Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Give.Me.A.Brick  | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 04:22 | | Subject: | Re: Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Shintaku writes:
| | Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
|
3068b doesn't exist anymore, now it is just 3068 to conform with LEGO number.
We have now 3068 for the regular current tile with groove and 3068a for the old
tile without groove.
Thus printed tiles with groove are now 3068p*
Hope that helps?
|
 |
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2024 04:08 | | Subject: | Many errors in the catalog | | Viewed: | 145 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello,
probably I'm not the first person to point this out but there are a lot of
2x2 printed tiles listed in the wrong way.
I suppose the part code is 3068b, so all the printed tiles should be 3068bp*,
but many are 3068pb*
Like : https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=3068pb2361&in=S
I believe that this is an error.
Can you confirm me?
Because when searching 3068bp*, as it should, many do not appear.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 24, 2024 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: Inaccuracies with the BIONICLE mask packs | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| All fixed up.
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| | Hello, this has been bothering me for a while now, but several of the mask packs
listed either do not exist at all, or are listed with the wrong region.
For starters, the US/non-US distinction -- having spoken with several Canadian
BIONICLE fans about these, Canada had the boxed versions as well. Additionally,
LEGO's naming scheme uses the distinguishment of "IN" and "AM",
rather than "NA" or "US", which leads me to believe that they
were available in both South and North America.
Considering that Connecticut became HQ for LEGO's activities in all of America
around 1998, this also tracks: https://www.lego.com/en-gb/history/articles/g-production-in-brazil/
Further-more, I have found no evidence of 8530, 8559, 8597, or 8600 existing
in boxed form. Just Google them, there are no photos of them - because they do
not exist.
To go through each set one-by-one:
Kanohi:
- US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/Lego-Shop-At-Home-summer-2001-Bionicle-Cover/page/n1/mode/2up
- US Shop@Home: https://web.archive.org/web/20031203111200/http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=8525
- UK Ad: https://biosector01.com/w/images/bs01/6/63/UK_2001_LEGO_shop_ad.jpg
This one is correct.
This one is correct.
[S=8530-2]
This one does not exist; the image used in a prototype moccup of the box art.
Krana:
UK Catalogue 1: https://images.brickset.com/library/view/?f=catalogues/c02uk&p=64
UK Catalogue 2: https://images.brickset.com/library/view/?f=catalogues/c02uk2&p=80
(this onse seems to confused 8559 and 8597).
US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/lego-shop-at-home-summer-2002/page/n31/mode/2up
This one does exist. The image is a digital moccup.
[S=8559-2]
This one is correct.
This one was released in America.
Kanohi Nuva:
US Catalogue: https://archive.org/details/lego-shop-at-home-holiday-2002/page/n43/mode/2up
US Catalogue 2: https://archive.org/details/shop-at-home-fall-2003/page/n35/mode/2up
LEGO Shop at Home: http://web.archive.org/web/20031204080846/http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=8574
(has a dead link to 8598)
This one should be labelled non-American polybag version.
This one should be labelled American boxed version.
Krana-Kal:
This one should be labelled American boxed version.
This one is correct.
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 24, 2024 15:52 | | Subject: | Re: How to resolve a Doctor Octopus inconsistency | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Peteparker writes:
| | Hello!
I noticed that some sets like the Daily Bugle (76178-1) list the Doc Ock figure
with the arms included, but the one from the Monster Truck set (76174-1) didn't.
Could it be at least included as an alternate to the minifigure alone? It makes
more sense to me for the figure to be offered both with and without the mechanical
arms, but the listings including these are inconsistent.
Thanks for the consideration and any feedback about the situation.
Nathan (Peteparker)
|
Our current catalog guidelines for minifigures make the condition of handheld
items being added to the minifigure in the instructions the finishing point of
the minifigure build. So, for Doc Ock from
the figure is considered complete on page 5 before the arms are built and added
on the subsequent pages.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 22:53 | | Subject: | Re: Flounder version | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, myixjetjet24 writes:
| | I got 2 version of flounder (little mermaid)(15679pb01) and got different set
of eyes. Is the set 43207 contains the latest version?
|
This has been completed.
The two new entries are
* | | 15679pb03 Fish, The Little Mermaid with Blue Stripes, Medium Azure Dorsal and Caudal Fins, Lime Eyes without Bottom Eyelids Pattern (Flounder / Fabius)
Parts: Animal, Water |
and
* | | 15679pb04 Fish, The Little Mermaid with Blue Stripes, Medium Azure Dorsal and Caudal Fins, Lime Eyes with Bottom Eyelids Pattern (Flounder / Fabius)
Parts: Animal, Water |
All inventories have also been updated.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 17:24 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
Any logged in member can submit a change request, unless the site has a glitch
and is giving you an error. Since you're the one who has the physical item,
it should be you who submits the dimension information.
David
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 15:29 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, KNI writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
I have submitted a change request
|
The change request has been approved
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 12:58 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, KNI writes:
| | In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
I have submitted a change request
|
|
| Author: | KNI | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
I can't l. Won't you do it. Kirsten
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2024 11:20 | | Subject: | Re: No dimensions on instruction for 41006 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Identification, KNI writes:
| | Would you like to put dimensions on instruction 41006. When SH is calculated
when ordering, you will have to pay for an L letter (14 EUR) when there are no
dimensions on it. Otherwise, it can be sent as an S letter for EUR 4.20. The
dimensions are 20.5 x 18 x 0.3 (BrickOwl) I have tried to replace it with another
instruction with the same dimensions, but where the dimensions are in the overview,
and then it can be sent as an S letter.
|
You can add the dimensions for the item here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=B
in the "Change Item Dimensions To" line.
David
|
|
| Author: | andreaseldh | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 21:10 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
Yeah, but that’s 800x600 (or 600x800). I believe the catalogue team sometimes
accepts better images.
|
Yes. The question is how do I upload the 1600x1050 version? The text is hard
to read on the current 800x525.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 18:05 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
Yeah, but that’s 800x600 (or 600x800). I believe the catalogue team sometimes
accepts better images.
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 17:59 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 16 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, andreaseldh writes:
| | […]
My large scale image is size 1600 x 1050. It is this version that I do not think
I have succeded with uploading yet.
|
I don’t know the rules and procedures for images in the catalogue but the forum
is not a good solution: it reduces images to a width of 640.
|
it should be as simple as going to this page selecting book
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page
and adding the image so long as it meets the restrictions and then submitting
it
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 17:47 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, andreaseldh writes:
| | […]
My large scale image is size 1600 x 1050. It is this version that I do not think
I have succeded with uploading yet.
|
I don’t know the rules and procedures for images in the catalogue but the forum
is not a good solution: it reduces images to a width of 640.
(And, please, don’t post personal info (e-mail) here  )
|
|
| Author: | andreaseldh | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 17:09 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
| | its seems youve already added it
|
Hello again!
My large scale image is size 1600 x 1050. It is this version that I do not think
I have succeded with uploading yet.
Leg godt!
Andreas Eldh
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| its seems youve already added it
|
| Author: | andreaseldh | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 16:39 | | Subject: | Large img 6475686 German Braille Instruction | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello!
I did not succeed uploading this large scale image to the catalog, but it seems
to be possible with this message!
Play well!
Andreas Eldh
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 15:54 | | Subject: | Re: LEGO House Tile | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, joshbeagrie writes:
| | Hi all,
I have discovered that the LEGO House Tile has 2 versions, see below.
Appeared in sets 40502, 40501, 4000010 and 21037, with PCC 6089148.
And it was updated to:
And this newer version appears in sets 40503, 40563, 40504 and 40505, with PCC
6320270.
Once the newer tile has been approved I will update the set inventories above
accordingly, and add a relationship between the 2 tiles.
I have put in a request for the version currently in the catalogue to change
it's name and remove it's second PCC.
Any questions just let me know!
Thanks,
Josh
|
This has been completed.
The two new entries are
and
All inventories have also been updated.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| Author: | pcthurman | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 12:21 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
You have to submit images before your parts can be approved.
~Jen
|
The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job. 
|
|
You can use some tweezers to re-align the sticker. If there is dirt / hair or
such on the part of the sticker that was hanging over the edge, you can use any
flat object to scrape off the debris. If done gently enough, the sticky glue
should still be viable and will re-stick very well.
I do this all the time and it works very well. I use my fingernail to scrape
the debris off as I have semi-long nails.
Cass T
|
|
| Author: | pcthurman | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 11:43 | | Subject: | Re: Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nathan123 writes:
| | Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
If you are looking to sell a misprinted item, you can list it under the normal
item category and add to your description that the part is a misprint. You can
also use your own photo for that item.
You could also list it under custom with the item number, but fewer custom items
get hits when someone searches.
Cass T
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 07:40 | | Subject: | Re: Unsuccessful add item attempt? | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Kumquat23 writes:
| | Hi,
On the 19th I tried to add a stickered item to the catalog, and I added an image.
Should those appear in the forum, and if not, does it mean that my request did
not go through?
I was trying to add part 45677pb161 (I can't remember the exact number at
the end, but I looked at recent sticker numbers from that part number and chose
the next one) from D.Va & Reinhardt set 75973. It seemed like it allowed me to
submit it and to submit the image. Just double-checking  Jennifer's link
explaining how to upload stickered parts was super helpful!
Thanks,
Beth
CA Brick Shop
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 00:16 | | Subject: | Re: Catalog Error (Self-Consistency issue) | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, sometom writes:
| | Set 76416 Inventory shows part 22385 in Green, but no such item in Dark Green.
This is consistent with the Lego instructions posted on Lego.com, since the
set includes one 6290600 according to the instructions.
The derived item with a sticker, 22385pb304, also in the inventory of that set,
claims it is Dark Green. I believe this needs to be updated to be Green.
|
It sure does. Thanks for catching this.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2024 00:13 | | Subject: | Re: Unsuccessful add item attempt? | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| No it dosnt make a forum post. You can check your entry here
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPend.asp
Market - catalog - pending approval
Stickered parts can take awhile to get approved so keep that in mind
|
| Author: | sometom | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 23:34 | | Subject: | Catalog Error (Self-Consistency issue) | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Set 76416 Inventory shows part 22385 in Green, but no such item in Dark Green.
This is consistent with the Lego instructions posted on Lego.com, since the
set includes one 6290600 according to the instructions.
The derived item with a sticker, 22385pb304, also in the inventory of that set,
claims it is Dark Green. I believe this needs to be updated to be Green.
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 14:19 | | Subject: | Re: Unsuccessful add item attempt? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Kumquat23 writes:
| | Hi,
On the 19th I tried to add a stickered item to the catalog, and I added an image.
Should those appear in the forum, and if not, does it mean that my request did
not go through?
|
Submitting an inventory change request does automatically generate a forum post,
but adding an item to the catalog does not generate a post.
David
|
|
| Author: | Kumquat23 | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 13:13 | | Subject: | Unsuccessful add item attempt? | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
On the 19th I tried to add a stickered item to the catalog, and I added an image.
Should those appear in the forum, and if not, does it mean that my request did
not go through?
I was trying to add part 45677pb161 (I can't remember the exact number at
the end, but I looked at recent sticker numbers from that part number and chose
the next one) from D.Va & Reinhardt set 75973. It seemed like it allowed me to
submit it and to submit the image. Just double-checking Jennifer's link
explaining how to upload stickered parts was super helpful!
Thanks,
Beth
CA Brick Shop
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 07:36 | | Subject: | Re: Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | | Viewed: | 66 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nathan123 writes:
| | Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
No
|
| Author: | Nathan123 | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 06:38 | | Subject: | Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? | | Viewed: | 103 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Do misprinted pieces get catalog entries? I understand misprinted pieces happen
often however if a misprint is listed under a non misprinted item then it doesn't
really reflect the item.
|
|
| Author: | ZELDATOTK | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:47 | | Subject: | Re: Help identify a Lego part and color | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, ZELDATOTK writes:
| | What is this Lego part can someone help
|
|
you beat me to it! 
|
Thanks guy I appreciate it.
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:42 | | Subject: | Re: Help identify a Lego part and color | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, ZELDATOTK writes:
| | What is this Lego part can someone help
|
|
you beat me to it!
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:42 | | Subject: | Re: Help identify a Lego part and color | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, ZELDATOTK writes:
| | What is this Lego part can someone help
|
|
| Author: | ZELDATOTK | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 19:41 | | Subject: | Help identify a Lego part and color | | Viewed: | 98 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| | What is this Lego part can someone help |
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 15:13 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | […]
You think that’s bad. This sticker was so far off it’s mark that it ended up
on a whole other part.
|
And not wholy on that part
Whom did you get the parts from? Mr Magoo?
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 15:02 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | […]
| | The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang  and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
You think that’s bad. This sticker was so far off it’s mark that it ended up
on a whole other part.
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 15:02 | | Subject: | Re: LEGO® Education Storage (white) Art.Nr. 14473 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Hi,
I had to cancel your post: link to sites selling LEGO are forbidden here.
Also, the Suggestions topic is for suggestions about the website. Questions
about the catalogue are better placed in the Catalog topics or in the more general
Help section.
As for the part you linked to, sorting trays are in the Gear section. You should
find it here: https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=G&catString=1092
In Suggestions, DreadHeadDad writes:
| | Hello.
I'm not sure if I post at the right place.
I'm new here, by the way excellent page.
As I started implement my Collection,
I realized I've got gear at home which isn't implemented in your Database.
What kind of gear you can see in the Topic.
Here the current HP where you can purchase these items.
[redacted]
Best regards
|
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 12:14 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | […]
| | The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
I uploaded the images to BL. Now is there an option for someone else who has
the part to add a different main image later? Thanks!
|
Yup! Any image can be updated if a better one is provided
|
That shouldn’t be too hard.
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 12:10 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | […]
| | The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
I uploaded the images to BL. Now is there an option for someone else who has
the part to add a different main image later? Thanks!
|
Yup! Any image can be updated if a better one is provided
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:49 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | […]
| | The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
I uploaded the images to BL. Now is there an option for someone else who has
the part to add a different main image later? Thanks!
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:35 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | […]
| | The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
Dang and I thought I wasn’t good with stickers
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:28 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
You have to submit images before your parts can be approved.
~Jen
|
The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:27 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
You have to submit images before your parts can be approved.
~Jen
|
The only problem is that the person who applied the stickers didn’t do a very
good job.
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:13 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
You have to submit images before your parts can be approved.
~Jen
|
Ah ok! Thanks Jen!
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 11:10 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
You have to submit images before your parts can be approved.
~Jen
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 05:45 | | Subject: | Re: pi198 and pi199 | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, attadeus writes:
| | Hi there,
Do we have more informations about the set they came from?
As I know, recently added pi198 and pi199 minifigures didn't appears in any
official Lego sets. The specific torso is well-know to be part of some pirates
keyrings that already have been inventoried here on Bricklink few years ago :
The torsos are, in my opinion, unused keyring torsos. I also own these torsos
Regards.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=356555
|
|
| Author: | attadeus | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 05:27 | | Subject: | pi198 and pi199 | | Viewed: | 100 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi there,
Do we have more informations about the set they came from?
As I know, recently added pi198 and pi199 minifigures didn't appears in any
official Lego sets. The specific torso is well-know to be part of some pirates
keyrings that already have been inventoried here on Bricklink few years ago :
The torsos are, in my opinion, unused keyring torsos. I also own these torsos
Regards.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 00:00 | | Subject: | Re: 553b | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Bond writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
Ah. So...I could just use the plain 553 entry to add that part in Set 22011 to
my inventory -- assuming that entry also pertains to any 553 having axle
holes -- and no need for a CCR?
Hoping that this is the case.
- B
|
Yes. 👍
|
|
| Author: | Bond | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 22:17 | | Subject: | Re: 553b | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
Ah. So...I could just use the plain 553 entry to add that part in Set 22011 to
my inventory -- assuming that entry also pertains to any 553 having axle
holes -- and no need for a CCR?
Hoping that this is the case.
- B
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 20:42 | | Subject: | Re: 553b | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Bond writes:
| | During parting out and adding to my inventory this set:
I noticed that 553b (aka Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top, C = Magenta or 71) is without
either catalog entry or image. I was about to submit a Cat Change Request and
then I remembered the ongoing headaches regarding the Variant Project as detailed
in this message:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1451828
So, is the image and entry merely and temporarily 'down' due to Variant
Project implementation? Or is 553b entry actually gone-gone and a CCR needs
to be completed in order to make 553b part of 553? Note that there are currently
only two catalog entries for Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top. One is while
553a is listed as "without Bottom Axle Holder".
FWIW, the 553 in Set 11022 has a blocked open stud.
I'm uncertain what action to take, or if I even should.
- B
|
The inventory is correct as is since 553b is gone, gone as of April 12:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?nID=&viewDate=Y&viewType=E&viewStatus=1.2&itemType=P&viewAction=M
|
|
| Author: | Bond | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 20:28 | | Subject: | 553b | | Viewed: | 91 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| During parting out and adding to my inventory this set:
I noticed that 553b (aka Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top, C = Magenta or 71) is without
either catalog entry or image. I was about to submit a Cat Change Request and
then I remembered the ongoing headaches regarding the Variant Project as detailed
in this message:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1451828
So, is the image and entry merely and temporarily 'down' due to Variant
Project implementation? Or is 553b entry actually gone-gone and a CCR needs
to be completed in order to make 553b part of 553? Note that there are currently
only two catalog entries for Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top. One is while
553a is listed as "without Bottom Axle Holder".
FWIW, the 553 in Set 11022 has a blocked open stud.
I'm uncertain what action to take, or if I even should.
- B
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 19:28 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
P.s. If you haven’t guessed already this is my first attempt at adding items
to the catalog.
|
it's lots of fun! for me its anywhere from a couple months to about a year
(tho several times they were approved within a week but that is rare)
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 19:27 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
It took around a week maybe to get a decorated part approved
|
Link to parts pending approval
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=P
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 19:27 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
It took around a week maybe to get a decorated part approved
|
Thank you!
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 19:26 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
P.s. If you haven’t guessed already this is my first attempt at adding items
to the catalog.
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 19:26 | | Subject: | Re: Add item | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, The_Boyz_Bricks writes:
| | Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
It took around a week maybe to get a decorated part approved
|
|
| Author: | The_Boyz_Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 19:23 | | Subject: | Add item | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello all! Does anyone know how long it takes for a new item to be approved to
the catalog? For instance I added a few snickered parts for the Lego Ideas Tribute
to Galileo Galilei this afternoon. How long will it take to get approved?
Thanks all!
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 17:29 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, pcthurman writes:
| | In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
I didn't think that a set bought USED was allowed to be used as proof to
change or update / add to an inventory. Did this policy change?
Cass T
|
We found out long time ago (based on original set contents) that 10040 had the
torso with black buckle, but we couldn't correct the inventory due to the
missing minifigure entries.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 06:39 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | […]
How much data space would it take to have two catalogs? One for detailed data
and one for generalized marketplace?
|
The problem isn’t space, it’s consistency and workload.
Basically, you’re doubling the workload.
If you make a change in one of the catalogues, should it be echoed on the other
one? To which extent? Can that be automatized?
In the software world, that’s called a fork (external / by another team) or a
branch (internal / by the same team).
We have tools and procedures to follow and “port” (transfer, apply) changes between
branches / versions / forks (‘diffs’ and ‘patches’ and ‘version control system’
(git, bitkeeper, mercurial…)).
And those tools are good and ‘smart.’ They can work around other changes and
differences that shouldn’t change (and (good) devs are lazy: everything that
can be automatized is automatized).
But we ALWAYS need to check the changes. The changes may apply without a hitch…
but they may break the program because they contradict an older change. That
can also be automatized, to some extent. But it’s work again and you can never
predict everything so you always need to check.
Duplicating a database and the changes on the database can be automitized in
the same way: changes are just instructions, like a program. So the same porting
solutions & problems apply: Should that change be applied? Can it be applied?
Should another change be applied instead? And you always need to check, check,
check.
Also, you first need to record these instructions. AFAIK, BrickLink’s changelogs
aren’t complete / sufficient.
TL;DR: It’s the same as the work done by Rebrickable: another catalogue, with
conversion tables, with changes to follow / apply or not, with errors or misses…,
and with a full team to manage it.
It could be a bit simpler and you could save a bit by keeping it inside BrickLink,
but that won’t remove most of the work needed.
Another possibility is to handle that in only one “catalogue,” with two (or more!)
different ways to present its info. The work would be done only once, in the
more detailed catalogue, and there would be mechanisms to hide the details to
the users. But that’s the same as the “umbrella part” solution: you need to
change the whole structure of the database and the way the site works. That
can’t be patched onto what exists now (which is already patched enough with spaghetti
and sauce as it is).
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 05:42 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
How much data space would it take to have two catalogs? One for detailed data
and one for generalized marketplace?
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 21:33 | | Subject: | Re: Technic Turntable 60T Redesign - 88738 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Duq writes:
| | So, Catalog admins, will this get updated?
|
Yes.
| | At the moment you have 18938 and 88738 as alternate numbers for the same part,
and 48168 as a mold variant. How anyone could have entered a 60 tooth gear as
mold variant of a 56 tooth gear is a question for another day...
From what I can see the mold variant link should be removed - Z56 and Z60 are
different.
The alternate number link should also be removed, and the descriptions of the
part should be updated to reflect the bevel teeth on one of them.
Or does all this fall in your recent program of dumbing down the database...
|
That had nothing to do with the catalog administrators.
|
|
| Author: | Duq | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 18:19 | | Subject: | Re: Technic Turntable 60T Redesign - 88738 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| So, Catalog admins, will this get updated?
At the moment you have 18938 and 88738 as alternate numbers for the same part,
and 48168 as a mold variant. How anyone could have entered a 60 tooth gear as
mold variant of a 56 tooth gear is a question for another day...
From what I can see the mold variant link should be removed - Z56 and Z60 are
different.
The alternate number link should also be removed, and the descriptions of the
part should be updated to reflect the bevel teeth on one of them.
Or does all this fall in your recent program of dumbing down the database...
|
|
| Author: | custommike | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 13:14 | | Subject: | Re: 30118pb03 - Add known color - Light Gray | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, custommike writes:
| | Picture on the catalog is of a light gray piece but no known color information
is listed.
|
If that part ever appeared in a set, then it would need to be added to the set
to get known color information to show up.
However, I think it is just the print from
* | | 30119pb01 Wing Plate Bi-level 8 x 4 and 2 x 3 1/3 Down with Silver/Orange/Black UFO Logo Pattern
Parts: Wing |
printed on the wrong part.
In that case, the part should probably not even be in the catalog.
Cheers,
Randy
|
I actually think this part should be deleted. It looks like I found it in error.
The part that I have on hand is actually 30119pb01 (up vs. down). It also appears
that the 30118pb03 pictured in the inventory is a printed on the wrong part.
|
|
| Author: | shonboi | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 21:38 | | Subject: | Set 42044, part 42044stk01 alternate part # | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Part number 42044stk01, sticker sheet for set 42044. Please add alternate item
number 24672/6134420
|
| Author: | shonboi | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 21:31 | | Subject: | Set 60071, part 60071stk01 alternate part # | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Part number 60071stk01, sticker sheet for set 60071. Please add alternate item
number 19445/6099713
|
| Author: | shonboi | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 21:21 | | Subject: | Set 60110, part 60110stk01 alternate part # | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Part number 60110stk01, sticker sheet for set 60110. Please add alternate item
number 24518/6133148
|
| Author: | shonboi | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 21:19 | | Subject: | Set 70323, part 70323stk01 alternate part # | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Part number 70323stk01, sticker sheet for set 70323. Please add alternate item
number 26712/6152338
|
| Author: | shonboi | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 21:13 | | Subject: | Set 70738, part 70738stk01 alternate part # | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Part number 70738stk01, sticker sheet for set 70738. Please add alternate item
number 21059/6112822
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 20:35 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | | |
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
|
The catalog panel was informed of this merge project months before it was announced
publicly. But the purpose of the panel is to bring community voice to the development
team, not contribute to catalog policy.
|
Unless there was a meeting I missed somehow, I do not recollect that we were
informed of this project or asked to give any input or suggestions. There was
a brief mention that there was a variant project but no details or timetables
were ever given. Considering that many people on the Panel were among those who
expressed surprise and dismay when this was all introduced, I would think that
those meetings would indeed have been an ideal place to breach the subject with
the members at large.
|
The only thing I recollect is talking about the need to tackle the variants on
the catalog, but nothing specific, I must have missed it too.
| |
| | We do address catalog policy when it comes up, but it's definitely a sideline
issue, as are all issues that relate to other BrickLink teams, like Marketplace
and Studio. Panel meetings are not the place to debate proposed variant merges.
The Forum is, and there was plenty of debate and even opportunity for more debate.
|
Perhaps it was not the place to discuss the exact specifics of each part being
looked at. But it would have been good to know how the project would be introduced
and carried out. We are supposed to be looking out for the community and sharing
out expertise after all.
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
He only claims that we were informed of the project and that is the truth. We
were told that it existed.
|
|
| Author: | Saitobricks.ca | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 19:53 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, UTLF writes:
| | cool, what about the help desk backlog that people have been talking about for
the past month?
|
Apparently destroying years of peoples hard work is more important than helping
others.
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 19:52 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Disgusting.
|
At least they are getting it done
|
| Author: | Saitobricks.ca | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 19:51 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Disgusting.
|
|
| Author: | Nathan123 | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 18:52 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, pcthurman writes:
| | In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
I didn't think that a set bought USED was allowed to be used as proof to
change or update / add to an inventory. Did this policy change?
Cass T
|
It isn't the only proof. There is only one set that occurred after the underside
torso design changed and that is 10040. The black buckle torso has the modern
underside so there isn't much possibility it could be any other set.
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 18:34 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, pcthurman writes:
| | In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
I didn't think that a set bought USED was allowed to be used as proof to
change or update / add to an inventory. Did this policy change?
Cass T
|
|
“ For the first year after a set was originally released, inventories will only
be accepted from sealed set contents. Exceptions may be made for bundle packs,
certain accessory sets or service packs which only contain very few items, and
also for sets that were distributed in an open (non-sealed) packaging. If no
inventory was created during the first year, then any source may be used to create
an inventory.”
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=199
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 18:33 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, pcthurman writes:
| | In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
I didn't think that a set bought USED was allowed to be used as proof to
change or update / add to an inventory. Did this policy change?
Cass T
|
I think that that only applies if the set is only 1 year old
|
|
| Author: | pcthurman | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 18:24 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
I didn't think that a set bought USED was allowed to be used as proof to
change or update / add to an inventory. Did this policy change?
Cass T
|
|
| Author: | Nathan123 | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 16:28 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
Thank you! I submitted two, one for white pants and one for blue.
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 11:21 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | | |
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
|
The catalog panel was informed of this merge project months before it was announced
publicly. But the purpose of the panel is to bring community voice to the development
team, not contribute to catalog policy.
|
Unless there was a meeting I missed somehow, I do not recollect that we were
informed of this project or asked to give any input or suggestions. There was
a brief mention that there was a variant project but no details or timetables
were ever given. Considering that many people on the Panel were among those who
expressed surprise and dismay when this was all introduced, I would think that
those meetings would indeed have been an ideal place to breach the subject with
the members at large.
|
The only thing I recollect is talking about the need to tackle the variants on
the catalog, but nothing specific, I must have missed it too.
| |
| | We do address catalog policy when it comes up, but it's definitely a sideline
issue, as are all issues that relate to other BrickLink teams, like Marketplace
and Studio. Panel meetings are not the place to debate proposed variant merges.
The Forum is, and there was plenty of debate and even opportunity for more debate.
|
Perhaps it was not the place to discuss the exact specifics of each part being
looked at. But it would have been good to know how the project would be introduced
and carried out. We are supposed to be looking out for the community and sharing
out expertise after all.
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 10:42 | | Subject: | Re: Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Nathan123 writes:
| | As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
This can only be fixed by replacing the minifigure in the set inventory. But
the correct minifigure (with 973pb0280c01) must first be added to the catalog.
You can submit it here:
https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=M
The number would be pi198.
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 10:39 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | | |
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
|
The catalog panel was informed of this merge project months before it was announced
publicly. But the purpose of the panel is to bring community voice to the development
team, not contribute to catalog policy.
|
Unless there was a meeting I missed somehow, I do not recollect that we were
informed of this project or asked to give any input or suggestions. There was
a brief mention that there was a variant project but no details or timetables
were ever given. Considering that many people on the Panel were among those who
expressed surprise and dismay when this was all introduced, I would think that
those meetings would indeed have been an ideal place to breach the subject with
the members at large.
| | We do address catalog policy when it comes up, but it's definitely a sideline
issue, as are all issues that relate to other BrickLink teams, like Marketplace
and Studio. Panel meetings are not the place to debate proposed variant merges.
The Forum is, and there was plenty of debate and even opportunity for more debate.
|
Perhaps it was not the place to discuss the exact specifics of each part being
looked at. But it would have been good to know how the project would be introduced
and carried out. We are supposed to be looking out for the community and sharing
out expertise after all.
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 10:22 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I would like to see an update on this grooved variant that was merged:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1457688
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 05:43 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
The important thing moving forward, though, is that no
| | one is going to keep investing in that handful of variants that we removed.
|
This is a serious understatement. From now until I don't know when, I'm
not investing in any of the variants.
|
| Author: | Nathan123 | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 02:26 | | Subject: | Attach 973pb0280c01 to set 10040 | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| As title says can be attached to set
I recently purchased a used copy of the reissued Black Seas Barracuda and this
torso was there, also the torso has a modern underside and that is in common
with all the figures that came with the re-released set.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 00:53 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 88 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location:  USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
 |
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, rickcraine writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
Wasn't there that whole controversy with that guy who claimed to have used
it in a "moc on top of a stud so therefore it was useful" even though
it cannot fit on top of a stud 
|
32064b could go on a hollow stud. I would have spoken up on it, but I didn't
realize it was on the block.
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
|
The catalog panel was informed of this merge project months before it was announced
publicly. But the purpose of the panel is to bring community voice to the development
team, not contribute to catalog policy.
We do address catalog policy when it comes up, but it's definitely a sideline
issue, as are all issues that relate to other BrickLink teams, like Marketplace
and Studio. Panel meetings are not the place to debate proposed variant merges.
The Forum is, and there was plenty of debate and even opportunity for more debate.
| | There went a double handful of my catalog work and all the give-a-darn that I
had stockpiled. I think I'll go touch grass and see if it is everything
people talk it up to be.
|
We knew the hardest thing about this project was having to undo some work that
the community had done. The important thing moving forward, though, is that no
one is going to keep investing in that handful of variants that we removed. This
will also force us to consider more closely the addition of variants in the future,
to avoid this happening again.
And, like I said clearly before, we have a complete record of all modern inventory
change requests. They are all preserved in the Forum for those that want to see
what you discovered in your sealed sets. And the vast majority of your work is
still completely intact and helping other members, so let's not paint this
as a total loss.
|
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 22:45 | | Subject: | Re: Please add note | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, here4bricks614 writes:
| | and as for the only dark orange 4010px1, there is this:
It is the best complete copy out there. According to the seller, the animals
are all the pb01 variant.
|
156000152927 ?
Note how the animals are well hidden on the picture.
Why would you hide precious parts to better show bricks?
And it's New, but opened and still partly assembled.
Much more the title is "Lego Duplo Set like 2445": like?
|
The seller probably didn’t think too much about it. I wouldn’t have been able
to tell you that this set was rare if not for the fact that I know a little more
about these older DUPLO sets. The parts all seem to be there.
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 22:16 | | Subject: | Re: Please add note | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, here4bricks614 writes:
| | and as for the only dark orange 4010px1, there is this:
It is the best complete copy out there. According to the seller, the animals
are all the pb01 variant.
|
156000152927 ?
Note how the animals are well hidden on the picture.
Why would you hide precious parts to better show bricks?
And it's New, but opened and still partly assembled.
Much more the title is "Lego Duplo Set like 2445": like?
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 21:25 | | Subject: | Re: Please add note | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| and as for the only dark orange 4010px1, there is this:
It is the best complete copy out there. According to the seller, the animals
are all the pb01 variant.
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 21:22 | | Subject: | Please add note | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| To the following parts:
“The rust version of this part is actually LEGO color 13 Red Orange, a color
not recognized on BrickLink.”
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 21:12 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, rickcraine writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
Wasn't there that whole controversy with that guy who claimed to have used
it in a "moc on top of a stud so therefore it was useful" even though
it cannot fit on top of a stud
|
32064b could go on a hollow stud. I would have spoken up on it, but I didn't
realize it was on the block.
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
There went a double handful of my catalog work and all the give-a-darn that I
had stockpiled. I think I'll go touch grass and see if it is everything
people talk it up to be.
|
This minifigure seems fine after touching it
|
I brought some in and set it on my desk. I really don't know what all the
fuss is about. It's like a long skinny leaf?
|
Essentially. The only things is it makes white parts stain green
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 20:59 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dhobeck writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, rickcraine writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
Wasn't there that whole controversy with that guy who claimed to have used
it in a "moc on top of a stud so therefore it was useful" even though
it cannot fit on top of a stud
|
32064b could go on a hollow stud. I would have spoken up on it, but I didn't
realize it was on the block.
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
There went a double handful of my catalog work and all the give-a-darn that I
had stockpiled. I think I'll go touch grass and see if it is everything
people talk it up to be.
|
This minifigure seems fine after touching it
|
I brought some in and set it on my desk. I really don't know what all the
fuss is about. It's like a long skinny leaf?
|
|
| Author: | Dhobeck | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 20:54 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, rickcraine writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
Wasn't there that whole controversy with that guy who claimed to have used
it in a "moc on top of a stud so therefore it was useful" even though
it cannot fit on top of a stud
|
32064b could go on a hollow stud. I would have spoken up on it, but I didn't
realize it was on the block.
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
There went a double handful of my catalog work and all the give-a-darn that I
had stockpiled. I think I'll go touch grass and see if it is everything
people talk it up to be.
|
This minifigure seems fine after touching it
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 20:48 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, rickcraine writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
Wasn't there that whole controversy with that guy who claimed to have used
it in a "moc on top of a stud so therefore it was useful" even though
it cannot fit on top of a stud
|
32064b could go on a hollow stud. I would have spoken up on it, but I didn't
realize it was on the block.
We definitely could have talked about it on the catalog panel if the catalog
panel had EVER been consulted about this.
There went a double handful of my catalog work and all the give-a-darn that I
had stockpiled. I think I'll go touch grass and see if it is everything
people talk it up to be.
|
|
| Author: | rickcraine | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 20:41 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
Wasn't there that whole controversy with that guy who claimed to have used
it in a "moc on top of a stud so therefore it was useful" even though
it cannot fit on top of a stud
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 20:34 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - April 16 | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
I didn't realize 32064b was on the chopping block.
|
|
| Author: | jice | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 14:27 | | Subject: | 783 storage case with packaging | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I was able to find this case I had as a child for sale on Facebook. It has the
original packaging including a price tag from Farm and Fleet.
|
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Apr 15, 2024 14:16 | | Subject: | Re: Part 3001old or 3001special? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| | In Catalog, nando10081969 writes:
| | Hello all Bricklinkers!
I found this 2 x 4 brick, in pink color (I guess...) without cross supports.
In the 3001old entry, there are no pink parts. However, I can find it at the
3001special entry (special bricks, test bricks and/or prototypes). The thing
is, all the pictures in this entry have a letter on the studs (f, c, etc). My
part have a old 'lego' logo printed on the studs. Is this still a 3001special?
Or is another kind of 3001 brick that I can't find?
Thanks in advance for your help!
(An yes, the part needs a serious bath ... )
|
3001special.
3001old was never made in this color.
|
Older test bricks were made in molds that were previously used for regular production.
The test bricks with letters and other markings are more recent.
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Apr 15, 2024 14:14 | | Subject: | Re: Part 3001old or 3001special? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, nando10081969 writes:
| | Hello all Bricklinkers!
I found this 2 x 4 brick, in pink color (I guess...) without cross supports.
In the 3001old entry, there are no pink parts. However, I can find it at the
3001special entry (special bricks, test bricks and/or prototypes). The thing
is, all the pictures in this entry have a letter on the studs (f, c, etc). My
part have a old 'lego' logo printed on the studs. Is this still a 3001special?
Or is another kind of 3001 brick that I can't find?
Thanks in advance for your help!
(An yes, the part needs a serious bath ... )
|
3001special.
3001old was never made in this color.
|
|
| Author: | WildBricks | | Posted: | Apr 15, 2024 13:03 | | Subject: | Re: Movements in Item Type and Category #7 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | +1 |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Portugal
Italy, Lombardia
Denmark
Sweden, Stockholm
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Canada, Ontario
Germany, Niedersachsen
Belgium
Ireland, Dublin
Spain, Comunidad Valenciana
)
)
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
