|
 |
| | | Author: | StormChaser  | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 10:57 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6359stk01 (Not Applicable) Sticker for Set 6359 - (190425)
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | RobErNat | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 13:06 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6359stk01 (Not Applicable) Sticker for Set 6359 - (190425)
|
I'm a bit puzzled:
obviously a nice catch in regards to the sheet, but
is holding a picture with the exact same number as
[p=6359stk01u]
So it's not really solving the matter 
Why not add the picture you posted before?
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=975474
Obviously incomplete, but it's not the only sheet like that in catalog.
And, it could also be 'altered' quite easely
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | maggiec | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 13:22 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, RobErNat writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6359stk01 (Not Applicable) Sticker for Set 6359 - (190425)
|
I'm a bit puzzled:
obviously a nice catch in regards to the sheet, but
is holding a picture with the exact same number as
[p=6359stk01u]
So it's not really solving the matter
Why not add the picture you posted before?
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=975474
Obviously incomplete, but it's not the only sheet like that in catalog.
And, it could also be 'altered' quite easely
|
The pictures were replaced with a proper (unaltered!) one, but may not show up
if you click on the large image in the forum post, even after a hard refresh.
 It should show up in the entry though.
Maggie
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | RobErNat | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 13:36 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, RobErNat writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6359stk01 (Not Applicable) Sticker for Set 6359 - (190425)
|
I'm a bit puzzled:
obviously a nice catch in regards to the sheet, but
is holding a picture with the exact same number as
[p=6359stk01u]
So it's not really solving the matter
Why not add the picture you posted before?
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=975474
Obviously incomplete, but it's not the only sheet like that in catalog.
And, it could also be 'altered' quite easely
|
The pictures were replaced with a proper (unaltered!) one, but may not show up
if you click on the large image in the forum post, even after a hard refresh.
It should show up in the entry though.
Maggie
|
Hi Maggie,
Thanks for pointing towards it.
I cleared my browser history, logged off and in again, now it shows properly
for me (nice image btw), if others have the same error they might need to do
the same thing.
so problem solved on the image 
While where at it
I have an unlisted
[p=BA06pb02]
However mine comes with stickers both sides (as there are 2 stickers on the sheet)
However the entry for the assembly does not say 'both sides' (stickers).
Another seller is also selling with stickers both sides.
Is it plausible this assembly should have stickers both sides.
Eric
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | maggiec | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 13:46 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, RobErNat writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, RobErNat writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6359stk01 (Not Applicable) Sticker for Set 6359 - (190425)
|
I'm a bit puzzled:
obviously a nice catch in regards to the sheet, but
is holding a picture with the exact same number as
[p=6359stk01u]
So it's not really solving the matter
Why not add the picture you posted before?
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=975474
Obviously incomplete, but it's not the only sheet like that in catalog.
And, it could also be 'altered' quite easely
|
The pictures were replaced with a proper (unaltered!) one, but may not show up
if you click on the large image in the forum post, even after a hard refresh.
It should show up in the entry though.
Maggie
|
Hi Maggie,
Thanks for pointing towards it.
I cleared my browser history, logged off and in again, now it shows properly
for me (nice image btw), if others have the same error they might need to do
the same thing.
so problem solved on the image
While where at it
I have an unlisted
[p=BA06pb02]
However mine comes with stickers both sides (as there are 2 stickers on the sheet)
However the entry for the assembly does not say 'both sides' (stickers).
Another seller is also selling with stickers both sides.
Is it plausible this assembly should have stickers both sides.
Eric
|
Hmm, you would think, wouldn't you? I just had a look at the instructions,
and they only show the sticker being applied to one side. So to me it
is ambiguous, as it could be considered implicit that it is one both sides because
of the existence of the other sticker and the fact that the back of the assembly
is visible on the built stable. If we don't get more concrete evidence one
way or another, we could add a note to the entry for sellers to indicate whether
they have the sticker on one or both sides.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | RobErNat | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 13:56 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | Hmm, you would think, wouldn't you? I just had a look at the instructions,
and they only show the sticker being applied to one side. So to me it
is ambiguous, as it could be considered implicit that it is one both sides because
of the existence of the other sticker and the fact that the back of the assembly
is visible on the built stable.
|
Yes, I saw that as well, but to me it ain't conclusive as TLG did not always
indicate to put stickers both side (they only start doing that later on), but
when looking at other assemblies the same thing is 'suggestive'
[p=BA17pb01]
(I didn't check whether there are images showing both sides)
| | If we don't get more concrete evidence one
way or another, we could add a note to the entry for sellers to indicate whether
they have the sticker on one or both sides.
|
Yes, that would be nice, something similar to:
Cheers, Eric
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | maggiec | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 14:07 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, RobErNat writes:
| |
Yes, that would be nice, something similar to:
Cheers, Eric
|
Thanks for finding that, it makes the perfect "model" for what to say in the
notes! [P=BA06pb02]
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | RobErNat | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 14:12 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, RobErNat writes:
| |
Yes, that would be nice, something similar to:
Cheers, Eric
|
Thanks for finding that, it makes the perfect "model" for what to say in the
notes!
|
Wasn't hard to find, as the note was added by either you or Ronald based
on my findings on that one
So it was just a matter of remembering where we had a similar case before
[P=BA06pb02]
Thanks !
now I need to remember another one 
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | elias3 | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 15:00 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| snip
| |
Hmm, you would think, wouldn't you? I just had a look at the instructions,
and they only show the sticker being applied to one side. So to me it
is ambiguous, as it could be considered implicit that it is one both sides because
of the existence of the other sticker and the fact that the back of the assembly
is visible on the built stable. If we don't get more concrete evidence one
way or another, we could add a note to the entry for sellers to indicate whether
they have the sticker on one or both sides.
|
Hi
Spoken about both sides, this one has a 'police' sticker on the outside
same as
but my request months/years ago was not accept
also viewable on box but not on instructions steps, stickersheet has 4 'police'
stickers
Stefaan
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | maggiec | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 15:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | snip
| |
Hmm, you would think, wouldn't you? I just had a look at the instructions,
and they only show the sticker being applied to one side. So to me it
is ambiguous, as it could be considered implicit that it is one both sides because
of the existence of the other sticker and the fact that the back of the assembly
is visible on the built stable. If we don't get more concrete evidence one
way or another, we could add a note to the entry for sellers to indicate whether
they have the sticker on one or both sides.
|
Hi
Spoken about both sides, this one has a 'police' sticker on the outside
same as
but my request months/years ago was not accept
also viewable on box but not on instructions steps, stickersheet has 4 'police'
stickers
Stefaan
|
I suspect you are right Stefaan, we've added a similar note to the entry
as well as your image as an additional image. Hopefully having the additional
image with the police sticker on the other side won't be too confusing to
people (at least not if they read the additional notes!  ). Thanks!
Maggie
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | elias3 | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 16:02 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | snip
| |
Hmm, you would think, wouldn't you? I just had a look at the instructions,
and they only show the sticker being applied to one side. So to me it
is ambiguous, as it could be considered implicit that it is one both sides because
of the existence of the other sticker and the fact that the back of the assembly
is visible on the built stable. If we don't get more concrete evidence one
way or another, we could add a note to the entry for sellers to indicate whether
they have the sticker on one or both sides.
|
Hi
Spoken about both sides, this one has a 'police' sticker on the outside
same as
but my request months/years ago was not accept
also viewable on box but not on instructions steps, stickersheet has 4 'police'
stickers
Stefaan
|
I suspect you are right Stefaan, we've added a similar note to the entry
as well as your image as an additional image. Hopefully having the additional
image with the police sticker on the other side won't be too confusing to
people (at least not if they read the additional notes! ). Thanks!
Maggie
|
Super 😉
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 14:19 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | The pictures were replaced with a proper (unaltered!) one, but may not show up
if you click on the large image in the forum post, even after a hard refresh.
It should show up in the entry though.
|
Great picture. Thanks!
And I like the title change for the entry marked for deletion. It certainly
makes the pending deletion much more attention-grabbing beyond just an additional
note.
My only concern regarding the new sticker entry would be the additional note
which equates cm to stud measurement, which are two different measurements.
To RobErNat: I found that incomplete image on BrickShelf and did not have permission
to use it for a catalog entry. I only posted it so that people would know what
I was referring to.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | RobErNat | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2016 14:33 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6359-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, maggiec writes:
| | The pictures were replaced with a proper (unaltered!) one, but may not show up
if you click on the large image in the forum post, even after a hard refresh.
It should show up in the entry though.
|
Great picture. Thanks!
And I like the title change for the entry marked for deletion. It certainly
makes the pending deletion much more attention-grabbing beyond just an additional
note.
|
Agreed. And maybe it should also say superseded by a new entry...
| |
My only concern regarding the new sticker entry would be the additional note
which equates cm to stud measurement, which are two different measurements.
|
yes noticed that as well, but it's not the first time sheets are being mismeasured,
I noticed a couple of people submit in cm, in stead of stud dimensions. Why on
earth is it stud dimensipons anyway on stickersheets, you don't measure an
instruction or box either in 'studs'
But I assume it's because stickers are still considered 'parts' (sigh)
and it's the main configuration of 'parts' that sets the dimensions
to 'stud' size.
| |
To RobErNat: I found that incomplete image on BrickShelf and did not have permission
to use it for a catalog entry. I only posted it so that people would know what
I was referring to.
|
Oh, OK, I thought it was yours
So good Maggie was around then, she found the ultimate 'gem' then I suppose
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Oklahoma
Belgium, Flemish Brabant
)
)