Stirring the pot somewhat.
Did you read that thread?
Of course I didn't read every word - that is not he way internet forums work.
Read what you want, comment what you want.
It works the best when you only read part of the post before commenting.
What this forum needs are 'TL/DR' summaries for those with limited time
(or interest).
There's no 'promoting the competition' in that thread.
I've always been led to believe when you 'cut' someone down, you
are doing so to 'build' yourself up. That's what my teachers said.
So anytime you say something bad about BL you are in fact, even unintentionally
promoting the competition!
But good for us we've had some kind words from the forum admins noting that
we're still upholding the intent of the forum rules. And - the intent -
that is what counts!
While I do feel the other thread has been bogged down in a lot of minutia and
semantic related disagreements, I don't feel it violates the intent of the
forum rule regarding promotion of a competitors website. What we want to avoid
is actively encouraging members to use a competitor site. While the statements
don't show BL in the best light, it certainly points to an area we need to
improve. In the end, a little competition can be good for business, as it often
encourages change and innovation.
While I do feel the other thread has been bogged down in a lot of minutia and
semantic related disagreements, I don't feel it violates the intent of the
forum rule regarding promotion of a competitors website. What we want to avoid
is actively encouraging members to use a competitor site. While the statements
don't show BL in the best light, it certainly points to an area we need to
improve. In the end, a little competition can be good for business, as it often
encourages change and innovation.
While I do feel the other thread has been bogged down in a lot of minutia and
semantic related disagreements, I don't feel it violates the intent of the
forum rule regarding promotion of a competitors website. What we want to avoid
is actively encouraging members to use a competitor site. While the statements
don't show BL in the best light, it certainly points to an area we need to
improve. In the end, a little competition can be good for business, as it often
encourages change and innovation.
While I do feel the other thread has been bogged down in a lot of minutia and
semantic related disagreements, I don't feel it violates the intent of the
forum rule regarding promotion of a competitors website. What we want to avoid
is actively encouraging members to use a competitor site. While the statements
don't show BL in the best light, it certainly points to an area we need to
improve. In the end, a little competition can be good for business, as it often
encourages change and innovation.
USA, Alabama
Netherlands, Gelderland
Lithuania, Panevėžys
Australia, Queensland
