Is it meant to be the US version of the 111? I have the origin of the image used,
it's the 1968 FAO Schwarz catalog, and it's just the 111. There is no
118 variant of the 111 Starter Set.
If it is meant to be the US version(as it has the correct release date for the
US), its number shouldn't be 118. If not, it should be removed entirely as
it is a currently unknown to exist set. I've not submitted a request either
way as I'd like a bit of confirmation as to what exactly this entry is meant
to reflect before requesting a change.
Is it meant to be the US version of the 111? I have the origin of the image used,
it's the 1968 FAO Schwarz catalog, and it's just the 111. There is no
118 variant of the 111 Starter Set.
If it is meant to be the US version(as it has the correct release date for the
US), its number shouldn't be 118. If not, it should be removed entirely as
it is a currently unknown to exist set. I've not submitted a request either
way as I'd like a bit of confirmation as to what exactly this entry is meant
to reflect before requesting a change.
These requests are very cool. I will read them in details later.
Not sure if it was possible but it could have been better to group all your comments
and photos in one catalog request but for multiple sets. Like: Please change
the extra info for the sets A, B, C,... are not from ... because they appear
in the adv. of ....
Then people could see the big picture better and understand your changes quicker.
I can bet 118-2 do no exist.
I always wonder why I never even find an incomplete used copy of 118-3 anywhere.
Is it meant to be the US version of the 111? I have the origin of the image used,
it's the 1968 FAO Schwarz catalog, and it's just the 111. There is no
118 variant of the 111 Starter Set.
If it is meant to be the US version(as it has the correct release date for the
US), its number shouldn't be 118. If not, it should be removed entirely as
it is a currently unknown to exist set. I've not submitted a request either
way as I'd like a bit of confirmation as to what exactly this entry is meant
to reflect before requesting a change.
These requests are very cool. I will read them in details later.
Not sure if it was possible but it could have been better to group all your comments
and photos in one catalog request but for multiple sets. Like: Please change
the extra info for the sets A, B, C,... are not from ... because they appear
in the adv. of ....
Then people could see the big picture better and understand your changes quicker.
I can bet 118-2 do no exist.
I always wonder why I never even find an incomplete used copy of 118-3 anywhere.
I didn't expect to have so many requests, and I wasn't familiar how changes
such as these worked. I grouped some sister sets together (ie 1605 and 1905),
but I agree there were a lot.
Oh this set very much EXISTS...I have the set and the original instructions.
I also have the 1969 full Sears catalog where it was advertised. BL just has
their information wrong, but the set is DEFINITELY NOT the 111 US version and
DOES exists...see attached image.
LM
In Catalog Requests, GreatBuy writes:
Is it meant to be the US version of the 111? I have the origin of the image used,
it's the 1968 FAO Schwarz catalog, and it's just the 111. There is no
118 variant of the 111 Starter Set.
If it is meant to be the US version(as it has the correct release date for the
US), its number shouldn't be 118. If not, it should be removed entirely as
it is a currently unknown to exist set. I've not submitted a request either
way as I'd like a bit of confirmation as to what exactly this entry is meant
to reflect before requesting a change.
Congrats on finding one! I've been waiting for a while now, it's unfortunate
that they're so rare.
In Catalog Requests, rikitikitaviguy writes:
Oh this set very much EXISTS...I have the set and the original instructions.
I also have the 1969 full Sears catalog where it was advertised. BL just has
their information wrong, but the set is DEFINITELY NOT the 111 US version and
DOES exists...see attached image.
LM
In Catalog Requests, GreatBuy writes:
Is it meant to be the US version of the 111? I have the origin of the image used,
it's the 1968 FAO Schwarz catalog, and it's just the 111. There is no
118 variant of the 111 Starter Set.
If it is meant to be the US version(as it has the correct release date for the
US), its number shouldn't be 118. If not, it should be removed entirely as
it is a currently unknown to exist set. I've not submitted a request either
way as I'd like a bit of confirmation as to what exactly this entry is meant
to reflect before requesting a change.
Oh this set very much EXISTS...I have the set and the original instructions.
I also have the 1969 full Sears catalog where it was advertised. BL just has
their information wrong, but the set is DEFINITELY NOT the 111 US version and
DOES exists...see attached image.
Is it meant to be the US version of the 111? I have the origin of the image used,
it's the 1968 FAO Schwarz catalog, and it's just the 111. There is no
118 variant of the 111 Starter Set.
If it is meant to be the US version(as it has the correct release date for the
US), its number shouldn't be 118. If not, it should be removed entirely as
it is a currently unknown to exist set. I've not submitted a request either
way as I'd like a bit of confirmation as to what exactly this entry is meant
to reflect before requesting a change.
USA, Missouri
Canada, British Columbia
