Discussion Forum: Thread 336750 |
|
![](/images/dot.gif) |
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | Author: | Spaceman_Bricks ![View Messages Posted By Spaceman_Bricks View Messages Posted By Spaceman_Bricks](/images/msgs16.png) | Posted: | Mar 20, 2023 01:42 | Subject: | Part 11090 vs 44873 | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello. Parts 11090 and 44873 are listed under the same entry in the catalog.
I would recommend splitting them out as separate parts as the internal spacing
is different. Part 44873 has a deeper interior spacing.
|
|
|
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) |
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | Author: | Nubs_Select ![View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select](/images/msgs16.png) | Posted: | Mar 20, 2023 02:02 | Subject: | Re: Part 11090 vs 44873 | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Spaceman_Bricks writes:
| Hello. Parts 11090 and 44873 are listed under the same entry in the catalog.
I would recommend splitting them out as separate parts as the internal spacing
is different. Part 44873 has a deeper interior spacing.
|
I can only image the nightmare of trying to separate those entries when listing
used 🫠(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent
|
|
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) |
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | Author: | axaday ![View Messages Posted By axaday View Messages Posted By axaday](/images/msgs16.png) | Posted: | Mar 20, 2023 04:04 | Subject: | Re: Part 11090 vs 44873 | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent
I'd bet it is
|
|
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) |
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | Author: | Nubs_Select ![View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select](/images/msgs16.png) | Posted: | Mar 20, 2023 11:47 | Subject: | Re: Part 11090 vs 44873 | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent
I'd bet it is
|
That would be very helpful
|
|
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) |
| ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | ![](/images/dot.gif) | Author: | Spaceman_Bricks ![View Messages Posted By Spaceman_Bricks View Messages Posted By Spaceman_Bricks](/images/msgs16.png) | Posted: | Mar 21, 2023 19:38 | Subject: | Re: Part 11090 vs 44873 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Spaceman_Bricks writes:
| Hello. Parts 11090 and 44873 are listed under the same entry in the catalog.
I would recommend splitting them out as separate parts as the internal spacing
is different. Part 44873 has a deeper interior spacing.
|
I can only image the nightmare of trying to separate those entries when listing
used 🫠(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent
|
From what I have seen, the holes are consistent. I certainly understand the
difficulty in separating it out, and I don't know off hand without more research
when the variance was added. My main thought is that there is a functional difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|