is provided
|
That shouldn’t be too hard.
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 12:10 | Subject: | Re: Add item | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| […]
| The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
I uploaded the images to BL. Now is there an option for someone else who has
the part to add a different main image later? Thanks!
|
Yup! Any image can be updated if a better one is provided
|
Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:49 | Subject: | Re: Add item | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| […]
| The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
I uploaded the images to BL. Now is there an option for someone else who has
the part to add a different main image later? Thanks!
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|