Discussion Forum: Thread 246621 |
|
|
| | Author: | yoavheskia | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 16:46 | Subject: | part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 91 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| i counted only 51 known colors, not 52 as mentioned in catalog statisics. |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 16:53 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yoavheskia writes:
| i counted only 51 known colors, not 52 as mentioned in catalog statisics.
|
That is odd. I cannot explain it. I thought the statistics were real-time data.
Even if not, I don't see any recent changes which could have caused this
discrepancy.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | MidwestBrick | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 17:12 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, yoavheskia writes:
| i counted only 51 known colors, not 52 as mentioned in catalog statisics.
|
That is odd. I cannot explain it. I thought the statistics were real-time data.
Even if not, I don't see any recent changes which could have caused this
discrepancy.
|
Must have counted itself as one. Silly catalog, you are not a color.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | qwertyboy | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 17:26 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yoavheskia writes:
| i counted only 51 known colors, not 52 as mentioned in catalog statisics.
|
This might be because of the "(not applicable)" color that is shown when you
look at the "item appears in:" - "39 parts" for item [p=4073c01]
That would be "color" #52.
Niek.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 17:29 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, qwertyboy writes:
| In Catalog, yoavheskia writes:
| i counted only 51 known colors, not 52 as mentioned in catalog statisics.
|
This might be because of the "(not applicable)" color that is shown when you
look at the "item appears in:" - "39 parts" for item [p=4073c01]
That would be "color" #52.
Niek.
|
Bingo!
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 17:39 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
And I seem to remember a certain person telling me that it didn't matter
if parts appeared in the N/A color.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 17:54 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
And I seem to remember a certain person telling me that it didn't matter
if parts appeared in the N/A color.
|
(quickly looks one way, quickly looks the other, then turns and runs out the
door)
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 19:48 | Subject: | Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
And I seem to remember a certain person telling me that it didn't matter
if parts appeared in the N/A color.
|
(quickly looks one way, quickly looks the other, then turns and runs out the
door)
|
I'm just laying this out here because I'm not sure at all, but does anyone
think it was Randy?
|
|
|
|
|
|