| Discussion Forum: Thread 242942 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | WFMTF  | | Posted: | Oct 11, 2018 08:05 | | Subject: | 3003 and 3003old | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| As far as I know none of the Trans- and Glittercolors have inside supports.
WHY do these colors appear as known colors on item 3003 and do not appear as
known colors on item 3003old - without inside supports.
This is a mismatch of catalog criterias - seen from my view.
I think that a short explanation in the additional notes would be good.
Thank you for a response
Waltraud
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Oct 11, 2018 11:51 | | Subject: | Re: 3003 and 3003old | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| FWIW, all my not-Pat Pend trans- 2x2s are 6223 and have walls identical to 3003old.
None of my opaque 2x2s have 6223.
Should 6223 be an alternate number for 3003old and NOT an alternate for 3003?
| | As far as I know none of the Trans- and Glittercolors have inside supports.
WHY do these colors appear as known colors on item 3003 and do not appear as
known colors on item 3003old - without inside supports.
This is a mismatch of catalog criterias - seen from my view.
I think that a short explanation in the additional notes would be good.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | WFMTF | | Posted: | Oct 12, 2018 08:46 | | Subject: | Re: 3003 and 3003old | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| If you search item nr. 6223 in catalog items, you get one set and item 3003!
I am getting a bit confused....
By the way: "FWIW" means ? sorry, do not know. BR Waltraud
In Suggestions, mfav writes:
| | FWIW, all my not-Pat Pend trans- 2x2s are 6223 and have walls identical to 3003old.
None of my opaque 2x2s have 6223.
Should 6223 be an alternate number for 3003old and NOT an alternate for 3003?
| | As far as I know none of the Trans- and Glittercolors have inside supports.
WHY do these colors appear as known colors on item 3003 and do not appear as
known colors on item 3003old - without inside supports.
This is a mismatch of catalog criterias - seen from my view.
I think that a short explanation in the additional notes would be good.
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | rikitikitaviguy | | Posted: | Oct 12, 2018 08:56 | | Subject: | Re: 3003 and 3003old | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| FWIW....
means "For What It's Worth".... 
LM
In Suggestions, WFMTF writes:
| | If you search item nr. 6223 in catalog items, you get one set and item 3003!
I am getting a bit confused....
By the way: "FWIW" means ? sorry, do not know. BR Waltraud
In Suggestions, mfav writes:
| | FWIW, all my not-Pat Pend trans- 2x2s are 6223 and have walls identical to 3003old.
None of my opaque 2x2s have 6223.
Should 6223 be an alternate number for 3003old and NOT an alternate for 3003?
| | As far as I know none of the Trans- and Glittercolors have inside supports.
WHY do these colors appear as known colors on item 3003 and do not appear as
known colors on item 3003old - without inside supports.
This is a mismatch of catalog criterias - seen from my view.
I think that a short explanation in the additional notes would be good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austria, Burgenland
USA, Vermont
