Discussion Forum: Thread 272743 |
|
|
| | Author: | TimeWarpDrive | Posted: | Aug 4, 2020 00:40 | Subject: | Catagorizing pieces via molds | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Its pretty simple, every printed astromech head (for instance) would link back
to its unprinted version under Mold (and vise versa in the "Item Appears In"
Molds.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | hpoort | Posted: | Aug 4, 2020 02:47 | Subject: | Re: Catagorizing pieces via molds | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, timewarp writes:
| Its pretty simple, every printed astromech head (for instance) would link back
to its unprinted version under Mold (and vise versa in the "Item Appears In"
Molds.
|
Yes, this evident relationship is missing on Bricklink. I would phrase it differently
though.
Every experienced user of Bricklink knows that in there is a relationship between
e.g. and by either stripping off the part number from
'p' onwards, or vice versa, to add 'p*' to search for all
printed or stickerred varieties. But this relationship has never been formalized
into an actual relationship in this list: https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRel.asp?utm_content=subnav
And therefore also does not show up on the catalog item pages.
For newer users this is confusing or obfuscating.
Please add a 1-on-n relationship for 'Plain versus Decorated', which
may or may not be automatically populated from the part number logic.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Aug 4, 2020 04:53 | Subject: | Re: Catagorizing pieces via molds | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, timewarp writes:
| Its pretty simple, every printed astromech head (for instance) would link back
to its unprinted version under Mold (and vise versa in the "Item Appears In"
Molds.
|
This is already implicit in the numbering.
Also, the unprinted part does not appear in a printed part, so that relationship
should not be made.
|
|
|
|
|
|