| Discussion Forum: All Replies to Message 1450572 |
|
 |
|  | | Author: | randyf  | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 19:43 | | Subject: | Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | | | The difference is actually more significant than that.
cannot clutch a 1x2 jumper plate or any other hollow stud for that matter attached
to the center tube underneath.
clutches them with ease.
The only thing about this one is that I do not have the time to look through
all 555 sets that use 10247 to see if it ever "officially" mattered.
However, the question I keep coming back to is why redesign the part in the first
place if not to use that additional functionality? And I believe the answer is
somewhere in those 555 sets.
|
So in theory, if we can find 1 set that has a 1x2 jumper under the modern base
of 1 it should then mean it cant be merged if I'm understanding correctly?
|
Yes.
| | but then even if we dont find it and then a year later lego does do that it would
be something that has to be split again if I understand correctly?
|
Yes, again. This is one of the main reasons losing information that is already
here is not a good plan.
|
 |
|
|  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | | Author: | axaday  | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 19:49 | | Subject: | Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Just start coding a database with umbrella options and WAIT. There is no urgency
to this project.
|
|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Author: | Nubs_Select  | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 19:52 | | Subject: | (Cancelled) | | Viewed: | 10 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | (Cancelled) |
|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Author: | Nubs_Select  | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 19:53 | | Subject: | Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | Just start coding a database with umbrella options and WAIT. There is no urgency
to this project.
|
+1 that option would make 100% of users happy instead of making some happy and
really annoying others.
|
|
|  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | | Author: | Nubs_Select  | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 19:52 | | Subject: | Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | | | The difference is actually more significant than that.
cannot clutch a 1x2 jumper plate or any other hollow stud for that matter attached
to the center tube underneath.
clutches them with ease.
The only thing about this one is that I do not have the time to look through
all 555 sets that use 10247 to see if it ever "officially" mattered.
However, the question I keep coming back to is why redesign the part in the first
place if not to use that additional functionality? And I believe the answer is
somewhere in those 555 sets.
|
So in theory, if we can find 1 set that has a 1x2 jumper under the modern base
of 1 it should then mean it cant be merged if I'm understanding correctly?
|
Yes.
| | but then even if we dont find it and then a year later lego does do that it would
be something that has to be split again if I understand correctly?
|
Yes, again. This is one of the main reasons losing information that is already
here is not a good plan.
|
mhm. a functional difference like this is not a good idea to merge. I just tested
it out, out of curiosity with the parts on hand and it truly has no grip. it
just falls off as there was no stud. Thankyou for clarifying
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|